Fedora-IoT-33-20200526.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.31 to 0.10 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/602209#downloads Current test data:

Re: late generation of assemble code

On Sun, 24 May 2020 05:21:05 +0200, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote: > The idea was to push code generation as near as possible of code execution. > Because at execution time, you know what are the specific features of the > CPU, and what is used to most often by the user of the program. In Free

Re: new packages review tickets

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:03 AM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Let me know if you agree (or disagree) with this proposal. I like it. I'm happy to help and take the ongoing "enforcement" work as part of the Program Manager's role if you don't want to stay on top of this forever (although I'd

Re: new packages review tickets

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:33:14AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:03 AM Mattia Verga via devel > wrote: > > > Let me know if you agree (or disagree) with this proposal. > > I like it. Let me add my +1 too. (Actually, I had some doubts about the details, but I think taking

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 26. 05. 20 16:14, Justin Forbes wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a > side tag. > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 26. 05. 20 16:14, Justin Forbes wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9,

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 26. 05. 20 17:19, Justin Forbes wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 26. 05. 20 16:14, Justin Forbes wrote: > > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok mailto:mhron...@redhat.com> >

Re: ocaml-extlib minimal build

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:19:11PM +0800, Andy Li wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Thank you for looking into this. > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 6:51 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I looked at the packages in Fedora which BR ocaml-extlib and it looks > > like nothing uses these modules. Haxe seems to

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: glances

I also had filed this ticket, back in Oct/2019 asking the EL8 build. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763319 On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 14:26, Richard Shaw wrote: > I did a local update and tested it, being innocuous enough I went and and > updated and am performing builds now.

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated > rebuild in a > > side tag. > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 > > > > If you see a "Rebuilt for Python

Review swaps

Hi all, I have these 2 packages that are probably almost OK. They were reviewed and should be probably good now. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811777 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811774 Would anyone give me a hand? They are important for having puppet and

libutempter rebase to version 1.2.0

Hi guys, later today i will rebase libutempter to version 1.2.0 in rawhide. There is no soname bump and i checked that the abi is 100% compatible so i do not expect any issues. Still I wanted to give you info if something unexpected would happen. ___

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200526.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200526.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 605301 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/605301 -- Mail generated by check-compose:

Re: [Rawhide] Missing boost-python3-devel in repository

On 24/05/20 00:43 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 23. 05. 20 20:09, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team, It looks like the build system is missing boost-python3-devel which causes openvdb to fail as  result below: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44871050 Could someone

Re: Increasing the packaging team: regular workshops/vFADs/classroom sessions on packaging

On Fri, May 22, 2020 14:19:02 -0400, Eduard Lucena wrote: > Hello, > > As part of the marketing team, I think we could put a community campaign, with > a video series (series means at least 3) posted properly on YouTube and > promoted by Twitter, CommBlog and ML: > > "Package with us!" I think

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200526.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) ID: 605599 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/605599 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

ocaml-extlib minimal build

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837823 Hopefully I've CC'd this to everyone who has a package that BuildRequires ocaml-extlib in Fedora. As Andy pointed out in the bug report above, ocaml-extlib has two ways to build it, and upstream recommends building using the "minimal" variant.

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, please don't rebuild it in regular 

Re: [Rawhide] Missing boost-python3-devel in repository

On 23/05/20 12:18 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: On 2020-05-23 11:20 a.m., Igor Raits wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 11:09 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team, It looks like the build system is missing boost-python3-devel which causes

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

-Rawhide-20200526-Python39-NOREPORT=1 and that looks good. The Cyrillic failure is a known bug in Rawhide, and the other failures are things that are known to fail when we run these tests with a netinst image as opposed to a DVD image (they rely on the image containing packages). I'm currently trying

Help needed with Fedora Python Classroom Lab container image

Hello. There is a docker/podman container image part of the Fedora Python Classroom Lab: https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/python-classroom I need help with two main issues: 1) The container doesn't built for Fedora 32: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45001647 But

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

ired to do a minimal compose should all be > rebuilt > now. So you should be able to hack it up somehow. If packages are missing, > please let me knwo and I'll make sure to include them in the initial set for > Python 3.10. So I got an installer image built and tested: https://openqa.stg.

