On 5 August 2013 12:14, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a problem on the bacula-docs package in Fedora 20. Build was stuck
for 15 hours and then killed by Koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5698742
I was able to reproduce it locally with mock; all the
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 11:35 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Ondrej Vasik (ova...@redhat.com) said:
Now I probably see why I did that - it was in the RPM_BUILD_ROOT from
some reason and because of the capabilities change, I needed to
explicitly mention all directories created in
I'll take Package fuse-zip (orphan).
2013/8/8 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com
I will retire acheck* as it has been orphaned by Debian because dead
upstream since 2006.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
On 08/08/13 03:47, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 10:43 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Just a note, I find my package's deps have magic requires for
5.16.2(not 5.16.3), does it mean that this has not rebuilded since
f19? Why?
On 2013-08-07, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
With the recent addition of arm in our primary buildsystem, I am seeing
some packages add ExcludeArch: arm or ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}
And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? arm or armv7hl or some
macro like %{ix86}?
-- Petr
--
devel
Hello,
I get the following when building for el6/ppc:
DEBUG util.py:264:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel-ppc64-server-6/getPackage/nss-softokn-3.12.9-11.el6.ppc64.rpm:
[Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - The requested URL returned error: 404
Not Found
DEBUG util.py:264: Trying other
On 08/07/2013 10:56 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 08/07/2013 03:01 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:39:31 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun
On 8 August 2013 10:44, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? arm or armv7hl or some
macro like %{ix86}?
Yep. At the moment for my local builds I use armv7hl because the package
I build works only on armv7 with hfp; but would be good to know if
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:02:23AM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
On 8 August 2013 10:44, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? arm or armv7hl or some
macro like %{ix86}?
Yep. At the moment for my local builds I use armv7hl because the
On 08/08/13 10:01, Phil Knirsch wrote:
On 08/07/2013 10:56 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 08/07/2013 03:01 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:39:31 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:10
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 10:58:48 +0200
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I get the following when building for el6/ppc:
...snip...
I've already tried 2 builds and I got the same result. Full log here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=5793165name=root.log
On 2013-08-08, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
On 08/08/13 10:01, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Just like Seth's script it has a few obviously problems as for really
correct build ordering you need to flip-flop between srpms/specfiles and
binary rpms, but that will need a bit of a different
Am 08.08.2013 10:05, schrieb Ondrej Vasik:
I already nuked /usr/etc yesterday - as FHS even disallows it (see
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLOCALLOCALHIERARCHY
Rationale note). But I still see /usr/local/etc there - and mentioned as
beneficial, so keeping it for now
yes
Thanks very much!
--Simone
On 8 August 2013 13:48, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 10:58:48 +0200
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I get the following when building for el6/ppc:
...snip...
I've already tried 2 builds and I got the same
Thanks to all! Yesterday I took a couple of days of vacation and I'll
rebuild my broken packages (gdcm,insight toolkit and libigtl) on monday.
Best,
Mario
On Aug 7, 2013 4:15 PM, Than Ngo t...@redhat.com wrote:
**
the bug is fixed in new texlive, it will be available soon in rawhide.
big
One package wouldn't rebuild because latex doesn't work. I get the error:
cd doc/res/latex \
latex doc.tex \
latex doc.tex \
dvips doc.dvi -o doc.ps
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013)
restricted \write18 enabled.
kpathsea: Running
Hello Than,
On 8 August 2013 14:47, Than Ngo t...@redhat.com wrote:
the buildrequirement is not correct, please replace your BR with these:
BuildRequires: ghostscript
BuildRequires: texlive-collection-latexrecommended texlive-preprint
can you please check this bug?
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 18:53 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
Error: /invalidfont in /findfont
Generally ghostscript will substitute another font if it can't find what
you're after.
This is /invalidfont though, which I think means it tried reading the
font you asked for but that font was invalid.
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 02:47:34PM +0200, Than Ngo wrote:
the buildrequirement is not correct, please replace your BR with these:
BuildRequires: ghostscript
BuildRequires: texlive-collection-latexrecommended texlive-preprint
It should fix the build failure. The ocaml-res scratch build
Kevin Fenzi venit, vidit, dixit 07.08.2013 18:39:
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 17:53:22 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:25:19AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
The special (pathless) %doc macro now installs docs to unversioned
/usr/share/doc/%{name} dir in Rawhide.
