Re: Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

On 12/11/2017 02:23 PM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: Hi Neal, And the issue you're having that requires %setupargs is not a problem in RPM 4.14 I don't have an issue with %setupargs, I have an issue with requiring packagers to change stuff in the spec header *and* at %prep level,

Re: Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

De: "Panu Matilainen" > On a more constructive note, I'd think conceptually this might better > fit into %autosetup territory. Have you looked at extending that, rather > than overriding/building something separate? I've looked at it a bit, but apart the fact autosetup is an actual macro,

licensing change: ragel changed from GPLv2 to MIT with version 7.0.0.10

With version 7.0.0.10 ragel moved from GPLv2 to MIT. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ragel/c/378118e75eab5d9ac97d93d2cfb5 0bd988bc7d30?branch=master JT ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Which Fedora/EPEL is targeted by packaging guidelines?

Dne 2.12.2017 v 02:35 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > Vít Ondruch wrote: >> This is big and old-school hammer. If you did "git cherry-pick" instead, >> you could get most of the changes you did in master without the >> branches. Also, merging means that you get into older (or EPEL) branches >> stuff

Re: Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 01:23:19PM +0100, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: > Hi Neal, > > > And the issue you're having that requires %setupargs is not a problem > > in RPM 4.14 > > I don't have an issue with %setupargs, I have an issue with requiring > packagers to change stuff in the spec

Re: Colm rawhide soname bump

On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 06:23 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Fabio Valentini m> wrote: > > "pro" .spec hack: This is why I hard-code library sonames in my > > packages > > (even if hardcoding is frowned upon in general, especially in .spec > >

Re: Colm rawhide soname bump

Do you happen to know if this was resolved? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402582 Thx Vít Dne 11.12.2017 v 11:26 Jason Taylor napsal(a): > The latest version of colm was pushed to rawhide which bumped the soname. > > I didn't catch this prior to the push to give a proper

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

De: "Panu Matilainen" Hi Panu, > Kudos for work on reducing repetitive complex error prone cruft in specs! Thanks! > But don't override %setup. There's no need for such abuse It is really pretty safe, the macro controls the downloaded file, the file structure is known, the only time it

Re: [SO-NAME BUMP] libjson-c.so.3 comes to Rawhide

On 12/11/2017 01:05 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > === Possible complications === > > Since we have a circular dependency in rebuilding cryptsetup (and many > other packages having direct or indirect (systemd !!!) BuildRequires on > that package, I'll do the rebuild chains in two passes: >

Re: Self introduction

- Original Message - > From: "Jan De Luyck" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2017 11:50:14 AM > Subject: Self introduction > > Hello people, > > I've recently submitted a package to be included with Fedora, and since > I'm new on the

Colm rawhide soname bump

The latest version of colm was pushed to rawhide which bumped the soname. I didn't catch this prior to the push to give a proper heads up so I apologize for that. I'll get a list of effected packages and notify the maintainers directly as well. JT ___

Re: Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

Hi Neal, > And the issue you're having that requires %setupargs is not a problem > in RPM 4.14 I don't have an issue with %setupargs, I have an issue with requiring packagers to change stuff in the spec header *and* at %prep level, which is not in the same place of the spec. That is something

[Bug 1524390] New: perl-Net-GitHub-0.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524390 Bug ID: 1524390 Summary: perl-Net-GitHub-0.91 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-GitHub Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Self introduction

> The package I've sent up is NotepadQQ, a 'clone' of a well-known editor > for Windows. I'm working with Ben Rosser to get this up to Fedora > standards - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519785 I don't know if this information is useful, but I've noticed we have that in a Copr too.

