On 09:20:48 Sunday 16 October 2011 Rawhide Report wrote:
jline-0.9.94-5.fc17
---
* Sat Oct 15 2011 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 0.9.94-5
- BuildRequire maven2.
A note to everyone. We are working hard to phase out maven2 as much as
possible so as much as this may look
WHAT: Fedora QA Meeting
WHEN: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 08:00 PDT)
WHERE: #fedora-meeting
It's meeting time again! First meeting of the F16 Final rush...so it'll
be lots of fun.
If anyone has anything to add to the agenda, please reply to this mail,
and whoever ends up running the meeting will add
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 11:14 -0700, darrell pfeifer wrote:
How does grubby decide which boot loader is running?
It doesn't care. It updates any grub config it finds. If you have both
grub1 and grub2 configs present, it will update both.
I have a system upgraded from grub to grub2. I've yum
On 16 October 2011 19:00, JB jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:
pk-command-not-found [OPTION...]
We fixed this quite a long time ago. Perhaps upgrading to F15 or F16
might be a good idea?
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Also, FYI, you you can disable it (as alternative to deleting):
unset -f command_not_found_handle
in your .bashrc ...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Compose started at Mon Oct 17 08:15:23 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686
Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from
http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both
udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not
find any guidelines on Fedora for what directory was appropriate.
I did find a discussion from
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:34:58 -0500,
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from
http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both
udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not
find any
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #667 Request to fix CRITPATH update
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:34:58 -0500,
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from
http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both
udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not
find any
On Mon, 17.10.11 08:34, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from
http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both
udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not
find any guidelines on
I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this?
I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746481 against systemd,
but it has been closed
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 16:07:54 +0200,
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
In fact, a package that installs rules files in /etc is almost
definitely doing it wrong, and should be fixed.
On that note I have filed bug 744230 against apmd which tries to package
a config file in
NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
technical one.
I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
single source package but contains two spec files. One for the
utilities (zfs{,-devel,-dracut,-test}) and one for the kernel module
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 09:27 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
technical one.
I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
single source package but contains two spec files. One for the
utilities
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 09:27 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
technical one.
I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
single
2011/10/17 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com:
NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
technical one.
I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
single source package but contains two spec files. One for the
utilities
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:27:38AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
technical one.
I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
single source package but contains two spec files. One for the
utilities
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/17 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com:
Is it technically possible to source in an spec from within a spec?
If that really worth it, I would create a package dropping several
macros into /etc/rpm.
Then I could
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:27:38AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
technical one.
I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
Ok, I've dug a little deeper and I think there needs to be two
separate packages. The reason for this is that the kernel module needs
to be rebuilt on every kernel install/update.
The current Makefile has a target to create a SRPM for the kernel
module. I think I can do something along these
On 10/17/2011 10:20 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this?
I filed
On Mon, 17.10.11 09:20, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote:
I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this?
Well, yes and no.
In general doing
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 19:10 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 17.10.11 09:20, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote:
I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
modules-load seem to
On Mon, 17.10.11 13:21, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
Note that you might still need to enable
NetworkManager-wait-online.servce with systemctl enable so that bootup
is delayed until NM configured a network. (more precisely: delay
network.target until NM configured a network).
If
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-17)
===
Meeting started by notting at 17:01:09 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-17/fesco.2011-10-17-17.01.log.html
Meeting summary
This is a followup to the earlier TC1 announcement
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2011-October/000309.html
when the x86_64 install images were not available yet. They are now in
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/16.TC1/Fedora/x86_64/iso/
Delta ISOs should be
On 10/17/2011 01:10 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 10/17/2011 10:20 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this?
I filed
The version of synergy-plus currently in Fedora doesn't work well with
gnome3; I had noticed this because I couldn't get the mouse past the
menubar to an alternate screen configured to be north, but there are
other problems as well:
http://synergy-foss.org/tracker/issues/2958
Since the
Hello all,
Just going through the process noted at the wiki for becoming a package
maintainer[1], so here I am introducing myself.
A bit about me: Red Hatter, Open Source Java guy, so far have done much more
lurking than participating at least wrt Fedora.
I am for now mainly taking on the
Hi,
The purpose of this bug was to provide native systemd script for cpuspeed in
Fedora 16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713572
But instead of adding systemd script which should load cpufreq modules other
solution was provided - cpufreq modules was compiled as built-in in Fedora
On 17/10/11 20:02, Alex Lancaster wrote:
Looking at the changelog, it isn't obvious whether this
introduces any ABI/API changes or not, hence this e-mail.
I just asked Dane on IRC and he confirms that they are not compatible so
the soname needs to be bumped.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
Frequency scaling have negative effects for me
so I need to have it disabled in BIOS.
I think that this is not BIOS option broken
but broken kernel with built-in cpufreq modules.
If hardware supports disabling frequency scaling
then should be possibility to do this.
BIOS have such possibility,
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:02:29 -0400 (EDT)
Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi there,
Looks like mapnik has been bumped from 0.7 to 2.0 upstream:
http://mapnik.org/news/2011/sep/26/release_2_0/
I am rebuilding mapnik in rawhide to fix broken deps, and I
was wondering if
On 17/10/11, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 17/10/11 20:02, Alex Lancaster wrote:
Looking at the changelog, it isn't obvious whether this
introduces any ABI/API changes or not, hence this e-mail.
I just asked Dane on IRC and he confirms that they are not compatible so
the soname needs to be bumped.
Greetings from the quirky engineering school we call Olin. We three (Kevin,
Ashley, and I) are getting a crash course on packaging and other release
engineering skills from Sebastian (Sdz
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sdz)
We've produced a package for the io programming language.
How should those of us with gmp-using packages manage updates while
the update to GMP 5.x is underway? I've got a handful of updates I
want to build for Rawhide at some point, but I don't want to cause
problems. Should I wait until the GMP update is done and the packages
are all tagged, or go
Greetings from the quirky engineering school we call Olin. We three
(Kevin,
Ashley, and I) are getting a crash course on packaging and other release
engineering skills from Sebastian (Sdz
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sdz)
We've produced a package for the io programming language.
commit d31f3ffd024743d38d080cda3f7b98d6d89b0d73
Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Oct 17 11:35:47 2011 +0100
Add binding for virDomainOpenConsole
Sys-Virt-0.9.5-open-console.patch | 52 +
perl-Sys-Virt.spec|7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543660
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase:
07a9c6f8c7d2b69c03443e5d07d784bd Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase-0.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a60921b8432f2e740dfa25ce1120750a4c773dee
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Oct 18 05:26:23 2011 +0200
update to 0.10
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files
Summary of changes:
5c85e38... update to 0.08 (*)
a60921b... update to 0.10 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
9287cff... Perl mass rebuild (*)
5c85e38... update to 0.08 (*)
a60921b... update to 0.10 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-GitLike:
4fbf492b4522c236d5fa70c45f78b0b9 Config-GitLike-1.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 06d9f19daf082ebd2587bda67cb07210b9d0a00c
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Oct 18 05:49:35 2011 +0200
update to 1.06
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Config-GitLike.spec | 10 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5
commit 5d904f4b4f0dcb1a763726f4681382fcfca57703
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Oct 18 05:49:56 2011 +0200
remove obsolete patches
...-attributes-from-parent-to-avoid-warnings.patch | 30 --
0002-silence-uninitialized-warnings.patch | 33
Summary of changes:
06d9f19... update to 1.06 (*)
5d904f4... remove obsolete patches (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
348b13c... Perl mass rebuild (*)
06d9f19... update to 1.06 (*)
5d904f4... remove obsolete patches (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
50 matches
Mail list logo
