I have rebuild eom yesterday for rawhide.
Untaging would force me another rebuild of eom.
I hope the update won't push to stable branches.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Cool. What packages don't use the 7?
This is from 2017, anything new since then?
https://legacy.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?t=32622
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sat, 2021-10-16 at 06:39 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote on 2021/10/16 0:37:
> > On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet <
> > fed...@famillecollet.com> wrote:
> > > Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in
> > > stable
> > > branches.
On 2021-10-15 08:37, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet
wrote:
Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable
branches.
Hi Luya,
Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a
one-week notice period.
Michael Catanzaro wrote on 2021/10/16 0:37:
On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet
wrote:
Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable
branches.
Hi Luya,
Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a one-week
notice period.
On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet
wrote:
Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable
branches.
Hi Luya,
Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a
one-week notice period. Since you did not give other maintainers
Le 15/10/2021 à 10:22, Remi Collet a écrit :
This list is not complete, at least php-pecl-imagick is missing
and this one is broken by recent changes...
# dnf repoquery --whatrequires ImageMagick-libs
ImageMagick
R-magick
WINGs-libs
autotrace
chafa
converseen
digikam-libs
dmtx-utils
Le 15/10/2021 à 10:05, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit :
Hello everyone,
ImageMagick is now pushed to 6.9.12.25 as a long-overdue update [1] for
all releases except EPEL8 branch, which I do not use (co-maintainer
welcome). Affected packages below may need to rebuild:
Sorry, but such update, with
17.03.2015 02:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:02:25 +0300
Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
The main question should it be done in such manner? May be it have
worth run at least off-tree (without commits and versions bump) mass
rebuild? It allow estimate amount of
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:02:25 +0300
Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
The main question should it be done in such manner? May be it have
worth run at least off-tree (without commits and versions bump) mass
rebuild? It allow estimate amount of broken packages and see
dependencies. Do
15.03.2015 16:57, Michael Schwendt пишет:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:49:28 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Right now, many issues/problems are interacting and affecting packages
simultanously, which occasionally render fixing these issues quite
complicated.
So far I've hit:
- GCC-5.0
-
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:49:28 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Right now, many issues/problems are interacting and affecting packages
simultanously, which occasionally render fixing these issues quite
complicated.
So far I've hit:
- GCC-5.0
- Hardening
- boost upgrade
- ImageMagick
-
On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in
On 03/10/2015 01:30 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23.
There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:11:03 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene only in
the case something goes wrong.
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene only in the
case
something goes wrong.
First attempt fails [1] with:
pfsinimgmagick.opfsoutimgmagick.o: : InIn
Hello.
06.03.2015 16:51, Tomáš Smetana wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:11:03 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23.
There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rather
than later as rawhide is
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru
wrote:
According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5 there no
planned mass-rebuild for GCC5.
There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
05.03.2015 15:52, Tomáš Smetana wrote:
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 02:09:00 +0300
Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Hello.
I have long outstanding update of ImageMagick[1] and plan do it in
rawhide in 1-3 days.
...
Affected packages needs to
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300
Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
pfsinimgmagick.opfsoutimgmagick.o: : InIn functionfunction
``writeFrames(readFramesint(,int ,char* *char)**)': /builddir/'build:/
17.03.2013 05:39, Rex Dieter wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/16/2013 07:38 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide
ASAP.
Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch
Pavel Alexeev wrote:
17.03.2013 05:39, Rex Dieter wrote:
As noted in http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 an issue
with pkg-config in cmake is that it isn't always present on all of the
platforms that cmake supports. But it is still probably the way to go
on Linux.
OK,
17.03.2013 16:40, Rex Dieter пишет:
Pavel Alexeev wrote:
17.03.2013 05:39, Rex Dieter wrote:
As noted in http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 an issue
with pkg-config in cmake is that it isn't always present on all of the
platforms that cmake supports. But it is still probably the
13.03.2013 20:24, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit :
php-pecl-imagick
As you're the owner of this one, if you prefer to update it, see
http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=329769
Patch incorporated, thanks again.
