Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On 07/06/2012 09:55 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package raptor (orphan) I have taken raptor regards Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On 10/07/12 19:38, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts: [ ... ] dogtail We use dogtail extensively inside of Red Hat QA. CCing the upstream maintainer, and I will make sure something good is going to happen to this package. Best, Matěj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 17:38:21 GMT, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: stalonetray Taken. - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJP/OenAAoJEKaxavVX4C1Xv/AP/1AOKgvPxk3aU6Q4H/p6xiSS cZy4PZqmzdKFON2GtMvJGFjtiDs0ORwTifvRNCu/x2gVpUy2c5j4HH8Du8t1tW80 eNOBp4GXkVt9noQbOLLhV1bXN/Gv7Lvf+mKCIMr1Yf3/JyoXZtpNvRr55Tl2fKnM 7DjFSYpphqn4+gysolE1SgpLuz04s5G0aEEYA+LmGxlJ+JxPRrFbQigZAQC+qljF rqW2yZJLLteeRGTl9TK7ZjyANA84ponxJYBpFBVAsaktwhimqa8viADuGmQDZVix BM8iG+UClWkB2BI9z/uPaRD1WWdxSuk+A6uSTBe3Zo17ibt4POjcd1iIPifrQaOx piYw7efteKTSBF+g8RLyB4B1q6Lwco6dxl3CVUhhzWDyMMsl0bbe2s9NG1hutEfv 2uQ851tiRVy/RlxdqU63NL58B5tMN/I3DxoRgDmopVs1G0dG4621enUouMHX/RJw NUPHklXws8CjMxp7wdg0+byLWkjfbyaTfXFfBs+p2b0jDxIy4ap20Skgxn6O16BW zysS/cWpqbGP1L8e0Ax1s47BuJ37FJ+RqRm8KOi62H0NPWcKCITwa3qiJzuDGq8O yxoiiy7+AGzqCt/zOaMzJ5hCLV7HLSrfm7cC3xRU0t1F3gdgfXq2VArL4RKtswKp 1NX8L7LQd4uIbEYNZRE0 =3uNz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: flickcurl has been updated to 1.22 and build in rawhide with raptor2-devel. So librawstudio and rawstudio should be rebuild , anyone do this ? please Doing it right now. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: On 07/10/2012 03:20 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires pkgconfig(raptor) = 1.4.21 liblrdf-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 librawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 rawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 tracker requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 Tracker currently has a BuildRequires on raptor-devel, but it's actually an obsolete check, since it dropped the require a couple of years ago. The BR should just be removed from the spec file in this case. Similar situation for liblrdf. It was built against raptor2 but the liblrdf-devel erroneously required raptor-devel. Now I got this fixed. Orcan Orcan, did you want to take on those that you are co-maintaining? If not I'll take them I took liblrdf from Anthony's list, along with a number of other packages which do not depend on raptor. I don't think we left anything behind. Cheers, Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On 07/06/2012 09:55 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package svnmailer (orphan) I've taken svnmailer in all branches. Co-maintainers very welcome (hint). Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On 07/10/2012 03:20 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires pkgconfig(raptor) = 1.4.21 liblrdf-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 librawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 rawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 tracker requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 Tracker currently has a BuildRequires on raptor-devel, but it's actually an obsolete check, since it dropped the require a couple of years ago. The BR should just be removed from the spec file in this case. Similar situation for liblrdf. It was built against raptor2 but the liblrdf-devel erroneously required raptor-devel. Now I got this fixed. Orcan Orcan, did you want to take on those that you are co-maintaining? If not I'll take them Brendan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
Hi, On 07/06/2012 10:55 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package vorbisspi (fails to build) Fixed. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Package devtodo (orphan) I will take this package. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On 2012-07-09 10:54, Matej Cepl wrote: On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? No. We're in progress of transfering the ownership of this package from me to gnat, will ping him. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On 07/10/2012 10:29 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: On 2012-07-09 10:54, Matej Cepl wrote: On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? No. We're in progress of transfering the ownership of this package from me to gnat, will ping him. Sorry, had a few busy days and didn't for whatever reason think I had reason to read the retiring packages... I took ownership. -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts: devilspie dogtail gtkmm-utils k12linux-quick-start-guide kcoloredit kgrab kiconedit koverartist ksig libzip polyester polyester3 python-djblets python-flask python-werkzeug stalonetray tasks -Toshio pgpyfDSkFBhQS.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 10:38 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: kcoloredit I think I've missed some mails, but this is a very useful application, is there any alternative? Cheers, Mario -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts: devilspie I've taken devilspie, but just that it's not removed from fedora since I think it's often useful to Xfce users. Co-Maintainers are welcome and I would also be totally happy if someone steps up and want to take ownership again! Johannes dogtail gtkmm-utils k12linux-quick-start-guide kcoloredit kgrab kiconedit koverartist ksig libzip polyester polyester3 python-djblets python-flask python-werkzeug stalonetray tasks -Toshio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts: kcoloredit kiconedit libzip I can help with these. -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
