Re: Intent to orphan dblatex (asciidoc dependency)

From asciidoc perspective, dblatex is quite important for generating PDF files (even it's called just via shell method). I have contacted asciidoc upstream (asciidoc-py3 to be precised) with question about dblatex replacement. I'll let you know once they reply. Josef Ridky Software Engineer

Re: Intent to orphan dblatex (asciidoc dependency)

But due FOP doesn't use Latex, its configuration is different and FOP output looks very different to the Latex output, it would be probably better to request Python2 exception for dblatex (or rewrite it to Python3). Josef Ridky Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. -

Re: Intent to orphan dblatex (asciidoc dependency)

On 03/09/19 18:34 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 03/09/19 09:57 -0600, Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:37 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: This is to let you know that I intend to orphan dblatex. Note that the gcc package uses dblatex to build libstdc++ documentation. We as a

Re: Intend to orphan i3 and some related packages

Christian Dersch writes: > Hi, > > I intend to orphan the packages related to i3 window manager: > > * i3 > > * i3lock > > * i3status > > * i3-ipc > I'll take the i3 stack, since I have not yet migrated to sway completely. I'd be however more than happy to share the maintenance with others. >

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:46 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le 2019-09-03 18:52, Kyle Marek a écrit : > > > Additionally, binding to a specific address does not handle dynamic > > networks very well. > > Simplify that to binding to a specific address does not handle network > very well,

Re: Intent to orphan dblatex (asciidoc dependency)

So good news, asciidoc(-py3) is already using FOP as second option for generating PDF files. So it just need to be set as default option instead of dblatex and all should be fine. Josef Ridky Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. - Original Message - | From:

Re: powertop vs upower, troubleshooting battery remaining

Hi, On 03-09-19 17:29, Chris Murphy wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:13 AM Hans de Goede wrote: Hi Chris, On 03-09-19 01:47, Chris Murphy wrote: This is an hp spectre running Fedora 30 Workstation. On Fedora 29, there was fairly close agreement between powertop and upower and the time

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 17:14 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote: > > After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ... > all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC. Hey Dario. Since in recent days I was testing and evaluating Samba as an AD domain controller, but using another

Re: Intend to orphan i3 and some related packages

Am 04.09.19 um 12:09 schrieb František Šumšal: On 9/4/19 12:02 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: I intend to orphan the packages related to i3 window manager Hello! I'd definitely take the dmenu package if there's no-one else! Thanks, dmenu is yours now :)

Re: Intend to orphan i3 and some related packages

Am 04.09.19 um 12:36 schrieb Dan Čermák: Christian Dersch writes: Hi, I intend to orphan the packages related to i3 window manager: * i3 * i3lock * i3status * i3-ipc I'll take the i3 stack, since I have not yet migrated to sway completely. I'd be however more than happy to share the

Orphaning pylint and its requirements python-astroid and python-lazy-object-proxy

Hi, I intend to orphan pylint, python-astroid and python-lazy-object-proxy (both required by pylint), anybody interested in taking them? Greetings Christian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Intend to orphan i3 and some related packages

On 9/4/19 12:02 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: > I intend to orphan the packages related to i3 window manager Hello! I'd definitely take the dmenu package if there's no-one else! -- Frantisek Sumsal GPG key ID: 0xFB738CE27B634E4B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

Le 2019-09-03 18:52, Kyle Marek a écrit : Additionally, binding to a specific address does not handle dynamic networks very well. Simplify that to binding to a specific address does not handle network very well, since everything is dynamic nowadays, on desktops, phones or servers (servers

Intend to orphan i3 and some related packages

Hi, I intend to orphan the packages related to i3 window manager: * i3 * i3lock * i3status * i3-ipc * dzen2 * dmenu Anybody here interested in taking them? Otherwise I'll orphan them on Friday. Greetings Christian ___ devel mailing list --

Fedora-Rawhide-20190904.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 10 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED:

Re: round up of failing f31 (branched) images

On 04. 09. 19 1:00, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Python-Classroom Packaging issue: 09:35:05,489 WRN packaging: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides python3.7dist(matplotlib) < 3.1 needed by mu-1.0.2-3.fc31.noarch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747415

[ABRT] Intent to put abrt-hook-ccpp to rest

Hello, fellow humans, Since nowadays pretty much everyone has systemd-coredump in their /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern[1][2], I would like to remove the custom ABRT hook that does largely the same thing. If anyone has made a conscious decision to keep using it, please let us know. [1] -

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On ke, 04 syys 2019, alcir...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 17:14 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote: After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ... all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC. Hey Dario. Since in recent days I was testing and evaluating Samba as

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190904.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190903.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190904.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:110 Upgraded packages: 116 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 330.04 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: inotify-tools with dead upstream cannot be fixed in Fedora

On Mon, 02 Sep 2019 23:33:32 +0200, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 09:33:29PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > Fix stack overflow in: `inotifytools_replace_filename` > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741472 > > > > Not sure how to fix this crashing bug.

