On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:02:58AM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:55 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > On 10/17/18 8:52 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > > Again, I use gmail and things look perfectly fine for me.
> >
> > That's because gmail only shows the HTML part.
> >
>
>
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 01:14:32PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 05:00:32PM +0000, Anderson, Charles R wrote:
> > How do I start a thread on Discourse from email? We should start this
> > discussion over there so we can experience it ourselves.
>
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:49:49AM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:40 AM Fulko Hew wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:28 PM Jason L Tibbitts III
> > wrote:
> >
> > While I'm not a contributor to these lists, I do follow them
> > and have so for probably 20
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:10:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I ... don't know how to engage constructively with this accusation, because
> it it seems to come from absolutely nowhere. Yes, we're *definitely* trying
> out Discourse. That's not a conspiracy — it's live! We're also trying out
>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 01:51:02PM -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
> On 10/17/18 2:38 PM, Anderson, Charles R wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:12:37PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 14:48:52 -0400,
> >> "tonynel...@georgeanelson.com&q
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 03:52:17PM -0300, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> I'm not an email expert by any means. What I said was that it works
> perfectly fine for me. If people have an issue with it they should file a
> bug or enhancement request with the discourse project. That way the issue
> could be
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:12:37PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 14:48:52 -0400,
> "tonynel...@georgeanelson.com" wrote:
> >> ... For html only messages you would either need to reject them or rewrite
> >> them, both of which have issues.
> >I've used elinks to do
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 07:23:28AM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:07 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> > I tried the mailing list mode to have it send me e-mail messages,
> > but the messages are multipart/alternative (html+text) with
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 04:08:06PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 3:29 PM Michal Konečný wrote:
>
> > Because this is mainly for Steam Proton I support the decision to raise
> > the limit only for Workstation. No need to do this on server edition.
> > I recommend to also
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 06:58:27AM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Completely agree - and discourse is a great solution. It allows for
> RSS feeds and
> email notifications = participation is a click away. Your email inbox
> is no longer cluttered
> with hard to follow threads, nor do you have to
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:10:23PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:57 PM Michal Konečný wrote:
> >
> > Shouldn't this be caused by F29 final freeze?
>
> Not necessarily. The freeze went into effect only yesterday, so it's
> not that (yet).
>
> The specific packages I
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:14:18PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:01 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Important announcements (and RFCs) like this should really be done
> > somewhere where the most people will see it (probably the devel ML?)
> >
> It was also published to the
On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 12:36:54PM -0600, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Bauer
> wrote:
> > Sorry for the noise. This was meant for the rpmfusion devel list.
>
> Why is Zoneminder in RPMFusion? I'm curious why is it ineligible for
> Fedora?
Because
On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 08:13:06PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 4:33 PM Anderson, Charles R wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 12:36:54PM -0600, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Bauer
> > > w
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:32:55PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:23 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > * Fabio Valentini:
> >
> > > In the past few weeks, it has come up regularly that future
> > > "module-only" packages are orphaned (and hence will soon be retired),
> >
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:48:59PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Per the Fedora 30 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 30
> on Jan 31st 2019. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 30 for the changes
> listed in:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8086
>
> Mass rebuild was done in a side
Igor, your change broke my package. Whatever automation you used should have
taken into account that %post sections don't end until the next RPM directive.
%ifarch does not end a %post section.
diff --git a/ocp.spec b/ocp.spec
index 0d6fd28..2495ab5 100644
--- a/ocp.spec
+++ b/ocp.spec
@@
I can take tcsh if nobody else does.
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:23:54PM +, Marcin Dulak wrote:
> Nobody took tcsh until now.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Perhaps VNC should default to listing only on the loopback interface.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:55:59AM -0400, Jason Montleon wrote:
> Imagine starting up VNC, having no intention of opening port 59xx, and
> intending to use SSH tunneling to connect to the service.
>
> You think you're being
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 07:57:20PM -, vvs vvs wrote:
> Well, thanks for sharing.
>
> I'm not complaining that nobody wants to fix things for me. I'm complaining
> because there is no possibility to fix things myself. After removing i686
> repository I'm either should start building it
So, not only do you want to keep "old" stuff in Fedora (i686), but now you want
to revert/remove "new" stuff (modules) too? I'm beginning to think that Fedora
just isn't a good fit for you.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 06:22:52PM +, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
> Removing modules is a potential
I know you didn't ask about F29 upgrades, but it looks like it might work:
Removing:
kernelx86_64 5.2.7-100.fc29
@updates-testing0
kernel-core x86_64 5.2.7-100.fc29
No dep failures, but downgrades:
Downgrading:
gimp x86_64
2:2.10.12-2.module_f31+5293+eb7fed42 fedora-modular 22 M
gimp-libs x86_64
2:2.10.12-2.module_f31+5293+eb7fed42 fedora-modular2.2 M
podman
I'm getting this error as of last night on all of my CentOS 7 boxes:
/etc/cron.hourly/0yum-hourly.cron:
Updateinfo file is not valid XML:
Is this an infrastructure problem that can be addressed on the master mirror,
or is there some manual step I'm expected to perform on all my CentOS 7 boxes
24 matches
Mail list logo