Le 10/07/2012 19:38, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : python-flask python-werkzeug I actively maintain these two (i pushed Flask 0.8.1 last week, 0.9 will land rawhide soon) as a co-maintainer. As a matter of fact, I would have taken ownership if i had been notified that they were orphaned, but i only got notified that someone else requested (and was automatically granted) ownership. H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:30:16PM +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote: Le 10/07/2012 19:38, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : python-flask python-werkzeug I actively maintain these two (i pushed Flask 0.8.1 last week, 0.9 will land rawhide soon) as a co-maintainer. As a matter of fact, I would have taken ownership if i had been notified that they were orphaned, but i only got notified that someone else requested (and was automatically granted) ownership. Sorry about that -- it was easier for me to make these mass changes in the database than through the pkgdb application so no notifications went out. I know that the person who picked up the packages did so because he needed them for things he was working on rather than a special need to own the packages themselves, though -- if you'd like to switch owner/comaintainer roles he'd probably be more than willing. -Toshio pgpuCdsexyg1n.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
Le 10/07/2012 20:42, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : Sorry about that -- it was easier for me to make these mass changes in the database than through the pkgdb application so no notifications went out. I know that the person who picked up the packages did so because he needed them for things he was working on rather than a special need to own the packages themselves, though -- if you'd like to switch owner/comaintainer roles he'd probably be more than willing. -Toshio I'd rather have new co-maintainers sending an email or opening tickets before being granted the commit bit. That avoids potential misunderstandings or conflicting changes. :] I'm more worried about werkzeug/flask - which i also use for some admin web apps- consistent packaging than ownership. H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:30:16 +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote: Le 10/07/2012 19:38, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : python-flask python-werkzeug I actively maintain these two (i pushed Flask 0.8.1 last week, 0.9 will land rawhide soon) as a co-maintainer. As a matter of fact, I would have taken ownership if i had been notified that they were orphaned, but i only got notified that someone else requested (and was automatically granted) ownership. Could you please respond to http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/python-feedparser in particular the aging NEEDINFO query in #787401 that addresses you? -- Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.4.4-5.fc17.x86_64 loadavg: 0.62 0.27 0.31 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
Le 10/07/2012 21:07, Michael Schwendt a écrit : Could you please respond to http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/python-feedparser in particular the aging NEEDINFO query in #787401 that addresses you? I'm looking that issue right now. H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Ter, 2012-07-10 at 02:11 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Seg, 2012-07-09 at 05:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sex, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires pkgconfig(raptor) = 1.4.21 liblrdf-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 librawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 rawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 tracker requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 from http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/168262.html So can we get flickcurl and (lib)rawstudio ported to raptor2? I think raptor 1 needs to be retired sooner or later. I open a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838709 to compile flickcurl against raptor2, I test in my local machine with mock and flickcurl and rawstudio compiles without problems with raptor2 ... flickcurl has been updated to 1.22 and build in rawhide with raptor2-devel. So librawstudio and rawstudio should be rebuild , anyone do this ? please BTW also darktable depend on flickcurl library ... Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? That sounds bad. Also, how can orphan be comaintained? Won't comaintainer be automatically elevated to a maintainer? Matěj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:54:38 +0200 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? That sounds bad. Also, how can orphan be comaintained? Won't comaintainer be automatically elevated to a maintainer? There's no setup to do that automatically, it's up to the comaintainer to note that the maintainer orphaned the package and take ownership. Normally you would think if you were co-maintaining something you would notice if it was orphaned I would think... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On 09/07/12 08:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:54:38 +0200 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? That sounds bad. Also, how can orphan be comaintained? Won't comaintainer be automatically elevated to a maintainer? There's no setup to do that automatically, it's up to the comaintainer to note that the maintainer orphaned the package and take ownership. Normally you would think if you were co-maintaining something you would notice if it was orphaned I would think... kevin -1 That's poor app design and, IMO, a bug. The software *should* allow the maintainer to relinquish responsiblities and either A) designate a new maintainer OR B) have maintainership automatically shift to the next co-maintainer (for simplicity, this could be based on date commit rights were granted to the package's repo) Both use cases should be supported because allowing a co-maintained package to be orphaned without the consent of *ALL* maintainers makes no sense. ---Brett. pgpvD7oE3zNKM.