Fedora-Cloud-33-20210727.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210726.0): ID: 935901 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

cups-filters's been rebuilt in side tag as cups-filters-1.28.9-5.fc35. I removed the build requirement for poppler-devel, since it is no longer needed (all stuff is now covered by poppler-cpp-devel). On 7/26/21 6:06 PM, Marek Kasik wrote: Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in

Re: squashfs-tools being updated in rawhide

The upstream fix looks good and squashfs-tools-4.5-2 has the patch and is in today's rawhide compose. There will be a minor point release for squashfs-tools in the near future with the fix. But phillip is waiting a short bit to see if any other problems get discovered before making a new

Re: Consider packaging Jello

Blaise! Awesome - long time, man! Will do. Kelly ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Azure CLI + SDK packaging update and review swap request

Hey folks, Thanks to everyone who helped with package reviews and guidance as I cobbled together the Azure CLI and SDK packages. The work is almost complete! There are a few remaining packages left to review: python-azure-appconfiguration (required SDK component)

Re: Consider packaging Jello

Hi Kelly, Let's see if I can hook you up. It would be a great excuse to get back in touch with you! I'm in eastern time zone these days, so send me your favorite contact info and we'll set something up. Best, blaise at gmail On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 3:50 PM Kelly Brazil wrote: > Thank you, but

Fedora-IoT-35-20210727.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210726.0): ID: 936467 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/936467 ID: 936484 Test: aarch64

Standard version specification in Dockerfile's for 'x-pkg verrel'

Hey y'all, I'm a developer at Red Hat working on adding a user-requested feature to the 'x-pkg' line of products. Specifically, the user would like the 'x-pkg verrel' command to work for those projects under the container/* branch of Fedora targeted software in the same way that the command

Re: Fedora Zuul had been integrated with Testing Farm and TMT

On 27. 07. 21 20:37, Colin Walters wrote: (If Fedora used a unified git repo, I could easily just grep it, but...) Here you go, it is 12 GB: https://src.fedoraproject.org/repo/git-seed-latest.tar.xz -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Standard version specification in Dockerfile's for 'x-pkg verrel'

Hey y'all, I'm a developer at Red Hat working on adding a user-requested feature to the 'x-pkg' line of products. Specifically, the user would like the 'x-pkg verrel' command to work for those projects under the container/* branch of Fedora targeted software in the same way that the command

systemd-oomd blows away the gnome-shell desktop session

Hi, I've been using f34 with gnome/wayland session on a 16MB machine which has 8GB zram swap configured. If I build anything large inside my desktop environment (llvm/clang) from a gnome-terminal, systemd-oomd blows away my whole desktop slice. This seems overly hostile. Now in theory I can use

Re: Self Introduction: Ma Zheng

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:29 PM Ma, Zheng wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is Zheng, newly coming to Fedora community :) > > I’m now working on the rpm packaging things, hoping to contribute a package > soon! Welcome! Hope for your first package! - robin > > > > Zheng > > > >

Re: systemd-oomd blows away the gnome-shell desktop session

On 7/27/21 6:23 PM, David Airlie wrote: Hi, I've been using f34 with gnome/wayland session on a 16MB machine which has 8GB zram swap configured. If I build anything large inside my desktop environment (llvm/clang) from a gnome-terminal, systemd-oomd blows away my whole desktop slice. This

Re: PSA: partner-bugzilla to be replaced with bugzilla.stage on July 31st

On 27. 07. 21 10:34, Kamil Paral wrote: If any of you uses https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com (e.g. for integration testing, etc, basically as a staging Bugzilla instance), please note that it says: "This instance of Bugzilla will be shut down

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before branching (i.e. in 1 week). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The

Re: PSA: partner-bugzilla to be replaced with bugzilla.stage on July 31st

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 07. 21 10:34, Kamil Paral wrote: > > If any of you uses https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com > > (e.g. for integration testing, > etc, > > basically as a staging Bugzilla instance), please note

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210727.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210726.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210727.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 104 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 21.00 MiB Size of dropped packages

