REMINDER: Fedora 28 Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline & Beta Freeze in 1 week

2018-02-27 Thread Jan Kurik
The next Tuesday, on 2018-Mar-06, we will reach two important milestones of the Fedora 28 release [1]: == Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline [2] == * New accepted changes must be code complete, meaning all the code required to enable to the new change is finished. * The level of code c

Fedora 28 Spins page: spin/labs owners please test

2018-02-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. Per this fesco ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1714 I have created the Fedora 28 spins/labs page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Spins All spin maintainers/owners/interested parties should test their spins and at least update this wiki page with beta/final testing. S

F28 Software String Freeze is today

2018-02-27 Thread Jan Kurik
Today (2018-Feb-27) we have reached the "Software String Freeze" deadline. Beyond this deadline there should not be any changes in strings, ideally. If you want to help with translations then, please check the packages that follow Fedora release cycle (Main projects): https://fedora.zanata.org/ver

REMINDER: Software Translation Deadline in 1 week

2018-02-27 Thread Jan Kurik
In one week on 2018-Mar-06 [1] we will reach the Software Translation Deadline [2]. At the time of the deadline all the strings translations should be substantially finished. Any help with the translations is welcomed. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproj

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

2018-02-27 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 22:00 +, n...@redhat.com wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Modularity Office Hours on 2018-02-27 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 > US/Eastern >At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity NB: I've just noticed that this reminder is a near dupli

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

2018-02-27 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
Hi Gerald, I'll try to explain how I understood it: On 02/26/2018 03:45 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > I must be missing something what is sad?  It has been stated that > CUPS does > not need any GPLv2 only component for building or linking. The issue is about packages, which have GPLv2only li

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

2018-02-27 Thread Gerald B. Cox
AA. Fedora is not (at this time) concerned about license compatibility issues arising from the relicensing of CUPS to Apache 2.0, in as much as this applies to linking of components together (our use case). BB. If you are planning on (or have) copying code from CUPS and including it in a GPLv2 on

Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

2018-02-27 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go packaging in fedora, and since I saw that packages are starting to make use of the new mechanisms, I wanted to finally check it out and started "converting" one of my own (one of ~50) golang packages (golang-github-Aud

Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings

2018-02-27 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:26 -0600, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos > wrote: > > regarding the strong crypto change in Fedora28 [0], we have > > identified > > few (usually internal) sites which break under firefox or other > > tools. > > The

Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

2018-02-27 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2018-02-27 15:49, Fabio Valentini a écrit : Hi Fabio, Thanks a lot for testing, we need more input to produce great Go packaging tooling. I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go packaging in fedora, and since I saw that packages are starting to make use of the ne

Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now

2018-02-27 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
- Original Message - > From: "Sergio Pascual" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 10:18:47 PM > Subject: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now > > Hello all, > > python package astropy as ceased to sup

Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

2018-02-27 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2018-02-27 15:49, Fabio Valentini a écrit : Hi I'll answer in more detail since I have a little more time now 2) Additionally, I wasn't able to figure out why I have to set both "%gobaseipath" and "%provider_prefix". That's one of the changes Jan made I don't understand either. It's look

[package review] f28-backgrounds ready for review

2018-02-27 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Hello team, f28-backgrounds is looking for package review needed for beta release. The location is on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549686 Thanks in advance. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net signature.asc D

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

2018-02-27 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
On 02/27/2018 03:22 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > AA. Fedora is not (at this time) concerned about license compatibility > issues arising from the relicensing of CUPS to Apache 2.0, in as much > as this applies to linking of components together (our use case). > > BB. If you are planning on (or have)

News in net-snmp package

2018-02-27 Thread Josef Ridky
Hi folks, I would like to inform you, that net-snmp package will use Python3 package instead of Python2. With this change, python2-net-snmp package will be renamed to python3-net-snmp package. This change will be applied in Fedora Rawhide and Fedora 28. I would be glad for any feedback. Regard

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-27 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 11:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the progress? > > ;) > > My plan is to do this bi-weekly ;) So this weekend then. Hello, So I made a fix for clamsmtp, and p

Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

2018-02-27 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On mardi 27 février 2018 16:03:36 CET Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 2018-02-27 15:49, Fabio Valentini a écrit : > > Hi Fabio, > > Thanks a lot for testing, we need more input to produce great Go > packaging tooling. > > > > I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go > > pa

