On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:05:18 -0300
Reartes Guillermo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The mail "[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests" is showing me
> these items since some time ago.
>
> These seems to have the NEEDINFO flag, but they are CLOSED (and
> several releases ago).
>
>
On 2.4.2015 01:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 13:56 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Humans I can
understand having different views, but the tools should provide
the humans with
what we need here. In this case I think that means one of the
following:
1) Require that the
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 13:56 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Humans I can
understand having different views, but the tools should provide
the humans with
what we need here. In this case I think that means one of the
following:
1) Require that the bot ignore bugs that are closed
Humans I can
understand having different views, but the tools should provide the humans
with
what we need here. In this case I think that means one of the following:
1) Require that the bot ignore bugs that are closed (assuming a majority
consensus agrees, which I understand isn't likely
Dne 30.3.2015 v 22:17 Neil Horman napsal(a):
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
There are currently no flags set at
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 01:37:23PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 16:17 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:34:47AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 30.3.2015 v 22:17 Neil Horman napsal(a):
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 03/30/2015
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:25:12AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Hi,
So I get a regular reminder for Your Outstanding Requests
However, a bunch of these are on closed bugs. It seems stuck somehow in
thinking it needs something from me. For example:
Bug 815617: PATCH: properly deal with
Dne 30.3.2015 v 15:39 Paul Wouters napsal(a):
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Petr Šabata wrote:
Bug 815617: PATCH: properly deal with crypt() returning NULL (1043
days old)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815617
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=585827action=edit
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:39:31AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Petr Šabata wrote:
Bug 815617: PATCH: properly deal with crypt() returning NULL (1043 days
old)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815617
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
There are currently no flags set at all.
Check the flags on the attachment itself (your second link).
Ohh. there is shows up. How odd. Thanks. Now at least I know how
to get rid of it, although I
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Petr Šabata wrote:
Bug 815617: PATCH: properly deal with crypt() returning NULL (1043 days old)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815617
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=585827action=edit
This bug is already closed. And has no flags set. In
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:48:23PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:39:31AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Petr Šabata wrote:
Bug 815617: PATCH: properly deal with crypt() returning NULL (1043 days
old)
On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
There are currently no flags set at all.
Check the flags on the attachment itself (your second link).
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 2015-03-30 9:55 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
There are currently no flags set at all.
Check the flags on the attachment itself (your second link).
Ohh. there is shows up. How odd. Thanks. Now at
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
There are currently no flags set at all.
Check the flags on the attachment itself (your second link).
Ohh. there is shows up. How
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
There are currently no flags set at all.
Check the flags on
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 16:17 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
There
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 16:17 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 16:48 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Dictating use of BZ is usually a futile effort, in Fedora. We have
a
policy on it which is in practice rarely observed by anyone. What
should or should not be the cause is pretty much moot: what *is*
the
case is that it makes sense
20 matches
Mail list logo