Re: Should we retire the mailx package?

On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 12:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 18:47, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 10:38 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;( > > > > > > Hopefully the current

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

> Am 11.12.2023 um 15:09 schrieb David Both : > > What is the objective of achieving this "boot with empty /etc"? What > does it accomplish? What problem does it solve? For me, from a sysadmin POV, the great advantage is the clear separation of sysadmin made configuration and distribution

Fedora Linux 39 Elections Voting are now Open!

Hi all, The F39 elections voting period has now opened for FESCo , Mindshare and Council .

Re: Help packaging PyTorch dependencies for Fedora

On 12/8/23 7:34 AM, Steve Grubb wrote: On Friday, December 8, 2023 12:41:59 AM EST Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote: Congratulations for the PyTorch package! https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-torch I hope someone will announce this great achievement to the Fedora community too, and update

Re: Should we retire the mailx package?

Hi guys, I am ok with retiring the mailx package so s-nail can become the primary supplier of the mailx command. On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 1:05 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 12:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 18:47, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > >

Re: Proven to be sickened

On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 9:49 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: ... > > FTBFS issues are, admittedly, complicated, but > such updates SHOULD be via a PR. If a PP wants > to claim they cannot follow that process, they need > to demonstrate that a particular packager is not > responsive (there is a process

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 09:09:33AM -0500, David Both wrote: > > I think I understand the immediate goal here, but I am still confused. > What is the objective of achieving this "boot with empty /etc"? What > does it accomplish? What problem does it solve? Is it a solution for a > small use case

Re: Should we retire the mailx package?

On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 18:47, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 10:38 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;( > > > > Hopefully the current maintainers are on board with this? > > Yeah, honestly, I'm not sure a Change is

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 09:58:04AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > >> No, it would be the other way round. We might have a > >> /usr/share/glibc/services which contains :include: /etc/services > >> somewhere in it. > > > > Ah, OK. I understand how the format

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

I think I understand the immediate goal here, but I am still confused. What is the objective of achieving this "boot with empty /etc"? What does it accomplish? What problem does it solve? Is it a solution for a small use case such as containers or something else? What problem does it solve for

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: >> No, it would be the other way round. We might have a >> /usr/share/glibc/services which contains :include: /etc/services >> somewhere in it. > > Ah, OK. I understand how the format would look, but I don't understand > why you'd want to implement it rather than

Re: Help packaging PyTorch dependencies for Fedora

On 12/8/23 08:34, Steve Grubb wrote: On Friday, December 8, 2023 12:41:59 AM EST Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote: Congratulations for the PyTorch package! https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-torch I hope someone will announce this great achievement to the Fedora community too, and update the

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

On Fr, 08.12.23 20:20, DJ Delorie (d...@redhat.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering writes: > > That said, I would certainly enjoy more if glibc would natively > > fallback to /usr/lib/glibc/nsswitch.conf or something like that if > > /etc/nsswitch.conf does not exist. > > glibc has an internal

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231211.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231210.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231211.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 26 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 179.08 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: Change of cronie and crontabs CIS compliance

Ondrej Pohorelsky writes: > I've removed cron.allow from my PR[0] and reverted to cron.deny approach. > As this was the only disputed change in these PRs so far, I plan on merging > both of them into rawhide at the end of this week. > However, if you see any issue with merging this "middle

Re: Fedora Review Service and setting the AutomationTriaged keyword

Thank you for the feedback Dominik, > Cool! Go for it. > Great idea. I am going for it then :-) On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 10:20 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > On Saturday, 09 December 2023 at 19:32, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > Hello, > > a year ago I announced >

Re: Help packaging PyTorch dependencies for Fedora

On Monday, December 11, 2023 4:59:45 AM EST Tim Flink wrote: > On 12/8/23 08:34, Steve Grubb wrote: > > On Friday, December 8, 2023 12:41:59 AM EST Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote: > > > >> Congratulations for the PyTorch package! > >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-torch > >> > >> I hope

Re: Fedora Review Service and setting the AutomationTriaged keyword

Thanks for working on this Jakub. I think it's quite useful. :) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 12:34, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:36 AM David Cantrell > wrote: > > > > On 12/8/23 10:25, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:58 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> There is a long-term goal

