.
I can continue listing examples but these 2 alone should be enough for
everyone to see that the projects are departing more and more and that if you
have that different goals you would hardly find common ground.
Regards,
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 13:24:10 Tuesday 23 August 2011 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 22 août 2011 13:42, Alexander Kurtakov a écrit :
Nicolas, while this was true things have changed dramatically last year
and Fedora is now what JPackage was in the past ...
Fedora might even be the first to ship JBossAS7
to not be started
until I start Amarok. Not that this is very common usage scenario but still I
know at least one guy using Amarok with mysql :).
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
this problem.
But until(if) this is done I see no other way than submiting builds until they
hit noppc builders. At least I do that often.
Regards,
Alexander Kurtakov
regards.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
.jpp.depmap.file/maven.local.depmap.file/ . The rest is just things
that
are not needed anymore but should not break things like defining
MAVEN_REPO_LOCAL and passing it to mvn-jpp.
P.S. Ville is just the last one I've seen doing that which made me writing
this mail.
Regards,
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel
On 21:59:40 Tuesday 25 October 2011 Josh Stone wrote:
On 10/25/2011 11:24 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:26 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer
har...@redhat.com napisał:
On
packages (shame on us if we can't make our own stuff run from our
packages)
* Name it :)
I'm pretty sure there are a number of other reasons for such SIG.
Alexander Kurtakov
I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse
java-devel mailing list for SIG discussions
On 30/08/10 15:38, Aditya Patawari wrote:
snip
It would be nice if we can help out newbies as well as other maintainers
like me to package and maybe develop java apps.
Similar, am only learning Java (1st Semester in College finished)
But would like to learn to package Java apps like
On 30/08/10 15:38, Aditya Patawari wrote:
snip
It would be nice if we can help out newbies as well as other maintainers
like me to package and maybe develop java apps.
Similar, am only learning Java (1st Semester in College finished)
But would like to learn to package Java apps like
On 08/30/2010 07:33 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
I'm pretty sure there are a number of other reasons for such SIG.
Our relationship with jpackage really needs to improve. They do a lot
of packaging work, we've borrowed a lot of that work, and then
diverged without contributing back
I don't currently maintain any Java packages within Fedora but I did
(somewhat) build the maven2 stack for EPEL[0] and I would be
interested in seeing a Java SIG happen as well as would definitely
join up.
Please everyone that is interested add yourself to
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
* AutoQA - QA guys are struggling with their effort to get their stuff
running from Fedora packages (shame on us if we can't make our own stuff
run from our packages)
* Name it :)
At my work, first thing that happens with Java
On 10/21/2010 08:10 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
Hi Fedora Packagers,
pitch
I would like to bring a new Eclipse plug-in to your
attention: Eclipse Fedora Packager[1]
Feedback, testing, bug reports, contributions are very much
appreciated. Our Trac instance is here (use your FAS
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
FYI the versionless jar/javadocs files are now in the draft (thanks for
the suggestion, somehow none of us thought of that)
Thanks for considering it.
But keep those
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 22:28 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 21:32 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 19:27
On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has not
managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging can
not even be used with the top Red Hat Java product, what is there to
say? (and on this subject, I don't
On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has
not managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging
can not even be used with the top Red Hat Java product, what is there
to say? (and on this subject, I
bugs makes things close to impossible to put priorities, fix and
improve the situation.
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
will change the version flag. Oh and looking at a
list of hundreds bugs makes things close to impossible to put priorities,
fix and improve the situation.
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 11:58:21PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/04/2010 10:22 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
2- ABRT should keep track of unresponsive users. If a user has an
outstanding needinfo? flag for the bugs sent through ABRT, he
shouldn't be able to send a new bug
On 11/06/2010 01:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/05/2010 09:46 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:56:51 +0100, Ralf wrote:
ABRT
It doesn't tell the user that core dumps without reproducer are
worthless in most cases but blindly sends out reports
Parts of the
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:17:59 +, Jóhann wrote:
On 11/06/2010 02:11 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/05/2010 10:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:58:21 +, Jóhann wrote:
On behalf of all reporters that have never received a response from a
maintainer on a
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:23:00 +0200, Alexander wrote:
How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs and
not expect the user to verify his/her bug still applies?
Have you noticed how many ticket EOL warnings some users receive all of
a sudden? They may be able to pay
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:23:00 +0200, Alexander wrote:
How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs and
not expect the user to verify his/her bug still applies?
