On 24.8.2018 02:53, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hello, Antonio.
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 11:05, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hello everyone.
Python2 Biopython is required by 'python-MDAnalysis' on fedora 30+
(other than 'openms', already modified).
Ask to the maintainer of
On 24.8.2018 09:59, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24.8.2018 02:53, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hello, Antonio.
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 11:05, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hello everyone.
Python2 Biopython is required by 'python-MDAnalysis' on fedora 30+
(other than 'openms', already
On 23/08/18 22:43, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> We've traditionally used the wiki for Change proposals because it's
> the tool we had. But, it's not necessarily well-suited to the purpose.
> But now we have Pagure, which can help address some of the
> shortcomings of using the wiki: poor
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 11:38 David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 23/08/18 22:43, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Hi community,
> >
> > We've traditionally used the wiki for Change proposals because it's
> > the tool we had. But, it's not necessarily well-suited to the purpose.
> > But now we have Pagure, which
Hey guys and gals,
Can we start to discuss this SIG goals? What each of you are expecting?
A few ideas:
- Making https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/More_Go_packaging official and
working on bringing them to EPEL7
- Assigning current Go packages to the SIG so each member of the SIG can work
on
Thanks for the feedback so far. Some of the responses are fairly
similar, so I'll try to clump them together:
> Vote in the Change ticket or a FESCo ticket?
The intent, for now, is to still have FESCo vote in a separate ticket,
mostly for their visibility. Alternatively, I could tag all FESCo
Are there any minutes from this meeting?
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 6:27 AM Clement Verna
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have scheduled our first IRC meeting for this week Thursday (August
> 23, 2018 - 15:00 UTC) on #fedora-containers (freenode) [0]. The
> agenda for this meeting is :
> - everyone
On 2018-08-22, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot
>
> glibc-minimal-langpack is added to @Buildsystem group and installed
> into the minimal buildroot instead of glibc-all-langpacks. Packages
> which need more locales than plain
On 08/23/2018 04:21 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:18 PM Randy Barlow
> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/23/2018 01:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>> OUTPUT: "late December"
>>
>> What about
>>
>>
>> OUTPUT: "late January"
>>
>> OUTPUT: "late February"
>
> Also don't forget
>
>
>
Hi!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ZRAMforARMimages is a change to
automatically create a zram device on memory-constrained systems. It is
implemented using 'zram' package, which uses a service unit and two
bash scripts to implement the starting and stopping of the zram device.
I wanted
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 12:38:48PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On 2018-08-22, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot
> > >
> > > glibc-minimal-langpack is added
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:39:47PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 12:38:48PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > On 2018-08-22, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 12:38:48PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2018-08-22, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot
> >
> > glibc-minimal-langpack is added to @Buildsystem group and installed
> > into the minimal buildroot instead of
Dear all,
The Fedora Infrastructure is running the fedora-tagger [0] service,
however it gets little usage and also has no one really maintaining it
or fixing issues with it. Earlier this year [1] we have tried to
support community members who expressed their interests in maintaining
this
Why not Haskell?
Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not attractive".
C is surely a reliable implementation language for long running system services.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 29/132 (x86_64), 6/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180822.n.0):
ID: 268930 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/268930
ID: 268938 Test: x86_64
On 08/22/2018 04:28 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 05:11:28PM -, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Why not Haskell?
>
> Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not
> attractive".
>
> C is surely a reliable implementation language for long running system
> services.
I love C myself and spend my days
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Why not Haskell?
>
> Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not
> attractive".
Why Haskell? You've provided no reason for Haskell.
Seems to me it's more likely people will be, or can become Rust
competent before
Hi Robert,
Maybe a document with Go packaging guidelines would be very helpful.
Also, it would be good document and maintain gofed as part of the go
packager toolkit.
I don't know if they are all already part of golang-SIG, but I'm in to
help improving the wiki pages.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 5:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:39:47PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 12:38:48PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > > On
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180822.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180823.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:12
Upgraded packages: 122
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 48.24 MiB
Size of dropped packages:
Hello!
Regarding Python2 package removal, 'python2-SCons' needs special
attention, i guess.
It's required for building by many packages on current 'rawhide':
$ dnf repoquery --release rawhide --enablerepo=*-source
--disablerepo=rpmfusion* --whatrequires scons
boswars-0:2.7-15.svn160110.fc28.src
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 01:33:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I've rebased mingw-openssl to match the latest version in Fedora
> Rawhide. This fixes a number of CVEs, but also it's the version with
> the new API.
>
> I have kicked off rebuilds for (hopefully) all dependent packages.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 05:24:25PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 5:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:39:47PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >
On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 20:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:15:53PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 17:11 +, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > Why not Haskell?
> > >
> > > Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is
> >
Hey all! I'm the author of Eternal Terminal, a replacement for ssh that
survives IP roaming & network outages. Michael Salim is an avid Fedora
user and has already created a Fedora package for ET, but I want to make
sure that Fedora is updated ASAP as soon as a new version is out (and
hopefully
Warm welcome, Jason, and thanks for all the work on Eternal Terminal!
I just sponsored Jason to be a Fedora package maintainer (for ET), looking
forward to getting feedback from the community at large (we already have
some dedicated users at work).
Best regards,
Michel
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at
OLD: Fedora-29-20180822.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180823.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 62
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 48.39 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:15:53PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 17:11 +, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > Why not Haskell?
> >
> > Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not
> > attractive".
> >
> > C is surely a reliable implementation language for
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:15:53 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 17:11 +, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/658.html
Is there a list like that for rust?
___
devel mailing list --
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 18/130 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 269161 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/269161
ID: 269171 Test: x86_64
On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 17:11 +, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Why not Haskell?
>
> Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not
> attractive".
>
> C is surely a reliable implementation language for long running
> system services.
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/658.html
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 2:22 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Regarding Python2 package removal, 'python2-SCons' needs special
> attention, i guess.
> It's required for building by many packages on current 'rawhide':
[snip]
> sagemath-0:8.2-4.fc29.src
[snip]
> What's the situation of
I've rebased mingw-openssl to match the latest version in Fedora
Rawhide. This fixes a number of CVEs, but also it's the version with
the new API.
I have kicked off rebuilds for (hopefully) all dependent packages.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 12:16:09PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 11:38 David Sommerseth wrote:
>
> > On 23/08/18 22:43, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > Hi community,
> > >
> > > We've traditionally used the wiki for Change proposals because it's
> > > the tool we had. But, it's
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:52:57PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 23.8.2018 22:43, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >Hi community,
> >
> >We've traditionally used the wiki for Change proposals because it's
> >the tool we had. But, it's not necessarily well-suited to the purpose.
> >But now we have Pagure,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611585
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Any-1.707-1.fc27 |perl-Log-Any-1.707-1.fc27
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611585
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616115
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Coro-Multicore-1.01-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1615176
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Coro-Multicore-1.01-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Dear all,
The Fedora Infrastructure is running the fedora-tagger [0] service,
however it gets little usage and also has no one really maintaining it
or fixing issues with it. Earlier this year [1] we have tried to
support community members who expressed their interests in maintaining
this
On 08/21/2018 11:06 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> I'd start untangling the deps and getting the following in:
>>
>> * six (looking at that one now)
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3-six/pull-request/1
>
>> * pytest
>> * Cython
>> * PyYAML
>> * pip
>> * attrs
>> *
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 3:04 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 08/21/2018 11:06 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd start untangling the deps and getting the following in:
> >>
> >> * six (looking at that one now)
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3-six/pull-request/1
Merged.
>
44 matches
Mail list logo