Fedora 31 compose report: 20190904.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-31-20190903.n.0 NEW: Fedora-31-20190904.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 1 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: New version of Copr

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:29 PM Dominik Turecek wrote: > Hello. > > Today, we have released a new version of Copr. > Main highlights from the release was the addition > of discussion panels in Copr projects and speed > optimization of front page. > The discussion page is a neat idea. For some

Re: Unannounced libproj soname bump

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 7:52 AM Tom Hughes wrote: > > > A similar issue is in Fedora 31 where the rebuilds should go to proj > > update . > > Doing it in F31 this late is especially problematic... > Looks like the update should be

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:47 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 04. 09. 19 14:12, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Be advised that clojure has failed to build since fedora 23, according to > > koji. > > I wonder why it hasn't been retired at some point ... > > The mass rebuild was not attempted at all.

Minimization Team Meeting notes 2019-09-04

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-04/minimization.2019-09-04-15.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-04/minimization.2019-09-04-15.00.txt Log:

Re: BackupPC selinux help

On 2019-09-04 10:40, Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 9:36 AM John Florian > wrote: On 2019-08-30 13:51, Richard Shaw wrote: > He's already tried restorecon, changed from a symlink to a bind mount > (for the backup root)... Maybe a

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 12:01 PM Kyle Marek wrote: > > I'm finding that 32G is not necessarily sufficient for compiling clang > itself. Similarly I've had a hard time compiling UnrealEngine from > source. I usually see ld using up to 12G of memory to link each > artifact. Using -j$(nproc) on a 16

Open NeuroFedora Meeting agenda for 2019-09-05

Hello, Please join us for the weekly Open NeuroFedora team meeting tomorrow. Details below: - Forwarded message - > > Hi all! > > You are kindly invited to attend the Open NeuroFedora team meeting this week > on Thursday (tomorrow) at 1500UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode): > >    

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On 9/3/19 12:30 AM, John Harris wrote: > On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 10:48:06 PM MST John Harris wrote: >> On Sunday, August 18, 2019 4:33:47 AM MST Gordan Bobic wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:36 AM wrote: >>> This seems like a distraction from the real goal here, which is to

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Fabio Valentini writes: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:41 PM Markku Korkeala wrote: >> >> Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 2019-09-02 13:00: >> > clojure kushal, orphan, s4504kr, 1 >> > weeks ago >> > salimma, walters >> >> I would like to

Fedora-31-20190904.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 16/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190903.n.0): ID: 442020 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/442020 Old failures (same test failed in

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 4:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Package (co)maintainers Status > Change > [snip] > libsvmbesser82, orphan

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

per cgroup swap file support https://lwn.net/Articles/591495/ This might be interesting. What happens if swap is only assigned to new unprivileged tasks? Your compile might take three days but it doesn't make the GUI fall over? *shrug* --- Chris Murphy

Minimization Objective report

This is the Minimization Objective [0] update. Status: Discovery phase == Feedback Pipeline == A prototype is live [1]! It shows packages and an overall size of use cases we are focusing on, installed on top of various Fedora bases. In addition to showing the current status, it will be also

Re: [ABRT] Intent to put abrt-hook-ccpp to rest

If you no longer plan to add the feature for generating backtraces without writing core files to disk, then abrt-hook-ccpp is pretty much useless - IMHO. -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Ernestas Kulik Komu: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Datum: 4. 9. 2019 10:06:05 Předmět: [ABRT]

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

* Kyle Marek: > I'm finding that 32G is not necessarily sufficient for compiling clang > itself. Similarly I've had a hard time compiling UnrealEngine from > source. I usually see ld using up to 12G of memory to link each > artifact. Using -j$(nproc) on a 16 VCPU system amplifies the issue. I >

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

Alexander Bokovoy writes: > On ke, 04 syys 2019, alcir...@gmail.com wrote: >>On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 17:14 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote: >>> >>> After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ... >>> all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC. >> >> Hey Dario. >> Since in

Re: New version of Copr

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 5:28:08 AM MST Dominik Turecek wrote: > Hello. > > Today, we have released a new version of Copr. > Main highlights from the release was the addition > of discussion panels in Copr projects and speed > optimization of front page. > > For more information, see: >

Re: Intend to orphan i3 and some related packages

Christian Dersch writes: > Am 04.09.19 um 12:36 schrieb Dan Čermák: > > Thanks! i3 packages are yours now. Are you also interested in dzen2? It > is required by i3. Ugh, I was hoping that it wasn't... But in that case: yes, please give it to me too, otherwise taking over i3 is futile.

