On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 21:30 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:18:17 -0400
Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com escribió:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The only Freedom you've lost is that now, in addition to the
person-hours to do the work and
On 2012-06-04, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Historically the only thing requiring vbetool was pm-utils, but that's
not been true in a nice long time:
* Fri Oct 08 2010 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com 1.3.1-2
- Drop the vbetool dependency, suspend is only supported on KMS drivers.
That
Hello,
sorry for double posting to devel and java-devel but the last seems not so
crowded.
On 24 May 2012 12:04, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
following the mail in fedora-devel, I'm posting here some progress in
packaging the Guacamole stack for Fedora. I hope to get some advice
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:16:49 -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 6/2/2012 7:03 PM, Adrian Alves wrote:
am not following what u mean?
Please don't top-post, Adrian. Top-posting makes it much more difficult to
understand what you refer to, especially since you've asked a question.
On Sat, Jun
Andreas wrote:
Hi,
first I would like to point out that I am totally open for a
discussion
about this. IMO bugzilla is just not the right place for it.
Thanks, that's great.
Chris wrote:
Well, no they don't. They are requesting the font Microsoft calls
Tahoma, not a Wine-provided
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 21:49 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 24.05.12 09:28, Alexander Larsson (al...@redhat.com) wrote:
I'm at a loss to how to proceed with the MiniDebugInfo work. I have
patches to rpmbuild that creates the compressed minidebuginfo putting
them in the main
I'd like to push octave-struct v1.0.10 and octave-optim v1.1.0 to
rawhide; octave-struct and octave-optim change, like the rest of the
octave forge repository, the license from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+.
The only package that depends on octave-struct in the repository
that I am aware of is
Le Mar 5 juin 2012 10:59, Kamil Paral a écrit :
If you are afraid there might be people out there who want wine-Tahoma as a
system font, it is important to realize that those people are probably just a
tiny fraction of the other side of the argument
That's a dangerous argument, looks are
04.06.2012 21:11, Pete Walter написал:
Pavel Alexeevforumat hubbitus.com.ru writes:
May be in next time? What disadvantages you are seen proceed with that
update? Do you try test it?
No, I did not test this. And here's a few reasons why I think this
shouldn't be pushed:
- You are forcing
04.06.2012 22:26, Michael Schwendt написал:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:36:29 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Additionally have worth I try read carefully all docs about
provenpackager and such updates and have not found how deal with such
versions.
It's not provenpackager specific stuff, but found in
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:55:21 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Only one other think before I do that. Is it will be needed then
introduce epoch in Fedora 16 IM build to push less version in stable
branch?
Could you explain _why_ you think you need to increase the Epoch?
Last package in F-16
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 20:01:15 -0400
Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 06/04/2012 07:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:37:07 -0400
Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Burned another DVD and booting it got some other errors (rpcbind?)
but it runs the installer at
On 05/06/12 11:15, Paul Howarth wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 20:01:15 -0400
Gerry Renogr...@verizon.net wrote:
Look back several years and you'll find still unaddressed
installation bugs for anaconda/preupgrade. For example /boot on RAID.
Hmm, I did a fresh F17 install two days ago with
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:05:13 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
04.06.2012 22:26, Michael Schwendt написал:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:36:29 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Additionally have worth I try read carefully all docs about
provenpackager and such updates and have not found how deal with such
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 21:30 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:18:17 -0400
Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com escribió:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The only Freedom you've lost
On 6/5/12 4:05 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
How can I reset the graphics card using KMS (vbetool post)?
You've needed to?
There's no direct equivalent to vbetool post. KMS drivers handle
suspend/resume in the kernel. Some of them have lockup detection and
have implemented GPU resets internally
05.06.2012 16:09, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:05:13 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
04.06.2012 22:26, Michael Schwendt написал:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:36:29 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Additionally have worth I try read carefully all docs about
provenpackager and such updates
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 21:49 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
The right way is probably to write a feature page for F18 for it, and
then get it through Fedora 18 feature process. With FESCO accepting the
feature you
On 2012-06-05, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 6/5/12 4:05 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
How can I reset the graphics card using KMS (vbetool post)?
You've needed to?
It's long time when I used the tool. After getting my nvidia card into
undefined state (X server crash, relicts after playing
On 06/05/2012 03:52 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
Systemd includes libudev.so.1, while the old libudev.rpm provided
libudev.so.0. Therefore, all packages using udev need to be rebuilt.
Here's a list of owners with packages that currently require
libudev.so.0 in Rawhide.
# repoquery --whatrequires
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 11:49 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mar 5 juin 2012 10:59, Kamil Paral a écrit :
If you are afraid there might be people out there who want wine-Tahoma as a
system font, it is important to realize that those people are probably just
a
tiny fraction of the other
Hi!
