Re: DRI and Silicon Motion

2003-09-04 Thread Craig Groeschel
TR> I would caution that your conclusion (licensing is not a > problem) does not > necessarily follow from your premise (SMI asked for it). Just so. Unless otherwise specified, cat_fish's code would be considered a work for hire, and copyright would belong to the employer. = -- Craig Groe

Re: DRI and Silicon Motion

2003-09-04 Thread Tim Roberts
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 09:49:53 -0700, Cheshire Cat Fish wrote: > >Licensing issues are not a problem. SMI has approached me asking for this >to be done, so I will have full access to all their source code to use to >complete this task. I would caution that your conclusion (licensing is not a prob

Re: DRI and Silicon Motion

2003-09-04 Thread Ian Romanick
Cheshire Cat Fish wrote: Mesa support/conformance is a requirement. The resulting SMI drivers would remain open source, and part of the Xfree/DRI/Linux distribution. That is the plan at least. That's good news. :) There are way too many variables to be able to accurately answer that question

Re: DRI and Silicon Motion

2003-09-04 Thread Cheshire Cat Fish
I am investigating supporting DRI and OpenGL for the Silicon Motion driver. 1) I have the OpenGL code from the Windows 2000 Silicon Motion driver. Can this code be mostly used "as is"? Or will the Linux code be entirely different? Depending on licensing issues attached to the code you have a

Confirmation Request (was: XXXSPAMXXX Re: Re: My details)

2003-09-04 Thread spampit-discard
Read below for instructions on getting your message past my spam pit. Your message with the subject: XXXSPAMXXX Re: Re: My details has been marked as spam by our spam filter. Unfortunately, we get an average of over a thousand spams per day per person at tummy.com. In order to allow us to q

Re: Arch specific optimizations?

2003-09-04 Thread emmanuel ALLAUD
--- Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 00:52:41 +0200 (CEST) emmanuel > ALLAUD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > babbled: > > > Hi all, > > in the thread about RENDER extension, it has beem > > mentionned that XFree was performing much slower > (ie 2 > > or 3 times slower)

I cant find that file

2003-09-04 Thread Bernadine Woodard
Buy Generic Víagra on the Internet. Gives you the exact performance and power as Víagra for HALF THE COST. Visit our site: http://www.98207.biz/gv/m2c.php?man=st4gv To be removed: http://www.98207.biz/bek/ ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: X for a cramped PC environment

2003-09-04 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
HS> So I'm wondering if: HS> 1. anyone has been experimenting with X that's almost so tiny as HS> tinyX, and liked what they got? TinyX is full X11, so your question really doesn't make sense. HS> 2. kdrive is an easier option instead of a patch kit in newer code HS> t

Re: XFree86 over Firewire !

2003-09-04 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
RFC 872. Juliusz ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mosue double click interval

2003-09-04 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Ping Cheng wrote: >Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 17:31:21 -0700 >From: Ping Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="_=_NextPart_001_01C3727B.DD496728" >Subject: Mos