I've tried updating F16 to F17 with yum again today,
#yum -v --releasever=17 repolist
Loading langpacks plugin
Loading presto plugin
Loading show-leaves plugin
Adding zh_CN to language list
Adding C to language list
Config time: 0.011
Yum Version: 3.4.3
Setting up Package Sacks
pkgsack time:
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 11:00 +0200, Alexander Boström wrote:
fre 2012-06-01 klockan 09:48 -0700 skrev Adam Williamson:
Frankly, I'd prefer it if we more strongly recommended that people do
DVD/netinst upgrades. That path is less complex than preupgrade and
involves fewer moving parts; it's
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 20:17 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
* 1st attempt:
Clean upgrade of Fedora 16 from DVD. I left the PC unattended while
anaconda was upgrading RPM packages. I returned a couple of hours
later and found a kernel panic. I was too angry to take note of the
error. The
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 17:22 +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 17:00 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
is there an easy way to test packages except of using
$ yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update package
yum install
:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120604 (I know I'm still a bit
behind on the wiki pages. Sorry. Let's say, if you want to add a topic,
create the page and put it in, eh?)
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Fedora 18
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:46:38AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 05/29/2012 05:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We actually have this on the QA wishlist and it was one of the projects
we proposed for GSoC for QA, but it didn't quite make it. We may still
wind up doing it through some
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 06:58:00PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 05/29/2012 06:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
It makes no sense to have a gui application ( or an application for that
matter ) without having written the relevant how to debug/how to test
pages for each component to
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:
yum groupinstall GNOME Desktop Environment
This alone unfortunately doesn't do the trick. You will probably have to
yum groupinstall X Window System
as well as some drivers for your graphic card to get it working.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
* 3rd attempt:
Same as options as the 2nd attempt but this time I chose to enable
only the F17 remote repositories and I disabled the Install repo so
I presume all the packages were downloaded from the net. At about 85%
The outcome was that a bunch of people were deriding MATE and not
wanting it in Fedora.
And this is why after 12 years of Red Hat and Fedora, I'm now moving to
Linux Mint. I know I'm going to miss yum, but at least they support
Cinnamon and Mate.
I gave Gnome 3 a fair chance from its
I'd like to brought to wider attention the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693180
What's the matter?
If you install wine, it brings as a dependency wine-tahoma font, that
is
then included in system wide fonts list. This causes the font to be
used
by applications like
Hi,
I was trying to check if packages on my system has defined a rpath (1)
, I've made a little script:
# for f in $(ls /usr/lib64/*.so.* ) ; do chrpath ${f} /dev/null;
RETVAL=$?; if [ ! $RETVAL == 2 ] ; then chrpath ${f} ; rpm -qf ${f} ;
echo ; fi; done
This script reported around 70 rpath
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 11:22 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to check if packages on my system has defined a rpath (1)
, I've made a little script:
# for f in $(ls /usr/lib64/*.so.* ) ; do chrpath ${f} /dev/null;
RETVAL=$?; if [ ! $RETVAL == 2 ] ; then chrpath ${f} ; rpm
Hi,
I am the new Fedora Package Collection Maintainer. I'm from
Russia, my name is Alexey, but people call me raorn (begins
with small letter r).
I was Packager in ALT Linux distro for about eight years, my
interests are IPv6, OpenFlow, Vim, zsh, mutt, ruby and
WindowMaker. I'm familiar with
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 02:20:02PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
It, in fact, provides proof that this feature is searching for a
problem. Which applications require gigabytes per second throughput out
of /tmp?
sort(1) and maybe mock(1) ;-)
(and your numbers for tmpfs would equal ext4
I pushed a release to updates-testing, but I'd like to update the Notes for
this
release. How should I do this?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Even in mature projects full of nit-picky reviewers, it seems there
are always a few misspelled words in comments, documentation, etc.
Here's a recipe for correcting those. Hook this up as a
make check dependent rule to prevent recurrence.
First, get this http://github.com/lyda/misspell-check
Hi all,
I'm orphaning ncpfs package (utilities for the ncpfs filesystem,
a NetWare client for Linux). I don't have a access to NetWare and
time to maintain the package. Ncpfs is pretty old, but it's still
used. Written in C, upstream is not interested in it anymore.
