Fedora Rawhide-20160714.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 28/74 (x86_64), 4/15 (i386) ID: 25167 Test: x86_64

Re: Add Budgie Desktop as optional DE in Fedora

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 07/13/2016 08:19 PM, haevalen...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Budgie desktop is doing a very good job using GNOME technologies keeping >> things simple. >> >> It is now officially offers from the Solus project through

Re: Accidentally installed libtool wrapper scripts instead of binaries

On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 2:27:11 PM CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Just a note more than anything, since I don't see this problem > discussed anywhere in the packaging guidelines ... > [...] > I accidentally packaged some libtool wrapper scripts by doing: It probably rarely happens as the

Re: Add Budgie Desktop as optional DE in Fedora

On 07/13/2016 08:19 PM, haevalen...@gmail.com wrote: Budgie desktop is doing a very good job using GNOME technologies keeping things simple. It is now officially offers from the Solus project through OBS, but it would be good to have in the official repositories of Fedora and perhaps in the

Re: g++ __VA_ARGS__ error

Jan Synacek wrote: > #define ssprintf(dest, ...) snprintf((dest), sizeof(dest), __VA_ARGS__) Did you want: #define ssprintf(dest, ...) snprintf((dest), sizeof(dest), ## __VA_ARGS__) David -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: I've orphaned moin in all branches

Hi, On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote: > Due to having less time available for Fedora than I used to, I have > decided to orphan the moin package, i.e. the MoinMoin wiki engine, in > all branches. > > If someone wants to pick it up, there's not that much

Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:11:12PM -0400, Garry Williams wrote: >>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 7:56:41 AM EDT Chris Murphy wrote: >>> > I

Re: Accidentally installed libtool wrapper scripts instead of binaries

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 05:20:41PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > I doubt installed wrapper script worked for you; but yes - it might be too > late as not everything is manually tested (if not detected by toolchain). It fails quite dramatically ... $ libguestfs-boot-benchmark mkdir: cannot

Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:11:12PM -0400, Garry Williams wrote: >> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 7:56:41 AM EDT Chris Murphy wrote: >> > I have KillUserProcesses=yes set in Fedora 24 for some time now. I'm >> > noticing that

Re: F25 change update: new storaged just landed in Rawhide

On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 08:06 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Packages in Fedora can be retired up to Final Freeze, while the > Contingency Plan > is expected to be put into play at Beta Freeze if things aren't > working properly > at that point. So I think the perfect time to retire Udisks2 would

Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016, at 03:04 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > I want to add a couple more to the scope: dnf and PackageKit. I don't > care *how* dnf and PackageKit get started. If they're making changes, > systemd should *not* zap them on logout. PackageKit has been a daemon from the start

Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

On 07/07/2016 08:13 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KillUserProcesses_by_default > > Change owner(s): > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek Copying my response from

rpm-ostree 2016.4 now with package layering

rpm-ostree 2016.4: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/releases/tag/v2016.4 is now in Bodhi: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2b9342c5cc https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-bfecf6abed Remember, to try it, you can rebase an existing Atomic Host system

Re: rpm-ostree 2016.4 now with package layering

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016, at 08:33 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > > Another thing I think is cool is that we use bubblewrap[3] to > run %post scripts, which greatly helps avoid system damage from badly written > scripts, and helps ensure that system changes are under control of rpm-ostree. I also

I've orphaned moin in all branches

Hi all! Due to having less time available for Fedora than I used to, I have decided to orphan the moin package, i.e. the MoinMoin wiki engine, in all branches. If someone wants to pick it up, there's not that much work to be done right now. It needs an update from 1.9.7 to 1.9.8, and maybe

Re: How best to handle tools which support multiple Python runtimes

Dne 13.7.2016 v 21:15 Avram Lubkin napsal(a): > Does anyone have any preferences, thoughts or alternative approaches? I do not have the solution. But I want to point out similar case, which I recently reported against pyp2rpm: https://github.com/fedora-python/pyp2rpm/issues/63 -- Miroslav

Re: How best to handle tools which support multiple Python runtimes

As someone pointed out somewhere on IRC - we should try to invent "alternatives" to python packages like it was done in java packages in Fedora. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 13.7.2016 v 21:15 Avram Lubkin napsal(a): >> Does anyone have any

Re: F25 change update: new storaged just landed in Rawhide

On 07/14/2016 04:56 AM, Tomáš Smetana wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:43:33 -0500 > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > >> On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 11:43 +0200, Tomáš Smetana wrote: >>> Hello, >>> Just a heads-up: I have just build the 2.6.2 version of storaged >>> that should >>>

