Any update on the status of ZFS?

2015-10-16 Thread Zach Villers
It's been a few months since I've seen any mention of this. Has there been any change in the legal status of bring ZFS to official fedora repos? Regards, Zach -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and Test Compose 11 (TC11) Available Now!

2015-10-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/16/2015 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 10/16/2015 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and TC11 are >> now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation >> testing! >> > > Hey Adam/Cloud list, > > Does

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-16 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sex, 2015-10-16 at 09:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:49:22 +0100 > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi, > > We detect migration problem from bodhi 1 to 2 [1] > > > > Can someone workaround and push to stable, because they reached the > > stable karma

Re: Any update on the status of ZFS?

2015-10-16 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Zach Villers wrote: > It's been a few months since I've seen any mention of this. > > Has there been any change in the legal status of bring ZFS to official > fedora repos? No. josh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and Test Compose 11 (TC11) Available Now!

2015-10-16 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 10/16/2015 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and TC11 are now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! Hey Adam/Cloud list, Does anyone know what happened between TC9 / TC10 / TC11 with regards to

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and Test Compose 11 (TC11) Available Now!

2015-10-16 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 10/16/2015 02:24 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 10/16/2015 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: On 10/16/2015 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and TC11 are now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! Hey

Re: Any update on the status of ZFS?

2015-10-16 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Zach Villers wrote: > It's been a few months since I've seen any mention of this. > > Has there been any change in the legal status of bring ZFS to official > fedora repos? > > Has the license changed? I thought that was the reason it

Ownership of /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs

2015-10-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
Various packages now install files into /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs for use when building rpms. Currently that directory is owned by: rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.4.fc23.x86_64 javapackages-tools-4.6.0-6.fc23.noarch Of the various packages on my machine that install files there:

Re: Any update on the status of ZFS?

2015-10-16 Thread Richard Shaw
Have you already tried their Fedora repository? http://zfsonlinux.org/fedora.html Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Fedora 23 Branched 20151016 compose check report

2015-10-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151015 No images in 23 Branched 20151015 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 7 of 52 ID: 6237Test: x86_64 universal server_simple_free_space@uefi ID: 6153Test: i386 workstation_live default_install ID:

Fedora Rawhide 20151016 compose check report

2015-10-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151015 Images in Rawhide 20151015 but not this: Mate disk raw armhfp Failed openQA tests: 8 of 52 ID: 6245Test: x86_64 universal server_simple_free_space@uefi ID: 6208Test: x86_64 kde_live default_install

Re: GNOME 3.18.1 megaupdate

2015-10-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 09:44 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 10/12/2015 12:04 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > It's GNOME 3.18.1 release this week and I'll be wrangling the > > builds for > > Fedora. Same drill as with previous megaupdates: if you are helping > > with > > builds, please

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and Test Compose 11 (TC11) Available Now!

2015-10-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 14:33 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On 10/16/2015 02:24 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 10/16/2015 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > > > On 10/16/2015 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and > > > > TC11 are >

Re: New package distribution-gpg-keys

2015-10-16 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 16.10.2015 v 10:13 Alexander Ploumistos napsal(a): > Btw, what about upstream links to the keys in the spec file? I did not use SourceX in spec file, because my source is tar.gz file created from github. This make the maintenance more easier. However - good idea - I will create some

Re: New package distribution-gpg-keys

2015-10-16 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Right now at least two projects (mock and fedora-upgrade) contains and use > those keys. > So once this get into Fedora (and Epel) I can remove those keys from > fedora-upgrade and mock and use this common package. > >

Re: Announce: Group projects in Copr

2015-10-16 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 15.10.2015 v 18:27 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:59:56AM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> >> >> - Original Message - >>> It is my pleasure to announce new version of Copr. >>> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/ >> >> Seems that the new version broke sorting

Re: Packaging of PlayOnLinux

2015-10-16 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 15.10.2015 v 16:24 Michael Cronenworth napsal(a): > I would suggest adding PlayOnLinux to RPMFusion. Downloading binaries this > way was frowned[1] upon before. > > [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1331 However POL does not download the games. And as stated before it is useful for