PSA: partner-bugzilla to be replaced with bugzilla.stage on July 31st

If any of you uses https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com (e.g. for integration testing, etc, basically as a staging Bugzilla instance), please note that it says: "This instance of Bugzilla will be shut down permanently on July 31st at 12:30 AM UTC. You should use bugzilla.stage.redhat.com instead"

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210727.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210726.0): ID: 935975 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Free Pascal and F35 Mass Rebuild

Thanks for the help, Florian. Unfortunately, I'll have to admit straight away that even though I co-maintain FPC, my knowledge of assembly, ELF and compilers in general is close to non-existent, so I don't really know how to apply the minimal patch you gave. I wanted to submit a bug report

Self Introduction: Peter Savage

Hi all, I was a MOTU for Ubuntu in the past, recently I've become interested in composing music and there are a number of packages that I'd like to see in Fedora's main repo. I'm tacklingthe sFizz package first, hoping you'll see a package for review from me soon! Pete

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210727.n.0 changes

Something in grep/sed/rpm is broken since today or yesterday. On July 24th, a %global definition in a spec file still worked. It still works with a local Mock build for Rawhide/F35. It fails in koji Rawhide: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3604/72743604/build.log

F35 mass rebuild is finished

Hi all, Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 on Jul 21st, 2021. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.17 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_1.5.25

Fedora-Rawhide-20210727.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING:

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210727.n.0 changes

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:26:31 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > It's a locale in sed: > > $ grep '[ ]*#define[ ]*_AUD_PLUGIN_VERSION[ ]\+' > /usr/include/libaudcore/plugin.h 2>/dev/null | LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 sed > 's!.*_AUD_PLUGIN_VERSION[ ]*\([0-9]\+\).*!\1!' > 48 /* 3.8-devel */ > $ grep '[

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210727.n.0 changes

* Petr Pisar: > V Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 03:03:36PM +0200, Michael Schwendt napsal(a): >> Something in grep/sed/rpm is broken since today or yesterday. >> >> On July 24th, a %global definition in a spec file still worked. >> It still works with a local Mock build for Rawhide/F35. >> It fails in

Self Introduction: Ma Zheng

Hi all, This is Zheng, newly coming to Fedora community :) I'm now working on the rpm packaging things, hoping to contribute a package soon! Zheng ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210727.n.0 changes

V Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 03:03:36PM +0200, Michael Schwendt napsal(a): > Something in grep/sed/rpm is broken since today or yesterday. > > On July 24th, a %global definition in a spec file still worked. > It still works with a local Mock build for Rawhide/F35. > It fails in koji Rawhide: >

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

Am Dienstag, dem 27.07.2021 um 16:23 +0200 schrieb Tomas Hrcka: > Hi all, > > Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 > on Jul 21st, 2021. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements This change hasn't

Re: F35 Change: Switch to WirePlumber as the PipeWire session manage (late Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:18 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WirePlumber > > == Summary == > PipeWire currently uses a simple example session manager. This > proposal is to move to the more powerful WirePlumber session manager. > Has the Fedora Workstation

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 15:37, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > Hi all, Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 > on Jul 21st, 2021. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for: > > [...] > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F35Boost176 This change isn't in rawhide, so the

How to correctly handle scriptlets for systemd template unit instances

Hi everybody, I have a package (syncthing [0]) that provides both system and user units, depending on how the user wants the service to start. The user units are obviously specific to each user, but the system units are templates that are instantiated for the user who wants to have the service

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

On 7/27/21 10:37 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: This is affectting many different packages that use the %cmake3 macro and try to enter its build directory. I traced the root of it. The %cmake3 macro calls the %_vpath_builddir macro to set its build directory name. F35 - %_vpath_builddir:

Re: coreos-diskimage-rehydrator

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021, at 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Yeah I saw it but as with many things I didn't necessarily understand > it :-( So in fact it's nothing to do with streams as I was thinking > about it. I guess "stream" means something like "software stream", as > in which distro

Re: F35 Change: Switch to WirePlumber as the PipeWire session manage (late Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, Jul 27 2021 at 12:50:29 PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Has the Fedora Workstation Working Group made any recommendations around this? Does that group feel that WirePlumber is mature enough to replace the existing session manager? This change proposal is the first I've heard of it.

