On 2/21/19 8:22 PM, Japheth Cleaver wrote:
On 2/20/2019 7:29 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 2/20/19 5:19 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:46 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
No, that was a bad joke from my end, what I need is proper apt in
Fedora to use sbuild.
If you also do t
On 2/19/19 7:04 PM, Raphael Groner wrote:
Hi,
maybe you already noticed, there's a project called pipreqs that parses python
code for import statements. We've already a review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665749
Although, I doubt in general that any automagic with depe
On 2/18/19 9:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
= BuildRequires Generators =
== Summary ==
Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec
file and teach RPM and mock how to handle this.
I am very excited about this ch
On 2/22/19 12:01 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 2/18/19 9:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
= BuildRequires Generators =
== Summary ==
Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec
file and teach RPM and mock how to ha
Hello,
I have orphaned the xcdroast package, feel free to take it or let it die. It
should be rebased but since the upstream version relies on the original
CDDL-licensed cdrtools there will always be some undroppable patches required
I'm afraid.
Regards,
--
Tomáš Smetana
OpenShift Engineering, R
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:01 AM Petr Viktorin wrote:
>
> On 2/18/19 9:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
> >
> > = BuildRequires Generators =
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec
> >
Once upon a time, Petr Viktorin said:
> Yes, automagic generators don't work in the long run. Requirements
> are always better listed explicitly.
Perl has been using automatic generators for ages. They're not perfect,
but they're really good and work fine in the most common cases.
--
Chris Adam
On 2/22/19 2:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:01 AM Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 2/18/19 9:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
= BuildRequires Generators =
== Summary ==
Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies wit
On 2/22/19 1:01 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 2/18/19 9:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
= BuildRequires Generators =
== Summary ==
Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec
file and teach RPM and mock how to handl
Is anyone able to contact Rick? A BZ ticket[1] has not gotten a response
from some time.
Use fedora-active-user it looks like he's logged in recently but all other
activity has been from last year:
$ ./fedora_active_user.py --user codeblock --email rel...@redhat.com
Last login in FAS:
codebloc
As we've now reached the branch point, it's time to start weekly
blocker status mails.
Action summary
=
Accepted blockers
-
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672761
ACTION: QA / dm-multipath team to verify the fix is fully complete
2. https://bugzilla.r
There will be an outage starting at 2019-02-26 20:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-02-26 20:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
Fedora Infrastructure would like to u
There will be an outage starting at 2019-02-27 20:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 4-6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-02-27 20:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
Fedora Infrastructure would like to
I'm here, I'm here. ;)
Richard, would it be okay if I add you as a committer/comaintainer on
that package? As you can tell, I have not had time to properly
maintain it of late.
Rick
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:26 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Is anyone able to contact Rick? A BZ ticket[1] has not g
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 2:19 PM Rick Elrod wrote:
> I'm here, I'm here. ;)
>
> Richard, would it be okay if I add you as a committer/comaintainer on
> that package? As you can tell, I have not had time to properly
> maintain it of late.
>
That'll work. Thanks!
Richard
_
Add -fsigned-char fix the build thanks, I still not understood, why only
ppc64le and GCC 9
A 22 de fevereiro de 2019 07:05:25 WET, Florian Weimer
escreveu:
>* Jerry James:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 7:28 PM Sérgio Basto
>wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm trying fix a FTBFS of gdcm , but just in ppc64l
Upstream ISPC [0] will need a dockerfile to reproduce the failure to
build ispc package in Fedora[1][2]. Unfortunately, I know very little
about the Docker functionality so I will need assistance to do so.
The docker file for Fedora is inside the upstream tarball .
Thanks in advance.
Luya
Refer
Does Fedora support the Intel 82801 RST (fake)RAID chip used in Lenovo's newest
ThinkPad P72? No F29 installer can see the two 2T SSDs setup as a RAID1 mirror,
either as a /dev/mdN array or individually as /dev/sdX or /dev/nvmeN. Adam
Williamson suggested I put this question to #fedora-devel. I
18 matches
Mail list logo
