Hi Erich,
so today I spent some time in the recording session with the following
settings and configurations:
- The machine is 2x 12core Intel Xeon with an SSD drive and 32GB RAM - I
know that this is a recording overkill and I am not sure how much the
machine itself can influence the
Hello everyone,
we are aiming to remove libdb-java package from Fedora-rawhide, as we are
currently preparing for jdk update from jdk-1.8 to jdk-11 in Fedora
rawhide. The problem is that we are unable to rebuild this package with
jdk-11. It is still possible to "hack" it and rebuild it with
On 6/11/20 8:37 AM, Robert Relyea wrote:
On 4/23/20 11:16 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:11:25AM +0200, Daiki Ueno wrote:
Hello,
I am not sure if this deserves a Fedora Change proposal, so I'd like to
hear any opinions first before proceeding with the process.
NSS (the
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, er...@ericheickmeyer.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm considering moving Fedora Jam from KDE Plasma to GNOME. There are
> multiple reasons for this, and I think part of it would be beneficial
> to the overall GNOME and Fedora communities as it would be a way
On 11. 06. 20 13:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 08. 06. 20 16:49, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
as a maintainer of the python2.7 package I was surprised to see it being built
for ELN and I like to start a discussion on whether and how can I opt out this
deprecated package from ELN.
I also see the
er...@ericheickmeyer.com writes:
Anyhow, I'd love to see a discussion about this as well as any guidance
toward making this change. I know there would have to be a new
kickstart along with Koji pointing toward said kickstart. I could make
the kickstart, but I think I'd need Koji to look for it.
On 4/23/20 11:16 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:11:25AM +0200, Daiki Ueno wrote:
Hello,
I am not sure if this deserves a Fedora Change proposal, so I'd like to
hear any opinions first before proceeding with the process.
NSS (the crypto library used by Firefox)
On 10. 06. 20 11:09, Vít Ondruch wrote:
You should probably open PR modifying this file:
https://github.com/minimization/content-resolver-input/blob/master/configs/view-eln.yaml
Thanks. I don't understand that file and hence I won't open PRs to it (not until
I understand the relation between
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/51146
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:33:17PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:55:08 +0200
> Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:46:15 +0200
> > Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:17:42 +0200
> > > Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 23:24:57 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings everyone.
>
> Just a quick recap of our day 2 datacenter move.
FYI, claiming the badge for the elections does not work,
badges.fedoraproject.org spews an error 500 Internal Server Error.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel
Thanks!
My first review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846175
Any one willing to review that? A very simple package. And I am also
looking for a sponsorship after this can be approved.
Robin Lee 于2020年6月11日周四 上午12:47写道：
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 11, 2020, Qiyu Yan wrote:
On 08. 06. 20 16:49, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
as a maintainer of the python2.7 package I was surprised to see it being built
for ELN and I like to start a discussion on whether and how can I opt out this
deprecated package from ELN.
I also see the python3.6 package being rebuilt for ELN and
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 21:42, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> - Copr project "runtime" dependencies were implemented.
Great!
> - Copr-cli supports batch build delete feature:
>
> $ copr-cli delete build_id [build_id ...]
Hooray! Just delete or delete-build?
--
Iñaki Úcar
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 04:31:39PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 June 2020 at 08:24, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings everyone.
> >
> > Just a quick recap of our day 2 datacenter move.
>
> Thanks for all your hard work and for providing these (not so little)
>
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2020-06-11 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2020-06-11 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2020-06-11
On 20-06-10 14:22:53, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 14:16 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 20:01 +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
> > "Nathanael D. Noblet" writes:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I maintain beanstalkd which is a message server of sorts. It
recently
> > >
On 11/06/20 06:41 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm working on updating fldigi to build better in the Fedora MinGW
environment and I have commit access to the git repo (at least access to
create my own branches).
I have a branch called "tmp/mingw" and I've made several commits. I know
other
On 10/06/20 09:09 -0700, er...@ericheickmeyer.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm considering moving Fedora Jam from KDE Plasma to GNOME. There are
multiple reasons for this, and I think part of it would be beneficial
to the overall GNOME and Fedora communities as it would be a way to be
helping improve the
Simo Sorce wrote:
> If you really want to avoid the warning instead of ignoring it, you
> should change the code this way:
>
> strncpy(t->name, name, MAX_TUBE_NAME_LEN-1);
> if (t->name[MAX_TUBE_NAME_LEN - 2] != '\0') {
> t->name[MAX_TUBE_NAME_LEN - 1] = '\0';
> twarnx("truncating tube
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:08 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> FYI, claiming the badge for the elections does not work,
> badges.fedoraproject.org spews an error 500 Internal Server Error.
