Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-12 Thread Jaroslav Skarvada
On 07/06/2012 09:55 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package raptor (orphan) I have taken raptor regards Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-11 Thread Matej Cepl
On 10/07/12 19:38, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts: [ ... ] dogtail We use dogtail extensively inside of Red Hat QA. CCing the upstream maintainer,

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-11 Thread Ben Boeckel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 17:38:21 GMT, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: stalonetray Taken. - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJP/OenAAoJEKaxavVX4C1Xv/AP/1AOKgvPxk3aU6Q4H/p6xiSS

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-11 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: flickcurl has been updated to 1.22 and build in rawhide with raptor2-devel. So librawstudio and rawstudio should be rebuild , anyone do this ? please Doing it right now. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-11 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: On 07/10/2012 03:20 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Paul Howarth
On 07/06/2012 09:55 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package svnmailer (orphan) I've taken svnmailer in all branches. Co-maintainers very welcome (hint). Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Brendan Jones
On 07/10/2012 03:20 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 07/06/2012 10:55 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package vorbisspi (fails to build) Fixed. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Patrick Uiterwijk
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Package devtodo (orphan) I will take this package. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 2012-07-09 10:54, Matej Cepl wrote: On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? No. We're in progress of transfering the ownership of this package from me to gnat, will

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On 07/10/2012 10:29 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: On 2012-07-09 10:54, Matej Cepl wrote: On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? No. We're in progress of transfering the

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts: devilspie dogtail gtkmm-utils k12linux-quick-start-guide kcoloredit kgrab kiconedit koverartist ksig libzip polyester polyester3 python-djblets

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Mario Torre
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 10:38 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: kcoloredit I think I've missed some mails, but this is a very useful application, is there any alternative? Cheers, Mario -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Johannes Lips
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts: devilspie I've taken devilspie, but just that it's not removed from fedora since I think it's often useful to Xfce

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Rex Dieter
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts: kcoloredit kiconedit libzip I can help with these. -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 10/07/2012 19:38, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : python-flask python-werkzeug I actively maintain these two (i pushed Flask 0.8.1 last week, 0.9 will land rawhide soon) as a co-maintainer. As a matter of fact, I would have taken ownership if i had been notified that they were orphaned, but i

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:30:16PM +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote: Le 10/07/2012 19:38, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : python-flask python-werkzeug I actively maintain these two (i pushed Flask 0.8.1 last week, 0.9 will land rawhide soon) as a co-maintainer. As a matter of fact, I would have

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 10/07/2012 20:42, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : Sorry about that -- it was easier for me to make these mass changes in the database than through the pkgdb application so no notifications went out. I know that the person who picked up the packages did so because he needed them for things he was

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:30:16 +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote: Le 10/07/2012 19:38, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : python-flask python-werkzeug I actively maintain these two (i pushed Flask 0.8.1 last week, 0.9 will land rawhide soon) as a co-maintainer. As a matter of fact, I would have

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 10/07/2012 21:07, Michael Schwendt a écrit : Could you please respond to http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/python-feedparser in particular the aging NEEDINFO query in #787401 that addresses you? I'm looking that issue right now. H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Ter, 2012-07-10 at 02:11 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Seg, 2012-07-09 at 05:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sex, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-09 Thread Matej Cepl
On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? That sounds bad. Also, how can orphan be comaintained? Won't comaintainer be automatically elevated to a maintainer? Matěj

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:54:38 +0200 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? That sounds bad. Also, how can orphan be comaintained?

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-09 Thread Brett Lentz
On 09/07/12 08:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:54:38 +0200 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? That sounds bad.

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-09 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:40:23AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:54:38 +0200 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-09 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires pkgconfig(raptor) = 1.4.21

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-09 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:18:59AM -0400, Brett Lentz wrote: On 09/07/12 08:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:54:38 +0200 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean,

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-09 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Bill Nottingham [07/07/2012 07:25] : Removing: selenium-remote-control perl-Alien-SeleniumRC requires selenium-server = 1.0.3-8.20100318svn.fc15 FYI, I'll be retiring perl-Alien-SeleniumRC unless someone steps up to maintain selenium-server. Emmanuel -- devel mailing list

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-09 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Seg, 2012-07-09 at 05:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sex, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-09 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-09 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Seg, 2012-07-09 at 15:21 -0400, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-08 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2012/7/7 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 coq requires

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-08 Thread Jonathan Underwood
On 7 July 2012 10:34, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 coq requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 coq-emacs requires

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-08 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sex, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires pkgconfig(raptor) = 1.4.21

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-07 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Bill Nottingham [07/07/2012 07:25] : Package perl-CSS-DOM (orphan) Package perl-Cache-Memcached (orphan) I've taken these two on their Fedora active branches. Emmanuel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-07 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2012/7/6 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com: .. Package libcrystalhd (fails to build) comaintained by: kwizart I have a fix ready for primary arch, but I still need to do more runtime test. Also I've requested to be in ACL, but stil in awaiting state. Hopefully I will submit the patch

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 coq requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 coq-emacs requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 coq-xemacs requires

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-07 Thread Jussi Lehtola
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:55:19 -0400 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-07 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 coq requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 coq-emacs

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-06 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-06 Thread Patrick Uiterwijk
Hello, Would it be a possibility for me to pick up one of the orphaned packages, without being sponsored into the packager group yet? I do have an accepted package, but the reviewer is now in the process of getting sponsor status. Would it be possible for me to already request it, or should I

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-06 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
PU == Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com writes: PU Hello, Would it be a possibility for me to pick up one of the PU orphaned packages, without being sponsored into the packager group PU yet? The answer is of course no, but he's now been sponsored and is free to take ownership of some of

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-06 Thread Brian Pepple
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote: On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Package papyon (orphan) comaintained by: itamarjp I will take papyon, emesene still uses it. Be aware, this will probably be

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-06 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:55:19 -0400 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Package Pound (orphan) I'm taking Pound in the interests of Swift, while we're figuring out what the standard reverse proxy in Fedora is. -- P -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org