Re: Colm rawhide soname bump

"pro" .spec hack: This is why I hard-code library sonames in my packages (even if hardcoding is frowned upon in general, especially in .spec files, where macros are preferable) - but that way, a soname bump always gets noticed as it results in failed builds if the .spec file is not adapted, and it

Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:57 AM, wrote: >>De: "Panu Matilainen" > > Hi Panu, > >>> But don't override %setup. There's no need for such abuse > >> It is really pretty safe, the macro controls the downloaded file, the file >> structure is known, the only time it won't

Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

>De: "Panu Matilainen" Hi Panu, >> But don't override %setup. There's no need for such abuse > It is really pretty safe, the macro controls the downloaded file, the file > structure is known, the only time it won't "just > work" is when a spec needs to call %setup several times (in that case

Re: Colm rawhide soname bump

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > "pro" .spec hack: This is why I hard-code library sonames in my packages > (even if hardcoding is frowned upon in general, especially in .spec files, > where macros are preferable) - but that way, a soname bump always

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

On 12/11/2017 12:51 PM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: De: "Panu Matilainen" and allows you to %autosetup underneath on versions where macro arguments are expanded (rpm >= 4.14) Interesting, are the changes described somewhere? Not that I want to break compat with el7 from the startup

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

On 12/11/2017 12:51 PM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: De: "Panu Matilainen" Hi Panu, Kudos for work on reducing repetitive complex error prone cruft in specs! Thanks! But don't override %setup. There's no need for such abuse It is really pretty safe, the macro controls the

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

On 12/08/2017 08:03 PM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: Hi, I am proposing for inclusion a macro set aimed at automating the packaging of forge-hosted projects. — Packaging draft: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forge-hosted_projects_packaging_automation — FPC ticket:

Re: Self introduction

Also, sorry, I didn't even say "welcome"… Welcome! -- 010 Giovanni [dacav] Simoni 001 111 OpenPGP key: 93FC 2A6A 43A4 AAC2 0D8E 5411 2F99 ABB6 BA14 DF9E signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Colm rawhide soname bump

On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 15:46 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Do you happen to know if this was resolved? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402582 > Thx > > Vít > I don't know if it has been resolved or not. I had contacted upstream to get their feedback on it but have not heard back

Re: Which Fedora/EPEL is targeted by packaging guidelines?

On 12/02/2017 02:35 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Vít Ondruch wrote: This is big and old-school hammer. If you did "git cherry-pick" instead, you could get most of the changes you did in master without the branches. Also, merging means that you get into older (or EPEL) branches stuff like changelogs

Re: Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

Hi all, Since most participants seems to be in favor of explicit %setup handling, I've updated the wiki and the macro file Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Infrastructure move -- thanks

I might be a bit biased from my perspective as the guy who manages the folks on the Infrastructure team. But I wanted to take a moment to say thank you to all the team members and everyone involved for conducting the recent colo move, a complex and critical process, in an outstanding manner.

Re: Infrastructure move -- thanks

Great job, thanks to everyone Guido fas account: tartina ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Infrastructure move -- thanks

Hi everyone, I would like to add my kudos too. The Infrastructure team did a great work. Thanks so much! Kind regards, Silvia FAS: Lailah 2017-12-11 19:17 GMT+01:00 Paul W. Frields : > I might be a bit biased from my perspective as the guy who manages the > folks on the

Re: Orphaning optipng

Hello, since I'm using that from time to time, I'll take it. Let me know if you'd like also assistance with your last update. Sincerely Peter On 12/04/2017 10:10 PM, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to orphan optipng. It is a PNG compression optimizer that I > do not use anymore.

Re: What to I have to do....

On Sun, 10 Dec 2017, Graham Leggett wrote: > In this case, we have the needs of the Fedora project (this > change) stacked up against your needs (your reluctance to > perform a task). This line of argument is a 'straw man' as are several other rationalizations advanced for NOT giving

Fedora Rawhide-20171211.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server boot x86_64 Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server dvd x86_64 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 49/106 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171210.n.2): ID: 179964 Test: x86_64 universal

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG (once every two weeks)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2017-12-12 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity

Re: Orphaning optipng

Hi Peter On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 08:13:25PM +0100, Peter Hanecak wrote: > since I'm using that from time to time, I'll take it. Let me know if > you'd like also assistance with your last update. Great! Please login to https://src.fedoraproject.org to make the system properly know you. Then I

Re: Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

On 12/11/2017 06:07 PM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: Hi all, Since most participants seems to be in favor of explicit %setup handling, I've updated the wiki and the macro file Thank you. - Panu - ___ devel mailing list --

[Bug 1524405] perl-Exception-Class-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524405 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-Exception-Class-1.44-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[389-devel] Please review: 49495 fix cos vattr handling