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:40:23AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:54:38 +0200 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? That sounds bad. Also, how can orphan be comaintained? Won't comaintainer be automatically elevated to a maintainer? There's no setup to do that automatically, it's up to the comaintainer to note that the maintainer orphaned the package and take ownership. Normally you would think if you were co-maintaining something you would notice if it was orphaned I would think... Except that not everyone is perfect and it is easy to miss such pkgdb mails in case someone returns from vacation. Therefore I would like it more if these procedures would be adjusted to make it harder to fail, i.e. by explicitly addressing all co-maintainers when the retiring of orphaned packages is due. I believe I proposed this already at least once. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires pkgconfig(raptor) = 1.4.21 liblrdf-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 librawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 rawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 tracker requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 Tracker currently has a BuildRequires on raptor-devel, but it's actually an obsolete check, since it dropped the require a couple of years ago. The BR should just be removed from the spec file in this case. Cosimo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:18:59AM -0400, Brett Lentz wrote: On 09/07/12 08:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:54:38 +0200 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? That sounds bad. Also, how can orphan be comaintained? Won't comaintainer be automatically elevated to a maintainer? There's no setup to do that automatically, it's up to the comaintainer to note that the maintainer orphaned the package and take ownership. Normally you would think if you were co-maintaining something you would notice if it was orphaned I would think... kevin -1 That's poor app design and, IMO, a bug. The software *should* allow the maintainer to relinquish responsiblities and either A) designate a new maintainer OR B) have maintainership automatically shift to the next co-maintainer (for simplicity, this could be based on date commit rights were granted to the package's repo) Both use cases should be supported because allowing a co-maintained package to be orphaned without the consent of *ALL* maintainers makes no sense. We had (B) setup at one time but without also having (A) it was more of a bug than a feature. fchiulli has done work to enable (A) in the development branch of pkgdb but someone needs to get enough 'round 'tuits to stabilize a release -Toshio pgpStrQVoOFfF.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
* Bill Nottingham [07/07/2012 07:25] : Removing: selenium-remote-control perl-Alien-SeleniumRC requires selenium-server = 1.0.3-8.20100318svn.fc15 FYI, I'll be retiring perl-Alien-SeleniumRC unless someone steps up to maintain selenium-server. Emmanuel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Seg, 2012-07-09 at 05:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sex, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires pkgconfig(raptor) = 1.4.21 liblrdf-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 librawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 rawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 tracker requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 from http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/168262.html So can we get flickcurl and (lib)rawstudio ported to raptor2? I think raptor 1 needs to be retired sooner or later. I open a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838709 to compile flickcurl against raptor2, I test in my local machine with mock and flickcurl and rawstudio compiles without problems with raptor2 ... I like rawstudio app, although I never had much time to use it. -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires pkgconfig(raptor) = 1.4.21 liblrdf-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 librawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 rawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 tracker requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 Tracker currently has a BuildRequires on raptor-devel, but it's actually an obsolete check, since it dropped the require a couple of years ago. The BR should just be removed from the spec file in this case. Similar situation for liblrdf. It was built against raptor2 but the liblrdf-devel erroneously required raptor-devel. Now I got this fixed. Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Seg, 2012-07-09 at 15:21 -0400, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires pkgconfig(raptor) = 1.4.21 liblrdf-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 librawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 rawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 tracker requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 Tracker currently has a BuildRequires on raptor-devel, but it's actually an obsolete check, since it dropped the require a couple of years ago. The BR should just be removed from the spec file in this case. I propose move BuildRequires to raptor2-devel, on case of flickcurl. -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
2012/7/7 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral
coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq-emacs requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq-xemacs requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
The dependency here is that the Coq emacs mode requires
the proofgeneral emacs mode. I will drop the dependency
and the coq-{,x}emacs subpackages (from Coq) unless someone
takes the above package.