Samba team has released Samba 4.0 beta 1 today. This is important
milestone in a more than 8 years of Samba 4 development.
This mail attempts to explain what will be and will not be available in
Fedora (Rawhide first,
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4128906,
we are
On 06/02/2012 06:27 PM, drago01 wrote:
No one is preventing anyone from providing instructions on how to
disable secure boot. We should definitely do that.
But those are not mutually exclusive ... i.e we can have both
documentation *and* an OS that just works.
Everyone, including Microsoft,
On 6/4/12 9:52 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
We merged the upstream udev repository entirely into the systemd
repository. There is no standalone upstream udev project anymore.
The version of systemd which includes udev has landed in rawhide a
couple of days ago. Fedora 18 will not have a udev.rpm, no
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SQL-Library:
e77199d4d71eac25cc82b2a86711052c SQL-Library-0.0.4.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 721bdcf49db6c40c40dda0357c545848fd39ca2b
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jun 5 17:35:46 2012 +0200
0.0.4 bump and some cleanup
.gitignore|1 +
perl-SQL-Library.spec | 25 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed,
Compose started at Tue Jun 5 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
On 6/5/12 10:33 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Here's a list of owners with packages that currently require
libudev.so.0 in Rawhide.
# repoquery --whatrequires libudev.so.0 --qf '%{sourcerpm}' | rev | cut
-f3- -d- | rev | sort | uniq | fedoradev-pkgowners | sort | column -t
ajax libdrm
bskeggs
Fedora developers,
While I brought many of these into Fedora, I have not been an active maintainer
for these packages for a very long time. Most of them have very responsible
and active co-maintainers already. I am about to release ownership of the
following packages:
ardour --
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Anthony Green gr...@redhat.com wrote:
Fedora developers,
While I brought many of these into Fedora, I have not been an active
maintainer for these packages for a very long time. Most of them have very
responsible and active co-maintainers already. I am
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 6/4/12 9:52 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
We merged the upstream udev repository entirely into the systemd
repository. There is no standalone upstream udev project anymore.
The version of systemd which includes udev has landed
Anthony Green wrote:
raptor -- Raptor RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland
I picked up this one (Fedora only, it's still up for grabs in EPEL 5). I was
already a comaintainer. It's part of the Redland stack, which is required by
Soprano, which is required by the Nepomuk stack, which is required by
I wrote:
Anthony Green wrote:
raptor -- Raptor RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland
I picked up this one (Fedora only, it's still up for grabs in EPEL 5). I
was already a comaintainer. It's part of the Redland stack, which is
required by Soprano, which is required by the Nepomuk stack, which is
Tomas Mraz wrote:
That's a total nonsense unless the restriction is by-license and not
just technical obstacle. If it is just a technical obstacle in the code,
you can remove it and run the software on any crippled machine at your
will. So no, making your software not to work on particular
Kamil Paral wrote:
Let's assume we have moved wine-Tahoma to wine-specific font directory:
1. Wine users experience stays the same - all wine applications are still
rendered correctly 2. General users experience improves - web browser
doesn't display a lot of favorite web pages (like Facebook)
On 06/05/2012 06:53 PM, Anthony Green wrote:
liblo -- Open Sound Control library
lv2core -- Audio Plugin Standard
mxml -- Miniature XML development library
phasex -- PHASEX -- Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment
seq24 -- Real-time midi sequencer
whysynth-dssi -- DSSI software
Hello,
I've released svn2cl's ownership in pkgdb as I don't use it any longer.
There were no co-maintainers so it's orphaned now, go grab it if you
use it.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Jun 5, 2012 12:58 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Anthony Green gr...@redhat.com wrote:
Fedora developers,
While I brought many of these into Fedora, I have not been an active
maintainer for these packages for a very long time. Most of them
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 19:54 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Tomas Mraz wrote:
That's a total nonsense unless the restriction is by-license and not
just technical obstacle. If it is just a technical obstacle in the code,
you can remove it and run the software on any crippled machine at your
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 19:54 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Tomas Mraz wrote:
That's a total nonsense unless the restriction is by-license and not
just technical obstacle. If it is just a technical obstacle in the code,
you can
Hi,
When setting up a koji server, does one have to use a caname of koji?
Surely one should be able to use a server's FDQN?
