On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 07:31:12PM +0300, Vascom wrote:
> I can't switch to any tty.
Also try alt + right-arrow and alt + left-arrow. They switch between text
consoles.
Zbyszek
>
> пт, 21 сент. 2018 г., 19:14 Adam Williamson :
>
> > On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 07:04 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org
Hi,
all packages should be now updated. If you experience broken dependencies, let
me please know.
Jan
On pátek 21. září 2018 13:13:23 CEST Jan Grulich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm updating all Qt 5 packages in rawhide now. Until all this is done, you
> may experience broken dependencies for packages
Adam Williamson wrote:
> While doing this extremely tedious task, it occurred to me to think:
> what the hell is the *point* of these 'optional' entries any more,
> anyway?
They are required for Dnfdragora to list the available packages in a
categorized manner. Dropping them without replacement
Thanks to all. I will try again after two weeks.
сб, 22 сент. 2018 г., 11:18 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 07:31:12PM +0300, Vascom wrote:
> > I can't switch to any tty.
>
> Also try alt + right-arrow and alt + left-arrow. They switch between text
> consoles.
>
>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 07:14:37PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Long (or, in my dreams, medium) term, I want to see the things that are now
> > "Labs" be instead software bundles that can be installed via GNOME Software
> > and other tools.
> When you say 'software bundle' are you thinking of
Antonio Trande wrote:
> Are we ready for excluding python2-future on fedora 30+ ?
I don't think removing migration tools is a good idea if you want to get the
tons of software still using Python 2 migrated to Python 3.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel
Matthew Miller wrote:
> +1, drop 'em.
Could you please consider the impact on the software we ship to our users,
and thus on our users themselves, before rushing to vote, without giving any
kind of rationale, for dropping essential functionality without a
replacement?
Kevin Kofler
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 01:07:27PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> So I see only 2 alternatives:
> a) keep comps as it is now, including optional packages, OR
> b) undeprecate the RPM Group tag, readd it to all Fedora packages, and
>switch back to it.
> Any other plan will completely break
sudo dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide julia
Dependencies resolved.
Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected
packages: dnf
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 01:14:47PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > +1, drop 'em.
> Could you please consider the impact on the software we ship to our users,
> and thus on our users themselves, before rushing to vote, without giving any
> kind of rationale, for dropping essential functionality
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 7:41 AM Neal Becker wrote:
> sudo dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide julia
>
> Dependencies resolved.
>
> Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected
> packages: dnf
>
It looks like the julia package bundles some libraries, but does not
suppress
I just saw a remark on another mailing list about an updated version
of a package I maintain. Sure enough, a new version was released, but
I never got email from release-monitoring.org about it. So I started
checking, and I've got nearly 2 dozen packages with new versions
upstream, but nary an
On 09/22/2018 01:52 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 2:48 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>> This looks to be:
>>
>> https://github.com/release-monitoring/anitya/issues/581
>
> That does indeed look like the issue. Thanks, Adam!
Yep. It's fixed but not yet rolled out to production,
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 7:23 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Antonio Trande wrote:
> > Are we ready for excluding python2-future on fedora 30+ ?
>
> I don't think removing migration tools is a good idea if you want to get the
> tons of software still using Python 2 migrated to Python 3.
>
>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 4:55 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I never thought I would ever ask this, but would it make sense to get
> sagemath into a module? We could pin all the necessary python2 packages
> in the module to the current (or even older?) versions (and don't update
> them to newer versions
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:39:51AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Somewhere halfway between those, in that I've talked with the GNOME
> > > Software
> > > dev about it in the past. Software presents "Categories" and "Featured
> > > Applications" -- the idea would be to extend that into
Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Please file a bug so that we can take a look.
>
> It would be nice to:
> - edit /etc/sssd/sssd.conf
> - add:
>[kcm]
>debug_level = 10
> - systemctl restart sssd # to regenerate the configuration
> - systemctl restart sssd-kcm # restart the KCM deamon
> - attach
On 09/21/2018 06:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
> The old gnome-packagekit, IIRC, also parsed groups and showed you all
> this stuff.
>
> But...we don't do that any more. anaconda does not expose 'optional'
> packages in any way any more (you can only pick environment groups and
> their
We're heading for a Fedora 29 release with a broken coq/frama-c/why3
stack. I've got fixes waiting in the wings, but they're blocked on
these antlr4 bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596974
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599015
Time is running out, and the antlr4
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 4:48 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> Koji seems to be requiring 7 days in -testing for F29. Shouldn't it
> be requiring 3 days at this point?