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

On Tue, 2021-07-27 at 16:23 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f35-rebuild) and moved over to > f35. > > Failures can be seen > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f35-failures.html > > Things still needing rebuilding >

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

On 7/27/2021 10:31 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am Dienstag, dem 27.07.2021 um 16:23 +0200 schrieb Tomas Hrcka: Hi all, Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 on Jul 21st, 2021. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for:

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

On 7/27/21 10:20 AM, Milan Crha wrote: Hi, looking on the libical build break [1], it looks like the ppc64le build doesn't use _target_platform properly in the CMake macros, because, if I read the build.log correctly, the build is done into `redhat-linux-build`, while the

Re: Consider packaging Jello

Thank you, but I'm not interested in becoming a package maintainer myself. I'm looking for someone to package and maintain a CLI app I developed. It is currently packaged or in process on some other platforms like homebrew, debian, AUR, etc. ___ devel

Re: PSA: partner-bugzilla to be replaced with bugzilla.stage on July 31st

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 27. 07. 21 10:34, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > If any of you uses https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com > > > (e.g. for integration

Re: Fedora Zuul had been integrated with Testing Farm and TMT

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, at 9:04 AM, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Dear all, > > Today we are gladly announcing that the Zuul CI system for Fedora, Congrats! > which is running checks for pull requests against > src.fedoraproject.org, will also run Test Management Tool (tmt) based > tests via

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Prioritized bugs and issues

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote: > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-07-28 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00 > America/Indiana/Indianapolis >At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat > > More information available at: >

Re: systemd-oomd blows away the gnome-shell desktop session

Also there's below: https://github.com/facebookincubator/below Hopefully it'll get packaged soon. https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/article-proposal-below-an-interactive-resource-monitor-for-modern-linux-systems/31176/2 Chris Murphy ___ devel

Re: systemd-oomd blows away the gnome-shell desktop session

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:14 PM Aleksei Bavshin wrote: > > On 7/27/21 6:23 PM, David Airlie wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been using f34 with gnome/wayland session on a 16MB machine which > > has 8GB zram swap configured. > > > > If I build anything large inside my desktop environment (llvm/clang)

Re: systemd-oomd blows away the gnome-shell desktop session

Killed /user.slice/user-1000.slice/user@1000.service/session.slice/org.gnome.Shell@wayland.service >Is there a command to list the current memory usage for each cgroup? Yes, either in sysfs or you can use systemd-cgls -m, and you can pass a path to eliminate extraneous processes and reveal more

releng pushed to perl-Net-LDAP-Server (rawhide). "- Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-07-27 07:08:57 UTC From 75e5a52340172aa4dc8222be72352bf960c47d1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2021 07:08:53 + Subject: - Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild

releng pushed to perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded (rawhide). "- Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-07-27 07:23:33 UTC From 31333c689e3e230ced027954b6251293efcf675f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2021 07:23:29 + Subject: - Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild

releng pushed to perl-Validation-Class (rawhide). "- Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-07-27 07:19:59 UTC From fac70706dfa779fb00c6259fab97fe2af2d23547 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2021 07:19:55 + Subject: - Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild

releng pushed to perl-Type-Tie (rawhide). "- Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-07-27 07:14:35 UTC From 1ba03f966c2ceacca0daff9cb527b13d32232660 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2021 07:14:30 + Subject: - Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild

releng pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (rawhide). "- Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-07-27 07:14:01 UTC From 8713af4b6e7fc355b7fd8cb0ef2eb6e8f953fa81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2021 07:13:56 + Subject: - Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-unversioned-command for epel8 (provides /usr/bin/python)

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:09 AM Tomas Orsava wrote: > > If I understand what you're describing correctly, this is not a bug. > In the default state, /usr/bin/python should *not* exist, that's correct > behaviour. If you want it to exist, you need to configure it using > alternatives [0]. > > We

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-unversioned-command for epel8 (provides /usr/bin/python)

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 2:04 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:09 AM Tomas Orsava wrote: > > > > If I understand what you're describing correctly, this is not a bug. > > In the default state, /usr/bin/python should *not* exist, that's correct > behaviour. If you want it to exist,

[Bug 1983178] perl-IPC-Shareable-1.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983178 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-unversioned-command for epel8 (provides /usr/bin/python)