Re: s390x builders are short on disk space?

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:54:16AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > Hi, > > three different builds of ceph have failed in the last 15 min. for lack of > space to untar the source. > > Would someone check them out please? The problem is that ceph uses a ton of disk space. If it failed on a

F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

Can someone explain why my update[1] which was submitted for F30 stable was not pushed but "marked obsolete"? It was a security update, too. Regards, Dominik [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2d381e061b -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion

Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Can someone explain why my update[1] which was submitted for F30 stable was not pushed but "marked obsolete"? It was a security update, too. Regards, Dominik [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2d381e061b Fedora 30

Re: TeXLive 2020 landing in rawhide

On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:48 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 05. 20 13:51, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > According to koschei, the graphite2 BuildRequires now pull in *about > > 300 more (tex + perl) packages than before the 2020 update*, which is > > slightly concerning? > >

Re: TeXLive 2020 landing in rawhide

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:05:32PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: ...snip... > there is, IIRC, supposed to be a 'spin review' process we go through > every release which should be run by the spin wrangler and that is > where max size changes are supposed to be done, but I don't think we've > had a

Re: s390x builders are short on disk space?

On 26. 05. 20 17:58, Kaleb Keithley wrote: My bad. Only one. The second failed because the first had not finished on the other arches, despite canceling it. The third is actually x86_64 and failed for a different reason. As a side note, you are running the ceph builds in rawhide, while my

Re: Help needed with Fedora Python Classroom Lab container image

On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. > > There is a docker/podman container image part of the Fedora Python Classroom > Lab: > >https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/python-classroom > > I need help with two main issues: > > > 1) The container doesn't built for

Re: TeXLive 2020 landing in rawhide

Perhaps graphite2 generates a .tex file as part of the process? I'd have to look at it to figure it out. Can you please open a bug on the 300+ package increase with the specifics so I can figure out what (if anything) I can do to remedy this? Thanks, Tom On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:16 PM José

Re: Self Introduction

Welcome Yaroslav! On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 21:17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:46:15PM +0300, Ярослав Сидловский wrote: > > Hello to everyone! > > I'm software engineer from Russia, my name is Yaroslav. > > > > Today I've read nice news about beta release of KIO

Re: Self Introduction

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:46:15PM +0300, Ярослав Сидловский wrote: > Hello to everyone! > I'm software engineer from Russia, my name is Yaroslav. > > Today I've read nice news about beta release of KIO Fuse. Works great > for beta grade software. > Therefore I wanted to package it for myself and

Re: Location of executable code

On 5/23/20 12:18 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Would the time be better spent enhancing SELinux? ThatSELinux already labels everything in /bin and /usr/libexec as system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 so maybe it could be leveraged to cover everything you are considering? Is there something

Re: Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-25) — proposal to cancel

On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 08:17:42AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Dear all, > > there is nothing to announce, and nothing on the meeting agenda. Some > tickets are in progress, but I think we should continue the discussion > in tickets. > > I propose to cancel today's meeting. If

Fedora 30 EOL

Hello all, As of the 26th of May 2020, Fedora 30 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 30. Fedora 31 will continue to receive updates until approximately one month after the release of Fedora 33. The

s390x builders are short on disk space?

Hi, three different builds of ceph have failed in the last 15 min. for lack of space to untar the source. Would someone check them out please? thanks -- Kaleb ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Self Introduction

Hello to everyone! I'm software engineer from Russia, my name is Yaroslav. Today I've read nice news about beta release of KIO Fuse. Works great for beta grade software. Therefore I wanted to package it for myself and other people using Fedora and become a package maintainer. So it is. I've

[Test-Announce] [Reminder] Vote the timing for Fedora QA Global Onboarding Call

Hey All, A couple of weeks back, we opened up whenisgood[0] to capture the preferred timing for the onboarding call. We got a bunch of votes and this is the final call for voting, as we'll be closing the voting and picking the timing that works best for all. Thanks to all the folks again for

Re: s390x builders are short on disk space?