Re: GNOME 3.18.1 megaupdate

2015-10-16 Thread Kalev Lember
On 10/12/2015 12:04 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Hi all, > > It's GNOME 3.18.1 release this week and I'll be wrangling the builds for > Fedora. Same drill as with previous megaupdates: if you are helping with > builds, please use f23-gnome build target. > > $ fedpkg build --target f23-gnome > >

Re: New package distribution-gpg-keys

2015-10-16 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 15.10.2015 v 23:23 Alexander Ploumistos napsal(a): > Hello, > > Please forgive my ignorance, but how is this supposed to be used? I > guess it's handy to keep track of all the current keys, but unlike, > say rpmfusion-free-release, the keys are not placed or linked in > /etc/pki/, nor are

rawhide report: 20151016 changes

2015-10-16 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Oct 16 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0

Re: siwinski pushed to php-Monolog (master). "Updated to 1.17.2 (RHBZ #1271882)"

2015-10-16 Thread Shawn Iwinski
I've had an updated SwiftMailer spec in my back pocket for a while that I have been meaning to submit. I'll submit the review request for it soon. On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 15/10/2015 18:20, notificati...@fedoraproject.org a écrit : >> +rm

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/15/2015 06:49 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, We detect migration problem from bodhi 1 to 2 [1] > > Can someone workaround and push to stable, because they reached > the stable karma threshold: > >

F-23 Branched report: 20151016 changes

2015-10-16 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Oct 16 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [openstack-swift] openstack-swift-2.3.0-2.fc23.noarch requires python-pyeclib [python-fiat] python-fiat-1.5.0-2.fc23.noarch requires ScientificPython

Re: New package distribution-gpg-keys

2015-10-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 15.10.2015 v 23:23 Alexander Ploumistos napsal(a): > > Hello, > > > > Please forgive my ignorance, but how is this supposed to be used? I > > guess it's handy to keep track of all the current keys, but unlike, > >

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:49:22 +0100 Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > We detect migration problem from bodhi 1 to 2 [1] > > Can someone workaround and push to stable, because they reached the > stable karma threshold: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-11787 >

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-16 Thread Ralph Bean
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:00:29AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'd suggest all maintainers should periodically check: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?user==testing > For their updates that are in testing. Noting here that there's an easy link to that url from your Bodhi profile page

Re: Ownership of /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs

2015-10-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:06:01PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Various packages now install files into /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs for use when > building rpms. Currently that directory is owned by: > > rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.4.fc23.x86_64 > javapackages-tools-4.6.0-6.fc23.noarch > > Of the

Re: New package distribution-gpg-keys

2015-10-16 Thread Dennis Gilmore
fedora-repos should have all the keys needed for upgrade. So the only thing needing the keys is mock. However I'm not sure you should include rpmfusion keys in Fedora. Dennis On October 16, 2015 2:26:16 AM CDT, "Miroslav Suchý" wrote: >Dne 15.10.2015 v 23:23 Alexander

Re: New package distribution-gpg-keys

2015-10-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 07:37:15PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > fedora-repos should have all the keys needed for upgrade. So the only thing > needing the keys is mock. However I'm not sure you should include rpmfusion > keys in Fedora. On a related note, something that I thought about when

Re: Any update on the status of ZFS?

2015-10-16 Thread Zach Villers
I have tried it. I don't like messing with dkms during upgrades. I remembered MM saying something about their being conversations about the license issue that were encouraging during an interview after the F22 release and wondered if there was any follow up. *apologies to MM if my recollection

Re: New package distribution-gpg-keys

2015-10-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 07:37:15PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> fedora-repos should have all the keys needed for upgrade. So the only thing >> needing the keys is mock. However I'm not sure you should

Re: New package distribution-gpg-keys

2015-10-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 03:05:42AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 07:37:15PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> fedora-repos should have all the keys needed for upgrade. So the only

[Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and Test Compose 11 (TC11) Available Now!