There are five opened bugs,
On 06/04/2012 02:23 PM, Richard Körber wrote:
The outcome was that a bunch of people were deriding MATE and not
wanting it in Fedora.
And this is why after 12 years of Red Hat and Fedora, I'm now moving to
Linux Mint. I know I'm going to miss yum, but at least they support
Cinnamon and
I posted about MALLOC_PERTURB_ about a year ago,
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/132690
but it is clear that not everyone is setting the variable, so for those
who didn't take the time last year, or who are new to the subject,
do yourself a favor and set
On 06/03/2012 11:07 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/04/2012 02:30 AM, Digimer wrote:
I can confirm that selinux is disabled (as sestatus shows 'disabled').
Any idea what I should next?
File a bug report against Gnome-Bluetooth you can try running this
hciconfig hci0 sspmode 0 from the
On 04/06/12 13:01, Neal Becker wrote:
I pushed a release to updates-testing, but I'd like to update the Notes for this
release. How should I do this?
Log to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ find the update and
change it? What's the problem with that?
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828214
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 13:50 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Brian Wheeler wrote:
How is this change a win?
Unfortunately, due to Lennart's ignorance (we're all ignorant of
something), he will consider your e-mail flame-bait and not reply.
Its not his ignorance - he's on vacation for
Matej Cepl wrote:
On 04/06/12 13:01, Neal Becker wrote:
I pushed a release to updates-testing, but I'd like to update the Notes for
this
release. How should I do this?
Log to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ find the update and
change it? What's the problem with that?
Matěj
Upstream released new bug-fixing version of libwbxml. Besides other
improvements, this versions relicenses the only GPLv2+ file to LGPLv2+
making the whole package covered by LGPLv2+ now.
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:16:49PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 6/2/2012 7:03 PM, Adrian Alves wrote:
am not following what u mean?
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
mailto:mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 23:00:29 -0300, Adrian Alves
Matthias Clasen wrote:
Its not his ignorance - he's on vacation for the next two weeks...
Brian replied to Lennart 7 minutes after Lennart's e-mail and mine was
an hour after that as a pretty good indication Lennart was not going to
reply. Unless the timing was coincidental of him packing his
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 23:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
[...]
If you're in a hurry to get an update earlier, you can use koji or bodhi
command-line tools to download specific NEVRs or (in the case of bodhi)
update IDs.
e.g.:
bodhi -D FEDORA-2012-7716
bodhi -D mesa-8.0.2-8.fc17
koji
Am 04.06.2012 12:50, schrieb Alexey I. Froloff:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 02:20:02PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
It, in fact, provides proof that this feature is searching for a
problem. Which applications require gigabytes per second throughput out
of /tmp?
sort(1) and maybe mock(1)
Am 04.06.2012 15:36, schrieb Matthias Clasen:
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 13:50 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Brian Wheeler wrote:
How is this change a win?
Unfortunately, due to Lennart's ignorance (we're all ignorant of
something), he will consider your e-mail flame-bait and not reply.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 06/01/2012 03:56 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Drive manufacturers need to do nothing.
One drive probably SSD at this point, gets dedicated to OS. Other drive
Compose started at Mon Jun 4 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828226
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On 06/03/2012 03:41 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Just because people have the ability to install Fedora and post in a
forum doesn't mean that you can reliably assume that they are willing to
fiddle with BIOS settings on their system or they would prefer that over
a
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Unicode-Casing:
2f674a2564a4129daa076eb3185a0557 Unicode-Casing-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b2f5dc669a02b0e761af0b2cb6a21ea87a698171
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 4 16:45:28 2012 +0200
0.012 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Unicode-Casing.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828231
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
# http://udrepper.livejournal.com/11429.html
export MALLOC_PERTURB_=$(($RANDOM % 255 + 1))
For supportability (and to help remind you to turn it off before
performance tests), then also consider adding a line such as:
echo 12 MALLOC_PERTURB_=$MALLOC_PERTURB_ # $HOME/.bash_profile
Hi,
first I would like to point out that I am totally open for a discussion
about this. IMO bugzilla is just not the right place for it.
As you have pointed out there are two aspects on this: A technical part
and a subjective part about the look and feel.
