Re: Looking for new urlgrabber maintainer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 4:37 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > Nothing stops you from writing tools to use it. :) Can't argue with that :) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for new urlgrabber maintainer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:10 AM Michal Domonkos wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:59 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > Cobbler uses it still, as does Spacewalk/Uyuni. Some of my software > > does as well, though admittedly I could replace if I wanted to (I > > don't, I like urlgrabber's handling semantics :) ). > > Okay, fair enough :) FWIW, I have to admit I've also secretly liked > urlgrabber's semantics. (I just don't happen to have a use-case for it > anymore, with YUM being gone now.) Nothing stops you from writing tools to use it. :) -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for new urlgrabber maintainer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:59 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > Cobbler uses it still, as does Spacewalk/Uyuni. Some of my software > does as well, though admittedly I could replace if I wanted to (I > don't, I like urlgrabber's handling semantics :) ). Okay, fair enough :) FWIW, I have to admit I've also secretly liked urlgrabber's semantics. (I just don't happen to have a use-case for it anymore, with YUM being gone now.) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for new urlgrabber maintainer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:46 AM Michal Domonkos wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 2:19 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > Sure. Let's make it official. Though I'd love to still have you as > > co-maintainer and other co-maintainers are welcome! :) > > OK, I just made a request: > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9257 > > As for co-maintenance, it still is "maintenance" and defeats the > purpose of us trying to "get rid of it" :) > > BTW, since koji-containerbuild no longer depends on python-urlgrabber > (see above in this thread), do we have any motivation for keeping the > package in the distro at all? I understand that SUSE actually uses it > (so the upstream should live on), but not sure about the Fedora > downstream package. Cobbler uses it still, as does Spacewalk/Uyuni. Some of my software does as well, though admittedly I could replace if I wanted to (I don't, I like urlgrabber's handling semantics :) ). -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for new urlgrabber maintainer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 2:19 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > Sure. Let's make it official. Though I'd love to still have you as > co-maintainer and other co-maintainers are welcome! :) OK, I just made a request: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9257 As for co-maintenance, it still is "maintenance" and defeats the purpose of us trying to "get rid of it" :) BTW, since koji-containerbuild no longer depends on python-urlgrabber (see above in this thread), do we have any motivation for keeping the package in the distro at all? I understand that SUSE actually uses it (so the upstream should live on), but not sure about the Fedora downstream package. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for new urlgrabber maintainer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 8:16 AM Michal Domonkos wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 5:07 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > Umm, don't I already own python-urlgrabber in Fedora and upstream? Not > > that I would mind co-maintainers, but I thought we already did this > > switchover during Fedora 31 development... > > Oh, I almost forgot, of course. We did talk about it. After all, you > made the release 4.0 happen, as a result of the discussion we had back > then. > > We never made it "official", though, since "packaging-team-maint" is > still listed as the primary maintainer on Pagure, which is basically > what we're trying to change. If you're interested, more power to you, > just let me know :) Sure. Let's make it official. Though I'd love to still have you as co-maintainer and other co-maintainers are welcome! :) -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for new urlgrabber maintainer
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 6:01 PM Martin Basti wrote: > > > On 12. 2. 2020 17:06, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:52 AM Michal Domonkos > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'd like to ask around if anyone would be willing to take ownership of > >> the python3-urlgrabber package and its upstream repository[1]? > >> > >> For historical reasons, the project is de facto maintained by us, the > >> DNF team (with the upstream repo hosted in our GitHub namespace). > >> However, with the community's departure from YUM (which depended on > >> urlgrabber) a few years back, we no longer have the incentive or > >> capacity to keep the project alive, and are considering deprecating it > >> in the near future, unless someone takes over. > >> > >> Now, urlgrabber has recently[2] been ported to Python 3, in an effort > >> to maintain its legacy as a standalone general-purpose URL library, > >> authored[3] by Jochen Breuer of SUSE in November, 2018. It's the only > >> component of the legacy YUM stack that wasn't dropped[4] from the > >> distro in Fedora 31. In addition to that, there currently is one last > >> component in Fedora that requires the package; koji-containerbuild. > >> > >> That said, I'd like to address this request especially to Jochen and > >> the maintainers of koji-containerbuild. Please, let us know if you > >> (or anyone, really) would be interested in the transfer. > >> > > Umm, don't I already own python-urlgrabber in Fedora and upstream? Not > > that I would mind co-maintainers, but I thought we already did this > > switchover during Fedora 31 development... > > > > > Ehm sorry, > > it seems that somebody forgot to remove that dependency from > koji-contianerbuild. At least it is not used in upstream I opened PR to > drop it. > > https://github.com/containerbuildsystem/koji-containerbuild/pull/159 Oh, and I can see the PR has been merged in the meantime, which is great! Thank you, Martin! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for new urlgrabber maintainer
