Re: Changes in packages workflow vs. modular Fedora

2018-09-25 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:45:59PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17.9.2018 12:36, Petr Šabata wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:07:50PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > d) (this example is not real (yet)) We decide to retire (remove) > > > > > python2-sphinx because upstream Sphinx no

Re: Changes in packages workflow vs. modular Fedora

2018-09-17 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 17.9.2018 12:36, Petr Šabata wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:07:50PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 13.9.2018 22:44, Petr Šabata wrote: On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 04:43:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hi, I was thinking about this for a while and I got the impression that this is something

Re: Changes in packages workflow vs. modular Fedora

2018-09-17 Thread Petr Šabata
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:07:50PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 13.9.2018 22:44, Petr Šabata wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 04:43:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was thinking about this for a while and I got the impression that this > > > is > > > something I don't

Re: Changes in packages workflow vs. modular Fedora

2018-09-13 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 13.9.2018 22:44, Petr Šabata wrote: On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 04:43:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hi, I was thinking about this for a while and I got the impression that this is something I don't know the answer for. The question is a bit harder to formulate simply, so let put it in

Re: Changes in packages workflow vs. modular Fedora

2018-09-13 Thread Petr Šabata
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 04:43:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi, > > I was thinking about this for a while and I got the impression that this is > something I don't know the answer for. The question is a bit harder to > formulate simply, so let put it in examples: I see no one's really

Re: Changes in packages workflow vs. modular Fedora

2018-08-19 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 17.8.2018 v 21:48 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On 08/17/2018 03:21 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> You triggered my interest, so I tried to get some information how many >> modules there are in Fedora, but >> >> 1) mbs.fedoraproject.org spits on me just some JSON instead of some user >> friendly web

Re: Changes in packages workflow vs. modular Fedora

2018-08-17 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 08/17/2018 12:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > You triggered my interest, so I tried to get some information how many > modules there are in Fedora, but > > 1) mbs.fedoraproject.org spits on me just some JSON instead of some user > friendly web UI, MBS UI is available at:

Re: Changes in packages workflow vs. modular Fedora

2018-08-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 08/17/2018 03:21 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > You triggered my interest, so I tried to get some information how many > modules there are in Fedora, but > > 1) mbs.fedoraproject.org spits on me just some JSON instead of some user > friendly web UI, > > 2) pagure cannot show content of modules

Re: Changes in packages workflow vs. modular Fedora

2018-08-17 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > This has received no reply in ~2 weeks. Am I the only one who ask those > questions? I'm interested as well, I just have no idea about the answers. - Ken ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Changes in packages workflow vs. modular Fedora

2018-08-17 Thread Vít Ondruch
You triggered my interest, so I tried to get some information how many modules there are in Fedora, but 1) mbs.fedoraproject.org spits on me just some JSON instead of some user friendly web UI, 2) pagure cannot show content of modules namespace nor can reliably search for modules, 3) opening

Re: Changes in packages workflow vs. modular Fedora

2018-08-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 3.8.2018 16:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hi, I was thinking about this for a while and I got the impression that this is something I don't know the answer for. The question is a bit harder to formulate simply, so let put it in examples: a) A need packaging guideline is about to be discussed.