I guess we can agree that the technical
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/02/2012 05:47 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
There is no additional security provided by the feature as so far
described—only security theater. So I can't modify the kernel or
bootloader, great—but the kernel wouldn't
Historically the only thing requiring vbetool was pm-utils, but that's
not been true in a nice long time:
* Fri Oct 08 2010 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com 1.3.1-2
- Drop the vbetool dependency, suspend is only supported on KMS drivers.
That was F14 gold:
% koji -q latest-pkg dist-f14 pm-utils
On 05/31/2012 02:09 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings.
This is a reminder email about the end of life process for Fedora 15.
Fedora 15 will reach end of life on 2012-06-26, and no further updates
will be pushed out after that time.
28.05.2012 16:45, Tomáš Smetana wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2012 23:28:03 +0400
Pavel Alexeevfo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Hi.
Due to the security issues ([1] for example) and act as newcomer
provenpackager I'll plan update ImageMagick in Fedora 16 too (I should
had been done it early off course).
Tadej Janež wrote:
Pavel,
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 20:21 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
It is main reason why I request provenpackager rights. In fedora 17 it
was so painful because I several times asks build dependencies and
then ask help to push updates too.
I think in that turn now I can do
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:44:38AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
Its not his ignorance - he's on vacation for the next two weeks...
Brian replied to Lennart 7 minutes after Lennart's e-mail and mine was
an hour after that as a pretty good indication Lennart was
03.06.2012 22:57, Tadej Janež wrote:
Pavel,
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 20:21 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
It is main reason why I request provenpackager rights. In fedora 17 it
was so painful because I several times asks build dependencies and
then ask help to push updates too.
I think in that turn
John Reiser wrote:
# http://udrepper.livejournal.com/11429.html
export MALLOC_PERTURB_=$(($RANDOM % 255 + 1))
For supportability (and to help remind you to turn it off before
performance tests), then also consider adding a line such as:
echo 12 MALLOC_PERTURB_=$MALLOC_PERTURB_
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= New business =
#topic #857 F18 Feature: Initial
On 06/02/2012 10:57 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
And I don't think having to disable Secure Boot in the firmware is a
hurdle which will make our users simply walk away.
The usability of Fedora Live will take a hit---the premise is that you
can insert the CD and boot as-is. If Live is going to
Olav Vitters wrote:
Expecting and more or less demanding a reply after calling someone
ignorant... not nice behaviour.
My intentions were not to insult anyone and I am not seeking a reply to
my e-mail.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Once upon a time, Andreas Bierfert andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de said:
I guess we can agree that the technical part of font installation etc.
is done like it should be. However, it is _not_ the wine-tahoma-fonts
package which bullies its way and changes the system look and fell on
its own.
Pavel Alexeev forum at hubbitus.com.ru writes:
If you or other will insist I may unpush that update and try patch
IM for all issues off course... But I really do not want doing it
now.
In my opinion, the right way to handle this is to backport the security fixes.
You even have patches linked
04.06.2012 20:10, Pete Walter wrote:
Pavel Alexeevforumat hubbitus.com.ru writes:
If you or other will insist I may unpush that update and try patch
IM for all issues off course... But I really do not want doing it
now.
In my opinion, the right way to handle this is to backport the security
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 19:56 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Frankly, I'd prefer it if we more strongly recommended that people do
DVD/netinst upgrades.
I refuse to buy writable DVDs or CDs, because if I did I would be giving
money
to the copyright lobby, helping to
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 19:56 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
I also won't install anything that I haven't checked the PGP signature on.
That excludes netinst.iso and Preupgrade, and if I use Anaconda I have to be
careful to not let it download anything.
The checksums of the images themselves are
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 10:03 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
* 3rd attempt:
Same as options as the 2nd attempt but this time I chose to enable
only the F17 remote repositories and I disabled the Install repo so
I
Pavel Alexeev forum at hubbitus.com.ru writes:
May be in next time? What disadvantages you are seen proceed with that
update? Do you try test it?
No, I did not test this. And here's a few reasons why I think this
shouldn't be pushed:
- You are forcing others to do work they otherwise
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 11:03 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 05/31/2012 02:09 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings.
This is a reminder email about the end of life process for Fedora 15.