My bad. Only one. The second failed because the first had not finished on the other arches, despite canceling it. The third is actually x86_64 and failed for a different reason. On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:54 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > Hi, > > three different builds of ceph have failed in the

Re: new packages review tickets

Il 26/05/20 14:33, Ben Cotton ha scritto: > > I like it. I'm happy to help and take the ongoing "enforcement" work > as part of the Program Manager's role if you don't want to stay on top > of this forever (although I'd probably do it once per release cycle, > which is still a big improvement on

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7

Mukundan, your package misses. Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or let me commit changes to it. On 25/05/20 19:18, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > I made builds for R-argon2 last night as well, which you can > include in your update. > > - R-argon2-0.2.0-7.fc31 > > Actually,

Re: Packages still using %{?_smp_mflags} manually?

On 05/21/2020 07:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Not really a big deal but %build_make has been available for quite a while. I > noticed a few of my packages still supply _smp_mflags manually. > > Is this worth a script and automatic BZ? Probably not, but I think there is > an intrinsic value to

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Tue, May 26, 2020, 12:51 Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild > > in a > > side tag. > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 > > > > If you see a "Rebuilt for Python

Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 4:08:52 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > Can someone explain why my update[1] which was submitted for F30 > > stable was not pushed but "marked obsolete"? It was a security > > update, too. > > > > Regards, > >

[Bug 1206915] Segfault during upgrade; Segmentation fault (core dumped) perl -MXML::SAX -e "XML::SAX->add_parser(q($p))->save_parsers()" 2> /dev/null

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206915 Ben Cotton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1709199] /usr/sbin/rt-setup-database segfaults

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1709199 Ben Cotton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1710933] Invalid DocumentLocator object passed to

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710933 Ben Cotton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1839915] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839915 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1839915] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839915 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1840033] New: F33FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840033 Bug ID: 1840033 Summary: F33FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Alien-pkgconf Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 1840033] F33FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840033 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1840052] F33FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840052 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1840033] F33FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840033 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- *** Bug 1840052 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel

[Bug 1840052] New: F33FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840052 Bug ID: 1840052 Summary: F33FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Alien-pkgconf Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

Re: Redesigning the %python_provide macro from scratch

On 26. 05. 20 11:29, Tomas Orsava wrote: On 5/25/20 7:42 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 25. 05. 20 18:33, Tomas Orsava wrote: On 4/19/20 4:55 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: 4) Make it so that for given arguments, the macro will only expand to something once per build. Hence when you use it with package

Re: Redesigning the %python_provide macro from scratch

On 5/26/20 11:52 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 26. 05. 20 11:29, Tomas Orsava wrote: On 5/25/20 7:42 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 25. 05. 20 18:33, Tomas Orsava wrote: On 4/19/20 4:55 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: 4) Make it so that for given arguments, the macro will only expand to something once per

Help needed with Fedora Python Classroom Lab container image

Hello. There is a docker/podman container image part of the Fedora Python Classroom Lab: https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/python-classroom I need help with two main issues: 1) The container doesn't built for Fedora 32: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45001647 But

[Bug 1840363] New: perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840363 Bug ID: 1840363 Summary: perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.27 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Compress-Bzip2 Keywords: FutureFeature,

[389-devel] please review: PR 51114 - CLI/UI - Allow using uid for the replication manager entry

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/51114 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 1840295] New: perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840295 Bug ID: 1840295 Summary: perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTTP-Daemon Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Fedora 30 EOL

Hello all, As of the 26th of May 2020, Fedora 30 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 30. Fedora 31 will continue to receive updates until approximately one month after the release of Fedora 33. The

[Bug 1596493] rpm-build wrong handling perl dependencies by rpmbuild command

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596493 Ben Cotton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1840484] New: perl-Dancer2-0.300004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840484 Bug ID: 1840484 Summary: perl-Dancer2-0.34 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Dancer2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1836456] perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf-0.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836456 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1839743] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.98 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839743 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1839536] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839536 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1839743] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.98 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839743 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-67732c2737 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-67732c2737 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1839743] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.98 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839743 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1839536] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839536 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-05-27 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/05/27/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.2-20200526git2fc834a.fc32.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1836456] perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf-0.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836456 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf-0 |perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf-0