2015-10-16 Thread Adam Williamson
As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and TC11 are now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! As discussed at yesterday's blocker review meeting, we requested two TCs at the same time because of the GNOME 3.18.1 mega-update. The two TCs

[Bug 1272278] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9156 is available

2015-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272278 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: [EPEL-devel] Centos 7, 32 bits edition

2015-10-16 Thread Peter
On 10/16/2015 02:54 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > soon will be a while. There needs to be testing and possible changes > to koji to support the issue of dealing with one build root coming > from one source (RHEL) and another one coming from another (CentOS). > The build infrastructure is under

adamwill pushed to perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-RenderFile (f22). "disable a test on

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
From 3f932958f8f21034f530aad2fa84f06802ff74a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Williamson Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:27 -0700 Subject: disable a test on https://github.com/koorchik/Mojolicious-Plugin-RenderFile/commit/0dfa997 +%if 0%{?fedora} < 23 +rm

adamwill pushed to perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-RenderFile (f23). "disable a test on

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
From 3f932958f8f21034f530aad2fa84f06802ff74a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Williamson Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:27 -0700 Subject: disable a test on https://github.com/koorchik/Mojolicious-Plugin-RenderFile/commit/0dfa997 +%if 0%{?fedora} < 23 +rm

adamwill pushed to perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-RenderFile (master). "disable a test on

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
From 3f932958f8f21034f530aad2fa84f06802ff74a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Williamson Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:27 -0700 Subject: disable a test on https://github.com/koorchik/Mojolicious-Plugin-RenderFile/commit/0dfa997 +%if 0%{?fedora} < 23 +rm

Re: [EPEL-devel] epel CD

2015-10-16 Thread Peter
On 10/16/2015 07:19 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > [smooge@batcave01 epel]$ du -shc ./5 ./6 ./7 > 22G ./5 > 50G ./6 > 32G ./7 > 103G total > > That is several (hundred) cdroms of data. Just out of curiosity, what is the space for 7/x86_64 ? I'm guessing this would be small enough to fit onto

adamwill pushed to perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-RenderFile (f22). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild"

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
From 6ccefea60dbf2d8e9051d765624d969656ff4cf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 04:37:03 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild --- perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-RenderFile.spec | 5 - 1 file changed,

adamwill pushed to perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-RenderFile (f22). "Perl 5.22 rebuild"

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
From 10f73c05d5222ed6f473879b46e318912defaebd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 17:05:45 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild --- perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-RenderFile.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

ppisar pushed to perl-CPANPLUS (f22). "0.9156 bump"

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
From 296c15599783dc55d55db5bd3c57fdf7dab7d3c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:56:35 +0200 Subject: 0.9156 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-CPANPLUS.spec | 9 ++--- sources| 2 +- 3 files

ppisar pushed to perl-CPANPLUS (f21). "0.9156 bump"

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
From a9274bd360676dbb0add683fb8553489772f92f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:56:35 +0200 Subject: 0.9156 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-CPANPLUS.spec | 9 ++--- sources| 2 +- 3 files

ppisar uploaded CPANPLUS-0.9156.tar.gz for perl-CPANPLUS

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
99134c27de949d2734278c4b121e5b3f CPANPLUS-0.9156.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-CPANPLUS/CPANPLUS-0.9156.tar.gz/md5/99134c27de949d2734278c4b121e5b3f/CPANPLUS-0.9156.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

ppisar pushed to perl-CPANPLUS (master). "0.9156 bump"

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
From eb22720467aff5bcea24bad9ae031f35a9431a9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:56:35 +0200 Subject: 0.9156 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-CPANPLUS.spec | 9 ++--- sources| 2 +- 3 files

ppisar pushed to perl-CPANPLUS (f23). "0.9156 bump"

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
From eb22720467aff5bcea24bad9ae031f35a9431a9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:56:35 +0200 Subject: 0.9156 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-CPANPLUS.spec | 9 ++--- sources| 2 +- 3 files

