The next Tuesday, on 2018-Mar-06, we will reach two important
milestones of the Fedora 28 release [1]:
== Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline [2] ==
* New accepted changes must be code complete, meaning all the code
required to enable to the new change is finished.
* The level of code c
Greetings.
Per this fesco ticket:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1714
I have created the Fedora 28 spins/labs page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Spins
All spin maintainers/owners/interested parties should test their spins
and at least update this wiki page with beta/final testing. S
Today (2018-Feb-27) we have reached the "Software String Freeze"
deadline. Beyond this deadline there should not be any changes in
strings, ideally.
If you want to help with translations then, please check the packages
that follow Fedora release cycle (Main projects):
https://fedora.zanata.org/ver
In one week on 2018-Mar-06 [1] we will reach the Software Translation
Deadline [2]. At the time of the deadline all the strings translations
should be substantially finished.
Any help with the translations is welcomed.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Schedule
[2] https://fedoraproj
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 22:00 +, n...@redhat.com wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Modularity Office Hours on 2018-02-27 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00
> US/Eastern
>At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity
NB: I've just noticed that this reminder is a near dupli
Hi Gerald,
I'll try to explain how I understood it:
On 02/26/2018 03:45 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> I must be missing something what is sad? It has been stated that
> CUPS does
> not need any GPLv2 only component for building or linking.
The issue is about packages, which have GPLv2only li
AA. Fedora is not (at this time) concerned about license compatibility
issues arising from the relicensing of CUPS to Apache 2.0, in as much as
this applies to linking of components together (our use case).
BB. If you are planning on (or have) copying code from CUPS and including
it in a GPLv2 on
Hi everybody,
I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go packaging
in fedora, and since I saw that packages are starting to make use of the
new mechanisms, I wanted to finally check it out and started "converting"
one of my own (one of ~50) golang packages
(golang-github-Aud
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:26 -0600, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
> wrote:
> > regarding the strong crypto change in Fedora28 [0], we have
> > identified
> > few (usually internal) sites which break under firefox or other
> > tools.
> > The
Le 2018-02-27 15:49, Fabio Valentini a écrit :
Hi Fabio,
Thanks a lot for testing, we need more input to produce great Go
packaging tooling.
I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go
packaging in fedora, and since I saw that packages are starting to
make use of the ne
- Original Message -
> From: "Sergio Pascual"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 10:18:47 PM
> Subject: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now
>
> Hello all,
>
> python package astropy as ceased to sup
Le 2018-02-27 15:49, Fabio Valentini a écrit :
Hi
I'll answer in more detail since I have a little more time now
2) Additionally, I wasn't able to figure out why I have to set both
"%gobaseipath" and "%provider_prefix".
That's one of the changes Jan made I don't understand either. It's look
Hello team,
f28-backgrounds is looking for package review needed for beta release.
The location is on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549686
Thanks in advance.
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
signature.asc
D
On 02/27/2018 03:22 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> AA. Fedora is not (at this time) concerned about license compatibility
> issues arising from the relicensing of CUPS to Apache 2.0, in as much
> as this applies to linking of components together (our use case).
>
> BB. If you are planning on (or have)
Hi folks,
I would like to inform you, that net-snmp package will use Python3 package
instead of Python2.
With this change, python2-net-snmp package will be renamed to python3-net-snmp
package.
This change will be applied in Fedora Rawhide and Fedora 28.
I would be glad for any feedback.
Regard
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 11:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the progress?
> > ;)
>
> My plan is to do this bi-weekly ;) So this weekend then.
Hello,
So I made a fix for clamsmtp, and p
On mardi 27 février 2018 16:03:36 CET Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le 2018-02-27 15:49, Fabio Valentini a écrit :
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> Thanks a lot for testing, we need more input to produce great Go
> packaging tooling.
>
>
> > I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go
> > pa
On 26.02.2018 13:06, Kamil Paral wrote:
I believe this means the compose wasn't done correctly (apitrace-libs
was considered multilib initially, and is not considered multilib
now). You can file a ticket for releng:
https://pagure.io/releng
Done [1], thanks.
[1] https://pagure.io/releng/
qpdf was updated from 7.1.1-4 to 8.0.0-1 in Rawhide on 2018-02-26.
This update bumped the soname from libqpdf.so.18 to libqpdf.so.21 .
This soname bump was not announced, as it is supposed to be, and
dependent packages were not rebuilt.
cups-filters depends on qpdf, so anything that includes cups-
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 09:02 -0500, Josef Ridky wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to inform you, that net-snmp package will use Python3 package
> instead of Python2.
> With this change, python2-net-snmp package will be renamed to
> python3-net-snmp package.
> This change will be applied in Fedo
Le mardi 27 février 2018 à 18:34 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
>
>
> How do we test this? I installedtho go-srpm-macros from Rawhide but it
> doesn't seem to have the required macros?
Yes in rawhide go-compilers and go-srpm-macros are in an intermediary
not fully tested/integrated state.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson <
adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate
> rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the maintainer of both
> packages and could have rebuilt cups-filters, but just forgot to)
On mardi 27 février 2018 15:49:44 CET Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go packaging
> in fedora, and since I saw that packages are starting to make use of the
> new mechanisms, I wanted to finally check it out and started "co
On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson
> mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
>
>
> Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and
> co-ordinate
> rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the maintainer of bo
I don't have to do it for many of my packages, but I do regularly check ABI
compliance before performing an update so I know if I need to rebuild
dependencies or not.
Currently my workflow is something like:
$ cd abicompare/
$ mkdir
$ cd (unpack pakage and -devel package)
(same for )
$ abi-com
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate
>> rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the maintainer of both
>> packages and could have rebuilt cu
On 02/26/2018 04:59 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 02/26/2018 07:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote
>> This is not the case with any of the bodhi enabled releases. They only
>> update the buildroot from base packages + stable updates + specific
>> packages that are added as buildroot overrides.
>
> Yeah t
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 12:27 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate
> > rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the maintainer of both
Hi all-
I'm looking for a package review of Apple's Swift programming language:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780
I greatly appreciate any and all assistance in getting Swift available
on Fedora.
Ron
___
devel mailing list -- deve
On mardi 27 février 2018 19:39:47 CET you wrote:
> > 6) When I finally got the macros right enough for %prep, %build, and
> > %install to proceed, the build failed due to missing debuginfo files (and
> > warnings about duplicate files) - well, it's a source-only library
> > package,
> > how do I sp
I forgot to mention that I'd be willing to do a review-swap for this as
well.
Ron
On 27 Feb 2018, at 14:08, Ron Olson wrote:
Hi all-
I'm looking for a package review of Apple's Swift programming
language:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780
I greatly appreciate any and al
Better late then never, vsqlite++ updated and rebuilt
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet
wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 11:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/27/2018 10:47 AM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
> A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
>
> Version: 27.93
> Commit(x86_64):
> da0bd968610aa1e29c5bb37065649407fbbfffa53e63831afdadbd34a3b05327
> Commit(aarc
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a
> "%global sover " and using it in %files?
>
> If nothing else it should at least be documented as a best practice.
Not yet another bureaucratic guideline making it harder to maintain
packages!
Hardcoded so
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a
> > "%global sover " and using it in %files?
> >
> > If nothing else it should at least be documented as a best practice.
>
> Not yet another bureaucra
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 19:41 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler
> wrote:
>
> > Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a
> > > "%global sover " and using it in %files?
> > >
> > > If nothing else it should
On 18 February 2018 at 12:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and
> gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to
> random
> reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by analyzing
> hundred
37 matches
Mail list logo
