No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
send me the wireframes too.
On 16 April 2018 at 11:59, Clement Verna wrote:
> On 14 April 2018 at 00:08, Abhishek Sharma
> wrote:
> > Sent you the invite, Umar. Thanks!
> >
> > Will love to see more participation from the community :-)
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 3:29 AM, Umar Parooq
> >
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 28 Branched 20180415.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_tes
On Sun, 2018-04-15 at 00:48 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Saturday, 14 April 2018 at 03:30, po...@pouar.net wrote:
> > golang-github-dsnet-compress
> > httpd
> > php-pecl-http
> > python-httpbin
> > webkit2gtk3
> > woff2
> >
> >
> > So I just announce that I'm updating the pac
OLD: Fedora-28-20180414.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180415.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:10
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 111
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 44.40 MiB
Size of dropped packages:13.25 MiB
Si
Congratulations!
With the fresh blood, I'm looking forward to see my Ruby guidelines
updates [1] reviewed and approved soon ;)
V.
[1] https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/710
Dne 16.4.2018 v 06:17 James Antill napsal(a):
> As a followup we now have ten new members of the FPC:
>
> Mir
I have been requesting the fedora team to remove me from the group distribution
list and it's been around 3-5 months I have been requesting them...
None of them have taken any action.
Can somebody help to sort this out.
Regards
Naseer.
From: Fedora compose checker
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2
I can test too.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:19 AM, mohammad luqman
wrote:
> send me the wireframes too.
>
> On 16 April 2018 at 11:59, Clement Verna wrote:
>
>> On 14 April 2018 at 00:08, Abhishek Sharma
>> wrote:
>> > Sent you the invite, Umar. Thanks!
>> >
>> > Will love to see more particip
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/137 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 28-20180414.n.0):
ID: 223376 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/223376
ID: 223415 Test: x86_
Hi!
During the last weeks we've been experimenting with the Flexible
Metadata Format proof of concept on some real-life components:
There's a small SELinux example showing how FMF could be used for
filtering relevant tests [1], Jakub Krysl successfully used FMF
for generating different device setu
Mea culpa... I was getting cross-eyed on that...
Got that fixed but not being a C++ guy I'm not sure what the next problem
is but perhaps pyCXX changed things between 6.2.8 and 7.0+
Now I'm getting:
[ 26%] Building CXX object
src/App/CMakeFiles/FreeCADApp.dir/GroupExtensionPyImp.cpp.o
cd /buildd
Count me in!
--
Eduard Lucena
Móvil: +56962318010
GNU/Linux User #589060
Ubuntu User #8749
Fedora Marketing Representative
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Richard Shaw wrote on 04/16/2018 10:09 PM:
Mea culpa... I was getting cross-eyed on that...
Got that fixed but not being a C++ guy I'm not sure what the next problem
is but perhaps pyCXX changed things between 6.2.8 and 7.0+
Now I'm getting:
While I may not find out the solution, would you
Look at the mail footer:
"To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org"
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
In [0] it was reported that after installation of pcsc-lite in Fedora,
no smart cards were functioning at the system. After rebooting Fedora
everything was functioning as expected.
The issue is that the pcsc daemon uses a socket-activated unit
which is installed by dnf, but not started (and hence
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180415.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180416.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 26
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:19.14 MiB
OLD: Fedora-28-20180414.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180416.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:9
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 111
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 44.40 MiB
Size of dropped packages:33.33 MiB
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2018-04-17 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00
US/Eastern
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Work
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 11/137 (x86_64), 5/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 28-20180415.n.0):
ID: 223902 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/223902
ID: 223930 Test: x86_64 Wor
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 38/137 (x86_64), 5/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180415.n.0):
ID: 223694 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/223694
ID: 223700 Test
Hi all,
Today, April 17th 2018, is an important day on the Fedora 28
schedule [1], with significant cut-offs.
Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages
which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be
marked as 'stable' and included in the Final compos
On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 22:19 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 11/137 (x86_64), 5/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> New failures (same test did not fail in 28-20180415.n.0):
>
> ID: 223902Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
> URL:
Hi all,
I'm a bit surprised that there's no reply to this fairly explosive
idea. Maybe Nikos' text is too long, so let me summarize:
tl;dr: the proposal is to start services immediately during
installation (in %post), iff they are enabled in presets and the
system is live (not a chroot or such).
On 2018-04-17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I'm a bit surprised that there's no reply to this fairly explosive
> idea. Maybe Nikos' text is too long, so let me summarize:
>
> tl;dr: the proposal is to start services immediately during
> installation (in %post), iff they are enabled in pres
Dne 17.4.2018 v 07:46 Petr Pisar napsal(a):
> Maybe nobody knows how to determine a system is live.
+1
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
25 matches
Mail list logo