14.03.2013 12:17, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit :
php-magickwand
Upstream 1.0.9-2 (yes with a -) includes the fix (and the php54 patch)
Thanks.
It built too - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5134893
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide
ASAP.
Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick
sonames that doesn't work for Fedora. Will need to work on a
On 03/16/2013 07:38 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide
ASAP.
Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick
sonames that doesn't work
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/16/2013 07:38 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide
ASAP.
Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of
ImageMagick
13.03.2013 20:24, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit :
php-pecl-imagick
As you're the owner of this one, if you prefer to update it, see
http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=329769
Thanks for pointing.
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
14.03.2013 20:04, Orion Poplawski пишет:
On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide
ASAP.
Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of
ImageMagick sonames that doesn't work for Fedora. Will need
Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit :
php-magickwand
Upstream 1.0.9-2 (yes with a -) includes the fix (and the php54 patch)
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit :
In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to
do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming
scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a side
tag to work out all the kinks.
If
On 14/03/13 01:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit :
In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to
do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming
scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a
Le 14/03/2013 10:30, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On 14/03/13 01:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit :
In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to
do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming
scheme or not. If
On 14/03/13 02:49 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 14/03/2013 10:30, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On 14/03/13 01:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit :
In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to
do some hard thinking about whether we want
On 03/14/2013 02:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit :
In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to
do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming
scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in
On 03/14/2013 09:30 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/14/2013 02:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit :
In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to
do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming
scheme or not.
On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP.
Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick
sonames that doesn't work for Fedora. Will need to work on a fix...
--
Orion Poplawski
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Good day.
By request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849065 I plan split
off ImageMagick-libs sub-package and update ImageMagick to last 6.8.3-9
version.
There many changes including so-name bump and
Le 13/03/2013 17:03, Pavel Alexeev a écrit :
I plan push it in rawhide 14-17 March if no one will argue.
Sounds good.
Dependency rebuild required.
php-magickwand
php-pecl-imagick
This 2 packages requires some patches to build with latest ImageMagick.
I already have them ready. So ping me
Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit :
php-pecl-imagick
As you're the owner of this one, if you prefer to update it, see
http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=329769
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/13/2013 10:03 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Good day.
By request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849065 I plan split off
ImageMagick-libs sub-package and update ImageMagick to last 6.8.3-9 version.
There many changes including so-name bump and version scheme change from
upstream:
On 03/13/2013 04:41 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/13/2013 10:03 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Good day.
By request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849065 I plan split off
ImageMagick-libs sub-package and update ImageMagick to last 6.8.3-9 version.
There many changes including so-name
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17
techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17
autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1
28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17
techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17
On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17
On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel
28.03.2012 20:17, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:17:30 -0600
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал:
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel
On 03/28/2012 10:24 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
28.03.2012 20:17, Orion Poplawski написал:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add them.
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com writes:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add
them. Let me know if there are other builds that
On 03/28/2012 10:25 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:17:30 -0600
Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
There were already calibre and pfstools
On 03/28/2012 10:33 AM, Karel Klíč wrote:
Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com writes:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add
them. Let
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 20:32 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:58 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
No, I have been tried edit update which was deleted to gave way to
update of Orion Poplawski - bodhi said I can't add it
24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17
techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17
autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build
overrides but got error
25.03.2012 11:59, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Pavel Alexeev [25/03/2012 09:51] :
hubbitus does not have commit access to perl-GD-SecurityImage
Ask for co-maintainer status for this package and I'll grant it right away.
Hello, Emmanuel.
I have asked it, thank you.
But It change nothing give me in
24.03.2012 01:30, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio
08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17
techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17
autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build
overrides but got error from bodhi what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto пишет:
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33
On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto пишет:
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote:
In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel
05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto пишет:
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote:
In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
Hello.
ImageMagick-6.7.6-5
In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
Hello.
ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short time. Soname change
happened (.so.5), so dependency rebuild needed.
Hi to all,
I am relative new in Fedora packager group.