It should... I wonder what's going on here?
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Michael Schwendt
wrote:
Apparently, this change breaks Google Mail IMAP for Claws Mail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1629151
You'll need to add a call to gnutls_server_name_set(), see:
https://www.gnutls.org/manual/gnutls.html#Server-name-indication
The
On 22.9.2018 22:47, Jerry James wrote:
Koji seems to be requiring 7 days in -testing for F29. Shouldn't it
be requiring 3 days at this point?
I've opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7741 ~3 weeks ago, but I've
got no response.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On 09/22/2018 03:14 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22.9.2018 22:47, Jerry James wrote:
>> Koji seems to be requiring 7 days in -testing for F29. Shouldn't it
>> be requiring 3 days at this point?
>
>
> I've opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7741 ~3 weeks ago, but I've
> got no response.
Ugh.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/132 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 284364 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/284364
ID: 284380 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 6:35 PM Julio González Gil
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> As requested by maintainers guide, I am introducing myself to the community.
>
> I am working as Release Engineer for the last 6 years, and since one year ago
> for SUSE as Release Engineer for SUSE Manager and the
Hi again Neal! :-)
2018-09-23 0:37 GMT+02:00 Neal Gompa :
> Welcome to Fedora! I'm glad to see you here (even if it's not for SUSE
> things). I'll be happy to review your package and sponsor you. :)
>
Well, this initial package (s3fs-fuse) is personal stuff (that's the reason
I am using my
I intent to orphan LabPlot soon. If anyone is interested, I can transfer
this package to that person.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LabPlot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list --
On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 14:29 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> I just saw a remark on another mailing list about an updated version
> of a package I maintain. Sure enough, a new version was released, but
> I never got email from release-monitoring.org about it. So I started
> checking, and I've got
Koji seems to be requiring 7 days in -testing for F29. Shouldn't it
be requiring 3 days at this point?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018, 22:48 Jerry James wrote:
> Koji seems to be requiring 7 days in -testing for F29. Shouldn't it
> be requiring 3 days at this point?
>
I was wondering about that too. All my updates for f29 needed 7 days for
stable, so it looks like something wasn't set up properly for the
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:39:51AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Somewhere halfway between those, in that I've talked with the GNOME Software
> > dev about it in the past. Software presents "Categories" and "Featured
> > Applications" -- the idea would be to extend that into also including
> >
On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 10:26 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 09/21/2018 06:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> ...snip...
> > The old gnome-packagekit, IIRC, also parsed groups and showed you all
> > this stuff.
> >
> > But...we don't do that any more. anaconda does not expose 'optional'
> > packages
On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 13:07 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > While doing this extremely tedious task, it occurred to me to think:
> > what the hell is the *point* of these 'optional' entries any more,
> > anyway?
>
> They are required for Dnfdragora to list the available
On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 07:14:37PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Long (or, in my dreams, medium) term, I want to see the things that are
> > > now
> > > "Labs" be instead software bundles that can be installed via GNOME
> > >
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 2:39 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 13:07 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > While doing this extremely tedious task, it occurred to me to think:
> > > what the hell is the *point* of these 'optional' entries any more,
> > >
Hi everyone,
As requested by maintainers guide, I am introducing myself to the community.
I am working as Release Engineer for the last 6 years, and since one year
ago for SUSE as Release Engineer for SUSE Manager and the community
developed Uyuni [1] (however keep in mind my participation at
On 22.9.2018 22:25, Jerry James wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 10:35 AM Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
Only sagemath worries me in this list since AFAIK there is still some way to
go, for full python3 support upstream.
I wrote about this about a month ago, and then got super busy and
didn't
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:26:06 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> This change enables TLS 1.3 (draft28) support on the gnutls crypto library.
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> That change should have no impact on upgrade or compatibility. The TLS
> 1.3 protocol is designed in a way that does not
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 2:48 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> This looks to be:
>
> https://github.com/release-monitoring/anitya/issues/581
That does indeed look like the issue. Thanks, Adam!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/23/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180922gitefa39cb.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631675
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631676
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628414
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631676
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180920-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631675
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.76-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631675
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.76-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
46 matches
Mail list logo