[Bug 1272278] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9156 is available

2015-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272278 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPANPLUS-0.91.56-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1f4ef443bd -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1272278] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9156 is available

2015-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272278 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPANPLUS-0.91.56-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6a7ef4da1f -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1272278] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9156 is available

2015-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272278 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1272278] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9156 is available

2015-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272278 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPANPLUS-0.91.56-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-31feb7c697 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1272440] perl-CGI-4.22 is available

2015-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272440 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1083619 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1083619=edit [patch] Update to 4.22 (#1272440) -- You are

[Bug 1272440] New: perl-CGI-4.22 is available

2015-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272440 Bug ID: 1272440 Summary: perl-CGI-4.22 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CGI Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1272440] perl-CGI-4.22 is available

2015-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272440 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11473726 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

jplesnik changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Approved'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik changed psabata's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Approved'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik changed psabata's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik uploaded Roman-1.24.tar.gz for perl-Roman

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
b1f80c9463f7b535d3d3c5738f29dbb4 Roman-1.24.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Roman/Roman-1.24.tar.gz/md5/b1f80c9463f7b535d3d3c5738f29dbb4/Roman-1.24.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Approved'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-Roman (master). "Initial import"

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
From b79cfd1bd70b8f21ba96c9017b13ec59d9ba4da8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:06:22 +0200 Subject: Initial import --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Roman.spec | 51 +++ sources

jplesnik set the koschei monitoring flag of perl-Roman to True

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik set the koschei monitoring flag of perl-Roman to True -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

jplesnik changed psabata's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Approved'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik changed psabata's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Approved'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Approved'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Approved'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Approved'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Approved'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

2015-10-16 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 726 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893 libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 491 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 340

jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Approved'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Approved'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Approved'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [EPEL-devel] EPEL package rebased upon RHEL update?

2015-10-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/15/2015 09:24 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi, Redis in EPEL6 is pretty dated, I'd like to update it to the latest 2.x version but somehow I haven't done major update like this. Is it allowed to update the package from 2.4 to 2.8 for new RHEL 6.x like 6.8 release?

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Obsolete'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Obsolete' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Obsolete'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Obsolete' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar created the branch 'f22' for the package 'perl-Roman'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
ppisar created the branch 'f22' for the package 'perl-Roman' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-HTML-Toc (master). "Specify all dependencies"

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
From fc43292893eded9a01df72b3a5f02d87ad8a28e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:47:18 +0200 Subject: Specify all dependencies --- perl-HTML-Toc.spec | 30 -- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Obsolete'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Roman (master) to 'Obsolete' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Obsolete'

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Roman (f23) to 'Obsolete' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Roman/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-Roman (f23). "Initial import"

2015-10-16 Thread notifications
From c90961b5d353ac2c0e765e25e4817cef2dcc9e67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:06:22 +0200 Subject: Initial import --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Roman.spec | 51 +++ sources

Re: [EPEL-devel] epel CD

2015-10-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:13:22 +1300 Peter wrote: > Just out of curiosity, what is the space for 7/x86_64 ? I'm guessing > this would be small enough to fit onto a double-layer DVD. If you > then donk the debug tree from there you could probably fit the rest > onto a

Re: [EPEL-devel] epel CD

2015-10-16 Thread Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/17/2015 03:44 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > We provide a handy way to answer this sort of question: > > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/DIRECTORY_SIZES.txt Oh cool, I had no idea about that. > 15G /pub/epel/7/x86_64 8.7G /pub/epel/7/x86_64/debug

[389-devel] Please review Ticket 47978: Deadlock between two MODs on the same entry between entry cache and backend lock

2015-10-16 Thread thierry bordaz
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47978/0001-Ticket-47978-Deadlock-between-two-MODs-on-the-same-e.patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47978 It exists a FreeIPA CI test that reproduce the hang (almost systematically): test_vault.py -- 389-devel mailing list