On 8 August 2013 16:03, Michael J Gruber
michaeljgruber+fedora-li...@gmail.com wrote:
Building an F20 (master) package on F18 does not work, then, even with
the proposed conditional %{_pkgdocdir}. Wouldn't a conditional based on
the Fedora version be a much more robust suggestion to deal with
Michael J Gruber venit, vidit, dixit 08.08.2013 16:03:
Kevin Fenzi venit, vidit, dixit 07.08.2013 18:39:
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 17:53:22 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:25:19AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
The special (pathless) %doc macro now installs docs
Il 08/08/2013 15:29, Fedora Rawhide Report ha scritto:
[gmaven]
gmaven-1.4-4.fc19.noarch requires gshell
hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-13855/gmaven-1.4-6.fc19
*bodhi
On 8 August 2013 15:21, punto...@libero.it punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 08/08/2013 15:29, Fedora Rawhide Report ha scritto:
[gmaven]
gmaven-1.4-4.fc19.noarch requires gshell
hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-13855/gmaven-1.4-6.fc19
On 08/08/13 15:21, punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 08/08/2013 15:29, Fedora Rawhide Report ha scritto:
[gmaven]
gmaven-1.4-4.fc19.noarch requires gshell
hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-13855/gmaven-1.4-6.fc19
*bodhi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/40/
---
(Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 2:38 p.m.)
Review request for blockerbugs.
it built fine with same texlive version on my local machine (x86_64). This
build failed on arm plattform, It seems textlive oder perl doesn't work
correct on arm.
How can developer access to arm machine with f20 in order to debug the issue?
thanks
than
Hello Than,
On 8 August 2013
the buildrequirement is not correct, please enable manual creation again and
replace all your BuildRequires on texlive* with these:
BuildRequires: texlive-collection-latexrecommended
BuildRequires: texlive-framed
BuildRequires: texlive-moreverb
it should fix the build failure.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993099
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On 08/08/13 12:50, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2013-08-08, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
On 08/08/13 10:01, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Just like Seth's script it has a few obviously problems as for really
correct build ordering you need to flip-flop between srpms/specfiles and
binary rpms, but that
Στις 7/8/2013 21:39, ο/η Adam Williamson έγραψε:
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 21:34 +0300, Georgios Petasis wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to install boost-static, but I am getting an error (fedora
19 x86_64):
yum install boost-static.i686
Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks,
I upgraded a laptop from F18 to F19 today. When I rebooted it after the
upgrade it failed to mount the root filesystem.
The disk is encrypted and /etc/crypttab looked like this:
rot1 UUID=cbb96d39-a39a-4f78-b39a-19c4053f3d7a none
home1 UUID=38fc5950-726a-4ff5-a106-55c85ae47a0e none
That
Dear Fedora Project People,
Here is my short introduction! I am a long time [GNU/]Linux user. I
was on Debian for nearly a decade followed by several years on Arch. I
did maintain some packages in Arch's AUR. I switched to Fedora as it's
mirrored at my soon-to-be university. I've ended up
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:47:18PM +0100, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar
wrote:
My contributions to Fedora won't be massive and will mostly consist of
packaging some small utilities, free fonts and themes. I'll get my
first package sorted out shortly for review pending a small query.
On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com wrote:
You make the decision by installing a js-foo package, just like you
make the decision to provide a web application by installing a package
for it.
You make a decision
Hi all,
Are there any plans to update Tcl/Tk to 8.6 in fedora 20?
Tcl/Tk 8.6 has been released in Dec 20, 2012:
http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/8.6.html
Regards,
George
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
On 8 August 2013 18:00, Georgios Petasis petas...@yahoo.gr wrote:
Στις 7/8/2013 21:39, ο/η Adam Williamson έγραψε:
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 21:34 +0300, Georgios Petasis wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to install boost-static, but I am getting an error (fedora
19 x86_64):
yum install
On 08/06/2013 02:36 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 22:57 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote:
Do you know there are GNOME JavaScript applications? And that
JavaScript is being encouraged as a language for desktop applications?
So all those libraries that can be used on desktop and web
On 08/06/2013 05:10 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com wrote:
Do you know there are GNOME JavaScript applications? And that JavaScript is
being encouraged as a language for desktop applications? So all those
libraries that can
Hi folks,
I would like to ask you what are necessary steps to develop
android applications under Fedora.
I suppose that Eclipse environment is needed.
Any other package(s)?
Is there any guide how to do that?
When some working guide will be ready then it will be a part of
DeveloperAssistant
2013/8/8 Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com:
Hi folks,
Hi,
I would like to ask you what are necessary steps to develop
android applications under Fedora.
I suppose that Eclipse environment is needed.
Any other package(s)?
Is there any guide how to do that?
When some working guide will be
Hello all,
I'm in the process of packaking kwakd for Fedora. On the user list
Rahul Sundaram mentioned that the service file should not use a
hardcoded path to the binary.
Previously the ExecStart line read like this:
ExecStart=/usr/bin/kwakd -p 80
After speaking to upstream and passing on
On 08/08/2013 09:50 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
2013/8/8 Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com:
Hi folks,
Hi,
I would like to ask you what are necessary steps to develop
android applications under Fedora.
I suppose that Eclipse environment is needed.
Any other package(s)?
Is there
On 2013-08-08 17:03, Michael J Gruber wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
Building an F20 (master) package on F18 does not work, then, even with
the proposed conditional %{_pkgdocdir}.
Sure it does, I've done dozens of them. Can't say much more without
seeing a
Hi All,
I spend mot of my time today bootstrapping fpc on ARM for F20. This is done now,
and the result seems to work :) So if you've any packages which are FTBFS on
F-20 due to fpc not being available, please re-submit a build for them, they
should build fine now.