>
The badge claim URL should be valid for a few days beyond the end of
the voting period. If anyone is unable to
On Mon, 2020-06-08 at 09:37 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 18:19 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 12:56 PM Konstantin Kharlamov <
> > > hi-an...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> > > enough! The moral of this story is that you can't get away with
> > > only
> > >
On 6/11/20 10:33 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> "The beatings will continue until morale improves" ?
>
No. The only way to provide feedback to improve something is to actually
*use* the product. Yelling and screaming if you're not actually using it
does nothing to improve it.
signature.asc
Hello,
I have a repository with a real time kernel I use for music.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ycollet/linuxmao/
With this kernel, I can 128 samples buffer at 48kHz and 5 ms latency
without Xruns.
I use "a lot" of applications to perform guitar (guitarix + tuxguitar).
I also can
I'm working on updating fldigi to build better in the Fedora MinGW
environment and I have commit access to the git repo (at least access to
create my own branches).
I have a branch called "tmp/mingw" and I've made several commits. I know
other commits had been made to master and I've done this in
On 11. 06. 20 13:41, Richard Shaw wrote:
remote: *** Your commits contain a bad merge:
remote: *** 47456e93 2020-06-10 Merge branch 'master' into tmp/mingw***
Please rebase on top of this commit in tmp/mingw:
remote: *** a596a086 2020-06-10 Initial commit for MinGW 64bit builds.
This
On Wednesday, June 10, 2020 10:31:32 PM CEST Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > - Copr-cli supports batch build delete feature:
> >
> > $ copr-cli delete build_id [build_id ...]
>
> Hooray! Just delete or delete-build?
Yes, typo, I meant "delete-build" command.
Pavel
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:46 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11. 06. 20 13:41, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > remote: *** Your commits contain a bad merge:
> > remote: *** 47456e93 2020-06-10 Merge branch 'master' into
> tmp/mingw***
> > Please rebase on top of this commit in tmp/mingw:
> > remote:
On 10/06/20 21:43 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 02:22:53PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 14:16 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 20:01 +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
> > "Nathanael D. Noblet" writes:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I maintain
Just a reminder that the deadline for this is just less two weeks away
now, so here's the information again if you want to apply:
The Fedora Packaging Committee has some open seats and is accepting
submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC.
This position involves not only
* Ondrej Dubaj:
> we are aiming to remove libdb-java package from Fedora-rawhide, as we
> are currently preparing for jdk update from jdk-1.8 to jdk-11 in
> Fedora rawhide. The problem is that we are unable to rebuild this
> package with jdk-11. It is still possible to "hack" it and rebuild it
>
On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 20:21 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > If you really want to avoid the warning instead of ignoring it, you
> > should change the code this way:
> >
> > strncpy(t->name, name, MAX_TUBE_NAME_LEN-1);
> > if (t->name[MAX_TUBE_NAME_LEN - 2] != '\0') {
> >
Greetings, all!
The elections for FESCo election for Fedora 32 have concluded, and the results
are shown below.
FESCo is electing 4 seats this time.
A total of 273 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate
could accumulate up to 2730 votes (273 * 10).
The results for the elections are as follows:
Thanks for the Link.
I use the RT Kernel just for music. For standard desktop tasks, I switch
to the official Fedora Kernel.
With the standard Fedora Kernel, I've got too many xruns, that's why I
decided to test RT Kernel.
Le 11/06/2020 à 22:47, Erich Eickmeyer a écrit :
Hi Yann,
On
Hi Yann,
On 6/11/20 10:50 AM, Yann COLLETTE wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a repository with a real time kernel I use for music.
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ycollet/linuxmao/
>
> With this kernel, I can 128 samples buffer at 48kHz and 5 ms latency
> without Xruns.
> I use "a lot" of
On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 16:13 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I wish this was easier done than said :)
Yeah, this isn't *my* project, I just packaged it.
Thank you to everyone who added suggestions to dealing with the C code.
I'll take a look and see what upstream thinks about it.
I am wondering if
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2020-06-15
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We didn't meet for a few weeks, so let's check in and see where
things are.
If anyone has any other
Greetings all.
This email will cover days 3 and 4, as by the time I was going to send
yesterdays it was late and mailman was still down anyhow. :)
So, yesterday started out seeming like a pretty simple day, but didn't
turn out that way. We planned to move only two things and work on fixing
On Thursday, June 11, 2020 9:09:53 PM MST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We are working on getting this install moved over to recent
> fedora or rhel, but for now it's rhel7 and python34.