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49495 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/f4f3ced91419e3953d6db532e 25681e05ec4d18ff5df3d33c9796a536bbf4750-0001-Ticket-49495-cos-stress- test-and-improvements.patch https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/1c50719b1a7d940768be44de0

[389-devel] Please Review: Issue 49431 - Add CI test for Replication Modrdn

Hello, Please review my patch for - Add CI test for Replication test suit *https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49431 *

[Bug 1523958] perl-Digest-SHA-6.00 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523958 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Digest-SHA-6.00-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3b004c0c49 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1524152] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-2.043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524152 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-2.043-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-d3a8567df0 -- You are

[Bug 1524405] perl-Exception-Class-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524405 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1365967 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1365967=edit [patch] Update to 1.44 (#1524405) -- You are

[Bug 1523888] perl-libwww-perl-6.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523888 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- A new 6.31 release hides LWP::Protocol::MyFTP private module. Because it was a bug, I will push it into F27 too. If it were a problem we can reintroduce the provide manually. -- You are

[Bug 1524078] perl-App-cpm-0.955 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524078 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

[Bug 1523893] perl-Log-Report-1.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523893 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1523958] perl-Digest-SHA-6.00 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523958 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Digest-SHA-6.00-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e962c72f9a -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1523958] perl-Digest-SHA-6.00 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523958 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Digest-SHA-6.00-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e963ed871d -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1523888] perl-libwww-perl-6.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523888 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1523888] perl-libwww-perl-6.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523888 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-libwww-perl-6.31-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-aa84f58bcc -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1523958] perl-Digest-SHA-6.00 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523958 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1523956] perlbrew-0.81 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523956 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1524345] New: perl-SQL-Translator-0.11023 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524345 Bug ID: 1524345 Summary: perl-SQL-Translator-0.11023 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-SQL-Translator Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1524382] New: ack-2.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524382 Bug ID: 1524382 Summary: ack-2.20 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ack Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: robinlee.s...@gmail.com

[Bug 1524382] ack-2.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524382 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1365949 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1365949=edit [patch] Update to 2.20 (#1524382) -- You are

[Bug 1524382] ack-2.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524382 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of ack-2.20-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23641898 -- You

[Bug 1524159] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000097 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524159 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1523884] perl-DBIx-Simple-1.37 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523884 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1524078] perl-App-cpm-0.955 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524078 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-App-cpm-0.955-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-97cf066690 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1524152] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-2.043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524152 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1524345] perl-SQL-Translator-0.11023 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524345 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1524405] New: perl-Exception-Class-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524405 Bug ID: 1524405 Summary: perl-Exception-Class-1.44 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Exception-Class Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1524159] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000096 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524159 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1523894] perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523894 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1524405] perl-Exception-Class-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524405 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1524152] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-2.043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524152 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1524078] perl-App-cpm-0.955 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524078 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1523888] perl-libwww-perl-6.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523888 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1523958] perl-Digest-SHA-6.00 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523958 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Digest-SHA-6.00-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1523958] perl-Digest-SHA-6.00 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523958 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1517572] Please add unar dependency/ configuration for *.rar and comment *.lrz support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572 Juan Orti changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(j.orti.alcaine@gm |

[Bug 1517572] Please add unar dependency/ configuration for *.rar and comment *.lrz support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck --- (In reply to Juan Orti from comment #2) > Why to comment lrz? doesn't if fail gracefully when the decoder is not > present? Yes and no. It gracefully fails, but it still

[Bug 1523958] perl-Digest-SHA-6.00 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523958 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Digest-SHA-6.00-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1524758] perl-XML-LibXML-Simple-0.99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524758 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-XML-LibXML-Simple-0.99-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1524758] perl-XML-LibXML-Simple-0.99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524758 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1366382 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1366382=edit [patch] Update to 0.99 (#1524758) -- You are

[Bug 1524758] New: perl-XML-LibXML-Simple-0.99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524758 Bug ID: 1524758 Summary: perl-XML-LibXML-Simple-0.99 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-LibXML-Simple Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1009 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 771 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 353

[Bug 1517572] Please add unar dependency/ configuration for *.rar and comment *.lrz support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com