On 03/23/2018 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 03/23/2018 04:17 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>> Does anyone know why latest dnf repodata for updates-testing in F27 appears
>> to be missing some packages that were supposed to be pushed? For instance,
>> kernel 4.15.12-301 is there, but latest
Wow! That's what I call a fast turnaround. Before even reading the replies, the
bug was fixed! :-)
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 03/23/2018 05:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 16:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> poppler was updated from 0.62.0-2 to 0.63.0-1 in Rawhide on 2018-03-23.
>> This update bumped the soname from libpoppler.so.73 to libpoppler.so.74.
>> This soname bump was not announced,
On 24 March 2018 at 00:24, Adam Williamson wrote:
[..]
>
> Update - the person who did the bump did rebuild several dependencies,
> but importantly not texlive-base or gdal. We are running those now.
BTW In situations like this is possible to observe how really bad
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Jan Kaluza wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
>>
>> The question here is why don't we actually implement the modularity
>> the simple way.
>>
>> Let's suppose I would like to make nodejs-8
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:24 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Jan Kaluza wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
>>>
>>> The question here is why don't we actually implement the
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 23:13 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:49 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> > On 03/22/2018 01:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM, John Reiser
> >> wrote:
>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 01:49:27PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> 1. ELF binaries
> 2. binary run-time loadable libraries
> 3. script files for scripting language environments (java programs
>could be arguably placed here)
> 4. scripting language libraries
> 5. java applets running in the
Hello everyone,
My name is Pavel Hrdina. I live in Brno and I work for Red Hat
for several years.
I mostly work on libvirt and virt-manager projects and I have some
experience with maintaining downstream packages.
My first package submission is D-Bus binding for libvirt.
tl;dr: Unless someone steps up to maintain Python 2 after 2020, we need
to start dropping python2 packages now.
Python 2.7 will reach end of upstream support on 1st of January, 2020,
after almost 10 years (!) of volunteer maintenance.
Fedora still has more than 3000 packages depending on
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for testing!
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 1:00 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So everything seems to be working fine for me with it, but I did notice
> that the logs are... quite a bit more terse.
>
> Here's the 4 messages I have so far:
>
> Mar 22 16:46:20 taim.scrye.com
Dne 22.3.2018 v 19:08 Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira napsal(a):
> I never packaged something for Fedora before, but can you give me a
> chance to see how is the effort to maintain the package before I adopt
> it?
This should be good place to start your journey:
Hi,
I have a suggestion. After some confusions that I have made related
with notifications with a big delay .
Please add the date of notification on the notification .
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 03/23/2018 04:24 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
> We attempted to keep the logging to a minimum, in particular we try to only
> log in case of a potential problem.
>
> The main log message is terse, but we include a lot of metadata (and we are
> open to adding
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 11/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 210432 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/210432
ID: 210468 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180322.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180323.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:12
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 13
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 127
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 24.20 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 2018-03-23, 11:23 GMT, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> Python 2.7 will reach end of upstream support on 1st of
> January, 2020, after almost 10 years (!) of volunteer
> maintenance.
Just a note of warning: don’t to be too over-eager with dropping
everything Python 2 related in EPEL-7. Its EOS is
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:29 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Just a note of warning: don’t to be too over-eager with dropping
> everything Python 2 related in EPEL-7. Its EOS is only sometime
> after 2024
> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux#Product_life_cycle)
> and
On 03/23/2018 12:23 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
tl;dr: Unless someone steps up to maintain Python 2 after 2020, we need
to start dropping python2 packages now.
Bummer - I am speechless.
Python 2.7 will reach end of upstream support on 1st of January, 2020,
after almost 10 years (!) of volunteer
On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 10:55 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 07:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This
> > version is focused on performance improvements, new API and
> > consolidating the whole software management stack.
> >
On 03/23/2018 07:23 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> In case no one steps up, we'd like to start dropping Python 2 support
> from dependent packages *now*, starting with ported libraries on whose
> python2 version nothing in Fedora depends. (We keep a list of those at
> [1].)
I'm +1 to the idea of
OLD: Fedora-28-20180322.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180323.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On 03/23/2018 04:17 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Does anyone know why latest dnf repodata for updates-testing in F27 appears
> to be missing some packages that were supposed to be pushed? For instance,
> kernel 4.15.12-301 is there, but latest dnsmasq is not and they were
> supposedly pushed at
On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 16:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> poppler was updated from 0.62.0-2 to 0.63.0-1 in Rawhide on 2018-03-23.
> This update bumped the soname from libpoppler.so.73 to libpoppler.so.74.
> This soname bump was not announced, as it is supposed to be.
>
> poppler has many
poppler was updated from 0.62.0-2 to 0.63.0-1 in Rawhide on 2018-03-23.
This update bumped the soname from libpoppler.so.73 to libpoppler.so.74.