Note that Coq itself doesn't build right now .. see the email
I sent a few days ago to this list.
I will take proofgeneral Real Soon Now. I'm in overload mode at
$DAYJOB at the moment, and will likely remain so for about 2 more
weeks. My apologies to those who have been waiting for me to do
something. If anybody needs to do something to one of the packages I
maintain at any time in the next couple of weeks, please just go
ahead. I hope to return to my normal Fedora activity levels around
the end of July.
I am on vacation during July, after that, back to contributing on
weekends and sometimes at night... thus did a lot of work on sagemath
dependencies. I will ask commit access to some packages, so I
can update them myself...
See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scitech/2012-July/000130.html
for an informal request to speed up a bit some tickets :-)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
Paulo
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On 7 July 2012 10:34, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral
coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq-emacs requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq-xemacs requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
The dependency here is that the Coq emacs mode requires
the proofgeneral emacs mode. I will drop the dependency
and the coq-{,x}emacs subpackages (from Coq) unless someone
takes the above package.
These should actually be renamed to (x)emacs-coq to comply with
packaging guidelines.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Sex, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: raptor flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1 flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 flickcurl-devel requires pkgconfig(raptor) = 1.4.21 liblrdf-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 librawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 rawstudio requires libraptor.so.1 tracker requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17 from http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/168262.html So can we get flickcurl and (lib)rawstudio ported to raptor2? I think raptor 1 needs to be retired sooner or later. I like rawstudio app, although I never had much time to use it. Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
* Bill Nottingham [07/07/2012 07:25] : Package perl-CSS-DOM (orphan) Package perl-Cache-Memcached (orphan) I've taken these two on their Fedora active branches. Emmanuel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
2012/7/6 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com: .. Package libcrystalhd (fails to build) comaintained by: kwizart I have a fix ready for primary arch, but I still need to do more runtime test. Also I've requested to be in ACL, but stil in awaiting state. Hopefully I will submit the patch next week for jarod review (primary maintainer). Thx Nicolas (kwizart) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral
coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq-emacs requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq-xemacs requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
The dependency here is that the Coq emacs mode requires
the proofgeneral emacs mode. I will drop the dependency
and the coq-{,x}emacs subpackages (from Coq) unless someone
takes the above package.
Note that Coq itself doesn't build right now .. see the email
I sent a few days ago to this list.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:55:19 -0400 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. That is currently scheduled to happen on or around August 7th. Package ape (fails to build) Whoops, this one slipped under my radar. Fixed. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral
coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq-emacs requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq-xemacs requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
The dependency here is that the Coq emacs mode requires
the proofgeneral emacs mode. I will drop the dependency
and the coq-{,x}emacs subpackages (from Coq) unless someone
takes the above package.
Note that Coq itself doesn't build right now .. see the email
I sent a few days ago to this list.
