Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On 11. 11. 19 8:06, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 12:16 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:54 AM wrote: I agree with you in general but I don't like the `brief` wording here. What that means exactly? I would rather go with specifying a strong freeze. Meaning

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to statically link with libpython3.8.a for better performance

Dne 08. 11. 19 v 20:40 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 6:01 PM Charalampos Stratakis > wrote: >> >> >> - Original Message - >>> From: "Vít Ondruch" >>> Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 10:01:47 AM >>> Subject: Re: Fedora 32

Review swap for python-molten

Hi everyone, I'd like to ask for a review for python-molten: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770162 It requires python-typing-inspect (which will be reviewed by my sponsor): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768490 I'm open for any review in exchange. Thanks in

Python bindings for protobuf on RHEL/CentOS/EPEL 8

Hi, the Python (3) bindings are missing on RHEL/CentOS/EPEL 8 for the protobuf package (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf). A bug request has been created on Bugzilla ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765844), but as no status has been given, I was wondering whether someone

Re: dnf unable to download source due to rpmfusion-free-source

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 11/10/19 1:52 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >> Well it does work if you do >> >> dnf --disablerepo=rpmfusion-free,rpmfusion-nonfree download -- >> enablerepo=rawhide --source mercurial >> >> But that is not exactly obvious, so I think it's something dnf could >> handle better

Re: Some Java packages looking for new maintainer(s)

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:10 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hello packagers, > > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum > maintenance for some packages, and none of our other packages depend > on these anymore. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of > them,

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to statically link with libpython3.8.a for better performance

* John M. Harris, Jr.: > Anyone that has ever worked with CD images understands that every megabyte > counts. It's clearly not a priority for Fedora. It wouldn't be too difficult to replace glibc-all-langpacks with glibc-locale-source in the installer, going from 26 MiB to less than 5 MiB

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 10:24 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails > > > are not sent anymore even for

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Fedora 31 Does Not Use Swap Well?

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 8:42 PM Code Zombie wrote: > > > Hi, > I recently installed a fresh Fedora 31 in order to improve performance. I > have started to have a new problem. When my memory fills up when launching an > Android emulator, the system starts acting very slowly and becomes quite >

Re: Fedora 31 Elections: Nomination period open

Reminder that the nominations for various Fedora leadership bodies are open through 23:59 UTC on 13 November. Nominations must be submitted before that time on the appropriate wiki page (links below). Current nomination counts: FESCo: 6 for 5 seats Council: 0 for 1 seat Mindshare: 1 for 1 seat

Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

Issue: Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel. wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventually leads to wxGTK3.2 release. Upstream is currently at 3.1.3 and expecting at least a 3.1.4 next year.

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

Dne 11. 11. 19 v 14:39 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > David Timms wrote: >> Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. > Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository. > >> The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel. >> wxGTK3.1 is

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, David Timms wrote: Issue: Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel. wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventually leads to wxGTK3.2 release. Upstream is currently at 3.1.3 and

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019, 15:09 Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 11. 11. 19 v 14:39 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > > David Timms wrote: > >> Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. > > Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository. > > > >> The normal Fedora

Re: Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-11-11)

> F32 System-Wide Change: Modules in non-Modular Buildroot > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2257 > Sorry, this is actually https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2255 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

David Timms wrote: > Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository. > The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel. > wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventually leads to

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 4:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Before you do this, can we figure out the details? > > 1. Do we use bodhi to handle the freeze? > > Previously, this would not be possible, as bodhi was not yet "activated" at > branching, however with rawhide gating (and hopefully "branched

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On 11/11/2019 3:51 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > Hi, one of the wxGTK maintainers here.  Where is the requirement to use > wxGTK 3.1 documented?  Like Kevin, I can't find that documented.  And if > it is definitely required, *why* is it required? On Archlinux audacity-git [1] builds against the

Re: I wrote a blog on why we moved Fedora 31 to cgroup V2

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 10:06:40AM -0500, Daniel Walsh wrote: > https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/fedora-31-control-group-v2 You write that snap does not run with v2, but linked bug shows snapd was fixed 2 months ago: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-bb0a25e48d2 -- Tomasz

Re: Will orphan packages with NEW F31FTBFS bugs tomorrow

On 08. 11. 19 13:16, Miro Hrončok wrote: According to the policy for packages that fail to build from source: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ I plan to orphan packages with NEW Fedora 31 Fail To Build From Source bugzillas tomorrow.

