Re: Rawhide plans

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:18:04 -0400 Kevin Fenzi lt;ke...@scrye.comgt; wrote Greetings. We had some nice discussions about rawhide in my friday workshop at flock. I thought I would post here to get input from folks not there, and also allow people who were there to comment more

Re: Rawhide plans

Le Mer 19 août 2015 18:22, Rex Dieter a écrit : gt; Kevin Fenzi wrote: gt; gt;gt; * Matt opened a thread on the marketing list about renaming rawhide. It gt;gt; sounds like most people would prefer us to make the changes first, gt;gt; then and only then look at renaming. gt; gt;

Bug Installing on Chromebook bug id 1135793

I've recently tested install media for F22 Workstation, F23 alpha rc2 (a couple flavors), rawhide, and F22 Mate Spin on my Acer C720. I'm only able to install with the F20 installer. The bug is that grub will load, you can make a selection, vmlinuz will load, then the system begins to probe

Chromebook/Installer Crash bug fix?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135793 The comments mention that this patch ( http://repo.or.cz/syslinux.git/commit/0a2dbb3392ee710838bea6bda80d4daad6b54780) fixes the bug and has been merged into upstream, however, the installer still crashes at EDD probe for me. How can I tell if

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

If it helps, Sixxs (https://www.sixxs.net/main/) is a very highly recommended tunnel broker. I have not tried it and am not affiliated. I do have ipv6 capability from my isp, so could help with testing. On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Oct

Any update on the status of ZFS?

It's been a few months since I've seen any mention of this. Has there been any change in the legal status of bring ZFS to official fedora repos? Regards, Zach -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Any update on the status of ZFS?

I have tried it. I don't like messing with dkms during upgrades. I remembered MM saying something about their being conversations about the license issue that were encouraging during an interview after the F22 release and wondered if there was any follow up. *apologies to MM if my recollection

Re: Better irc policies?

interested, maybe submit a ticket for infra with some requirements. :) Zach Villers #aikidouke -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: dnf behavior expected?

> > > I am running the rawhide-no-debug-alloc kernel with F23. I had three > saved > > 4.3 kernels. dnf.conf was not changed. I wanted to keep a total of six > > kernels and edited /etc/dnf/protected.d/dnf.conf to read; > > > > [main] > > gpgcheck=1 > > installonlypkgs=kernel.x86_64,

dnf behavior expected?

Sorry if this is the wrong list; I am running the rawhide-no-debug-alloc kernel with F23. I had three saved 4.3 kernels. dnf.conf was not changed. I wanted to keep a total of six kernels and edited /etc/dnf/protected.d/dnf.conf to read; [main] gpgcheck=1 installonlypkgs=kernel.x86_64,

Re: ZFS on linux

, Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 01/14/2016 03:26 PM, Zach Villers wrote: > > Now that Debian has added zfs support to their experimental branch; > > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/zfs-linux_0.6.4.2-1.html > > I don't know where you got this informati

Re: ZFS on linux

Thanks Smooge/Florian. I respect your opinions, thoughts, and explanations. Regards. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 January 2016 at 08:58, Zach Villers <zachvatw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I understand. My thought

ZFS on linux

Now that Debian has added zfs support to their experimental branch; https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/zfs-linux_0.6.4.2-1.html is there a possibility that Fedora could add support/packages as well? Regards, Zach #aikidouke -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: ZFS on linux

Well - If there was to be a plan, it would have to start with RH legal making that determination would it not? Could FESCO or the other council (sorry it escapes me ATM) take this up as a meeting item? Is it worth presenting for a legal determination? In my mind, if it was approved by legal we

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

Anyone know if/when nvidia drivers will be included? On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:24 AM Peter T. wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:34 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > > > > DRI3 is a prerequisite, yes. The F23 builds of the intel driver had it > > disabled until

Re: Proposal: spins-kickstarts workflow changes

+1 for moving forward and involving pagure. I'm not experienced enough to pick out any issues, but will help however I can. On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:37 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > I am sending this to the devel and spins lists. Feel free to forward to > other places

Re: Testing request: AMD chipset kernel issue

Will test tonight and report. On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:45 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 14:19 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > On 18/08/16 12:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > Hi folks! > > > > > > There is a bug nominated as a Fedora

Odd message when escalating priveledge with sudo - F27 - LXQt - QTerminal ( Apologies if wrong list )

I just saw this and haven't had time to search Bugzilla yet; [jkrong@masada ~]$ sudo su /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.bin: line 1 error due to: Non-ASCII characters found /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.homedirs.bin: line 1 error due to: Non-ASCII

Self Introduction - Zach Villers #aikidouke

And the infra issue; https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5136 Americans - Have a safe and happy 4th of July! Everyone Else - do the same ( celebrate or not as you see fit :) Regards, -- Zach Villers z...@mailup.net zachvatw...@gmail.com

Re: Fwd: Re: Vagrant: can we make it show up in Software?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi - lurking on this thread but wanted to share; > > and GCC are not? > > > > Should we keep it upon individual maintainer > discretion? Should we > > somehow evaluate all the cases one by one? > > What about a "Command Line tools for

Re: IBM buying RedHat

On 10/28/18 7:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > We are all astonished honestly, > I took to fedora-devel only because I finished reading *all* the > internal emails about it that I downloaded so far (it took me a few > hours) and ... still can't digest the news. > > > I am sure it will happen at