New version of Copr

Hello. Today, we have released a new version of Copr. Main highlights from the release was the addition of discussion panels in Copr projects and speed optimization of front page. For more information, see: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4aca9d983d Dominik

Re: Orphaning pylint and its requirements python-astroid and python-lazy-object-proxy

I will. FAS: limb Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On Sep 4, 2019, 4:54 AM, Christian Dersch wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to orphan pylint, python-astroid and python-lazy-object-proxy > (both required by pylint), anybody interested in taking them? > > Greetings > >

Re: Unannounced libproj soname bump

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:41 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > > I noticed proj-5.2.0 was rebased to 6.2.0 in Fedora ≥ 31. This rebase > changed libproj soname from libproj.so.13 to libproj.so.15. I don't think this soname bump even happened by accident, because the .so file names %files entries in the

Re: Intend to orphan i3 and some related packages

Am 04.09.19 um 13:49 schrieb Dan Čermák: Christian Dersch writes: Am 04.09.19 um 12:36 schrieb Dan Čermák: Thanks! i3 packages are yours now. Are you also interested in dzen2? It is required by i3. Ugh, I was hoping that it wasn't... But in that case: yes, please give it to me too,

Re: Unannounced libproj soname bump

On 2019-09-04, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 04/09/2019 13:40, Petr Pisar wrote: > >> I noticed proj-5.2.0 was rebased to 6.2.0 in Fedora ≥ 31. This rebase >> changed libproj soname from libproj.so.13 to libproj.so.15. > > This may be a significant problem as I believe 6.x removes the > old 4.x API

Re: Intent to orphan php-gettext-gettext

On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 11:12 +0530, Sundeep Anand wrote: > Hi Randy, > > I have some interest maintaining it. Is your FAS account sundeepanand? If so, it doesn't appear that you are a Fedora packager at the moment. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: BackupPC selinux help

On 2019-08-30 13:51, Richard Shaw wrote: He's already tried restorecon, changed from a symlink to a bind mount (for the backup root)... Maybe a dumb Q, but have you tried doing the same?  Maybe it's your host that's not per defaults. ___ devel

Re: Unannounced libproj soname bump

On 04/09/2019 14:00, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2019-09-04, Tom Hughes wrote: On 04/09/2019 13:40, Petr Pisar wrote: I noticed proj-5.2.0 was rebased to 6.2.0 in Fedora ≥ 31. This rebase changed libproj soname from libproj.so.13 to libproj.so.15. This may be a significant problem as I believe

Looking for maintainers of Bazaar / Breeze (bzr / brz)

Hello, it seems that the current maintainers of Bazaar (bzr) are not likely interested anymore in the package. It is mostyl dead upstream, depends on Python 2 and brings a quite a stack of required packages. There is s Python 3 compatible fork called Breeze (brz). I've prepared the spec

Re: New version of Copr

Dne 04. 09. 19 v 14:44 Kamil Paral napsal(a): > > The discussion page is a neat idea. For some projects, I see "start > discussion" button, but for others, I see just > "Loading Discussion..." that eventually changes to "Error embedding". Yes, the loading takes too long when the topic has to be

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

Il giorno mer, 04/09/2019 alle 14.27 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy ha scritto: > I still need to see network traces that show breakage between Windows > clients. I have update the filezilla bug with tcpdump pcap -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 30 Workstation)

Re: Unannounced libproj soname bump

On 04/09/2019 13:40, Petr Pisar wrote: I noticed proj-5.2.0 was rebased to 6.2.0 in Fedora ≥ 31. This rebase changed libproj soname from libproj.so.13 to libproj.so.15. This may be a significant problem as I believe 6.x removes the old 4.x API which was only deprecated before and some of the

Re: Orphaning pylint and its requirements python-astroid and python-lazy-object-proxy

Am 04.09.19 um 14:37 schrieb Gwyn Ciesla via devel: I will. FAS: limb Thanks! You own the packages now. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Orphaning pylint and its requirements python-astroid and python-lazy-object-proxy

Thank you! --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 8:07 AM, Christian Dersch wrote:

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

Il giorno mer, 04/09/2019 alle 12.48 +0200, alcir...@gmail.com ha scritto: > Accessing a folder shared by windows machine 1 from windows machine > 2doesn't work... if I use the computer name or the fqdn (name > resolutionworks using nslookup). But if I use the IP address I'm able > to accessthe

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:41 PM Markku Korkeala wrote: > > Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 2019-09-02 13:00: > > clojure kushal, orphan, s4504kr, 1 > > weeks ago > > salimma, walters > > I would like to take clojure, filed a releng ticket:

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

Il giorno mer, 04/09/2019 alle 12.48 +0200, alcir...@gmail.com ha scritto: > P.S. if this list is not the right place to discuss such topic, we > cango elsewhere. I have open this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748860 -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 30

Unannounced libproj soname bump

I noticed proj-5.2.0 was rebased to 6.2.0 in Fedora ≥ 31. This rebase changed libproj soname from libproj.so.13 to libproj.so.15. x86_64 Fedora 32 contains these packages needs rebuilding: # dnf --quiet repoquery --whatrequires 'libproj.so.13()(64bit)' --source | sed 's/-[^-]*-[^-]*$//' | sort

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 04. 09. 19 14:12, Fabio Valentini wrote: Be advised that clojure has failed to build since fedora 23, according to koji. I wonder why it hasn't been retired at some point ... The mass rebuild was not attempted at all. Maybe this is because: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8601 -- Miro

Re: Unannounced libproj soname bump

On 04/09/2019 13:51, Tom Hughes wrote: On 04/09/2019 13:40, Petr Pisar wrote: I noticed proj-5.2.0 was rebased to 6.2.0 in Fedora ≥ 31. This rebase changed libproj soname from libproj.so.13 to libproj.so.15. This may be a significant problem as I believe 6.x removes the old 4.x API which was

Re: BackupPC selinux help

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 9:36 AM John Florian wrote: > On 2019-08-30 13:51, Richard Shaw wrote: > > He's already tried restorecon, changed from a symlink to a bind mount > > (for the backup root)... > > Maybe a dumb Q, but have you tried doing the same? Maybe it's your host > that's not per

Re: Unresponsive Maintainer: Chitlesh Goorah

Chitlesh, Just to confirm, you meant "Back in 2010 I mentioned that I could*n't* continue as a fedora developer due to time constraints.", not how you wrote it above? Geoff Marr IRC: coremodule On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:35 AM Chitlesh Goorah wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Back in 2010 I

Re: Unresponsive maintainers: Alex Chernyakhovsky & Othman Madjoudj

Alex Chernyakhovsky writes: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:16 PM Alex Chernyakhovsky wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 3:33 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: >>> >>> Hi Fedora, >>> >>> I'm trying to contact Alex Chernyakhovsky and Othman Madjoudj, who >>> are the maintainers of mosh as far as I can tell. I

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On 9/4/19 3:16 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kyle Marek: > >> I'm finding that 32G is not necessarily sufficient for compiling clang >> itself. Similarly I've had a hard time compiling UnrealEngine from >> source. I usually see ld using up to 12G of memory to link each >> artifact. Using

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On 9/4/19 3:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:03 PM Chris Murphy wrote: >> I'm skeptical of swapfiles for this use case, because it likely >> increases the chance for file system disk contention, see section >> 11.17 >>

Packages with broken dependencies on Python 3.7

Hello packagers! The following packages failed to build on Fedora 32 with Python 3.8 and they still require Python 3.7 on runtime. If the packages won't build with Python 3.8, they won't be installable, along with all their dependent packages, in Fedora 32. If there is an "actual" build

Re: Unannounced libproj soname bump

On 04. 09. 19 14:40, Petr Pisar wrote: I noticed proj-5.2.0 was rebased to 6.2.0 in Fedora ≥ 31. This rebase changed libproj soname from libproj.so.13 to libproj.so.15. ... A similar issue is in Fedora 31 where the rebuilds should go to proj update

[389-devel] Please review: 50584, 49212 - docker healthcheck and configuration

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50584 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49212 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50585 Thanks! -- Sincerely, William ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

How to contact hno (Henrik Nordström)?

