Am 16.03.20 um 09:15 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
>> I knew someone would bring this up: TMP does not protect your drive,
>> as you could boot with "init=/bin/bash 1" .
>How do you do that WITHOUT KEYBOARD? This thread is about very
> specific situation, please do not forget that when
On 16. 03. 20 11:22, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I always thought that one should not call `rpm` during rpmbuild.
I remember this from when I learned packaging.
In one of the slides (possibly by spot, but not sure), there was:
"never call rmp from rpm"
(There was a picture, Ghostbusters - Don't
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-03-16 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:18 AM Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
>
>
> On 15/03/2020 14:02, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > The latest java-1.8.0-openjdk update for rawhide (the first build with
> > GCC 10) seems to have introduced some serious problems - including
> > crashes and
Dne 14. 03. 20 v 10:14 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> On 14. 03. 20 8:16, Dan Čermák wrote:
>> However, I am not an expert on RPM macro evaluation and kinda worried
>> that this uses the clang version that is present on the system building
>> the srpm, which might not be the version that I want? Or is
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:22:40 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I always thought that one should not call `rpm` during rpmbuild.
> Nevertheless I am not sure what was the reason? Probably locking of
> RPM db? Can somebody elaborate?
It couldn't be guaranteed to work in the case that the buildroot was
On 15.03.2020 23:12, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> I knew someone would bring this up: TMP does not protect your drive,
> as you could boot with "init=/bin/bash 1"
You should enable UEFI Secure Boot, create your CA, install systemd-boot
and sign it with your CA.
TPM 2.0 protect full boot chain using
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 11:12:43PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Am 15.03.20 um 13:32 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> > On 14.03.2020 13:05, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> >> If you encrypt the fedora ( or any ) installation with luks, as
> >> security of a mobile device indicates, you end up
Hello,
I'm working on update of tipcutils from 2.2.0 to 3.0.4. This will bring
a license change: GPLv2 was dropped upstream, BDS license remains.
Sincerely
Peter
--
Peter Hanecak
http://hany.sk/~hany/
GnuPG: http://hany.sk/~hany/gpg/475DFC4C.txt
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
FWIW a small variation of this problem also affects AFL:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/american-fuzzy-lop/c/6d5fd7f4d7b90adf6e975a7de7e57dc335300655?branch=master
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1813541
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200314.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200316.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 84
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 13.52 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Dne 16. 03. 20 v 11:38 Paul Howarth napsal(a):
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:22:40 +0100
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> I always thought that one should not call `rpm` during rpmbuild.
>> Nevertheless I am not sure what was the reason? Probably locking of
>> RPM db? Can somebody elaborate?
> It couldn't be
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:22:10PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On February 25, 2020 3:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > In the previous mass build LWT FTBFS because the tests failed on POWER
> > and s/390 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1792780). There is also a new
> >
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200313.0):
ID: 546772 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/546772
ID: 546773 Test:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2
== Summary ==
We update the current system-wide crypto policy to further disable
legacy cryptographic protocols (TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1), weak
Diffie-Hellman key exchange sizes (1024 bit), and use of the SHA-1
hash in signatures.
== Owner
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sqlite_Rpmdb
== Summary ==
Change format of the RPM database from Berkeley DB to a new Sqlite format.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:pmatilai| Panu Matilainen]] [[User:ffesti|Florian Festi]]
* Email: pmati...@redhat.com ffe...@redhat.com
== Detailed
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.16
== Summary ==
Update RPM to the 4.16.0 release.
== Owner ==
* Name: User:pmatilai, User:ffesti
* Email: pmati...@redhat.com,ffe...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
RPM 4.16 contains numerous improvements over previous versions
* New
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MAKE43
== Summary ==
Rebase GNU make in Fedora 33 from make version 4.2 to make version 4.3.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:djdelorie| DJ Delorie]]
* Email: d...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
Make 4.3 was released on January 19th 2020. It includes
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F33MingwEnvToolchainUpdate
== Summary ==
Update the MinGW base environment and toolchain to the latest upstream
stable releases.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:smani|Sandro Mani]]
* Email: manisan...@gmail.com
== Detailed Description ==
The following
OLD: Fedora-32-20200315.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200316.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Subject: Fonts packaging guidelines change status
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> WHAT IS IT ALL ABOUT
>
> On 2020-02-13, FPC approved a rewrite of our fonts packaging
> guidelines.
and again that was published on the 14th removing some top
matter through the Section mark: NEW
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 5:26 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> I have upgraded to Fedora 32 today and after a while I have noticed that
> `repoquery --whatrequires` yields incomplete results.
