On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:05:42AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:57:58AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xnvme/adduser
> >
> > I try to add karlowich (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/karlowich/)
> > but his name
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:14:38AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:05:42AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:57:58AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xnvme/adduser
> > >
> > > I try to add
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xnvme/adduser
I try to add karlowich (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/karlowich/)
but his name doesn't appear in the username field even though he's
in the packager group. Why?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:57:58 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xnvme/adduser
>
> I try to add karlowich (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/karlowich/)
> but his name doesn't appear in the username field even though he's
> in the packager group.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 09:57:58 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xnvme/adduser
>
> I try to add karlowich (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/karlowich/)
> but his name doesn't appear in the username field even though he's
> in the packager group. Why?
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:57:58AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xnvme/adduser
>
> I try to add karlowich (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/karlowich/)
> but his name doesn't appear in the username field even though he's
> in the packager group.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 1:51 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:14:38AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:05:42AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:57:58AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 01:55:14PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 1:51 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:14:38AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:05:42AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar
On 18. 03. 24 16:33, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Hello, all:
After investigating the recent Fedora-Security-Live livespin compose failure
on F-41, it is found that this is caused because:
- Recently on F-41, bash-completion packaging changed so that pkgconfig file
is moved into -devel subpackage:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-03-11 19:30 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Hello, all:
After investigating the recent Fedora-Security-Live livespin compose failure
on F-41, it is found that this is caused because:
- Recently on F-41, bash-completion packaging changed so that pkgconfig file
is moved into -devel subpackage: (bash-completion-2.11-15.fc41)
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 4:33 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
> Hello, all:
>
> After investigating the recent Fedora-Security-Live livespin compose failure
> on F-41, it is found that this is caused because:
>
> - Recently on F-41, bash-completion packaging changed so that pkgconfig file
>is moved
OLD: Fedora-40-20240317.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240318.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:07:08 +0100
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 4:33 PM Mamoru TASAKA
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, all:
> >
> > After investigating the recent Fedora-Security-Live livespin compose failure
> > on F-41, it is found that this is caused because:
> >
> > - Recently
Thanks, lynis is fixed, cowsay will be momentarily.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Monday, March 18th, 2024 at 10:33 AM, Mamoru TASAKA
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 5:22 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:07:08 +0100
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > I wonder why these packages rely in pkg-config and don't just install
> > to `%{bash_completions_dir}`?
>
> because it hasn't always exist? Or it's mentioned in some guidelines?
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024, at 10:00 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 11:55 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 2024-03-17 at 23:12 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
>> >
>> > Did I miss an announcement (very possible),
>> > or did something else change to no longer
>> > pull
On 18. 03. 24 17:07, Fabio Valentini wrote:
I wonder why these packages rely in pkg-config and don't just install
to `%{bash_completions_dir}`?
Because they either predate the macro or the thing was copied from another
package that predates it.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:46:46 +
Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> Thanks, lynis is fixed, cowsay will be momentarily.
and mt-st is fixed as well
Dan
>
>
>
> --
> Gwyn Ciesla
> she/her/hers
>
> in your fear, seek only peace
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-03-18/flatpak-sig.2024-03-18-15.30.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-03-18/flatpak-sig.2024-03-18-15.30.log.html
Text Minutes:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:33:02AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> 8gromacs/rawhide/gromacs.spec%define compdir %(pkg-config
> --variable=completionsdir bash-completion)
I changed gromacs to use %{bash_completions_dir} now.
Zbyszek
--
In one week (2024-03-25), or slightly later, I plan to update the
flatbuffers package to 24.3.7 in F41/Rawhide[1]. As usual, this includes
an SONAME version bump. Upstream follows calendar versioning and does
not attempt to keep the ABI stable across releases.
Unless a maintainer asks me to
Gonna help with this today
Den tors 14 mars 2024 kl 05:35 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee :
>
> Dear Fedorans,
>
> Are you ready to make a difference in the world of Fedora Linux? We're
> thrilled to announce the launch of our brand new test day series:
> Rawhide Test Days! These events are your
On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 16:17 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 4:06:46 AM EDT Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
> > Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > > I hope my report can be resolved before I am forced to use
> > > Wayland.
> >
> > You will not be forced to use Wayland.
On 10-03-2024 18:10, Sandro wrote:
On 03-03-2024 21:42, Sandro wrote:
I plan to update libunibreak to version 6.1 in rawhide and F40 in
about a week.
This update comes with an soname bump. The following packages depend
on libunibreak:
fedrq wrsrc -Xs libunibreak -F name
coolreader
fbreader
"Martin Gansser" writes:
> Hi,
>
> when compiling openclonk [1] on rawhide it fails with this error message [2]:
> /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/c4group.dir/link.txt
> --verbose=1
> /usr/bin/g++ -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g
> -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe
On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 4:06:46 AM EDT Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > I hope my report can be resolved before I am forced to use Wayland.
>
> You will not be forced to use Wayland. Stay tuned.
In an effort to test a Wayland bug I reported upstream, I upgraded
and done with some testing and translations for dnf5 and dnf4
Den tis 19 mars 2024 kl 03:45 skrev Luna Jernberg :
>
> Gonna help with this today
>
> Den tors 14 mars 2024 kl 05:35 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee :
> >
> > Dear Fedorans,
> >
> > Are you ready to make a difference in the world of Fedora
According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate Beta-1.8 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269439
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-f9685bc9ea (perl-HTML-Parser-3.82-1.fc39) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-f9685bc9ea
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270079
Bug ID: 2270079
Summary: perl-CGI-4.64 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CGI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269439
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-HTML-Parser-3.82-1.fc4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270060
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270059
--- Comment #1 from TEJ RATHI ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270060
Bug ID: 2270060
Summary: CVE-2021-47154 perl-Net-CIDR-Lite: improper handling
of extraneous zero characters in an IP address string
[fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270060
TEJ RATHI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2270058 (CVE-2021-47154)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270059
TEJ RATHI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2270058 (CVE-2021-47154)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270060
--- Comment #1 from TEJ RATHI ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270059
Bug ID: 2270059
Summary: CVE-2021-47154 perl-Net-CIDR-Lite: improper handling
of extraneous zero characters in an IP address string
[epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270059
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269439
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269706
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|anon.am...@gmail.com, |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269706
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270079
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Tk` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Tk/pull-request/2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270079
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269706
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PAR-Packer-1.063-1.fc4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270079
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-535c7c3d84 (perl-CGI-4.64-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-535c7c3d84
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270204
Bug ID: 2270204
Summary: perl-Variable-Magic-0.64 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Variable-Magic
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270079
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-535c7c3d84 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269439
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-1663894056 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d241ea2238
libuev-2.4.1-1.el8
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d7cc38dee9
apptainer-1.3.0-1.el8
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269439
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-f9685bc9ea has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267346
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
54 matches
Mail list logo