This soname bump was not announced, as it is supposed to be.
poppler has many dependencies. This is the list dtardon posted last
time he correctly
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:57:19 -0400, you wrote:
>On 03/23/2018 07:23 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>> In case no one steps up, we'd like to start dropping Python 2 support
>> from dependent packages *now*, starting with ported libraries on whose
>> python2 version nothing in Fedora depends. (We keep a
Hello team,
It looks like both OpenImageIO and opencv failed again as I was unable
to build LuxRender which depends on them.
Could someone investigate the issue?
Thanks.
Ref:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25908143
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E:
Does anyone know why latest dnf repodata for updates-testing in F27 appears to
be missing some packages that were supposed to be pushed? For instance, kernel
4.15.12-301 is there, but latest dnsmasq is not and they were supposedly pushed
at the same time.
I noticed a similar pattern the day
On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 16:12 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> It looks like both OpenImageIO and opencv failed again as I was unable
> to build LuxRender which depends on them.
The problem isn't in either of those, it's this:
DEBUG util.py:439:- package
These three rust crates have changed from a combo "MIT or ASL 2.0"
license to just MIT.
rust-tokio-executor-0.1.1-1.fc29
rust-tokio-reactor-0.1.1-1.fc29
rust-tokio-threadpool-0.1.1-1.fc29
The same change will be coming to rust-tokio-0.1.4 in this update:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 210660 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/210660
ID: 210668 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL:
On 2018-03-23 04:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 16:12 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> Hello team,
>>
>> It looks like both OpenImageIO and opencv failed again as I was unable
>> to build LuxRender which depends on them.
> The problem isn't in either of those, it's this:
>
On 23.3.2018 15:16, Jerry James wrote:
And please don't start dropping python 2 subpackages that are actually
used by other packages in Fedora without talking to the maintainers
first. I just got bitten by this change to python-nose-cov:
* Thu Mar 22 2018 John Dulaney
On 03/22/2018 07:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This
version is focused on performance improvements, new API and
consolidating the whole software management stack.
Please read more details on our blog:
On 03/23/2018 11:07 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Face it, your plan is naive and has failed even before it begun.
This is not useful feedback, and is hostile. Please use only
constructive criticism in the future.
___
devel mailing list --
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 28 Branched 20180323.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 12:20 AM Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018, Christopher wrote:
>
> > I received the following message about a new version of a package, but
> I'm
> > unable to figure out how to change these settings, because I *AM*
> interested
> > in bugs being
On 03/23/2018 08:27 PM, Christopher wrote:
> I received the following message about a new version of a package, but I'm
> unable to figure out how to change these settings, because I *AM*
> interested in bugs being filed (or at least... interested in trying it out).
>
> It also references pkgdb,
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 12:44 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 03/23/2018 08:27 PM, Christopher wrote:
> > I received the following message about a new version of a package, but
> I'm
> > unable to figure out how to change these settings, because I *AM*
> > interested in bugs being
On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 19:15 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 03/23/2018 05:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 16:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > poppler was updated from 0.62.0-2 to 0.63.0-1 in Rawhide on 2018-03-23.
> > > This update bumped the soname from
I received the following message about a new version of a package, but I'm
unable to figure out how to change these settings, because I *AM*
interested in bugs being filed (or at least... interested in trying it out).
It also references pkgdb, but pkgdb is no longer available.
Also, why is this
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018, Christopher wrote:
I received the following message about a new version of a package, but I'm
unable to figure out how to change these settings, because I *AM* interested
in bugs being filed (or at least... interested in trying it out).
It also references pkgdb, but pkgdb
On 03/23/2018 07:36 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 24 March 2018 at 00:24, Adam Williamson wrote:
> [..]
>>
>> Update - the person who did the bump did rebuild several dependencies,
>> but importantly not texlive-base or gdal. We are running those now.
>
> BTW In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
The generator intentionally ignores non-top-level run-time-loaded modules,
indented "require Foo":
my $glob = sub {
my ( $do, $src_glob, @args ) = @_;
local $CPRFComp = 1;
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
983 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
873 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
844
On 03/23/18 17:57, Randy Barlow wrote:
On 03/23/2018 07:23 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
In case no one steps up, we'd like to start dropping Python 2 support
from dependent packages *now*, starting with ported libraries on whose
python2 version nothing in Fedora depends. (We keep a list of those at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533513
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560128
Bug ID: 1560128
Summary: perl-Text-SimpleTable-2.04 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Text-SimpleTable
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560133
Bug ID: 1560133
Summary: perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.88 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-WWW-Mechanize
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
982 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
872 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
844
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1110 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
873 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
455
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.40-3.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c4fb1d3e12
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.40-3.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-051664aa73
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.40-3.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0d1617f491
--
You are receiving
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
873 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
455
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.40-3.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
59 matches
Mail list logo