I wrote a blog on why we moved Fedora 31 to cgroup V2

https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/fedora-31-control-group-v2 If you like it, please put it out on social media. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Python Annual Release Cycle adjusted to match odd-numbered Fedora releases

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 01:31:48PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > tl;dr New Python 3.X versions will be released annually, with RC > period adjusted to make it possible to update Python in odd-numbered > Fedora releases. We plan to submit the Python 3.9 change proposal > for Fedora 33 after the

pcre2-10.34-RC2 with AArch64 SIMD JIT

I've just pushed pcre2-10.34-RC2 into Fedora 32. Among some boring featuring like Unicode 12.1.0 and matching in invalid UTF strings, now the AArch64 JIT compiler uses NEON instructions for better performance. It's a quite fresh new code and there were some issues with it that I believe are

Re: are the ppc64le builders low on memory?

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 10:34:10AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:10:07PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Last week I built ceph 14.2.4-2 and it built fine on both fc31 and rawhide. > > > > I fixed a typo for a Requires: and the ppc64le builds today are getting > >

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2019-11-11)

= #fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-11-11) = Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:23 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-11-11/fesco.2019-11-11-15.00.log.html . Meeting

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 03:17:28PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > 4. Documentation of how to create a module stream is comprehensive but > daunting. There is a lot of available information, but what is really > lacking is a basic walkthrough for converting a single package to a > module stream.

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 1:15 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > > Robbie Harwood writes: > > > Stephen Gallagher writes: > > > >> My intention was to provide some scope to the problem, because it > >> seemed that a lot of alternatives being floated were not seeing some > >> of the more subtle cases

Re: are the ppc64le builders low on memory?

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 1:39 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:10:07PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Last week I built ceph 14.2.4-2 and it built fine on both fc31 and > rawhide. > > > > I fixed a typo for a Requires: and the ppc64le builds today are getting > > killed. > > >

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On 11. 11. 19 19:09, Miro Hrončok wrote: Excellent. I think this is ready to be presented to fesco for a vote. Unless we decide it requires a change proposal. To limit the required bureaucracy, I can help draft it. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: are the ppc64le builders low on memory?

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:10:07PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > Last week I built ceph 14.2.4-2 and it built fine on both fc31 and rawhide. > > I fixed a typo for a Requires: and the ppc64le builds today are getting > killed. > >

Re: Modularity and all the things

- Original Message - > From: "Matthew Miller" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 1:16:22 PM > Subject: Re: Modularity and all the things > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:28:02PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > That's all well and good,

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On 11. 11. 19 18:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 09:51:33AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 4:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: Before you do this, can we figure out the details? 1. Do we use bodhi to handle the freeze? Previously, this would not be possible, as

Fonts packaging policy rewrite proposal

Hi, A fonts packaging policy rewrite proposal has been pushed to FPC today: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/934 It should be clearer, more opinionated, and take into account: – updates of The OpenType standard – variable fonts – web fonts – upstream depreciation of non

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: On-demand Side Tags

Per conversation with Miro and Zbigniew, this proposal is withdrawn for the time being. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 09:51:33AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 4:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > Before you do this, can we figure out the details? > > > > 1. Do we use bodhi to handle the freeze? > > > > Previously, this would not be possible, as bodhi was not yet

are the ppc64le builders low on memory?

Last week I built ceph 14.2.4-2 and it built fine on both fc31 and rawhide. I fixed a typo for a Requires: and the ppc64le builds today are getting killed. https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7359/38917359/build.log thanks -- Kaleb ___

Re: Modularity and all the things

On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:28:02PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > That's all well and good, but you seem to be forgetting that people > are actually getting *paid* to work on modularity for fedora. > Any proposal for an alternative, which apparently needs to arrive at > least at MVP /

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

Robbie Harwood writes: > Stephen Gallagher writes: > >> My intention was to provide some scope to the problem, because it >> seemed that a lot of alternatives being floated were not seeing some >> of the more subtle cases that we were trying to address. However, the >> biggest problem is that

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On 12/11/19 12:39 am, Kevin Kofler wrote: David Timms wrote: Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository. see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux or from the horse - (Mr Ed):

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On 12/11/19 8:05 am, David Timms wrote: Audacity support when my users crash because they aren't running the recommended library (there is other locally adjusted libs which Audacity uses). Not that this is different from the past - but I would like it to oops, dropped word this is "no"

Re: Modularity and all the things

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 03:02:13PM -0500, Alex Scheel wrote: > From my organization at least, we have PM and management buy-in to > continue contributing so long as we don't have a long-term solution > that somebody else manages for us. So far, ursine packages have been > our solution and we've

