I just found out about the package brandy and was saddened to realize
that I missed the orphan-deprecation announcement. I'd like to take this
one.
Oddly, I see that the dead.package file states that:
This package was retired on 2011-07-25 due to it being unable to
build this
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 18:43 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 10:23 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
Hi Adam,
On the week of Aug 7 David Shein and I will be at POSSE-RIT teaching
professors how open source communities work. On the Wednesay afternoon
and Thursday
The ARM Secondary Arch project[0] is working on an F15 release for the
existing armv5tel architecture as well as the new armv7hl architecture
(with hardfp ABI). This effort has been previously announced and is
ongoing. A number of minor package changes are required as a result of
this effort:
(1)
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 16:53 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 07:36:40PM +0530, Tirtha Chatterjee wrote:
Can Plymouth be modified so that it shows up during hibernation and
wake-up too? In that case, can anyone guide me on how to do it? I am
ready to do the coding, but
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 16:51 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
* This policy of sticking religiously to upstream means we are not shipping
KDE integration for Firefox, despite patches from openSUSE existing. This
makes Firefox suck under KDE. Our Firefox maintainers refuse to do anything
about it.
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 17:49 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Chris Tyler wrote:
If you (or whoever is interested) can't get those patches through the
upstream review process for technical reasons, then perhaps they're ugly
patches. If you can't get them through because of lack of
time/energy
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 18:47 +0530, magina antimage wrote:
Hi,
I have ported fedora for my target board,
i am getting high CPU utilisation(30-35%) even when my system is
idle (no gnome / X session).
i used top command to see which process is consuming CPU,but couldn't
find any.
any
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 15:15 +0100, jonathan MERCIER wrote:
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 16:50 +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka
Pahan-Hubbitus) a écrit :
16.01.2011 16:21, jonathan MERCIER wrote:
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 16:10 +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka
Pahan-Hubbitus) a écrit :
Hello.
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 20:53 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
[0] We're making a one time incompatible ABI switch in F-15 bringup to
the hard float ABI defined in section 6 of the ARM AAPCS (commonly
referred to as the ARM EABI - but that doesn't actually exist as a
name). The procedure call standard
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 02:17 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Folks,
Join us on Friday to celebrate July with another in our series of VFADs!
Hi Jon,
Just a heads up that you won't have many Canadians joining you -- July 1
is Canada Day, a *big* party date on our calendar.
-Chris
--
devel
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 10:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, folks. The Test Day cycle for Fedora 16 will open shortly, and we're
putting out the call for anyone who has an idea for a Test Day. There
are many open slots on the schedule -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_16_test_days -
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 21:24 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
from here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
I see
/usr/bin/update-desktop-database /dev/null || :
what does mean this part of the code || : ?
|| is logical-OR with optimization (i.e., iff the
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 17:37 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/20/2012 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
That said, I considera cross-building environment for secondary arch to
be inevitable, which would at least help for the
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:21 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
drago01 píše v Út 20. 03. 2012 v 17:57 +0100:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/20/2012 09:37 AM, drago01 wrote:
I'm a big fan of cross compilation, but introducing it into Fedora in
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 05:04 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
just a side note - I was told by an OpenSUSE on ARM person that they
use
x86 boxes with the user-space qemu virtual machine. It works quite
fast,
but still needs some hacking eg. in test-suites
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 02:38 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
And finally, for our build speed issue, the practical consideration will be
whether the parallelism will actually speed our builds up. Right now our
builds are either serial or have portions parallelized with make -j, which
assumes a
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 01:51 +0300, Slava Zanko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 12:45 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 13:37:11 -0400,
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 10:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I don't see how using Mozilla trademarks provides significant benefit
to Fedora. It
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 00:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 04/26/2010 12:18 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
Let's not be brash. If we want to ship TB with one small patch, it's a
simple matter of asking.
If it was so simple, why haven't we done it already?
We did, with Firefox and Pango
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 23:55 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
You mean compliance with Mozilla's own standards such as APNG which
require a bundled hacked version of a system library to support?
Kevin, you keep bringing up APNG, so let me address that one. I know the
story because the Mozilla
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 23:42 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Just in case, let's say we have the package foo-1.0 if I make a
scratch build of package foo-1.1, that doesn't count at all, isn't
it?
I mean can I send an update foo-.1.1 completely different of the
foo-1.1 sent as a scratch build,
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:07 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
Some requisite patches weren't upstream in time for Fedora 19's 3.9 GA
kernel, but are in the 3.10 update. This means Arndale should be fully
supportable in Fedora 20. Meanwhile, there is an F19 remix for Arndale
using a later
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:28 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 07/15/2013 10:15 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
I think that's s/Arndale/Chromebook/
Same SoC, different peripherals sticking out.
Right -- but also different boot processes. I was just noting that the
image for which you provided
23 matches
Mail list logo