Thanks - john
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 5, 2012 12:58 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Anthony Green gr...@redhat.com wrote:
Fedora developers,
While I brought many of these into Fedora, I have not been
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 05/30/2012 02:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Yes, for the Fedora side of things I think gluster 3.2 is the best
strategy with a
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 13:55 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
I'll plan unpush that update and work on patching ImageMagick to handle
these issues locally. But I'm not security expert and can't guarantee
something except mentioned patch apply (contrary leave it on upstream
authors, as I was want
On 06/05/2012 03:52 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
Systemd includes libudev.so.1, while the old libudev.rpm provided
libudev.so.0. Therefore, all packages using udev need to be rebuilt.
Here is what's happening on my x86_64 rawhide install which has some
i686 packages (in particular, mesa) installed
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:32:37PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
You can write .iso image to USB key¹ and boot from it, you know.
Even the installation DVD images? What I've heard is that that only works
with
the live CD images.
You can dd all of the iso's to USB or
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 16:28 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:32:37PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
You can write .iso image to USB key¹ and boot from it, you know.
Even the installation DVD images? What I've heard is that that only works
with
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 09:48:37AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 10:37 +0200, Caterpillar wrote:
I am very disappointed with that, because preupgrade is the official
supported way to upgrade Fedora versions
Strictly, no. It's *a* supported way.
Frankly, I'd
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:03:24AM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
* 3rd attempt:
Same as options as the 2nd attempt but this time I chose to enable
only the F17 remote repositories and I disabled the Install repo so
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Anthony Green wrote:
Fedora developers,
While I brought many of these into Fedora, I have not been an active
maintainer for these packages for a very long time. Most of them have very
responsible and active co-maintainers already. I am about to release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Tue, 05 Jun 2012 08:15:57 +0200
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com escribió:
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 21:30 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:18:17 -0400
Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com escribió:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:05 PM,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:43:03PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
We don't allow software in fedora that has a license that has a usage
restriction that says it can not be used in a commercial environment
for instance. I do not see why we would allow software that says you can
use this as long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Wed, 6 Jun 2012 03:58:14 +0100
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org escribió:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:43:03PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
We don't allow software in fedora that has a license that has a
usage restriction that says it can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2012 08:38 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
im talking purely about the wording of the license in that
paragraph. if someone sumbited a license that had something along
the lines of software under this license can not be used on UEFI
systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823390
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828689
Bug ID: 828689
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: el6
Priority: unspecified
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823390
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
My calendar has different rules :) I've just submitted it for stable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP:
43f600c77ccf40b44c585955d5656ae4 POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.947.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 59d6a8c3c451d2fe900ea62de1558938cbc52b4b
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jun 5 11:00:14 2012 +0200
0.947 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP.spec | 14 --
sources |2 +-
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828230
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828216
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBD-CSV:
90e1635b1b2e4605f5dc6939c41e3087 DBD-CSV-0.35.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7ea5ec0627d12b4dbf2ddd93cc41c114ec30bae8
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jun 5 14:21:22 2012 +0200
0.35 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-DBD-CSV.spec |6 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828216
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828819
Bug ID: 828819
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: david.hanneq...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828819
antb52 abartrav...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|Unspecified |x86_64
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-MMagic:
ea74f4c817229117f4e9341889430308 File-MMagic-1.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ff5cf966f0806acc0934067d52356e0d2f4fc618
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jun 5 15:11:17 2012 +0200
1.28 bump and some cleanup
.gitignore|1 +
perl-File-MMagic.spec | 46 --
sources |2 +-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828232
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit 68018535d8d44bb876662c84af8928aa02b9d633
Author: Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
Date: Tue Jun 5 09:50:49 2012 -0600
Drop gcc version requirement
abi-compliance-checker.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/abi-compliance-checker.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828232
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823390
--- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #5)
From comment #3: Fedora Update System 2012-05-21 22:20:32 EDT ...
... Today is June 5th ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818651
Sergio Monteiro Basto ser...@serjux.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|high|low
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828203
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828234
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
commit 32a04c1d7b7923aca6fe6d43c001c91fc96cfe1b
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Jun 6 04:29:14 2012 +0200
Upstream update.
- Cleanup perl module filters.
.gitignore|2 +-
perl-CHI.spec | 16 +++-
sources |2 +-
3 files
Summary of changes:
32a04c1... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
32a04c1... Upstream update. (*)
0009b4f... Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f17' into f16
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 0009b4f03365c354520f3e7c5bde9fa2e9073d93
Merge: 4655b80 32a04c1
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Jun 6 04:31:39 2012 +0200
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f17' into f16
.gitignore|2 +-
perl-CHI.spec | 16 +++-
sources |
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CHI:
2b638e3887497bee4a0d3eb3e7e407ad CHI-0.54.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f3b910dc187ecca4b2ffb9bca2871537b8b4e428
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Jun 6 04:44:58 2012 +0200
Upstream update.
.gitignore|2 +-
perl-CHI.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
81 matches
Mail list logo
