No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 09:31:25PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> My question now is how can we determine what is meant to be
> executable by system applications vs examples and other cruft? (This might be
> relevant to people minimizing systems/containers.)
Theoretically the examples are a
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 604589 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/604589
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 4:00 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 7:48 PM James Cassell
> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 24, 2020, at 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 6:42 PM Paul Dufresne via devel
> > > wrote:
> > > > Le 20-05-24 à 19 h 34, Naheem Zaffar a écrit
Hello,
as there has a buffer-overflow vulnerability [1] been discovered in
json-c recently, I've patched [2] the package to fix the issue and
pushed updates for F3{2,1,0}. [3,4]
The update for F32 is already in stable, but the updates for the earlier
releases are still in waiting to be tested,
Hi Sandro,
I have not been able to solve the problem so far.
The file QxtDesignerPlugins-qt5.pc is simply not created and I don't know how
to change it to libqxt-libqxt-eaf6872f6ad4/qt5/src/designer/Makefile, if that's
the right place.
Regards
Martin
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 07:48:53PM -0500, Parker Gibson wrote:
> The issue I see is that no package management system I know of handles
> multiple so versions, they explicitly state packages conflict with
> each-other even if in principle the so versioning means they would not.
Gentoo portage
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 09:14:14PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> The scheme you are proposing is kind-of used for Java and Go, and is
> sometimes known as 'vendoring' because it allows publishing software in
> complete dependency bundles independent of anything else. It works as long
Dear all,
there is nothing to announce, and nothing on the meeting agenda. Some
tickets are in progress, but I think we should continue the discussion
in tickets.
I propose to cancel today's meeting. If there's something urgent, we can
still hold it.
@nirik: maybe you could provide your weekly
builds for borgbackup done (finally):
- borgbackup-1.1.11-3.el7
- borgbackup-1.1.11-5.fc31
Please add these once you submit the final update.
Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 24/05/2020 19:56, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> "These directories are defined below the placeholder file system $BOOT. This
> placeholder file system shall be determined during installation time, and an
> fstab entry for it shall be created mounting it to /boot. The installer
> program
Am Montag, den 25.05.2020, 11:32 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser:
> Hello,
>
> as there has a buffer-overflow vulnerability [1] been discovered in
> json-c recently, I've patched [2] the package to fix the issue and
> pushed updates for F3{2,1,0}. [3,4]
>
> The update for F32 is already in
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 08:17:42AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> there is nothing to announce, and nothing on the meeting agenda. Some
> tickets are in progress, but I think we should continue the discussion
> in tickets.
>
> I propose to cancel today's meeting. If
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200524.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200525.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 78
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 178.84 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi all.
Some packages has string
...
And appstream-util validate-relax show error
? tag-invalid : stock icon is not valid
There exist bugreport one year old!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584944
Please pay attention to it.
No I don't know what to do:
1. Remove this
I made builds for R-argon2 last night as well, which you can include
in your update.
- R-argon2-0.2.0-7.fc31
Actually, there's no need for a _new_ update; you can just edit the
existing one.
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 08:41, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
>
> builds for borgbackup done (finally):
> -
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 9:31 PM Vascom wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Some packages has string
> ...
> And appstream-util validate-relax show error
> ? tag-invalid : stock icon is not valid
>
> There exist bugreport one year old!
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584944
>
>
>
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > So a request here: once the rebuilds are done, before we consider
> > > > moving
Hi Mattia,
Mattia Verga via devel writes:
> Hi all,
>
> now that we have new detailed statistics about new package review
> tickets ( https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ) I would like
> to make some cleanings... at the time I'm writing, there are 517 tickets
> listed as new, many
On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
So a request here: once the rebuilds are done, before we consider
moving them to Rawhide proper, can we have releng run a test compose
using the side
First I'd like to thanks people that made me realize I was confusing the
GPT's partition type GUID and GPT's Unique partition GUID. And to also
mention the filesystem UID.
Because Fedora choose not to apply the BLS partition type GUID or BLS
MBR type id, I believe we generate the following
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839536
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839536
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839536
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-e0d594df2d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e0d594df2d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-8eb5734d75 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8eb5734d75
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6feefb27e9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6feefb27e9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839743
Bug ID: 1839743
Summary: perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.96 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-PatchPerl
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839702
Bug ID: 1839702
Summary: perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-JMAPTalk
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839702
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839702
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On 4/19/20 4:55 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello Python packagers.
After touching the %python_provide topic in:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/SSJLPWSGFGPYRSHXQZDR7JNQXSDGGX3Z/
I have realized several things I don't like about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839743
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.96
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838657
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Mojolicious-8.43 is|perl-Mojolicious-8.50 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835354
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835359
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-22764f623f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-22764f623f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835354
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-22764f623f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-22764f623f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835359
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 5:00 AM Petr Viktorin wrote:
>
> I finally got around to this mail...
>
> On 2020-04-19 16:55, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > As always, this leaves us with the name problem, but I'd very much like
> > to use %python_provides (note the s). The only problem I see is that it
>
On 25. 05. 20 18:33, Tomas Orsava wrote:
On 4/19/20 4:55 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
4) Make it so that for given arguments, the macro will only expand to
something once per build. Hence when you use it with package name, the
automatic provides won't re-add the same provide again. This also means
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831309
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839915
Bug ID: 1839915
Summary: perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.15 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-JMAPTalk
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838904
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837829
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6feefb27e9 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835354
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-39d40d9ae9 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835359
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-39d40d9ae9 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835359
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839536
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835354
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-8eb5734d75 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
54 matches
Mail list logo