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

On 12/11/23 09:55, Peter Boy wrote: Am 11.12.2023 um 15:09 schrieb David Both : What is the objective of achieving this "boot with empty /etc"? What does it accomplish? What problem does it solve? For me, from a sysadmin POV, the great advantage is the clear separation of sysadmin made

Re: Proven to be sickened

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:28:31AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > While I generally agree that a merge request is a more polite and > elegant solution, if a package is listed as FTBFS (having had a bug > automatically opened) and some reasonable amount of time (two, three > weeks?) has

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

On 12/8/23 10:25, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:58 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> There is a long-term goal of moving packaged files out of /etc, so that >> only actual local configuration remains in /etc. This has some advantages: >> >> - Local

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

Once upon a time, Peter Boy said: > I would like to go even further and also separate distribution default code > and locally installed code in the /usr tree. OpenSuse has developed a good > proposal for this some time ago. More separation than /usr vs. /usr/local? -- Chris Adams --

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

Lennart Poettering writes: > Well, as you might be aware many distributions these days do more than > "files dns" for "hosts", and similar for the other databases, and > hence a built-in default in glibc is great, but most distributions and > image builders probably want to pick different

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:36 AM David Cantrell wrote: > > On 12/8/23 10:25, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:58 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> There is a long-term goal of moving packaged files out of /etc, so that > >> only actual local

Re: Help packaging PyTorch dependencies for Fedora

On 12/7/23 22:41, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote: Congratulations for the PyTorch package! https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-torch I hope someone will announce this great achievement to the Fedora community too, and update the following page too.

Re: Help packaging PyTorch dependencies for Fedora

On 12/9/23 14:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Friday, 08 December 2023 at 16:34, Steve Grubb wrote: On Friday, December 8, 2023 12:41:59 AM EST Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote: Congratulations for the PyTorch package! https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-torch I hope someone

Re: Change of cronie and crontabs CIS compliance

I've removed cron.allow from my PR[0] and reverted to cron.deny approach. As this was the only disputed change in these PRs so far, I plan on merging both of them into rawhide at the end of this week. However, if you see any issue with merging this "middle ground" change, feel free to discuss.

OCaml 5.1.1 rebuild in Rawhide

.. is under way: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239227 Shouldn't take more than a day or two, with any luck! In terms of the new version, nothing much to see here. There a three important regressions that are fixed, and one breaking change that is unlikely to be noticed:

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, at 12:31 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > We're currently not allowed to use /usr/etc (not that I like that path > anyway) because it breaks RPM-OSTree. My understanding is that this > directory is reserved by RPM-OSTree for storing pristine copies of > /etc content for each

armadillo soname bump to version 12

Hello there, I plan to bump the major version of the Armadillo linear algebra library to version 12 for rawhide next week; this will be an ABI/API change. I will rebuild the package and its dependencies (looks like gdal and mlpack only) in the side tag 'f40-build-side-79101'. Thanks! Ryan --

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

On 12/11/23 12:31, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:36 AM David Cantrell wrote: >> >> On 12/8/23 10:25, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:58 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >>> wrote: Hi, There is a long-term goal of moving packaged files out

Re: Should we retire the mailx package?

I've opened [1], please take a look. After it is merged, I'll start the package retirement process for mailx. Thanks, Nikola [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/s-nail/pull-request/3 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Fedora Review Service and setting the AutomationTriaged keyword

Many thanks Jakub. It is a helpful tool. Hopefully it will also encourage more community contributions to help improve and update Fedora Review as well. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Self Introduction: Rafel Amer

Welcome to Fedora, Rafel! On Sunday, 10 December 2023 at 22:17, Rafel Amer Ramon wrote: >Hi, >my name is Rafel Amer and I'm professor at the Technical University of >Catalonia [1]https:/www.upc.edu. I teach Maths >and I use sagemath for my classes. After the sagemath package is >

[Bug 2253770] perl-Math-BigInt-2.002001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253770 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jples...@redhat.com,|

Heads up: dnf5 cannot handle BuildRequires with Python extras

Hello Pythonistas. In case you upgraded to mock-core-configs-39.3 and see failures like this in rawhide mockbuilds with %pyproject_buildrequires: No match for argument: python3dist(setuptools-scm[toml]) >= 5 No match for argument: python3dist(raven[flask]) No match for argument:

[Bug 2253785] perl-App-Cme-1.039 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253785 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

Fedora Linux 39 Elections Voting are now Open!