Fedora 15 will reach end of life on 2012-06-26,
Pete Walter wrote:
Pavel Alexeev forum at hubbitus.com.ru writes:
May be in next time? What disadvantages you are seen proceed with that
update? Do you try test it?
No, I did not test this. And here's a few reasons why I think this
shouldn't be pushed:
- You are forcing others to do
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-06-04)
===
Meeting started by mjg59 at 17:01:49 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-06-04/fesco.2012-06-04-17.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
I'm using a Rawhide VirtualBox 4.1.16 guest set up to automatically install
guest additions via dkms for each new kernel. My problem is apparently caused by
failure of the guest additions to build properly with the 3.5.0 kernel. When it
attempts to build (either when I install a new 3.5.0 kernel,
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Andre Robatino
robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm using a Rawhide VirtualBox 4.1.16 guest set up to automatically install
guest additions via dkms for each new kernel. My problem is apparently caused
by
failure of the guest additions to build properly with
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:57:01 +0200, Tadej Janež wrote:
For techne (one of the dependent packages which I maintain) you bumped
the release from 0.2.3-2 to 0.2.3-3, which breaks upgrades to F-17 and
rawhide.
Is there a way to revert the change and make a 0.2.3-2.fc16.1 build?
Revert the change
Hi,
I agree some wine fonts are particularly ugly, but then :
1. why is wine making them mandatory? Can't the package be made optional in
wine and wine use one of the default system fonts when it is not present?
2. otherwise an uglier workaround is to ship a fontconfig rule in your package
that
Greetings!
A friendly reminder that the elections for the Fedora Board, Fedora
Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo), and the Fedora Ambassadors
Steering Committee (FAmSCo) began on June 1st, 2012, at 00:00:01 UTC,
and will end Thursday, June 7th, 2012 at 23:59:59 UTC.
Please refer to a UTC
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:36:29 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Additionally have worth I try read carefully all docs about
provenpackager and such updates and have not found how deal with such
versions.
It's not provenpackager specific stuff, but found in the basic packaging
guidelines:
and Cinnamon is under review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252.
Yes, it's under review for 6 months now... :(
I have the impression that the criticism about Gnome 3 isn't taken very
seriously. Neither from the Gnome nor from the Fedora developers. It's just
frustrating...
Today tried installing F17 x86_64 from DVD and get these errors:
ERROR: could not insert 'floppy': No such device
Loading Fedora 17 x86_64 installer...
dracut Warning: Unable to process initqueue
dracut Warning: /dev/disk/by-label/Fedorax2017x20x86_64 does not exist
dracut
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:06:46 -0400
Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Today tried installing F17 x86_64 from DVD and get these errors:
ERROR: could not insert 'floppy': No such device
Loading Fedora 17 x86_64 installer...
dracut Warning: Unable to process initqueue
On 06/05/2012 12:26 AM, Richard Körber wrote:
and Cinnamon is under review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252.
Yes, it's under review for 6 months now... :(
So help out if you can. Going on a rant isn't going to contribute
towards that.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 20:56 +0200, Richard Körber wrote:
and Cinnamon is under review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252.
Yes, it's under review for 6 months now... :(
If you read the history, you can see why. Implementing an entire desktop
environment in line with
On 06/04/2012 10:24 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 06/01/2012 03:56 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Drive manufacturers need to do nothing.
One drive probably SSD at this
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 20:06 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
1. why is wine making them mandatory? Can't the package be made
optional in
wine and wine use one of the default system fonts when it is not
present?
You can use wine without the font installed. It is just the meta package
which
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 06/04/2012 10:24 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 06/01/2012 03:56 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Drive
On 2012/06/04 20:06 (GMT+0200) Nicolas Mailhot composed:
1. why is wine making them mandatory?
Probably related to Tahoma being the Windows System (aka Menu) font in W2K
and/or WXP (IIRC, in both).
--
The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive. Proverbs
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 16:21 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2012/06/04 20:06 (GMT+0200) Nicolas Mailhot composed:
1. why is wine making them mandatory?
Probably related to Tahoma being the Windows System (aka Menu) font in
W2K
and/or WXP (IIRC, in both).
