Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

On 01. 03. 19 22:19, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhideSinglePackageUpdates == Summary == We want to gate packages on test results before they can land in rawhide. This will reduce the amount of broken dependency, uninstallable packages and broken composes

Re: /dev/net/tun no longer exists in F31 rawhide ?

On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 14:07 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > Historically in Fedora the /dev/net/tun device always existed, even if > there is no 'tun' module currently loaded. Opening it then cause the > 'tun' kernel module to autoload IIUC. > > In Fedora 31 rawhide this is no longer the case.

Removing "hawkey.Repo" class from pythonX-hawkey

Hi, as was announced on DevConf.cz 2019 (https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/devconfcz2019/20/Future%20of%20the%20DNF%20package%20management%20stack.pdf) we are working on unified architecture of DNF stack. Finally the plan will lead in removal of hawkey subpackages (Python2/3) from libdnf

Re: /dev/net/tun no longer exists in F31 rawhide ?

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 02:23:12PM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 18/03/2019 14:07, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > Historically in Fedora the /dev/net/tun device always existed, even if > > there is no 'tun' module currently loaded. Opening it then cause the > > 'tun' kernel module to autoload

Re: /dev/net/tun no longer exists in F31 rawhide ?

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 02:33:20PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 02:23:12PM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > > On 18/03/2019 14:07, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > > > Historically in Fedora the /dev/net/tun device always existed, even if > > > there is no 'tun' module

Re: [HEADS UP] Eclipse dropping 32-bit arches

On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 15:29, Mat Booth wrote: > The Eclipse Platform upstream is in the process of dropping all support > for 32bit arches. > > The current state is that upstream are no longer building for 32bit arches > upstream for 4.10 (release 2018-12) onwards. I expect them to start >

Re: /dev/net/tun no longer exists in F31 rawhide ?

On 18/03/2019 14:07, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: Historically in Fedora the /dev/net/tun device always existed, even if there is no 'tun' module currently loaded. Opening it then cause the 'tun' kernel module to autoload IIUC. It doesn't just exist.. There is a systemd service

Re: sway SIG

I am interested in joining as well. On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:37 AM Jan Staněk wrote: > Before the social UNIX fallacy [1] kicks in, let me say that I'm > interested in joining, and thank you for your activity ;) > > As a side note, a taiga board was noted in the sway bug discussion; > as I

Re: sway SIG

Before the social UNIX fallacy [1] kicks in, let me say that I'm interested in joining, and thank you for your activity ;) As a side note, a taiga board was noted in the sway bug discussion; as I have recently found out, the Fedora one is invite only – is there anyone with access to invite

Re: Reviewing a package with an rpmfusion dependency

On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 21:53 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > I was just looking at reviewing this package: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684950 > > It is a Go wrapper around ffprobe, which is in the ffmpeg package, > which is in rpmfusion-free. The package can be built without >

Re: hdf5, netcdf, and vtk updates coming to Rawhide today

On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 8:59 AM Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm updating: > > hdf5 to 1.10.5 > netcdf to 4.6.3 > vtk to 8.2 > I'm assuming that's the cause of my failed FreeCAD build... DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides

/dev/net/tun no longer exists in F31 rawhide ?

Historically in Fedora the /dev/net/tun device always existed, even if there is no 'tun' module currently loaded. Opening it then cause the 'tun' kernel module to autoload IIUC. In Fedora 31 rawhide this is no longer the case. The /dev/net/tun device node doesn't exist at all in a fresh install.

[Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]

After thinking , my suggestion is do not retire any java package. These package should be take by java sig . Forwarded Message From: Miro Hrončok Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org,

sway SIG

Hi all, there's been a rising number of people interested in sway, the i3-compatible Wayland compositor. At the same time, with the recent sway 1.0 release, the packaging work is also increasing, as more and more components are split into separate projects. For this reason, we thought about

Re: /dev/net/tun no longer exists in F31 rawhide ?

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 2:23 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 14:07 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Historically in Fedora the /dev/net/tun device always existed, even if > > there is no 'tun' module currently loaded. Opening it then cause the > > 'tun' kernel module to

Re: Help us test FedoraReview on Python 3

On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 14:21 +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > No matching package to install: 'R-mapproj' -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2019-03-18)

= #fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-03-18) = Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:14 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-03-18/fesco.2019-03-18-15.00.log.html . Meeting

Re: Reviewing a package with an rpmfusion dependency

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:15 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 21:53 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > > I was just looking at reviewing this package: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684950 > > > > It is a Go wrapper around ffprobe, which is in the ffmpeg package, >

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:34:23AM +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote: > On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 19:36 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 23:48:49 +0100, you wrote: > > > > > * Richard W.M. Jones [15/03/2019 20:23] : > > > > Is Java being dropped from the distro? > > > > > > Yes, that's

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190318.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190317.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190318.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 111 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: sway SIG

On 18/03/19 16:22 +0100, Till Hofmann wrote: > there's been a rising number of people interested in sway, the > i3-compatible Wayland compositor. At the same time, with the recent sway > 1.0 release, the packaging work is also increasing, as more and more > components are split into separate

Fedora Rawhide-20190318.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 7 of 47 required tests failed, 8 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 25/141 (x86_64), 5/24

Re: Copr is going to remove build data from end-of-life chroots

The initial batch of emails has been sent, so if you use Copr for some time and have packages built for F27 and lesser, or EPEL5, you should check your inbox for a message with the following subject [Copr] upcoming deletion of outdated chroots in your projects It was established, that the

Re: sway SIG

Hello, I'm interested as well! > As a side note, a taiga board was noted in the sway bug discussion; > as I have recently found out, the Fedora one is invite only – is there > anyone with access to invite others, if there is interest? There is an ongoing effort to make taiga a first-class