>
> From Fedora 31:
>
> $ dnf --refresh repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires
> python3-flaky
>
Meeting started by zbyszek at 15:00:56 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-03-16/fesco.2020-03-16-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
* init process (zbyszek, 15:00:59)
* #2356 Fedora 31: Reset eclipse stream for all (once)
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:45:34PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:35:03AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 11:49 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> > > /etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf
> >
> > So that is a global config file...
> > RFE: move
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 13:56, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Tomasz Torcz writes:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 11:12:43PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> >> Am 15.03.20 um 13:32 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> >> > On 14.03.2020 13:05, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> >> >> If you encrypt the fedora ( or
On 16/03/20 11:23 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F33MingwEnvToolchainUpdate
== Summary ==
Update the MinGW base environment and toolchain to the latest upstream
stable releases.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:smani|Sandro Mani]]
* Email: manisan...@gmail.com
==
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On 16. 03. 20 21:30, Fabio Valentini wrote:
3) python-matplotlib-3.1.3-1.fc31 is going to f31 stable:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-188dd2b161
The update to 3.1.3 has been built for f33 and f31, but not for f32.
The 3.1.3 changes aren't even merged from master into the f32
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 09:30:51PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> It's that time of the semi-year again, and I again found multiple
> instances of packages that have updates for rawhide and f31/f30, but
> no bodhi update for fedora 32.
>
> In most cases, the updated package
Hi all,
a new version fedpkg-1.38 is released.
Currently, Fedora 30, 31, 32 and Rawhide packages are in the stable
repository, feel free to try other waiting distributions (el6, epel7) in
Bodhi.
Release description:
Feature documentation, changelog and fixes description can be seen here:
Hi all,
a new version fedpkg-1.38 is released.
Currently, Fedora 30, 31, 32 and Rawhide packages are in the stable
repository, feel free to try other waiting distributions (el6, epel7) in
Bodhi.
Release description:
Feature documentation, changelog and fixes description can be seen here:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:24 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sqlite_Rpmdb
>
> == Summary ==
> Change format of the RPM database from Berkeley DB to a new Sqlite format.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:pmatilai| Panu Matilainen]] [[User:ffesti|Florian Festi]]
> *
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 03:57:09PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 3:46 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > My scratch builds are failing on s390x:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450592
> >
Tomasz Torcz writes:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 11:12:43PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>> Am 15.03.20 um 13:32 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
>> > On 14.03.2020 13:05, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>> >> If you encrypt the fedora ( or any ) installation with luks, as
>> >> security of a mobile
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:38:07AM +, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:22:40 +0100
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > I always thought that one should not call `rpm` during rpmbuild.
> > Nevertheless I am not sure what was the reason? Probably locking of
> > RPM db? Can somebody elaborate?
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:35:03AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 11:49 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> > /etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf
>
> So that is a global config file...
> RFE: move it under /usr, and only look for overrides in /etc.
> 99% of users should not modify
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-32-20200315.n.0):
ID: 547006 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_background
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/547006
ID: 547015 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 15/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
Il giorno dom, 15/03/2020 alle 14.44 +0100, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 2:37 PM Alexander Bokovoy <
> aboko...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On su, 15 maalis 2020, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I’m going to ask a FESCo exception for python2 for package
> > >
Hi everybody,
It's that time of the semi-year again, and I again found multiple
instances of packages that have updates for rawhide and f31/f30, but
no bodhi update for fedora 32.
