On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 4:25 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> I'd accept the criterion as proposed (because we need it now), and do the
> reorganization later (possibly when this cycle is over and we have more
> time to bikeshed about best criterion layout). I'm fine with either adding
> to the existing
On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 14:47 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:50 AM Geoffrey Marr wrote:
>
> > At today's blocker review meeting[0], we ran across a bug[1] that we
> > believe is bad enough to warrant blocker status, but as the criteria
> > currently stand, does not violate
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:47 AM Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
> I'm really uncomfortable about the amount of crossp-posting, so I'm
> limiting this to devel@ (I receive it) and test@ (obvious to me why
> relevant).
>
> Kamil Paral writes:
> > Adam writes:
>
> > > Arguably the environment from
I'm really uncomfortable about the amount of crossp-posting, so I'm
limiting this to devel@ (I receive it) and test@ (obvious to me why
relevant).
Kamil Paral writes:
> Adam writes:
> > Arguably the environment from which they logged in is not
> > "working as expected" if you can't then log
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:07 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> There's a sort of technical argument to be made that this is covered by
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Beta_Release_Criteria#desktop-shutdown-reboot-logout
> .
> That says "Shutting down, logging out and rebooting must work
On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 00:49 -0600, Geoffrey Marr wrote:
> At today's blocker review meeting[0], we ran across a bug[1] that we
> believe is bad enough to warrant blocker status, but as the criteria
> currently stand, does not violate any particular criterion. The bug in
> question has to do with
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 09:18:56AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:48 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I'd make this even simpler. We already have a Beta criterion
> > related to logging out (among others):
> >
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:48 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> Actually, I'd make this even simpler. We already have a Beta criterion
> related to logging out (among others):
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Beta_Release_Criteria#Shutdown.2C_reboot.2C_logout
>
> So let's just include logging in
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:50 AM Geoffrey Marr wrote:
> At today's blocker review meeting[0], we ran across a bug[1] that we
> believe is bad enough to warrant blocker status, but as the criteria
> currently stand, does not violate any particular criterion. The bug in
> question has to do with
On 04.08.20 11:54, Paul Howarth wrote:
> If you remove the "with multiple user accounts" then being able to log
> in and out on a single-user system would satisfy the requirement even
> if the multi-user bug was present, which wouldn't be very helpful.
Hm, true. As usual, the devil is in the
On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 10:55:30 +0200
Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> On 04.08.20 10:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > I would even go further and remove the "with multiple user accounts"
> > condition. Even on a singe user system, I'd like to be able to log
> > out and back in again.
>
> +1 on that.
On 04.08.20 10:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I would even go further and remove the "with multiple user accounts"
> condition. Even on a singe user system, I'd like to be able to log out
> and back in again.
+1 on that.
Christopher
___
devel mailing list
On 04. 08. 20 8:49, Geoffrey Marr wrote:
"A system with multiple user accounts must be able to log in and out of said
accounts as presented by all release-blocking desktops in their default
configuration."
I would even go further and remove the "with multiple user accounts" condition.
Even
13 matches
Mail list logo