RHEL7 is better than RHEL8 anyway. ;)
I'm planning to skip RHEL8 entirely, it's totally b0rked.
--
John M. Harris,
On Thursday, June 11, 2020 9:25:41 AM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:08 PM Kevin Kofler
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > FYI, claiming the badge for the elections does not work,
> > badges.fedoraproject.org spews an error 500 Internal Server Error.
> >
> >
>
> The badge claim URL should
Hello team,
Blender 2.83.0 successfuly built on all but one architecture: armv7h.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1522859
Could these maintainers investigate the cause ? I intend to temporarly
exclude it until the fix is publishe.
Thanks
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On 21. 05. 20 11:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
There are possible followup rebuilds in play for two particular reasons:
1) The ABI can change between beta releases of Python and all arched Python
packages (661) will need a rebuild.
This can happen (but doesn't have to) at:
- beta 2: 2020-06-08+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846147
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846147
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ---
Good for EPEL8 either, but a new perl(Test::MemoryGrowth) dependency is missing
there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Hello everyone,
we are aiming to remove libdb-java package from Fedora-rawhide, as we are
currently preparing for jdk update from jdk-1.8 to jdk-11 in Fedora
rawhide. The problem is that we are unable to rebuild this package with
jdk-11. It is still possible to "hack" it and rebuild it with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1846147
Referenced Bugs:
On 6/9/20 12:15 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 2020-06-08 12:15, Tomas Orsava wrote:
On 6/8/20 11:58 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 2020-06-05 16:12, Tomas Orsava wrote:
On 6/5/20 2:26 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 2020-06-05 11:51, Tomas Orsava wrote:
On 6/5/20 11:26 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-61103921dc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-61103921dc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Hi,
we're the Python-maint team from Red Hat, and we'd like to experiment
with sharing with you what we are working on from month to month. There
are some things we should not disclose (such as embargoed CVEs), but the
majority of what we do is out in public. Please let us know if you find
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-61103921dc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-61103921dc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0236944568 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0236944568
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0236944568 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0236944568
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846147
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1846148, 1846149
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1846147
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1252529
Referenced Bugs:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/06/11/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.9-1.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
Bug ID: 1846148
Summary: perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.012 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sereal-Decoder
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846490
Bug ID: 1846490
Summary: perl-Sereal-4.014 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sereal
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846147
Bug ID: 1846147
Summary: perl-Sereal-4.012 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sereal
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846493
Bug ID: 1846493
Summary: perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.014 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sereal-Decoder
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846491
Bug ID: 1846491
Summary: perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.014 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sereal-Encoder
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149
Bug ID: 1846149
Summary: perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.012 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sereal-Encoder
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842709
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829089
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120200602094358.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838904
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120200602094358.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840363
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120200602094358.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842709
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120200602094358.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830464
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120200602094358.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
php-horde-Horde-Core-2.31.14-1.el6
tomcat-7.0.104-1.el6
Details about builds:
php-horde-Horde-Core-2.31.14-1.el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835360
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Email-MIME-1.949-1.el8, perl-Email-MIME-ContentType-1.024-1.el8 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846509
Bug ID: 1846509
Summary: perl-Devel-Gladiator-0.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-Gladiator
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200607-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200607-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845194
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-libwww-perl-6.45-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842709
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200603-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841308
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
Just a reminder that the deadline for this is just less two weeks away
now, so here's the information again if you want to apply:
The Fedora Packaging Committee has some open seats and is accepting
submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC.
This position involves not only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829089
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3220200602094358.35f641a4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830464
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3220200602094358.35f641a4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840363
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3220200602094358.35f641a4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838904
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3220200602094358.35f641a4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835355
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Email-MIME-1.949-1.el8, perl-Email-MIME-ContentType-1.024-1.el8 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835353
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Email-MIME-1.949-1.el8, perl-Email-MIME-ContentType-1.024-1.el8 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842524
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842698
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200607-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844899
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842176
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200607-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/51150
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844899
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200607-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842176
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200607-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842698
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200607-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845194
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842709
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200603-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/51151
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Greetings, all!
The elections for FESCo election for Fedora 32 have concluded, and the results
are shown below.
FESCo is electing 4 seats this time.
A total of 273 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate
could accumulate up to 2730 votes (273 * 10).
The results for the elections are as follows:
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
