Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), > but none of the providers can be installed > > Looks like this needs another rebuild and an update. > > There's more stuff to be fished out from this report ... but I need to run. > > Zbyszek > ___

Re: Need help with my packages

ist Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the menta

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

; To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archi

Re: Needs help to finalize partio.spec

.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our

Review request/swap: python-subprocess-tee

Hi, This package is a new dependency of python-molecule. Can someone take a look and review it please. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901747 Happy to review in exchange. -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible

Review request/swap python-enrich

Hi, This package is a new dependency of python-molecule. Can someone take a look and review it please. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911296 Happy to review in exchange. -- *Chedi Toueiti* ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try

review request

Hi, I have a trivial python package (re-assert) to review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941362 needed for pre-commit tests. Happy to review in exchange. Regards, -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34

l mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guide

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35

_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer per

Review swap

Help needed for reviewing this trivial python package python-ansible-pygments: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010045 -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff

missing pyproject-rpm-macros component from EPEL (Bugzilla)

I noticed that pyproject-rpm-macros is not listed as a Bugzilla component in the EPEL product. Is there a specific reason for that? If not can someone add it or direct me to the adequate procedure to request it. -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we

Re: missing pyproject-rpm-macros component from EPEL (Bugzilla)

fair enough, will this be also the case for EPEL9? On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:47 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 22:24 +0100, chedi toueiti wrote: > > I noticed that pyproject-rpm-macros is not listed as a Bugzilla component > > in the EPEL product. Is there a

Python package review

Hi, I'm looking for help review the following python packages needed by python-jsonschema+format python-rfc3339-validator: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106174 python-rfc3986-validator: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106171 and let me know if you need

Re: Missing qt6-webengine package

thanks for the insight, I'll try to see if they could use my help. On 10/18/22 21:05, Dan Horák wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 19:54:13 +0100 chedi toueiti wrote: Sorry if this has been asked before (I didn't find any reference in the archives). I noticed that the qt6-webengine package

Missing qt6-webengine package

Sorry if this has been asked before (I didn't find any reference in the archives). I noticed that the qt6-webengine package is missing, a bug has been filled since February with no answer ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055135). Is there any hope to have it packaged, and how can I