Re: sway SIG

On 3/18/19 11:12 AM, Timothée Floure wrote: > Hello, > > I'm interested as well! > >> As a side note, a taiga board was noted in the sway bug discussion; >> as I have recently found out, the Fedora one is invite only – is there >> anyone with access to invite others, if there is interest? > >

Re: hdf5, netcdf, and vtk updates coming to Rawhide today

On 3/18/19 9:28 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 8:59 AM Orion Poplawski > wrote: > > I'm updating: > > hdf5 to 1.10.5 > netcdf to 4.6.3 > vtk to 8.2 > > > I'm assuming that's the cause of my failed FreeCAD build... > > DEBUG

Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future

Le lundi 18 mars 2019 à 04:55 -0400, Jakub Cajka a écrit : Hi, > Golist exist based > on Nicolas's initial requests and requirements(created based on them > by jchaloupka in his free time over one year ago), This is quite a simplistic way to present things, which is injust to Jan and to me. I

Re: [Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]

On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:45:49 +, you wrote: > >After thinking , my suggestion is do not retire any java package. > >These package should be take by java sig . That's nice, who exactly is this Java sig you have kindly decided should take on this significant undertaking? My (limited)

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-03-19 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Team. More information available at: [Modularity Team

Re: [Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]

On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 19:06 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:45:49 +, you wrote: > > > > > After thinking , my suggestion is do not retire any java package. > > > > These package should be take by java sig . > > That's nice, who exactly is this Java sig you have

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On 18. 03. 19 22:58, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: The actual effect of this is that I'm going to disable Java bindings for all the affected packages. Java loses, Fedora loses. Everybody looses :( -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 3:36:47 PM > Subject: Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future > > On dimanche 17 mars 2019 09:29:28 CET Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le dimanche 17 mars

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 19:36 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 23:48:49 +0100, you wrote: > > > * Richard W.M. Jones [15/03/2019 20:23] : > > > Is Java being dropped from the distro? > > > > Yes, that's what we were warned about months ago. > > Don't think so. > > Nothing has

Self Introduction: Hirotaka Wakabayashi

Hello, My name is Hirotaka Wakabayashi. I would like to contribute to the Fedora Project. My goal in the Fedora Project is to learn the Fedora package review process and the QA process and to enlarge the community in Japan if I could. I am a software engineer in Tokyo. In this 10 years, I have

Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaning rubygem-kaminari

Hi everybody, I don't have any use for rubygem-kaminari, therefore I orphaned the package. I am not really sure if it works, since the test suite was disabled. Update to the newer version would reuqire to introduce 3 new dependencies, so it currently ships in quite obsolete version. Vít

libargon2 soname change

Hi, we are going to build new libargon2 in Fedora rawhide to version 20171227 with soname bump. These are affected packages: R-argon2 cryptsetup-libs keepassxc php php-cli php-dbg php-embedded php-fpm uwsgi-plugin-php yapet We are going to rebuild all affected packages once new libargon2 build

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 05:35, Jakub Jelen wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 19:36 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 23:48:49 +0100, you wrote: > > > > > * Richard W.M. Jones [15/03/2019 20:23] : > > > > Is Java being dropped from the distro? > > > > > > Yes, that's what we

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2019-03-18)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-03-18 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

[Bug 1689355] perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.036 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689355 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1689253] perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.035-2.fc31 FTBFS: t/04_merge_move_copy_delete_lexicon_utf-8.t fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689253 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[389-devel] please review: PR 50290 - UI - fix various issues around database tab

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50290 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html

Re: [HEADS UP] Eclipse dropping 32-bit arches

On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 15:29, Mat Booth wrote: > The Eclipse Platform upstream is in the process of dropping all support > for 32bit arches. > > The current state is that upstream are no longer building for 32bit arches > upstream for 4.10 (release 2018-12) onwards. I expect them to start >

[Bug 1689776] ack-2.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689776 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1689776] ack-2.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689776 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- ack-2.26-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0c7d8fbdd2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1689776] ack-2.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689776 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- ack-2.26-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1404a9dbe3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1689656] perl-Net-SSH2-0.70 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689656 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1690193] New: perl-CPAN-2.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690193 Bug ID: 1690193 Summary: perl-CPAN-2.26 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CPAN Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-03-19 - 87% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/03/19/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.1-20190319git33fbced.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1689776] ack-2.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689776 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- ack-2.26-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing

[Bug 1687224] perl-Sub-Quote-2.006003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687224 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1689776] ack-2.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689776 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- ack-2.26-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-304f0c2818 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1689776] ack-2.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689776 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 1689776] ack-2.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689776 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- ack-2.26-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for

[Bug 1689253] perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.035-2.fc31 FTBFS: t/04_merge_move_copy_delete_lexicon_utf-8.t fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689253 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.036-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e270ee2a80 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1689450] perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-Util-4.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689450 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-Util-4.002-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-25f820bdd7 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1689618] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-2.046 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689618 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1689450] perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-Util-4.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689450 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1689656] perl-Net-SSH2-0.70 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689656 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Net-SSH2-0.70-1.fc31 -- You

[Bug 1689665] perl-App-cpm-0.979 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689665 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1689355] perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.036 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689355 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.036-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e270ee2a80 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1689656] perl-Net-SSH2-0.70 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689656 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 1689656] perl-Net-SSH2-0.70 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689656 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-SSH2-0.70-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-745be2c9c5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1689665] perl-App-cpm-0.979 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689665 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-App-cpm-0.979-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-70e7bd3f00 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1689608] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000119 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689608 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1689608] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000119 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689608 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test2-Suite-0.000119-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c9bdc489e7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on