It is quite nicely described on
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 22:52 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Given that I was stating my personal opinion on the message we should
communicate to the general user population about which upgrade methods
are most likely to work with the least tweaking, though, I'm not sure
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 16:58:18 -0400,
Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote:
I eventually hit it with a hammer and did yum remove '*fc16*', when I reviewed
the resultant transaction there were a handful of fc17 packages also removed as
a result of dependencies but these were easily
On 06/04/2012 03:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:06:46 -0400
Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Today tried installing F17 x86_64 from DVD and get these errors:
ERROR: could not insert 'floppy': No such device
Loading Fedora 17 x86_64 installer...
dracut
On 06/04/2012 06:23 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 06/04/2012 03:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:06:46 -0400
Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Today tried installing F17 x86_64 from DVD and get these errors:
ERROR: could not insert 'floppy': No such device
Loading
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:37:07 -0400
Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Burned another DVD and booting it got some other errors (rpcbind?)
but it runs the installer at least.
I'm doing custom partitioning and I selected to encrypt the LVM
physical volume (LUKS) but now it is also asking
On 06/04/2012 07:37 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 06/04/2012 06:23 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 06/04/2012 03:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:06:46 -0400
Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Today tried installing F17 x86_64 from DVD and get these errors:
ERROR: could not insert
On 06/04/2012 07:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:37:07 -0400
Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Burned another DVD and booting it got some other errors (rpcbind?)
but it runs the installer at least.
I'm doing custom partitioning and I selected to encrypt the LVM
physical
Richard Körber wrote:
Yes, [Cinnamon]'s under review for 6 months now... :(
It's available from repos.fedorapeople.org though:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/leigh123linux/cinnamon/
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
The usability of Fedora Live will take a hit---the premise is that you
can insert the CD and boot as-is. If Live is going to require permanent
changes to the system, one might as well permanently install, no?
Disabling Secure Boot doesn't necessarily have to be
We merged the upstream udev repository entirely into the systemd
repository. There is no standalone upstream udev project anymore.
The version of systemd which includes udev has landed in rawhide a
couple of days ago. Fedora 18 will not have a udev.rpm, no libudev.rpm
and no libudev-devel.rpm.
I follow this thread, and I follow the other thread about the same
topic, on the user forum where I belong. Flame if if you like for
posting her, but when I read this URLs below [1], I do feel worry.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:18:17 -0400
Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com escribió:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The only Freedom you've lost is that now, in addition to the
person-hours to do the work and monetary cost to
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:35:22 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
The usability of Fedora Live will take a hit---the premise is that
you can insert the CD and boot as-is. If Live is going to require
permanent changes to the system, one might as well
On 2012/06/04 16:56 (GMT+0200) Andreas Bierfert composed:
I guess we can agree that the technical part of font installation etc.
is done like it should be. However, it is _not_ the wine-tahoma-fonts
package which bullies its way and changes the system look and fell on
its own. There are some
commit 96b40818247aa0ac8071b3ac7d8b07c082254079
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 4 09:37:22 2012 +0200
Do not require specific architecture of openssh-clients
The %_isa is undefined on noarch build root. Or it just gets random
value depending on machine koji
commit 3b406ea0d8ba12a07eddb42fa5d996242cf7fb1c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 4 13:51:08 2012 +0200
The POD tests do not run by default anymore
perl-Locale-Codes.spec |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit ac29bc901e2160f05756b9ed92629e955b2a44c4
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 4 13:53:25 2012 +0200
Switch build script from Module::Build to EU::MM
perl-Locale-Codes.spec | 12 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 1faddf246fc30f013c54103280db5aa0d53c3f08
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 4 14:18:28 2012 +0200
The POD tests do not run by default
perl-YAML-Tiny.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-YAML-Tiny.spec
commit 8d14bc143063d8d86355547732d19ec554d7da18
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 4 14:23:22 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-Devel-Leak.spec | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-Leak.spec
commit 6963f57cb67159a6e48137be851ee50305dda3e1
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 4 14:40:01 2012 +0200
Do not run PAR tests on bootstrap
perl-Module-Build.spec | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Build.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828203
Bug ID: 828203
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
URL: http://search.cpan.org/~sbeck/Locale-Codes-3.22/
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828213
Bug ID: 828213
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828214
Bug ID: 828214
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
