Re: CheckRequire: in spec?
Marian Csontos wrote:
> I wonder, when there is a %check in spec, and the testsuite requires
> more packages than BuildRequires, is there a way to have them installed
> only if check is running?
>
> Or shall I just throw them in as BuildRequire`s?
use BuildRequires
If these extra deps could cause complications (say, for bootstrapping), you
can make them conditional (e.g. only used if %{bootstrap} macro is not
defined)
-- rex
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: CheckRequire: in spec?
On 14 February 2018 at 08:56, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 09:39 +0100, Marian Csontos wrote:
> > I wonder, when there is a %check in spec, and the testsuite requires
> > more packages than BuildRequires, is there a way to have them installed
> > only if check is running?
>
> This has been brought up few time... There is nothing like that. The
> consensus,
> IIRC, was to use %bcond_without check and have
> %if %{with check}
> BuildRequires: ...
> %endif
>
> same for %check section itself. I think someone wanted to implement this
> generally in RPM, but this didn't happen.
>
Using such constructions is not compliant with --nocheck rpmbuild command
line option.
When I've proposed here CheckRequire few months ago on this list original
intention was to use those additional dependency when rpmbuild is not
executed with --nocheck option.
kloczek
PS. Igor may I ask you disable use PGP signs in public emails? or at least
switch to use PGP signature as MIME attachment? Please ..
I can understand that using PGP is OK or is sometimes necessary when
someone who receives your emails needs to be sure that it is your emails.
--
Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: *http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH *
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: CheckRequire: in spec?
%check run only on build stage so you can use just BuildRequire for it. ср, 14 февр. 2018 г. в 11:47, Marian Csontos : > I wonder, when there is a %check in spec, and the testsuite requires > more packages than BuildRequires, is there a way to have them installed > only if check is running? > > Or shall I just throw them in as BuildRequire`s? > > -- Martian > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: CheckRequire: in spec?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 09:39 +0100, Marian Csontos wrote:
> I wonder, when there is a %check in spec, and the testsuite requires
> more packages than BuildRequires, is there a way to have them installed
> only if check is running?
This has been brought up few time... There is nothing like that. The consensus,
IIRC, was to use %bcond_without check and have
%if %{with check}
BuildRequires: ...
%endif
same for %check section itself. I think someone wanted to implement this
generally in RPM, but this didn't happen.
> Or shall I just throw them in as BuildRequire`s?
Yes.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-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=1auY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
CheckRequire: in spec?
I wonder, when there is a %check in spec, and the testsuite requires more packages than BuildRequires, is there a way to have them installed only if check is running? Or shall I just throw them in as BuildRequire`s? -- Martian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