On 28. 07. 21 1:19, Neal Gompa wrote: 3) In Fedora, various Python interpreters use pip/setuptools/wheel wheels from /usr/share/python-wheels or bundle their own wheel when the "general" ones are too new to work with old Pythons. Given the differences of life cycle of RHEL and Fedora, we plan to

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-unversioned-command for epel8 (provides /usr/bin/python)

On 27. 07. 21 23:03, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:09 AM Tomas Orsava wrote: If I understand what you're describing correctly, this is not a bug. In the default state, /usr/bin/python should *not* exist, that's correct behaviour. If you want it to exist, you need to configure

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-unversioned-command for epel8 (provides /usr/bin/python)

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 6:50 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 27. 07. 21 23:03, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:09 AM Tomas Orsava wrote: > >> > >> If I understand what you're describing correctly, this is not a bug. > >> In the default state, /usr/bin/python should *not* exist,

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-8676850578 chromium-91.0.4472.164-1.el8 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1b74f2e3ca tor-0.4.5.9-1.el8 4

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 61 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1f259a45ef openjpeg2-2.3.1-11.el7 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-edab6b43f2 seamonkey-2.53.8.1-1.el7 The following builds have

[Bug 1986640] New: perl-PDF-API2-2.041 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986640 Bug ID: 1986640 Summary: perl-PDF-API2-2.041 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PDF-API2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1986164] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000141 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986164 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 1986164] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000141 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986164 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-68b68c5ed7 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #5: 0.000141 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you are following: `` 0.000141 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/5 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1986164] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000141 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986164 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

[Bug 1986347] New: perl-Archive-Tar-2.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986347 Bug ID: 1986347 Summary: perl-Archive-Tar-2.40 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Archive-Tar Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #6: 0.000141 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you are following: `` 0.000141 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/6 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #7: 0.000141 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you are following: `` 0.000141 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/7 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1986164] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000141 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986164 --- Comment #2 from Michal Josef Spacek --- And for fedora 34, 33, forward change -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #5: 0.000141 bump

mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` 0.000141 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/5 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #7: 0.000141 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 0.000141 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/7 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #6: 0.000141 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 0.000141 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/6 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #8: 0.000141 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you are following: `` 0.000141 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/8 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #8: 0.000141 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 0.000141 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/8 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1986164] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000141 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986164 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1986164] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000141 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986164 --- Comment #3 from Michal Josef Spacek --- Builds: * perl-Test2-Suite-0.000141-1.fc35 * perl-Test2-Suite-0.000141-1.fc34 * perl-Test2-Suite-0.000141-1.fc33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

F35 mass rebuild is finished

Hi all, Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 on Jul 21st, 2021. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.17 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_1.5.25

spot pushed to perl-Mail-Message (rawhide). "3.011"

Notification time stamped 2021-07-27 14:39:30 UTC From 6a0dcdc631a12cf2c36352396e3d435d5cf12e06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom spot Callaway Date: Jul 27 2021 14:39:24 + Subject: 3.011 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index c69583c..e5df25e 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++

[Bug 1986164] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000141 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986164 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-68b68c5ed7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-68b68c5ed7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[EPEL-devel] Re: Updated KDE Plasma Desktop ready for testing on CentOS Stream 8

What does "fresh install" mean in this context? (You freshly installed the kde-desktop, you did a new CentOS Stream 8 minimal/server/workstation install, etc..) I haven't seen this yet, and I'm having a hard time reproducing it. On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 10:50 AM Massi aka Ergosum wrote: > Il

[Bug 1986436] New: perl-Mail-Message-3.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986436 Bug ID: 1986436 Summary: perl-Mail-Message-3.011 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mail-Message Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before branching (i.e. in 1 week). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The

[Bug 1986436] perl-Mail-Message-3.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986436 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been automatically reported. Sorry! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[EPEL-devel] Re: Updated KDE Plasma Desktop ready for testing on CentOS Stream 8

I've been able to install, and update all of the packages listed here. So, unless you are able to give more details about how your machine is setup, there isn't much I can help with. On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 6:39 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > What does "fresh install" mean in this context? > (You

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-07-28 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname

[Bug 1986436] perl-Mail-Message-3.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986436 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---