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On Tue, 12 Nov 2019, David Timms wrote: David Timms wrote: Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository. see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux or from the horse - (Mr Ed):

Next NeuroFedora team meeting: 1600 UTC on Tuesday, 12th November

Hello everyone, You are invited to the next NeuroFedora team meeting at 1600UTC on Tuesday 12th November. You can see the time in your local time zone by running this command in a terminal: $ date --date='TZ="UTC" 1600 next Tue' or please use the link below:

Re: Modularity and all the things

Matthew Miller wrote: > There are certainly many examples of awesome great stuff that's been > created in Fedora without the investment of Red Hat (or anyone's) full > time employees. The zchunk metadata feature is a recent example. The > Stewardship SIG is another one. This is good stuff, and I'm

Re: Modularity and all the things

Matthew Miller wrote: > One of the things I love about Fedora is that we don't have a big company- > vs-community divide. Huh? In what parallel universe do you live? Modularity is just yet another example that clearly shows this divide. Just look at how Red Hat's desktop environment choice

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

David Timms wrote: > see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux > or from the horse - (Mr Ed): > https://github.com/audacity/audacity/blob/master/linux/build.txt > " > wxWidgets: > > 1) Clone wxWidgets and checkout 3.1.1 from the Audacity fork of the > wxWidgets project: >

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On 12/11/19 2:36 am, Christopher Engelhard wrote: On 11/11/2019 3:51 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > Hi, one of the wxGTK maintainers here.  Where is the requirement to use > wxGTK 3.1 documented?  Like Kevin, I can't find that documented. And if > it is definitely required, *why* is it

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to statically link with libpython3.8.a for better performance

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:23 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * John M. Harris, Jr.: > > > Anyone that has ever worked with CD images understands that every megabyte > > counts. > > It's clearly not a priority for Fedora. It wouldn't be too difficult to > replace glibc-all-langpacks with

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Scott Talbert wrote: Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository. see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux or from the horse - (Mr Ed):

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On 12/11/19 1:51 am, Scott Talbert wrote: On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, David Timms wrote: Issue: Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel. wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventually leads to wxGTK3.2

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On 12/11/19 1:33 am, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2019, 15:09 Vít Ondruch > wrote: Dne 11. 11. 19 v 14:39 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > David Timms wrote: >> I would like to be able to release the next Audacity (once tested) when >> it

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

David Timms wrote: > Perhaps calling a compat package 3.2.0.develseries.3.1.3 etc would make > sense to indicate to consumers that they are using what will soon (TM) > become the main version. Please no. There is a numeric version, please use that, not some ugly version hack. What would be

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-11-12 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Team. More information available at: [Modularity Team

Review request: xournalpp

Xournal which is currently shipped by default on Fedora Design Suite has remained stale since 2016. Enter xournal++, a fork started as a rewrite in c++ to evolve beyond. The author of xournal even encourage its use considering the compatibility with the format. Here is the ticket:

[Bug 1770710] New: Upgrade perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian to 0.102

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770710 Bug ID: 1770710 Summary: Upgrade perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian to 0.102 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian Assignee:

[Bug 1770717] Upgrade perl-Module-Load-Conditional to 0.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-c72d751f08 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c72d751f08 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1770721] New: Upgrade perl-Parse-PMFile to 0.42

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770721 Bug ID: 1770721 Summary: Upgrade perl-Parse-PMFile to 0.42 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Parse-PMFile Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1770717] Upgrade perl-Module-Load-Conditional to 0.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1770716] Upgrade perl-Module-CoreList to 5.20191110

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-c32aff9ca1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c32aff9ca1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1770717] Upgrade perl-Module-Load-Conditional to 0.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |MODIFIED Resolution|RAWHIDE

[Bug 1770716] Upgrade perl-Module-CoreList to 5.20191110

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-2e005ea26f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2e005ea26f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1770719] Upgrade perl-Net-LibIDN2 to 1.01

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770719 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1770711] Upgrade perl-Devel-PatchPerl to 1.76

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770711 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1768802] perl-RDF-Query for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768802 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2019-007e47d15e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-007e47d15e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1770711] New: Upgrade perl-Devel-PatchPerl to 1.76

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770711 Bug ID: 1770711 Summary: Upgrade perl-Devel-PatchPerl to 1.76 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Devel-PatchPerl Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1770712] Upgrade perl-Devel-PPPort to 3.55

