OLD: Fedora-30-20190326.n.0
NEW: Fedora-30-20190329.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:7
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:36
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:1.25 GiB
Size
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 7/144 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 374065 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374065
ID: 374077 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso
On 3/29/19 12:23 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 29/03/2019 16:17, Robert Marcano wrote:
I have been working on a private RPM for a Rust based program and
noticed that the RPM strip scripts are not reducing the binaries files
like when I execute strip directly on those binaries.
The first thing I
On 3/29/19 1:44 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
On 3/29/19 9:17 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
I have been working on a private RPM for a Rust based program
Side note on this -- if you do package Rust shared libraries, not just
executables, and you want them to be available for further linking, then
rustc
On 3/29/19 9:17 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
> I have been working on a private RPM for a Rust based program
Side note on this -- if you do package Rust shared libraries, not just
executables, and you want them to be available for further linking, then
rustc needs to have the metadata in the .rustc
On 29/03/2019 16:17, Robert Marcano wrote:
I have been working on a private RPM for a Rust based program and
noticed that the RPM strip scripts are not reducing the binaries files
like when I execute strip directly on those binaries.
The first thing I checked is the brp-strip script. This
I have been working on a private RPM for a Rust based program and
noticed that the RPM strip scripts are not reducing the binaries files
like when I execute strip directly on those binaries.
The first thing I checked is the brp-strip script. This one is filtering
executables where "file"
Dne 29. 03. 19 v 19:47 John Florian napsal(a):
> I know it's not unusual to carry builds over from prior releases. My
> understanding is that happens because there was no mass rebuild.
> However, when I look at the F29 repo I see
> rubygem-puppet-lint-1.1.0-2.fc23.noarch.rpm. Was there really
I know it's not unusual to carry builds over from prior releases. My
understanding is that happens because there was no mass rebuild.
However, when I look at the F29 repo I see
rubygem-puppet-lint-1.1.0-2.fc23.noarch.rpm. Was there really no mass
rebuild between F23 and F29? This package is
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 05:03:23PM +0100, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:04:53PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 06:07:05PM +0100, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> > > because rpm automatically adds something like:
> > >
> > > libfoo.so.1()(64bit)
> > >
Hi everybody,
It looks like the first round of orphans has been taken in by our SIG - this
seemed to be a good time to do inventory and think about how to proceed.
Status Report
-
First of all, I've written a small script [0] that produces a simple HTML page
of the current status
On 3/29/19 2:58 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 29. 03. 19 v 19:47 John Florian napsal(a):
>> I know it's not unusual to carry builds over from prior releases. My
>> understanding is that happens because there was no mass rebuild.
>> However, when I look at the F29 repo I see
>>
On 2019-03-28 12:47 p.m., Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> > > Pass the correct Python version to cmake: > > %cmake \ >
-DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE:BOOL=TRUE \ > -DBOOST_ROOT=%{_prefix} \ >
-DLUXRAYS_DISABLE_OPENCL=0 \ > -DPYTHON_V=%{python3_version_nodots} \ >
.. Done
> > > You'll need to apply the
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 5:24 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:46 PM Christopher
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 9:50 AM Mikolaj Izdebski
> > wrote:
> > > - javapackages-tools, stream 201801 (buildroot-only module, not
> > > intended to be delivered to users)
>
Hi everyone,
My name is Venkata Rama Koundinya Lanka. I am currently pursuing my final
year of engineering at Vasireddy Venkatadri Institute of Technology, Andhra
Pradesh. My skills include python, Java, Android, and Machine Learning. I
would like to contribute to* Fedora Gooey Karma* project
On 29/03/19 08:40, Michal Konecny wrote:
On 28/03/19 20:14, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On Thursday, 28 March 2019 19:38:30 CET Michal Konecny wrote:
I found out what is wrong, you created the project without Fedora
mapping, so the first version was retrieved without knowing how this is
On 28/03/19 20:14, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On Thursday, 28 March 2019 19:38:30 CET Michal Konecny wrote:
I found out what is wrong, you created the project without Fedora
mapping, so the first version was retrieved without knowing how this is
packaged in Fedora. But I see, that the
On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 00:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 20. 03. 19 9:57, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > I've gone ahead with my proposal and created the Stewardship SIG.
> >
> > This includes the SIGs/Stewardship wiki page [0], the @stewardship-
> > sig
> > FAS group [1], to which high-priority
Dne 28. 03. 19 v 14:53 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a):
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 8:44 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Trying to take look from the other side, the java.yaml might need some
>> love [1], because the GH links are broken [2, 3]
> java module doesn't have any complete builds. It is not actively
Hi, Mikolaj,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:24 AM Mikolaj Izdebski
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:46 PM Christopher
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 9:50 AM Mikolaj Izdebski
> wrote:
> > > - javapackages-tools, stream 201801 (buildroot-only module, not
> > > intended to be delivered
On 29. 03. 19 10:31, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On Friday, 29 March 2019 09:30:31 CET Michal Konecny wrote:
Could you send me the list of projects you added? I will manually
refresh them.
I was right, there is missing message call in API code for adding new
package mapping. I created
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:46 PM Christopher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 9:50 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > - javapackages-tools, stream 201801 (buildroot-only module, not
> > intended to be delivered to users)
>
> How do I enable/install this module locally? It would be very helpful
>
On Friday, 29 March 2019 09:30:31 CET Michal Konecny wrote:
> >
> >
> > Could you send me the list of projects you added? I will manually
> > refresh them.
>
>
> I was right, there is missing message call in API code for adding new
> package mapping. I created issue for it here
>
On 29/03/19 10:31, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On Friday, 29 March 2019 09:30:31 CET Michal Konecny wrote:
Could you send me the list of projects you added? I will manually
refresh them.
I was right, there is missing message call in API code for adding new
package mapping. I created issue
On Friday, 29 March 2019 10:33:36 CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 03. 19 10:31, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 29 March 2019 09:30:31 CET Michal Konecny wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Could you send me the list of projects you added? I will manually
> >>> refresh them.
> >>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694100
Bug ID: 1694100
Summary: Upgrade perl-Class-Inspector to 1.34
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Class-Inspector
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50312
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694100
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693934
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688874
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690939
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-LWP-MediaTypes-6.04-1. |perl-LWP-MediaTypes-6.04-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690653
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690560
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687067
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688059
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688060
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679574
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686247
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686178
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-libwww-perl-6.37-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680399
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685532
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Pod-Tests-1.20-1.fc29 |perl-Pod-Tests-1.20-1.fc29
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690193
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-2.26-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679596
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689665
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689656
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-SSH2-0.70-1.fc31 |perl-Net-SSH2-0.70-1.fc31
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689776
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|ack-2.26-1.fc28 |ack-2.26-1.fc28
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687197
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-ExtUtils-Manifest-1.72 |perl-ExtUtils-Manifest-1.72
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1682908
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687224
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Sub-Quote-2.006003-1.f |perl-Sub-Quote-2.006003-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687209
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685531
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Type-Tie-0.014-1.fc29 |perl-Type-Tie-0.014-1.fc29
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685928
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689253
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689450
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689355
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689608
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689528
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691349
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694239
Bug ID: 1694239
Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.07 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692229
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.14
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
104 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7556983e8
tomcat-7.0.92-1.el6
28 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-06b243cced
guacamole-server-1.0.0-1.el6
9
61 matches
Mail list logo
