Fedora Packager Dashboard available for testing

Hi, We'd like to announce public testing of the Packager Dashboard - a new service for Fedora package maintainers aiming to provide all relevant data: FTBFS/FTI status (from both Bugzilla, Koschei and health check), orphan warnings, bugzillas, pull requests, active overrides and updates - at a sin

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard available for testing

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:16 AM Bob Hepple wrote: > > Nice! > > Is the ourobolos (the snake eating its own tail) supposed to animate > all the time? To me, that kinda sorta means something is working - but > what? Hovering over it gives no clue. > > Or should I just wait a bit longer for it to fin

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard available for testing

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 9:15 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > RFE: would it be possible to make the icons in the header clickable > (the part where there's the ladybug, zapf, blocks, wrench, etc), so that > we'd get redirected to that list of issues (e.g. FTI bugs)? > > Zbyszek Zbyszek,

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard available for testing

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 9:15 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > RFE: would it be possible to make the icons in the header clickable > (the part where there's the ladybug, zapf, blocks, wrench, etc), so that > we'd get redirected to that list of issues (e.g. FTI bugs)? It also dawned on me th

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard available for testing

only see one of them. Why? > > Iñaki > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 18:35, Josef Skladanka wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We'd like to announce public testing of the Packager Dashboard - a new > > service for Fedora package maintainers aiming to provide a

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard available for testing

First of all, thanks for the feedback! On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:28 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > Would it be possible to change the "reset" to something like "set > all/unset all". When I wanted to know what actually "orphaned" means, I > had to click on every option, which is not very convenient. W

Taskbot: TAP vs Subunit

Tim (and of course the rest of the gang ;)), During our chat with Tim, we agreed that we'd really like to use some standardized 'output format' for the tests in Taskbot, to be a bit more programming-language/results-store-implementation agnostic. We knew about two options - TAP

Re: 2016-05-09 @ 14:00 UTC - Fedora QA Devel Meeting

Won't be able to make it today, but I spent the last two weeks dealing with base-image building. I can use some tasks, if we have something urgent and doable. Otherwise, I'd continue hacking on the trigger. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Tim Flink wrote: > # Fedora QA Devel Meeting > # Date: 20

Re: Release validation NG: planning thoughts

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 18:20 +0100, Josef Skladanka wrote: > > I would try not to go the third way, because that is really prone to > erros > > IMO, and I'm not sure that "per context" is always right. So f

Re: ResultsDB 2.0 - DB migration on DEV

Just for the sake of logging things done, this is how pruning the PROD db was done - it is conceptually the same as what was done for STG, so I'm not adding the comments. $ pg_dump -Fc resultsdb > resultsdb.dump $ createdb -T template0 resultsdb_archive $ pg_restore -d resultsdb_archive resultsdb.

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:01 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > Oh, and to answer your other point: > > Lukas Brabec wrote: > > It is pretty common for us in Fedora QA (well, I'm quite biased in this > > case). > > And no, we cannot compose our images, we have to test the exact same > > images that will be

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:06 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hence, the remainder of your post is a strawman based on entirely > fictional > "statistics". > > I'm glad you agree that your own argumentation is flawed, since it's based entirely on fictional statistics :) Since you not only presented no pr

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Final is GO

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:02 PM Christian Dersch wrote: > > Having that criterion " if there's an RC specific failure to output images > that didn't cause nightlies to fail, then we have to find out what's going > on." would be really nice. > > Greetings, > Christian > Christian, I absolutely a

Re: Check out the Fedora Packager Dashboard!

Björn, I won't be addressing the comments one-by-one, as it mostly boils down to "I don't like the UI/UX" (how I read it, at least). And I absolutely understand and accept that. On the other hand, we (as in the people who developed this) are, well, developers, and that about sums up the UX optimiz