Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv

2003-10-30 Thread Andrew C Aitchison
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:26:45PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote: As I recall we had problems with allocating additional memory for Xv on neomagic chips (hence the overly_mem option). As I recall there was an issue with allocating memory beyond the

Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 08:09:05AM +, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:26:45PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote: As I recall we had problems with allocating additional memory for Xv on neomagic chips (hence the overly_mem

Re: Server regeneration no longer works

2003-10-30 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Frank Gießler wrote: snip cvs rdiff -D 15 October 2003 -D 16 October 2003 Xserver/os gives: snip Thanks, it is indeed the same bug. I've marked the one in Bugzilla as fixed. Is there an easy way to figure out the dates for the diffs? Also,

Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:07:13AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 08:09:05AM +, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:26:45PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote: As I recall we had problems with allocating

Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 11:06:45AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:07:13AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 08:09:05AM +, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:26:45PM -0800,

Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Alan Hourihane
Andrew, I've just committed a patch to the trident driver to enable it. Best use that as the basis for the neomagic work. Alan. ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Billy Biggs
Alan Hourihane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Well, if someone else has a chip, or wants to update and test other drivers (but be careful with DRI enabled drivers as it needs more work in the driver). Here's a patch to the neomagic that should work, and could be used as a template for the other

Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:47:06AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote: Alan Hourihane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Well, if someone else has a chip, or wants to update and test other drivers (but be careful with DRI enabled drivers as it needs more work in the driver). Here's a patch to the neomagic that

Re: XFree CVS Blocker Bugreport

2003-10-30 Thread Owen Taylor
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 03:14, Ali Akcaagac wrote: Please bear with me abusing the ML for reporting this bug. But It's quite seldom that I report anything to XFree thus I didn't wanted to open yet another bugzilla account for this. I would like to ask whether it is possible for you developers

Re: Capturing events from the root window

2003-10-30 Thread Gerhard W. Gruber
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 08:20:52 +1100, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: basically you are competing with the wm. you need to basically hack/modify/patch and work WITH the wm to do what you want. you cant do it on your own. now your solution will be wm specific. So it this

RE: C+T 69030 driver on powerpc

2003-10-30 Thread Rob Taylor
so I correct myself. looks like its nothing to do with the kernel framebuffer driver. it mroe to do with the state the card gets left in after being half configured *phew*!! so thats makes life a bit easier - i just need to fix the card configuration! This should not happen. It

Re: Capturing events from the root window

2003-10-30 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Gerhard W. Gruber wrote: Thanks for your explanation though. I wonder why such a thing never has been implemented. From what I saw brwosing the web I'm not the only one who could use this for some desktop tools. Also I wonder how event recorder will do their job under X?

Re: Capturing events from the root window

2003-10-30 Thread Henrik Sandklef
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 20:18, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Gerhard W. Gruber wrote: Thanks for your explanation though. I wonder why such a thing never has been implemented. From what I saw brwosing the web I'm not the only one who could use this for some desktop

Re: Capturing events from the root window

2003-10-30 Thread Gerhard W. Gruber
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:18:31 + (GMT), Dr Andrew C Aitchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe that the RECORD extension is what people use for that sort of Recording is not really what I need for my app, because I will only see the events and can not prevent them from getting through to

Re: Capturing events from the root window

2003-10-30 Thread Gerhard W. Gruber
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:51:07 +1100, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you willonly then get events when the mouse passes over your thin window. That's no problem as long as my window stays on top. not as a widget - no. you'll have to jump down to gdk. i'm not sure if gdk

Re: XFree86 specific patch to freetype-config.in

2003-10-30 Thread Matthieu Herrb
Matthieu Herrb wrote (in a message from Tuesday 28) Unfortunately, -R is not a recognized option to ld on Darwin and perhaps other platforms as well. This should be conditionalized in some way. My configure-foo is fairly weak, but it appears that the

Re: Capturing events from the root window

2003-10-30 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:07:37 +0100 "Gerhard W. Gruber" [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bbabbled: (B (B On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:51:07 +1100, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) (B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (B (B you willonly then get events when the mouse passes over your thin window. (B (B That's no

Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Alex Deucher
I'll take a look at fixing this in the radeon driver. What needs to be done to play nice with the DRI? Alex --- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:47:06AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote: Alan Hourihane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Well, if someone else has a chip, or

Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Alan Hourihane
I've actually already done it, but I'll probably leave it till after XFree86 4.4.0. Once 4.4.0 is out, I'll merge that into the DRI CVS and create a branch for this work I've been doing on the radeon with regard to dynamic allocation the DRI. Alan. On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:36:42AM -0800,

Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Billy Biggs
Alan Hourihane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I've actually already done it, but I'll probably leave it till after XFree86 4.4.0. Regarding bug 830, does this mean my users can expect to sometimes hit these situations where XVIDEO apps can't run until they shut down a large application like their web

Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:59:41AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote: Alan Hourihane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I've actually already done it, but I'll probably leave it till after XFree86 4.4.0. Regarding bug 830, does this mean my users can expect to sometimes hit these situations where XVIDEO