Have you noticed how many ticket EOL warnings some users receive all of
a sudden? They may be able to
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:24PM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:23:00 +0200, Alexander wrote:
How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs
and not expect the user to verify his/her bug still applies?
Have you noticed how many
Scilab?is,?in?fact,?in?advanced?packaging?stage,?waiting?for?JOGL.
A lot of java packages need package from scratch or patch(this may be
difficult if you are not provenpackager, since some package maintainers
are non-responsive for a long while) for scliab5.2.1.
Please give us the
?
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
documents to look in a different way. We are not
speaking for tech savy users only and change for this type of users means you
have to take care of This update broke my homework formatting or Where is
that blue icon for usb devices now? and etc.
Alexander Kurtakov
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
On Monday 15 March 2010, Mat Booth wrote:
Hi all,
I can't find the Java bindings for libnotify -- I thought they would
be in libgnome-java, but I guess not.
So a couple of questions for the Gnome Desktop team:
And are there plans to package java-gnome?
Hi Mat,
I'm not in the Gnome
m2eclipse packaged and available on
Fedora?
If yes please join #fedora-java on freenode.net or say so on this mailing list
and I'll help as much as possible for this to become a reality.
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
that it should be fine if you do the changes when you have other
reasons too.
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07:33:18 pm Friday, November 19, 2010 Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:16:14PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Tom spot Callaway
tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
The Java Packaging Guidelines have been revised:
because people can
use eclipse for things that even require less than the current settings.
Alexander Kurtakov
!ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 4 2010-11-20 15:47:18.005
!MESSAGE An internal error has occurred.
!STACK 0
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
On 01:56:00 pm Tuesday, February 08, 2011 Mat Booth wrote:
On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned
packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where
necessary. It's that time
On 01:59:44 pm Tuesday, February 08, 2011 Mat Booth wrote:
On 8 February 2011 11:47, Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned
packages in the release, and
not to break the requiring
packages, so please claim these if your app depends on it:
Orphan: pmd
emacs-pmd requires pmd = 4.2.5-9.fc15
maven-pmd-plugin requires pmd = 4.2.5-9.fc15
xemacs-pmd requires pmd = 4.2.5-9.fc15
I took pmd because of maven-pmd-plugin which I maintain.
Alexander
On 10:33:31 AM Wednesday, March 23, 2011 Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:41 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
Hi,
fedora is known for offering the latest and greates software and
being on the edge etc. So I was
it.
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
at Fedora as a toy is really
hurting a lot of feelings.
Alexander Kurtakov
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 08:17:24 AM Tuesday, June 21, 2011 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.06.2011 01:44, schrieb Adam Williamson:
so where was the QA before the release which forbids fix the release?
Well, a few things:
There's no planned testing of mysql prior to release. QA does not have
the resources to
Hi everyone,
Fedora is transitioning to using Maven 3 by default. Up until now it was
working because a lot of things were bringing maven2 into the build system.
Maven2 was part of Fedora for more ~5 years - long enough time to get a lot of
crap accumulated. We are slowly fixing issues as they
On 07:38:37 PM Thursday, June 23, 2011 David Timms wrote:
On 23/06/11 22:53, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
maintainers of most of the stack are slightly moving it to maven 3 only.
We
Hey Alex, is that supposed to be slowly ?
Not really. We do it as fast as we can but we try to not break
On 09:34:10 AM Saturday, July 02, 2011 Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
It would be nice to see Lucene Core in F16. There is an old Lucene
2.9.x for F16 - the latest
On 10:51:05 Thursday 14 July 2011 Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Orphan link-grammar
I am taking this one.
- fabiand
Can we get a v3 of the packages to be retired? There seem to be enough
changes in the list already.
Regards,
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel
which is where the actual start magic is happening...
FWIW, tomcat package (note the missing 6) is at version 7.x.y and ships with
the systemd integration and seems to be working fine.
Alexander Kurtakov
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
that ever worked for me.
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
things).
Alexander Kurtakov
If the reason for asking was w.r.t re-builds, it is unlikely that most
applications will need a rebuild -- only those using deprecated APIs
(which would have been deprecated for years now) and private APIs would
be affected. That would likely be a small subset
grow co-maintainers
without going through the complicated AWOL-process.
--
sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@lankes.net
--
Sounds reasonable enough to me.
Regards
Big +1 from me too for such change.
Alexander Kurtakov
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic
48 matches
Mail list logo