Hi all, The F39 elections voting period has now opened for FESCo , Mindshare and Council .

[Bug 2252479] perl-Date-Manip-6.93 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252479 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-c6885fca46 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c6885fca46 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2253976] perl-Mail-Message-3.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253976 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2253976] perl-Mail-Message-3.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253976 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-Message-3.015-1.f

[Bug 2253770] perl-Math-BigInt-2.002001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253770 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 2253976] New: perl-Mail-Message-3.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253976 Bug ID: 2253976 Summary: perl-Mail-Message-3.015 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mail-Message Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2253979] New: perl-WWW-Splunk-2.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253979 Bug ID: 2253979 Summary: perl-WWW-Splunk-2.09 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-WWW-Splunk Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2253979] perl-WWW-Splunk-2.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253979 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 2003719 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2003719=edit Update to 2.09 (#2253979) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2253976] perl-Mail-Message-3.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253976 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 2003706 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2003706=edit Update to 3.015 (#2253976) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2253979] perl-WWW-Splunk-2.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253979 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-WWW-Splunk-2.09-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110179132 -- You

[Bug 2253976] perl-Mail-Message-3.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253976 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Mail-Message-3.015-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110178719 -- You

[Bug 2253828] perl-Code-TidyAll-0.84 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253828 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2253785] perl-App-Cme-1.039 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253785 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2253770] perl-Math-BigInt-2.002001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253770 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Math-BigInt-2.0020.01-

[Bug 2253785] perl-App-Cme-1.039 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253785 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 2253828] perl-Code-TidyAll-0.84 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253828 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 2253828] perl-Code-TidyAll-0.84 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253828 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2246934] perl-Mail-Box-3.010-1.fc40 FTBFS with perl-Mail-Message-3.014: t/505parser-bodymp.t tests fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246934 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #1 from

Re: python packaging assistance sought for xgboost

On 10. 12. 23 23:05, Nathan Scott wrote: Thanks for the assistance Miro. I've uploaded a local build log here: https://nathans.fedorapeople.org/xgboost/build.log AFAICS the python parts of the %install step seemed to have worked, but based on Sandro's pointer I can see many files are

[Bug 2252479] perl-Date-Manip-6.93 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252479 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jpazdzi...@redhat.com

[Bug 2252479] perl-Date-Manip-6.93 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252479 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[EPEL-devel] cloud-utils-growpart package conflict

While updating to EL8.9 I noticed that cloud-utils-growpart is in EPEL and RHEL8? cloud-utils-growpart noarch 0.33-0.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms cloud-utils-growpart noarch 0.33-3.el8 epel Subpackage conflict? -- Leon -- ___ epel-devel

[Bug 2254072] New: perl-JSON-Path-1.0.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254072 Bug ID: 2254072 Summary: perl-JSON-Path-1.0.4 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-JSON-Path Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] Re: cloud-utils-growpart package conflict

Am 11.12.23 um 20:29 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 2:19 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: While updating to EL8.9 I noticed that cloud-utils-growpart is in EPEL and RHEL8? cloud-utils-growpart noarch 0.33-0.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms cloud-utils-growpart noarch

[EPEL-devel] Re: cloud-utils-growpart package conflict

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 2:19 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: > > While updating to EL8.9 I noticed that cloud-utils-growpart is in EPEL > and RHEL8? > > cloud-utils-growpart noarch 0.33-0.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms > > cloud-utils-growpart noarch 0.33-3.el8 epel > > Subpackage

[Bug 2254117] New: perl-Dancer2-1.1.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254117 Bug ID: 2254117 Summary: perl-Dancer2-1.1.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Dancer2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: python packaging assistance sought for xgboost

Thanks Miro - that size pointer was helpful. Indeed, the only thing in the wheel are 3 metadata files. Things seem to be OK up to this point in the upstream hatchling build: https://github.com/dmlc/xgboost/blob/43897b829680d241491abe1ecd46b2ba9d338967/python-package/packager/pep517.py#L86 ...