Hey, anybody knows how to properly contact hno (Henrik Nordström) and whether they are still interested in maintaining bzr? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749118 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486686 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734995

FedoraRespin-30-updates-20190904.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/31 (x86_64) ID: 442226 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/442226 ID: 442228 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso release_identification URL:

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Freeze

> "CM" == Chris Murphy writes: CM> But anyway, I did laugh a bit out loud at 23:45 UTC because *of CM> course* there are many other totally unambiguous times to choose CM> from instead. Some of the best comedy is pointing out the obvious. If we're going to bikeshed it, I'll vote for two

[Bug 1749126] New: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection should depend on perl-Gtk3

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749126 Bug ID: 1749126 Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection should depend on perl-Gtk3 Product: Fedora Version: 30 Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 1749132] New: Too strict gir lib search pattern

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749132 Bug ID: 1749132 Summary: Too strict gir lib search pattern Product: Fedora Version: 30 Status: NEW Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection Assignee:

[Bug 1749132] Too strict gir lib search pattern

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749132 Vadim Raskhozhev changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment|0 |1 #1611740 is|

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-09-05 - 96% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/09/05/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-20190904git295ea07.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-09-05 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2019-09-05 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2019-09-05 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2019-09-05

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:03 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > I'm skeptical of swapfiles for this use case, because it likely > increases the chance for file system disk contention, see section > 11.17 > https://www.kernel.org/doc/gorman/html/understand/understand014.html Actually that looks outdated

Unresponsive maintainers: Alex Chernyakhovsky & Othman Madjoudj

Hi Fedora, I'm trying to contact Alex Chernyakhovsky and Othman Madjoudj, who are the maintainers of mosh as far as I can tell. I have started the nonresponsive maintainer process due to lack of contact through bugzilla mail; bugs are https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697355 and

Re: Open NeuroFedora Meeting agenda for 2019-09-05

Ankur, On 2019-09-05 02:38, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hello, Please join us for the weekly Open NeuroFedora team meeting tomorrow. Details below: As: - a Linux user since the kernel 0.9 days - a RH user since v4 - a Fedora user since the beginning - an Ex Dir of the

Re: Intent to orphan php-gettext-gettext

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 7:06 PM Randy Barlow wrote: > On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 11:12 +0530, Sundeep Anand wrote: > > Hi Randy, > > > > I have some interest maintaining it. > > Is your FAS account sundeepanand? If so, it doesn't appear that you are > a Fedora packager at the moment. > ah, sorry I

[Bug 1748038] Please build perl-XML-Parser-Lite for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748038 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-fabd190d13 clamav-0.101.4-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing armadillo-9.700.2-1.el8 arpack-3.7.0-1.el8

[Bug 1748057] Request for branching to epel-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748057 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1745561] Upgrade perl-Test-Simple to 1.302167

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745561 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.30-3020190903071535.bba63816 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1744494] Request to build perl-Number-Bytes-Human for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744494 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1745561] Upgrade perl-Test-Simple to 1.302167

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745561 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.30-2920190903071535.fafb7136 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 Modular testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1748057] Request for branching to epel-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748057 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- It seems the components in Bugzilla were not created . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1748754] New: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Test-UseAllModules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748754 Bug ID: 1748754 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Test-UseAllModules Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-UseAllModules Assignee:

[Bug 1744783] (RFE) EPEL8 branch of perl-Net-Netmask

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744783 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1748754 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1744783] (RFE) EPEL8 branch of perl-Net-Netmask

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744783 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1748857] New: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Test-Needs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748857 Bug ID: 1748857 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Test-Needs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Needs Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-09-04 - 96% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/09/04/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-20190904git295ea07.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MCE-Shared (master). "Update to 1.848 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-09-04 09:35:55 UTC From 48a56497e7ad1c8215be87a2b66ac6ac469f6328 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sep 04 2019 09:35:16 + Subject: Update to 1.848 - New upstream release 1.848 - Fixed broken examples in the MCE::Shared documentation -

[Bug 1748856] New: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Sub-Quote

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748856 Bug ID: 1748856 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Sub-Quote Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sub-Quote Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1748877] New: perl-Sys-Virt-5.7.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748877 Bug ID: 1748877 Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-5.7.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sys-Virt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MCE-Shared (f31). "Update to 1.848 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-09-04 09:54:05 UTC From 48a56497e7ad1c8215be87a2b66ac6ac469f6328 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sep 04 2019 09:35:16 + Subject: Update to 1.848 - New upstream release 1.848 - Fixed broken examples in the MCE::Shared documentation -

[Bug 1748740] perl-MCE-1.848 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748740 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 1748169] perl-MCE-1.847 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748169 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 1748740] perl-MCE-1.848 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748740 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-ece3d41a8e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ece3d41a8e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1748169] perl-MCE-1.847 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748169 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from

[Bug 1748251] Upgrade perl-Pod-PseudoPod to 0.19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748251 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

  1   2   >