On 2013-12-06, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2013-12-04, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Petr Pisar wrote:
[snip] and GPLv2 and GPLv3+.
Huh? WTF is upstream smoking there?
Upstream releases a tar ball bundling a lot of subprojects. Thus the
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net wrote:
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 07:28:09 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net wrote:
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 07:11:40 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013
Hi.
Before my question, little bit of introduction:
---
I'm the maintainer of 'openobex' package (library) which
was rebased to the latest version in rawhide on the
end of September this year. The rebase was announced
2 weeks in advance on fedora-devel
Compose started at Mon Dec 9 07:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
Compose started at Mon Dec 9 05:15:07 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libImath-2_0.so.10
LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libIlmThread-2_0.so.10
I got a message from buildsys about an unsuccessful tag which I hadn't
initiated - probably left over bits from the F20 mass rebuild.
Should I simply (re)build on master to try abd deal with that?
Since fedpkg has no scratch-head command I'll settle for
scratch-build next...
Michael
Was it from koji.fedoraproject, or arm.koji.fedoraproject?
Peter
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Michael J Gruber m...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I got a message from buildsys about an unsuccessful tag which I hadn't
initiated - probably left over bits from the F20 mass rebuild.
Should I
Peter Robinson venit, vidit, dixit 09.12.2013 14:19:
Was it from koji.fedoraproject, or arm.koji.fedoraproject?
Peter
There were two mails with identical content:
the first from buildsys@fp.o to ausil@fp.o and myself
the second from buildsys@fp.o to probinso@fp.o, arm-bu...@lists.fp.o and
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
1 packages were orphaned
giflib [devel,f18,f19,f20] was orphaned by robert
Library for manipulating GIF format image files
On 12/06/2013 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
printf(string) is legitimate C, forcing printf(%s, string) is just
silly.
My apologies for being repetitive, but the original point is that
printf(string) is insecure unless you can guarantee that you control
'string' now and forever. Also, %s
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47622
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47622/0001-Ticket-47622-Automember-betxnpreoperation-transactio.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 01:17 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michael scherer wrote:
There is enough software not building anymore and dropped after mass
rebuild to show that such problem are not really so uncommon.
… the difference is that in this case, the offending code is actually
perfectly
On 12/09/2013 03:33 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 12/06/2013 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
printf(string) is legitimate C, forcing printf(%s, string) is just
silly.
My apologies for being repetitive, but the original point is that
printf(string) is insecure unless you can guarantee
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 15:59 -0700, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 12/09/2013 03:33 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 12/06/2013 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
printf(string) is legitimate C, forcing printf(%s, string) is
just silly.
My apologies for being repetitive, but the
On 10.12.2013 00:01, Les Howell wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 15:59 -0700, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 12/09/2013 03:33 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 12/06/2013 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
printf(string) is legitimate C, forcing printf(%s, string) is
just silly.
My apologies for being
On 09/12/13 23:01, Les Howell wrote:
unless something has changed recently fputs and puts just like gets and
fgets have been deprecated and are discouraged due to potential security
issues.
Nonsense.
The reason gets is dangerous is because it doesn't take a buffer size so
will continue
Les Howell wrote:
printf(%s, string) is inefficient. In
this case, it would be better to use puts/fputs.
unless something has changed recently fputs and puts just like gets
and fgets have been deprecated and are discouraged due to potential
security issues.
gets is horribly insecure
Ignore that it was due to something I was looking at. it needs no action from
anyone.
Dennis
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi all-
I'd like to claim ownership of the 'fish' package (i.e. the fish
shell). The (re-)review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974852
This is my first package, so I'll need a sponsor, too.
Thanks,
Andy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Adam Jackson wrote:
Allow me to suggest something that really shouldn't be controversial,
but probably is, because this is the internet: standards compliance for
its own sake is not actually worthwhile.
Tell that to the GCC (especially g++) developers who keep breaking backwards
compatibility
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 13:20 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 11:44:47AM +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
Hello all,
I think this kind of bug should not be filled against the single
package, but something like against infrastructure. Also it should
block all bugs assigned
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 03:01:55PM -0800, Les Howell wrote:
unless something has changed recently fputs and puts just like gets and
fgets have been deprecated and are discouraged due to potential security
issues.