Re: Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27

2018-02-27 Thread Sandro Mani
On 26.02.2018 13:06, Kamil Paral wrote: I believe this means the compose wasn't done correctly (apitrace-libs was considered multilib initially, and is not considered multilib now). You can file a ticket for releng: https://pagure.io/releng Done [1], thanks. [1] https://pagure.io/releng/

Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-27 Thread Adam Williamson
qpdf was updated from 7.1.1-4 to 8.0.0-1 in Rawhide on 2018-02-26. This update bumped the soname from libqpdf.so.18 to libqpdf.so.21 . This soname bump was not announced, as it is supposed to be, and dependent packages were not rebuilt. cups-filters depends on qpdf, so anything that includes cups-

Re: News in net-snmp package

2018-02-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 09:02 -0500, Josef Ridky wrote: > Hi folks, > > I would like to inform you, that net-snmp package will use Python3 package > instead of Python2. > With this change, python2-net-snmp package will be renamed to > python3-net-snmp package. > This change will be applied in Fedo

Re: Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

2018-02-27 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le mardi 27 février 2018 à 18:34 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : > > > How do we test this? I installedtho go-srpm-macros from Rawhide but it > doesn't seem to have the required macros? Yes in rawhide go-compilers and go-srpm-macros are in an intermediary not fully tested/integrated state.

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-27 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson < adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate > rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the maintainer of both > packages and could have rebuilt cups-filters, but just forgot to)

Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

2018-02-27 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On mardi 27 février 2018 15:49:44 CET Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go packaging > in fedora, and since I saw that packages are starting to make use of the > new mechanisms, I wanted to finally check it out and started "co

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-27 Thread Christian Dersch
On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson > mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > > Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and > co-ordinate > rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the maintainer of bo

Add ability to check ABI compliance from fedpkg?

2018-02-27 Thread Richard Shaw
I don't have to do it for many of my packages, but I do regularly check ABI compliance before performing an update so I know if I need to rebuild dependencies or not. Currently my workflow is something like: $ cd abicompare/ $ mkdir $ cd (unpack pakage and -devel package) (same for ) $ abi-com

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-27 Thread Rex Dieter
Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson < > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> >> Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate >> rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the maintainer of both >> packages and could have rebuilt cu

Re: runroot changing during the course of a rawhide pungi run

2018-02-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 02/26/2018 04:59 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 02/26/2018 07:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote >> This is not the case with any of the bodhi enabled releases. They only >> update the buildroot from base packages + stable updates + specific >> packages that are added as buildroot overrides. > > Yeah t

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 12:27 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson < > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate > > rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the maintainer of both

Review Request: swift-lang (Apple's Swift programming language)

2018-02-27 Thread Ron Olson
Hi all- I'm looking for a package review of Apple's Swift programming language: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 I greatly appreciate any and all assistance in getting Swift available on Fedora. Ron ___ devel mailing list -- deve

Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

2018-02-27 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On mardi 27 février 2018 19:39:47 CET you wrote: > > 6) When I finally got the macros right enough for %prep, %build, and > > %install to proceed, the build failed due to missing debuginfo files (and > > warnings about duplicate files) - well, it's a source-only library > > package, > > how do I sp

Re: Review Request: swift-lang (Apple's Swift programming language)

2018-02-27 Thread Ron Olson
I forgot to mention that I'd be willing to do a review-swap for this as well. Ron On 27 Feb 2018, at 14:08, Ron Olson wrote: Hi all- I'm looking for a package review of Apple's Swift programming language: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 I greatly appreciate any and al

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-27 Thread Vinzenz Feenstra
Better late then never, vsqlite++ updated and rebuilt On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 11:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the pr

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 27.93

2018-02-27 Thread Dusty Mabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/27/2018 10:47 AM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.93 > Commit(x86_64): > da0bd968610aa1e29c5bb37065649407fbbfffa53e63831afdadbd34a3b05327 > Commit(aarc

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
Richard Shaw wrote: > Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a > "%global sover " and using it in %files? > > If nothing else it should at least be documented as a best practice. Not yet another bureaucratic guideline making it harder to maintain packages! Hardcoded so

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-27 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Richard Shaw wrote: > > Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a > > "%global sover " and using it in %files? > > > > If nothing else it should at least be documented as a best practice. > > Not yet another bureaucra

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 19:41 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler > wrote: > > > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a > > > "%global sover " and using it in %files? > > > > > > If nothing else it should

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-27 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On 18 February 2018 at 12:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to > random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by analyzing > hundred