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770712 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1770717] Upgrade perl-Module-Load-Conditional to 0.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-5ab1f07403 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5ab1f07403 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1770718] Upgrade perl-Net-DAVTalk to 0.17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770718 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1770720] New: Upgrade perl-Parallel-Pipes to 0.005

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770720 Bug ID: 1770720 Summary: Upgrade perl-Parallel-Pipes to 0.005 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Parallel-Pipes Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1768805] perl-RDF-Trine for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768805 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2019-dba01dca66 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-dba01dca66 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1768805] perl-RDF-Trine for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768805 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-RDF-Trine-1.019-8.epel |perl-RDF-Trine-1.019-8.el8

Python bindings for protobuf on RHEL/CentOS/EPEL 8

Hi, the Python (3) bindings are missing on RHEL/CentOS/EPEL 8 for the protobuf package (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf). A bug request has been created on Bugzilla ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765844), but as no status has been given, I was wondering whether someone

[Bug 1770717] Upgrade perl-Module-Load-Conditional to 0.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1770716] Upgrade perl-Module-CoreList to 5.20191110

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1770716] Upgrade perl-Module-CoreList to 5.20191110

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-f4ff3b0278 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f4ff3b0278 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1770718] Upgrade perl-Net-DAVTalk to 0.17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770718 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-5bdc4ba7c3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5bdc4ba7c3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1770718] Upgrade perl-Net-DAVTalk to 0.17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770718 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-eb875b74dc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-eb875b74dc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1770716] New: Upgrade perl-Module-CoreList to 5.20191110

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716 Bug ID: 1770716 Summary: Upgrade perl-Module-CoreList to 5.20191110 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Module-CoreList Assignee:

[Bug 1770717] New: Upgrade perl-Module-Load-Conditional to 0.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717 Bug ID: 1770717 Summary: Upgrade perl-Module-Load-Conditional to 0.70 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Module-Load-Conditional Assignee:

[Bug 1770718] Upgrade perl-Net-DAVTalk to 0.17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770718 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-e57eb4c32c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e57eb4c32c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1770718] New: Upgrade perl-Net-DAVTalk to 0.17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770718 Bug ID: 1770718 Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-DAVTalk to 0.17 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-DAVTalk Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 1770719] New: Upgrade perl-Net-LibIDN2 to 1.01

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770719 Bug ID: 1770719 Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-LibIDN2 to 1.01 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-LibIDN2 Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 1768805] perl-RDF-Trine for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768805 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-RDF-Trine-1.019-8.epel |perl-RDF-Trine-1.019-8.epel

[Bug 1770720] Upgrade perl-Parallel-Pipes to 0.005

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770720 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1768802] perl-RDF-Query for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768802 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1770717] Upgrade perl-Module-Load-Conditional to 0.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-24efeb13e4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-24efeb13e4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1770688] Upgrade perl-Config-Model-Tester to 4.004

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770688 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1770714] New: Upgrade perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX to 1.02

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770714 Bug ID: 1770714 Summary: Upgrade perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX to 1.02 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX Assignee: dd...@cpan.org

[Bug 1770712] New: Upgrade perl-Devel-PPPort to 3.55

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770712 Bug ID: 1770712 Summary: Upgrade perl-Devel-PPPort to 3.55 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Devel-PPPort Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[Bug 1770721] Upgrade perl-Parse-PMFile to 0.42

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770721 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1770506] Plans for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770506 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1770507] Plans for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770507 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Re: Fedora 31 Elections: Nomination period open

Reminder that the nominations for various Fedora leadership bodies are open through 23:59 UTC on 13 November. Nominations must be submitted before that time on the appropriate wiki page (links below). Current nomination counts: FESCo: 6 for 5 seats Council: 0 for 1 seat Mindshare: 1 for 1 seat

Fonts packaging policy rewrite proposal

Hi, A fonts packaging policy rewrite proposal has been pushed to FPC today: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/934 It should be clearer, more opinionated, and take into account: – updates of The OpenType standard – variable fonts – web fonts – upstream depreciation of non

[389-devel] please review: PR 50700 - Add disk monitor to CLI and UI

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50700 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 1771119] perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771119 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1635047 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1635047=edit [patch] Update to 1.02 (#1771119) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1771119] New: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771119 Bug ID: 1771119 Summary: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.02 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 1771165] New: perl-App-s2p-1.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771165 Bug ID: 1771165 Summary: perl-App-s2p-1.003 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-App-s2p Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

  1   2   >