I am the maintainer of converseen and I
Hi Mario,
I think you should try rebuild your package in rawhide. The problem is
that converseen-0.4.9-1.fc17.x86_64 is used in rawhide, but it was built
with the previous version of imagemagick and requires soname .so.4.
If all goes well you can simply give a pkgdb build (after changing
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote:
In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
Hello.
ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short time. Soname change
happened (.so.5), so dependency rebuild needed.
Does it land on F17 ? , if
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 21:04 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote:
In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
Hello.
ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short time. Soname change
happened
In data domenica 04 marzo 2012 20:40:26, Mattia Verga ha scritto:
Hi Mario,
I think you should try rebuild your package in rawhide. The problem is
that converseen-0.4.9-1.fc17.x86_64 is used in rawhide, but it was built
with the previous version of imagemagick and requires soname .so.4.
If
22.05.2010 17:28, Hans de Goede пишет:
Hi,
On 05/17/2010 03:13 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/5/16 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)fo...@hubbitus.com.ru
mailto:fo...@hubbitus.com.ru
About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick -
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
Actually spec file contain string to delete in root build directory:
rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la
What can happened bad if I do:
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name *.la -exec rm -f {} \;
as Chen Lei suggested
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 05/30/2010 11:59 PM +9:00:
22.05.2010 17:28, Hans de Goede пишет:
This is not necessarily good advice either:
1) As these la files are for plugins which are located outside of %{_libdir},
they do no harm
2) In the past there have been cases with
30.05.2010 19:22, Mamoru Tasaka пишет:
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 05/30/2010 11:59 PM +9:00:
22.05.2010 17:28, Hans de Goede пишет:
This is not necessarily good advice either:
1) As these la files are for plugins which are located outside of
%{_libdir},
they do
Hi,
On 05/17/2010 03:13 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/5/16 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) fo...@hubbitus.com.ru
mailto:fo...@hubbitus.com.ru
About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick -
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org/msg736218.html
2010/5/22 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Hi,
On 05/17/2010 03:13 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ImageMagick-c++
ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.i686
ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.x86_64
inkscape-0:0.48-0.2.20100505bzr.fc14.x86_64
03.05.2010 03:37, Orcan Ogetbil пишет:
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
26.04.2010 05:04, Orcan Ogetbil пишет:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Christoph Wickert wrote:
repoquery --disablerepo=\*
16.05.2010 19:35, Orcan Ogetbil пишет:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
I just wonder about frequently of upstream releases (as I say before around
one in week). Is it normal update it in rawhide each time?
About ABI breakage there separate
On 16 May 2010 21:05, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
I just wonder about frequently of upstream releases (as I say before around
one in week). Is it normal update it in rawhide each time?
About ABI breakage there separate
On 05/16/2010 02:53 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
On 16 May 2010 21:05, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
mentioned in the above link. I would say, rebuilding 30(?) packages
every other week just for an ImageMagick update would be impractical,
Are you referring to ABI changes or just rebuilds.
For
26.04.2010 05:04, Orcan Ogetbil пишет:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Christoph Wickert wrote:
repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires
ImageMagick
FYI, repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires ImageMagick does the trick
too.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
26.04.2010 05:04, Orcan Ogetbil пишет:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Christoph Wickert wrote:
repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires
ImageMagick
FYI, repoquery
Am Sonntag, den 25.04.2010, 18:11 +0400 schrieb Pavel Alexeev (aka
Pahan-Hubbitus):
I'll plan update ImageMagick now -
[snipped]
Must I notify someone about coming update? How? Is it enough write
here?
I suggest to use
repoquery --whatrequires ImageMagick
and
repoquery --disablerepo=\*
Christoph Wickert wrote:
repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires
ImageMagick
FYI, repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires ImageMagick does the trick
too.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Christoph Wickert wrote:
repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires
ImageMagick
FYI, repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires ImageMagick does the trick
too.
That does not detect packages that require
85 matches
Mail list logo