I will take proofgeneral Real Soon Now. I'm in overload mode at
$DAYJOB at the moment, and will likely remain so for about 2 more
weeks. My apologies to those who have been waiting for me to do
something. If anybody needs to do something to one of the packages I
maintain at any time in the next couple of weeks, please just go
ahead. I hope to return to my normal Fedora activity levels around
the end of July.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. That is currently scheduled to happen on or around August 7th. Package papyon (orphan) comaintained by: itamarjp I will take papyon, emesene still uses it. -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
Hello, Would it be a possibility for me to pick up one of the orphaned packages, without being sponsored into the packager group yet? I do have an accepted package, but the reviewer is now in the process of getting sponsor status. Would it be possible for me to already request it, or should I wait to get sponsored and then apply for the orphaned package? Thanks in advance, Patrick Uiterwijk On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. That is currently scheduled to happen on or around August 7th. Package Pound (orphan) Package ape (fails to build) Package asylum (orphan) Package cmucl (orphan) comaintained by: green Package cmucl (orphan) comaintained by: green Package debmirror (orphan) Package devtodo (orphan) Package drupal6-video (orphan) Package eclipse-m2m-qvtoml (fails to build) Package emacs-common-proofgeneral (fails to build) Package eruby (orphan) Package fbterm (orphan) comaintained by: dchen Package fdupes (orphan) comaintained by: hobbes1069 Package fillmore-lombard (fails to build) comaintained by: salimma Package fuse-encfs (orphan) Package gant (fails to build) Package gpsdrive (orphan) Package hardinfo (fails to build) Package healpix (fails to build) Package hexter-dssi (orphan) comaintained by: oget Package html401-dtds (orphan) comaintained by: gnat Package innotop (orphan) Package json (orphan) Package kadu (fails to build) comaintained by: gajownik radekl Package libcrystalhd (fails to build) comaintained by: kwizart Package libhid (fails to build) Package libinfinity (orphan) Package libqttracker (fails to build) comaintained by: jreznik Package libsoup22 (orphan) Package logback (orphan) Package mcabber (orphan) comaintained by: mmahut Package monkeysphere (orphan) Package natus (fails to build) Package ncpfs (orphan) Package ntfs-config (fails to build) Package papyon (orphan) comaintained by: itamarjp Package perl-Beanstalk-Client (orphan) Package perl-CSS-DOM (orphan) Package perl-Cache-Memcached (orphan) Package perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk (orphan) Package pfqueue (orphan) Package pino (fails to build) Package python-pywt (fails to build) Package qtparted (fails to build) Package radeontool (orphan) comaintained by: pknirsch Package raptor (orphan) comaintained by: oget kkofler Package selenium-remote-control (fails to build) Package sonata (orphan) Package svn2cl (orphan) Package svnmailer (orphan) Package torque (orphan) Package upstart (orphan) Package vorbisspi (fails to build) Package whatsup (orphan) List of deps left behind by packages which are orphaned or fail to build: Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 coq requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 coq-emacs requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 coq-xemacs requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 Removing: fbterm ibus-fbterm requires fbterm = 1.6-5.fc17 Removing: fuse-encfs cryptkeeper requires fuse-encfs = 1.7.4-6.fc18 Removing: healpix skyviewer requires chealpix-devel = 2.13a-2.fc14 skyviewer requires libchealpix.so Removing: html401-dtds w3c-markup-validator-libs requires html401-dtds = 4.01-19991224.12.fc17.1 Removing: libinfinity gedit-collaboration requires libinfinity-0.5.so.0 gedit-collaboration requires libinfgtk-0.5.so.0 gedit-collaboration requires libinftextgtk-0.5.so.0 gedit-collaboration requires libinfinity-devel = 0.5.0-2.fc15 gedit-collaboration requires libinfinity-gtk-devel = 0.5.0-2.fc15 gedit-collaboration requires libinftext-0.5.so.0 Removing: libsoup22 libopensync-plugin-syncml requires libsoup22-devel = 2.2.105-9.fc15 libsyncml requires libsoup-2.2.so.8 libsyncml requires libsoup22-devel = 2.2.105-9.fc15 Removing: ncpfs hydra requires ncpfs-devel = 2.2.6-16.fc17 hydra requires libncp.so.2.3 hydra requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS.2.2.0.17) hydra requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.0.19) hydra requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.1) medusa requires ncpfs-devel = 2.2.6-16.fc17 medusa requires libncp.so.2.3 medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS.2.2.0.17) medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.0.19) medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.1) Removing: papyon emesene requires papyon = 0.5.6-3.fc18 Removing: perl-Cache-Memcached perl-CGI-Session-Driver-memcached requires perl(Cache::Memcached) = 1.29
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
PU == Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com writes: PU Hello, Would it be a possibility for me to pick up one of the PU orphaned packages, without being sponsored into the packager group PU yet? The answer is of course no, but he's now been sponsored and is free to take ownership of some of those packages. - J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote: On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Package papyon (orphan) comaintained by: itamarjp I will take papyon, emesene still uses it. Be aware, this will probably be quite a bit of work to maintain since papyon has been dead upstream for a while now. Most telepathy clients are using xmpp-gateway via telepathy-gabble for MSN support. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple bpep...@fedoraproject.org https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:55:19 -0400 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Package Pound (orphan) I'm taking Pound in the interests of Swift, while we're figuring out what the standard reverse proxy in Fedora is. -- P -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
