John you're comparing apples and oranges. One is active the other is
passive. One uses your space allocation the other doesn't.
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019, 19:07 John Harris wrote:
> On Friday, August 30, 2019 5:40:22 AM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > You just explained exactly why it was
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:51 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > Well, technically, the correct thing to do would be for Mock to
> > support downloading bootstrap images to speed up bootstrap. These
> > images could be regularly produced by Fedora infrastructure and made
> > available
* Neal Gompa:
> Well, technically, the correct thing to do would be for Mock to
> support downloading bootstrap images to speed up bootstrap. These
> images could be regularly produced by Fedora infrastructure and made
> available on the mirror network for all targets we support as a
> project.
Recently, I requested to retire Skychart module and this has been done
in F31 and F32:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8640
Now I'm trying to push an update to Skychart classic RPMs, Koji shows it
as tagged both in F30-updates-testing and F31-updates-testing, but
there's no sign of them in the
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190831.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190901.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.04 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:31 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Kevin Fenzi:
>
> > On 8/29/19 11:44 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >> Dne 29. 08. 19 v 18:58 Kamil Dudka napsal(a):
> >>> What is the recommended way to build Fedora 31+ RPMs on a RHEL-7 host?
> >>
> >> I think that no one contemplate
* Kevin Fenzi:
> On 8/29/19 11:44 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> Dne 29. 08. 19 v 18:58 Kamil Dudka napsal(a):
>>> What is the recommended way to build Fedora 31+ RPMs on a RHEL-7 host?
>>
>> I think that no one contemplate supporting RHEL 7 regarding zstd. The real
>> thing is "how to build
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/142 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190831.n.0):
ID: 439634 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/439634
ID: 439708 Test: x86_64
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 7:16 AM wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 6:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia
> wrote:
> > If 30 years in DevOps and system security in both large and small
> > networks count for anything, this makes *complete* sense. The
> > distinction between a "Workstation" deployment and a
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:52 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > Well, technically, the correct thing to do would be for Mock to
> > support downloading bootstrap images to speed up bootstrap. These
> > images could be regularly produced by Fedora infrastructure and made
> > available
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 6:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia
wrote:
If 30 years in DevOps and system security in both large and small
networks count for anything, this makes *complete* sense. The
distinction between a "Workstation" deployment and a "Server" or
"Everything" deployment should not include
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
10 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED:
OLD: Fedora-31-20190831.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20190901.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
I've orphaned jsch-agent-proxy, previously maintained by the Stewardship SIG.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Per this suggestion [1] by hakavlad (Alexey Avramov), I did a single
test with earlyoom, a user space service that's already packaged for
Fedora. I have not yet tested nohang, also mentioned.
I chose a configuration that has fairly consistently (>80%) resulted
in a total hang for more than 30m.
Hi,
Fix stack overflow in: `inotifytools_replace_filename`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741472
Not sure how to fix this crashing bug. Upstream is dead while Fedora package
maintainer requires to upstream the fix first. A Catch 22.
Debian has the crasher fixed by an off-trunk
* Nico Kadel-Garcia:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:52 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>> * Neal Gompa:
>>
>> > Well, technically, the correct thing to do would be for Mock to
>> > support downloading bootstrap images to speed up bootstrap. These
>> > images could be regularly produced by Fedora
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:47 PM Emery Berger wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, my research group attacked basically exactly this
> problem some time ago. We built a modified Linux kernel that we called
> Redline that was utterly resilient to fork bombs, malloc bombs, and so on. No
> process
Hello,
Being one of the biggest users of Modularity (more than 25 modules)
I'm surprised that:
1) Many builds are stuck for more than half a month
(https://mbs.fedoraproject.org/module-build-service/1/module-builds/5639,
13 Aug)
2) F32 branching was not handled well, basically all Rust modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(cpanc...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746993
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-fabd190d13
clamav-0.101.4-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
disktype-9-29.el8
icewm-1.6.1-4.el8
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
383 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
159 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294
cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7
125
Hey all,
RC images have been pushed: https://hub.docker.com/r/389ds/dirsrv
I'll try to accomodate as much feedback as possible, aiming for 1.4.2 to be out
first fully supported release. Sounds okay?
> On 29 Aug 2019, at 12:55, William Brown wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been wanting this for
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/09/02/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-20190901git0c94f21.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-af80b147c4
python-mitogen-0.2.8-1.el6
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-54cf4d603d
seamonkey-2.49.5-1.el6
2
26 matches
Mail list logo