Re: Requiring package test instructions

> Oh no, that is not what we're aiming for. We are aiming for a set of > automated *sanity tests* that run for every update. Over time maybe > we could add regression tests to it that can't be added to the > upstream testsuite for some reason (requiring root privs for example, > much easier to

Re: Accidentally installed libtool wrapper scripts instead of binaries

Good point, but how do we know if file is libtool wrapper and not real shell-script? On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Just a note more than anything, since I don't see this problem > discussed anywhere in the packaging guidelines ... > > If a

Re: F25 change update: new storaged just landed in Rawhide

On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:43:33 -0500 Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 11:43 +0200, Tomáš Smetana wrote: > > Hello, > >   Just a heads-up: I have just build the 2.6.2 version of storaged > > that should > > replace udisks2 in Fedora 25. The upgrade should be

Re: Accidentally installed libtool wrapper scripts instead of binaries

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 09:52:20AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Good point, but how do we know if file is libtool wrapper and not real > shell-script? If you're happy with a heuristic, then they should be easy to identify from the comments at the very beginning of the file, which look like

Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:11:12PM -0400, Garry Williams wrote: > On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 7:56:41 AM EDT Chris Murphy wrote: > > I have KillUserProcesses=yes set in Fedora 24 for some time now. I'm > > noticing that I still often have 90 second delays if I restart or > > shutdown, more than half

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 493 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 255 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 122

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 371 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 365 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 297

Re: [Python-SIG] Self-Introduction: Tim Orling

Hi Petr, It is precisely the security information that I am seeking access to. My job depends on it. I have already done everything in [0]. In some cases more than once. And we are talking over the period of many months. So let me ask this in return: what is the process once someone has done

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires

Re: [Python-SIG] Self-Introduction: Tim Orling

Hello Tim! Welcome to python-devel, and sorry for us being so quiet. Is there anything in particular you're pinging about? If want to access the python-sig FAS group, note that an introduction here is just a part of the process [0]. However, that list is mostly used to get notifications about

[Bug 1354483] dropbox-api-command-2.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354483 --- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1179793 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1179793=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1354483] dropbox-api-command-2.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354483 --- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for dropbox-api-command-1.17 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Broken dependencies: perl-Algorithm-Permute

perl-Algorithm-Permute has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Algorithm-Permute-0.12-21.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Algorithm-Permute-0.12-21.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386:

[Bug 1354483] dropbox-api-command-2.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354483 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1354483] dropbox-api-command-2.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354483 --- Comment #15 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora

[Bug 1295437] CVE-2015-8508 bugzilla: cross-site scripting when generating a dependency graph [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295437 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- The update that fixes this issue was published late 2015 (this is update FEDORA-2015-247b517a18, btw). I'm quite confident that this bug can be closed. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1295438] CVE-2015-8509 bugzilla: information leak when parsing the CSV file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295438 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

jplesnik pushed to perl (master). "Add missing BR perl(version) to ExtUtils-MakeMaker"

From fed53a90053851236877a7a495abe752a14412d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:36:13 +0200 Subject: Add missing BR perl(version) to ExtUtils-MakeMaker --- perl.spec | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/perl.spec

ppisar pushed to perl-Importer (master). "0.014 bump"

From fe42e6aa7c18c3bad7bdd22b27c3a3dfae464fc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:17:25 +0200 Subject: 0.014 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Importer.spec | 5 - sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

[Bug 1356312] perl-B-Hooks-OP-PPAddr-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356312 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1356323] perl-Math-BigInt-1.999725 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356323 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED External

ppisar uploaded Importer-0.014.tar.gz for perl-Importer

b311f1196b955eebd2d736daef2e7284 Importer-0.014.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Importer/Importer-0.014.tar.gz/md5/b311f1196b955eebd2d736daef2e7284/Importer-0.014.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[Bug 1356320] perl-Importer-0.014 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356320 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

jplesnik uploaded B-Hooks-OP-PPAddr-0.05.tar.gz for perl-B-Hooks-OP-PPAddr

b50415026b32ad2ae38fb0cc791c11a1 B-Hooks-OP-PPAddr-0.05.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-B-Hooks-OP-PPAddr/B-Hooks-OP-PPAddr-0.05.tar.gz/md5/b50415026b32ad2ae38fb0cc791c11a1/B-Hooks-OP-PPAddr-0.05.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

jplesnik pushed to perl-B-Hooks-OP-PPAddr (master). "0.05 bump"

From 97c35ff17d39bc464e14c5fed10be00b9f3c6bc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 12:36:34 +0200 Subject: 0.05 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-B-Hooks-OP-PPAddr.spec | 24 +++- sources