That is wrong. Only gets is deprecated (removed in C11, obsolescent in
POSIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
WG meeting will be today at 13:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Next Steps ==
- PRD - based on discussion on env-and-stacks mailing list
(some discussion on pad: http://piratepad.net/PwUiH4MEPR)
== Open Floor ==
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Fennec:
71ecafd843037bc6b48e5b7ba3f84bbc Fennec-2.012.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 086f923085cfbe2c526e6e6b9d707a229810c597
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Dec 9 11:21:08 2013 +
Update to 2.012
- New upstream release 2.012
- Fix around_all
- Documentation fixes
perl-Fennec.spec |7 ++-
sources |2 +-
The lightweight tag 'perl-Fennec-2.012-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
086f923... Update to 2.012
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708
Bug ID: 1039708
Summary: perl-DateTime-1.04 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DateTime
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039710
Bug ID: 1039710
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712
Bug ID: 1039712
Summary: perl-Gnome2-1.045 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Gnome2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021207
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039713
Bug ID: 1039713
Summary: perl-Math-PlanePath-112 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Math-PlanePath
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039715
Bug ID: 1039715
Summary: perl-Module-Starter-1.62 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-Starter
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039717
Bug ID: 1039717
Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2-0.24 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039719
Bug ID: 1039719
Summary: perl-POE-1.358 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-POE
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: psab...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016253
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021855
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Rose-DateTime:
dd59316348ecf9827d432369242547bf Rose-DateTime-0.540.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit aa20b216c707e9a4a826eaed590ccd98005fb271
Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@worldbroken.com
Date: Mon Dec 9 16:18:40 2013 -0500
update to version 0.540
Handle object return value from DateTime-DefaultLocale
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Rose-DateTime.spec |6 +-
Summary of changes:
1173135... Update to version 0.539 (*)
aa20b21... update to version 0.540 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
099be47... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
33aab1a... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
1173135... Update to version 0.539 (*)
aa20b21... update to version 0.540 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora
Summary of changes:
f665890... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass (*)
e02844a... update to version 0.538 (*)
099be47... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
33aab1a... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
1173135... Update to version 0.539 (*)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016253
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.el6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038513
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016253
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016253
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035761
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-STOMP-Client-2.2-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035760
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Config-Validator-1.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035761
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-STOMP-Client-2.2-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035760
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Config-Validator-1.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime:
f8bbaaec1c115abd0301e2caa02d6d40 DateTime-1.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 28b99ffc7fb1d81c300455e75dd5b43e1ce0cef8
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 10 08:06:25 2013 +0100
1.04 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DateTime.spec | 11 ---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is a bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Summary of changes:
28b99ff... 1.04 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit afc18b86f8515dac7c986bef2def2d69f45d4b70
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 10 08:06:25 2013 +0100
1.04 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DateTime.spec |9 +++--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit d83ee6a090fafefcc3863347beee46d570e65e84
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 10 08:06:25 2013 +0100
1.04 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DateTime.spec |9 +++--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-1.04-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-1.04-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-1.04-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-1.04-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-1.04-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-1.04-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039844
Bug ID: 1039844
Summary: perl-DateTime-1.04 is available
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Version: 7.0
Component: perl-DateTime
Keywords: FutureFeature, Rebase, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Gnome2:
95c06139f9d950df17c9cb0340c74168 Gnome2-1.045.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2a97619f3bd70e9c212791093fd36a6b5672bf4d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 10 08:47:54 2013 +0100
1.045 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Gnome2.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
2a97619... 1.045 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This changes documentation only. Suitable for all Fedoras.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
commit 41ede1e0b21e4c5498a263f0781ecf4d548ff019
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 10 08:47:54 2013 +0100
1.045 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Gnome2.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit a7c9f37be74cd730a8816b46511bc10f8314b1b4
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 10 08:47:54 2013 +0100
1.045 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Gnome2.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47623/0001-Ticket-47623-fix-memleak-caused-by-47347.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
#416: irc list sort order doesn't match html buglist
---+---
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
72 matches
Mail list logo