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 5:07 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > Umm, don't I already own python-urlgrabber in Fedora and upstream? Not > that I would mind co-maintainers, but I thought we already did this > switchover during Fedora 31 development... Oh, I almost forgot, of course. We did talk about it. After all, you made the release 4.0 happen, as a result of the discussion we had back then. We never made it "official", though, since "packaging-team-maint" is still listed as the primary maintainer on Pagure, which is basically what we're trying to change. If you're interested, more power to you, just let me know :) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for new urlgrabber maintainer
On 12. 2. 2020 17:06, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:52 AM Michal Domonkos wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to ask around if anyone would be willing to take ownership of >> the python3-urlgrabber package and its upstream repository[1]? >> >> For historical reasons, the project is de facto maintained by us, the >> DNF team (with the upstream repo hosted in our GitHub namespace). >> However, with the community's departure from YUM (which depended on >> urlgrabber) a few years back, we no longer have the incentive or >> capacity to keep the project alive, and are considering deprecating it >> in the near future, unless someone takes over. >> >> Now, urlgrabber has recently[2] been ported to Python 3, in an effort >> to maintain its legacy as a standalone general-purpose URL library, >> authored[3] by Jochen Breuer of SUSE in November, 2018. It's the only >> component of the legacy YUM stack that wasn't dropped[4] from the >> distro in Fedora 31. In addition to that, there currently is one last >> component in Fedora that requires the package; koji-containerbuild. >> >> That said, I'd like to address this request especially to Jochen and >> the maintainers of koji-containerbuild. Please, let us know if you >> (or anyone, really) would be interested in the transfer. >> > Umm, don't I already own python-urlgrabber in Fedora and upstream? Not > that I would mind co-maintainers, but I thought we already did this > switchover during Fedora 31 development... > > Ehm sorry, it seems that somebody forgot to remove that dependency from koji-contianerbuild. At least it is not used in upstream I opened PR to drop it. https://github.com/containerbuildsystem/koji-containerbuild/pull/159 -- Martin Bašti Senior Software Engineer Red Hat signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for new urlgrabber maintainer
koji-containerbuild isn't maintained by the core Koji maintainers. That's the osbs folks. On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:06 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:52 AM Michal Domonkos > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to ask around if anyone would be willing to take ownership of > > the python3-urlgrabber package and its upstream repository[1]? > > > > For historical reasons, the project is de facto maintained by us, the > > DNF team (with the upstream repo hosted in our GitHub namespace). > > However, with the community's departure from YUM (which depended on > > urlgrabber) a few years back, we no longer have the incentive or > > capacity to keep the project alive, and are considering deprecating it > > in the near future, unless someone takes over. > > > > Now, urlgrabber has recently[2] been ported to Python 3, in an effort > > to maintain its legacy as a standalone general-purpose URL library, > > authored[3] by Jochen Breuer of SUSE in November, 2018. It's the only > > component of the legacy YUM stack that wasn't dropped[4] from the > > distro in Fedora 31. In addition to that, there currently is one last > > component in Fedora that requires the package; koji-containerbuild. > > > > That said, I'd like to address this request especially to Jochen and > > the maintainers of koji-containerbuild. Please, let us know if you > > (or anyone, really) would be interested in the transfer. > > > > Umm, don't I already own python-urlgrabber in Fedora and upstream? Not > that I would mind co-maintainers, but I thought we already did this > switchover during Fedora 31 development... > > > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for new urlgrabber maintainer
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:52 AM Michal Domonkos wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to ask around if anyone would be willing to take ownership of > the python3-urlgrabber package and its upstream repository[1]? > > For historical reasons, the project is de facto maintained by us, the > DNF team (with the upstream repo hosted in our GitHub namespace). > However, with the community's departure from YUM (which depended on > urlgrabber) a few years back, we no longer have the incentive or > capacity to keep the project alive, and are considering deprecating it > in the near future, unless someone takes over. > > Now, urlgrabber has recently[2] been ported to Python 3, in an effort > to maintain its legacy as a standalone general-purpose URL library, > authored[3] by Jochen Breuer of SUSE in November, 2018. It's the only > component of the legacy YUM stack that wasn't dropped[4] from the > distro in Fedora 31. In addition to that, there currently is one last > component in Fedora that requires the package; koji-containerbuild. > > That said, I'd like to address this request especially to Jochen and > the maintainers of koji-containerbuild. Please, let us know if you > (or anyone, really) would be interested in the transfer. > Umm, don't I already own python-urlgrabber in Fedora and upstream? Not that I would mind co-maintainers, but I thought we already did this switchover during Fedora 31 development... -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