In most cases, the updated package was built on fedora 32 (a koji
build was successful), but no bodhi update was
Il giorno dom, 15/03/2020 alle 15.02 +0100, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> Hi everybody,
>
> The latest java-1.8.0-openjdk update for rawhide (the first build
> with
> GCC 10) seems to have introduced some serious problems - including
> crashes and segmentation faults during package builds for
Another idea, since util-linux 2.35 is only on Fedora 32+, how about
- %triggerpostun -- fedora-release < 32
+ %triggerpostun -- util-linux < 2.35
%systemd_post fstrim.timer
--
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813602
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0b03b12929 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0b03b12929
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813602
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813602
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-cf95f89bd2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cf95f89bd2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|w3c-markup-validator-20.2.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461
--- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
The following Sources of the specfile are not valid URLs so we cannot
automatically build the new version for you. Please use URLs in your Source
declarations if possible.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813602
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813676
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813603
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-fe90fd7233 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-fe90fd7233
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813603
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004354
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813676
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813603
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813653
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813720
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813602
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200314-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813603
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200314-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813602
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813720
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d708f52a27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d708f52a27
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sqlite_Rpmdb
== Summary ==
Change format of the RPM database from Berkeley DB to a new Sqlite format.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:pmatilai| Panu Matilainen]] [[User:ffesti|Florian Festi]]
* Email: pmati...@redhat.com ffe...@redhat.com
== Detailed
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2
== Summary ==
We update the current system-wide crypto policy to further disable
legacy cryptographic protocols (TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1), weak
Diffie-Hellman key exchange sizes (1024 bit), and use of the SHA-1
hash in signatures.
== Owner
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-9d364c6070
cacti-1.2.10-1.el8 cacti-spine-1.2.10-1.el8
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8ce58993d7
mbedtls-2.16.5-1.el8
8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813720
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0acf97c1e1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0acf97c1e1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813602
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200314-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813603
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813603
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200314-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.16
== Summary ==
Update RPM to the 4.16.0 release.
== Owner ==
* Name: User:pmatilai, User:ffesti
* Email: pmati...@redhat.com,ffe...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
RPM 4.16 contains numerous improvements over previous versions
* New
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F33MingwEnvToolchainUpdate
== Summary ==
Update the MinGW base environment and toolchain to the latest upstream
stable releases.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:smani|Sandro Mani]]
* Email: manisan...@gmail.com
== Detailed Description ==
The following
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MAKE43
== Summary ==
Rebase GNU make in Fedora 33 from make version 4.2 to make version 4.3.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:djdelorie| DJ Delorie]]
* Email: d...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
Make 4.3 was released on January 19th 2020. It includes
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50958
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814011
Bug ID: 1814011
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-8.34 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004354
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813720
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Pod-Usage-1.70-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814114
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Gtk3-0.037-1.fc30.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42550723
--
You are
Hi,
As a follow up of the PR https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50939,
I wrote down a small design about rewriters (filter/computed_attr)
plugin: http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/search_rewriters.html
Comments are welcome
best regards
thierry
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
580 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
322 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
319
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814107
Bug ID: 1814107
Summary: Please make it available on EPEL8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-Iconv
Assignee: andr...@bawue.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814114
Bug ID: 1814114
Summary: perl-Gtk3-0.037 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Gtk3
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814114
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1670723
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1670723=edit
[patch] Update to 0.037 (#1814114)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
> On 17 Mar 2020, at 02:49, thierry bordaz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As a follow up of the PR https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50939,
> I wrote down a small design about rewriters (filter/computed_attr) plugin:
> http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/search_rewriters.html
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813720
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813720
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Pod-Usage-1.70-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8ce58993d7
mbedtls-2.16.5-1.el8
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-02f03affd4
ansible-2.9.6-1.el8
5
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/03/17/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.4-20200317gitb32c745.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808774
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-List-AllUtils-0.16-1.f |perl-List-AllUtils-0.16-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808730
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808744
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809214
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808731
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808816
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-String-Print-0.94-1.fc |perl-String-Print-0.94-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809881
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807263
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.105-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808774
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-List-AllUtils-0.16-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808816
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-String-Print-0.94-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808744
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200229-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809214
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Deep-1.130-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