Regards,
Hans
--
devel
I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora,
and if there is anything in the packaging guidelines that would stop
UML being packaged as a regular package?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Fedora Windows
Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora,
and if there is anything in the packaging guidelines that would stop
UML being packaged as a regular package?
By regular package, you mean using a separate
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:45:14PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora,
and if there is anything in the packaging guidelines that would stop
UML being packaged as
Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 20:55 +0100, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda
Samaddar a écrit :
Hello all,
I'm in the process of packaking kwakd for Fedora. On the user list
Rahul Sundaram mentioned that the service file should not use a
hardcoded path to the binary.
So, the mail was :
commit 4750be26b34d91789fb5cc107122bfa3058f3302
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 8 23:54:01 2013 +0200
Perl 5.18 rebuild
perl-Moo.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Moo.spec b/perl-Moo.spec
index c74dc6b..21c1ea1
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora,
and if there is anything in the packaging guidelines that would stop
UML being packaged as a regular package?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys, my name is Matt. I'm obviously new to the community. My nick
on irc is syn-ack and I'm planning on packaging the Fingerprint-GUI
application for Fedora. That is, if you guys will have me, :)
This application is works via the fprint libs as
Georgios Petasis wrote:
Are there any plans to update Tcl/Tk to 8.6 in fedora 20?
Tcl/Tk 8.6 has been released in Dec 20, 2012:
http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/8.6.html
Already reported, see:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/889201
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Non free should go to rpmfusion.
Sent from Note I
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Thanks!
Sent from Note I
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I see a package review here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837450
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991871
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||991914
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991926
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||991031
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991922
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992724
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914295
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992735
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991873
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 87393
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991872
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 79151
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991880
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890721
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xml...@redhat.com
---
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning
to the new owner of this component.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992695
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xml...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914301
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xml...@redhat.com
---
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning
to the new owner of this component.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Package perl-Net-Amazon-S3 in Fedora 18 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-Amazon-S3
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Net-Amazon-S3 in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-Amazon-S3
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Net-Amazon-S3 in Fedora 19 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-Amazon-S3
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991926
Bug 991926 depends on bug 991031, which changed state.
Bug 991031 Summary: root-5.34.09-3.fc20 does not build on ARM in rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991031
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994894
Bug ID: 994894
Summary: perl-Soot does not support ARM
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-SOOT
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
commit 9c674d76090e6d4eacf37b8a9654bda46d76afa1
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 8 10:34:27 2013 +0200
Disable ARM support
perl-SOOT.spec |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SOOT.spec b/perl-SOOT.spec
index cdc55ee..5288397
commit 40aa55f6158344415bb36b627be7e3e54b3df59a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 8 10:45:46 2013 +0200
RPM knows armv7hl, not arm
perl-SOOT.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SOOT.spec b/perl-SOOT.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991926
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994894
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
ARM support disabled in perl-SOOT-0.17-3.fc20.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991767
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994947
Bug ID: 994947
Summary: perl-IPC-Cmd-0.84 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-IPC-Cmd
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994949
Bug ID: 994949
Summary: perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.28 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MogileFS-Utils
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994948
Bug ID: 994948
Summary: perl-MogileFS-Client-1.17 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MogileFS-Client
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993099
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987397
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994951
Bug ID: 994951
Summary: perl-Probe-Perl-0.03 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Probe-Perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994952
Bug ID: 994952
Summary: perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction-0.003006 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992638
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||991925
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992652
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||991925
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992126
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||991925
--
You
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IPC-Cmd:
952618e5a8cee553d1d1e0085b156216 IPC-Cmd-0.84.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 934d3ba4cd5dd7bc102029590bc3ccd76c5e9661
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 8 12:40:17 2013 +0200
0.84 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-IPC-Cmd.spec | 16 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994947
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MogileFS-Client:
f077c567fc29358ea6308f22a6ad76e5 MogileFS-Client-1.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b5b451eeff5213231663f2e5ae59063da3eff4e3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 8 12:50:54 2013 +0200
1.17 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-MogileFS-Client.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MogileFS-Utils:
c66745666dacef9554f6ae998cd76706 MogileFS-Utils-2.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a2e7789a207f21423d6ad3d3d901fd98eb5de412
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 8 12:57:23 2013 +0200
2.28 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MogileFS-Utils.spec |9 +++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994948
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction:
27df6696dd3f6bb828227625227c851b Syntax-Keyword-Junction-0.003006.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a42d3a6a926891c32c35cb06016890532377321b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 8 13:11:30 2013 +0200
0.003006 bump
.gitignore|1 +
.rpmlint |2 ++
perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction.spec |5 -
sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994949
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
commit 74a6fb5d7da5d19fb4de48c57c06805e5891f3c0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 8 13:22:13 2013 +0200
%{arm} represents all 32-bit ARMs
perl-SOOT.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SOOT.spec b/perl-SOOT.spec
index
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
