Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

Hello guys, and sorry for the delay - I've got caught in my other responsibilites. I have created the Wiki page for this change, as requested: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GhostscriptPackageUpdate28 To comply with the guidelines there, I had to categorize this as a "system-wide change"

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

Hello guys! I wanted to let you know I have decided to create additional subpackage 'ghostscript-tools-dvipdf' after some discusssions. It is because the 'dvipdf' tool requires 'dvips' utility to work correctly, which is provided in 'texlive-dvips' subpackage. This resulted in lot of texlive

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On 01/09/2018 04:51 PM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: Initial NOTE: I have made some bigger changes in Ghostscript package during the cleanup, which should be self-contained. In my opinion those changes are not so significant to create "self-contained change" wiki page for it (for F28), but if

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 10:45 +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 11:51:03 PM CET David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > > > The new Ghostscript should be available for trying/testing in Rawhide >

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 10:45 +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 11:51:03 PM CET David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > > Initial NOTE: I have made some bigger changes in Ghostscript package during > > the cleanup, which should be self-contained. In my opinion those changes > > are not

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > If the content of "ghostscript-core" is now part of "ghostscript", you > can do the following: > > Obsoletes: ghostscript-core < 9.22-5 > Provides: ghostscript-core = %{version}-%{release} > > In addition, packages that

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:30 AM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> Is there a specific bug that forces us to require we have transitional >> packages like this? RPM's Conflicts+Obsoletes logic is

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:30 PM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > I hope I didn't forget to mention something important... :D If something > is unclear, lay it on me! ;) > ​ Yeah, I forgot one more small thing to mention... :D For now I'm waiting for 'google-droid-fonts' to be

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > Is there a specific bug that forces us to require we have transitional > packages like this? RPM's Conflicts+Obsoletes logic is powerful enough > to allow us to avoid this. > ​I'm not aware of any BZ/Fedora wiki page that

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:51 PM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > Hello guys! :) > > Initial NOTE: I have made some bigger changes in Ghostscript package during > the cleanup, which should be self-contained. In my opinion those changes are > not so significant to create

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 11:51:03 PM CET David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > Initial NOTE: I have made some bigger changes in Ghostscript package during > the cleanup, which should be self-contained. In my opinion those changes > are not so significant to create "self-contained change" wiki page