There are some new subpackages (and some old ones went away), but
since every package had the release value bumped, this is expected.
Tom
On 2020-05-27 at 00:52, ke...@scrye.com wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:05:32PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> > there is, IIRC, supposed
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:05:32PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
> there is, IIRC, supposed to be a 'spin review' process we go through
> every release which should be run by the spin wrangler and that is
> where max size changes are supposed to be done, but I don't think we've
> had a
On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:48 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 05. 20 13:51, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > According to koschei, the graphite2 BuildRequires now pull in *about
> > 300 more (tex + perl) packages than before the 2020 update*, which is
> > slightly concerning?
> >
Perhaps graphite2 generates a .tex file as part of the process? I'd have to
look at it to figure it out. Can you please open a bug on the 300+ package
increase with the specifics so I can figure out what (if anything) I can do
to remedy this?
Thanks,
Tom
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:16 PM José
On 22. 05. 20 13:51, Fabio Valentini wrote:
According to koschei, the graphite2 BuildRequires now pull in *about
300 more (tex + perl) packages than before the 2020 update*, which is
slightly concerning?
See:https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/8369713
I also believe this makes the Python
On Friday, 22 May 2020 12.51.26 WEST Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Also, the build now fails with "! LaTeX Error: File `hanging.sty' not
> found.". graphite2 sources do not contain any .tex files, but
> graphite2 uses LaTeX / pdf output when building documentation /
manual
> with doxygen, so I'm
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:56 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
>
> I've just kicked off new builds for texlive and texlive-base for TeXLive 2020
> in rawhide. Hopefully, everything that depends on them will continue to work,
> but if you notice any new issues generating docs (or any missing components
>
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 7:14 AM Tom Callaway wrote:
> If your package has a tex file that it uses to generate documentation, and
> that tex file says \usepackage{foo}, then your package needs to have:
>
> BuildRequires: tex(foo.sty)
>
> The only exception to that is for packages which include
Thank you. It seems that it was working previously by accident :)
Have a nice day.
Lumír
On 5/21/20 2:13 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
If your package has a tex file that it uses to generate documentation,
and that tex file says \usepackage{foo}, then your package needs to have:
BuildRequires:
If your package has a tex file that it uses to generate documentation, and
that tex file says \usepackage{foo}, then your package needs to have:
BuildRequires: tex(foo.sty)
The only exception to that is for packages which include .sty files,
obviously, if the \usepackage dependency is met within
Hello.
I am trying to investigate a new problem in ipython that is probably
related to the update of texlive:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838474
ipython uses latex to generate png images of tex formulas. Internally it
calls latex and dvipng commands.
Right now, I have a
I think the issue here is that the most recent texlive package fixes landed
this morning, and the "rawhide" compose that mock would pull in doesn't
have all the fixes yet.
Tom
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:12 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:08 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
>
>> I'm
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:08 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
> I'm not sure what your failure looked like (maybe the rawhide packages
> used are older than the ones currently in the koji buildroot), but a koji
> scratch build from master succeeded without issue:
>
>
I'm not sure what your failure looked like (maybe the rawhide packages used
are older than the ones currently in the koji buildroot), but a koji
scratch build from master succeeded without issue:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44738672
Tom
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:21 PM
It's probably not the same bug, that error is a fairly generic error
meaning "something has made texlive unhappy". I'm investigating.
Tom
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:29 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> Thanks for the PR but it looks like I'm being bitten by:
>
>
Thanks for the PR but it looks like I'm being bitten by:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578426
In the mock build, so how do I generate pdflatex.fmt within a mock chroot?
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list --
Richard,
I've got a PR for you that adds your explicit tex BuildRequires so that
this works again:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/OpenColorIO/pull-request/1
Upstream TeXLive sometimes moves .sty files around, so in most cases, it is
easier to specify BuildRequires using the
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:39 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> Not sure if this problem is related, but the last time I build OpenImageIO
> it worked, I was performing a local mock build (with the local repo
> enabled) and ran into this:
>
Correction, OpenColorIO. My fingers always want to type
Not sure if this problem is related, but the last time I build OpenImageIO
it worked, I was performing a local mock build (with the local repo
enabled) and ran into this:
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenColorIO-1.1.1/build/docs/build-latex &&
/usr/bin/pdflatex OpenColorIO.tex
This is pdfTeX, Version
On 20. 05. 20 10:32, Miro Hrončok wrote:
pungi has:
...
Writing index file Pungi.idx
(./Pungi.aux) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/ts1cmr.fd)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/psnfss/t1ptm.fd)
! LaTeX Error: File `epstopdf-base.sty' not found.
Looking at
On 20. 05. 20 9:55, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 05. 20 23:55, Tom Callaway wrote:
I've just kicked off new builds for texlive and texlive-base for TeXLive 2020
in rawhide. Hopefully, everything that depends on them will continue to work,
but if you notice any new issues generating docs (or any
On 14. 05. 20 23:55, Tom Callaway wrote:
I've just kicked off new builds for texlive and texlive-base for TeXLive 2020 in
rawhide. Hopefully, everything that depends on them will continue to work, but
if you notice any new issues generating docs (or any missing components or
broken
On 20. 05. 20 6:05, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 5/19/20 5:16 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 15. 05. 20 22:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
I'm hoping that when texlive is able to fully install this issue will go
away. I just got a successful build for -21 that _should_ resolve all the
broken deps except for
On 5/19/20 5:16 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 15. 05. 20 22:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
I'm hoping that when texlive is able to fully install this issue will
go away. I just got a successful build for -21 that _should_ resolve
all the broken deps except for biber.
At this point I get:
nothing
On 5/19/20 5:16 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 15. 05. 20 22:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
I'm hoping that when texlive is able to fully install this issue will
go away. I just got a successful build for -21 that _should_ resolve
all the broken deps except for biber.
At this point I get:
nothing
On 15. 05. 20 22:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
I'm hoping that when texlive is able to fully install this issue will go away. I
just got a successful build for -21 that _should_ resolve all the broken deps
except for biber.
At this point I get:
nothing provides biber >= 2.14 needed by
I'm hoping that when texlive is able to fully install this issue will go
away. I just got a successful build for -21 that _should_ resolve all the
broken deps except for biber.
Tom
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:33 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 5/14/20 10:48 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On
On 5/14/20 10:48 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 5/14/20 3:55 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
I've just kicked off new builds for texlive and texlive-base for
TeXLive 2020 in rawhide. Hopefully, everything that depends on them
will continue to work, but if you notice any new issues generating
docs (or
On 15. 05. 20 4:10, Tom Callaway wrote:
I'll get that fixed up first thing tomorrow.
Thanks, Tom.
Apologies,
No worries. I can only imagine the horrors of maintaining this.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing
On 5/14/20 3:55 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
I've just kicked off new builds for texlive and texlive-base for TeXLive
2020 in rawhide. Hopefully, everything that depends on them will
continue to work, but if you notice any new issues generating docs (or
any missing components or broken
I'll get that fixed up first thing tomorrow.
Apologies,
Tom
On Thu, May 14, 2020, 6:51 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 14. 05. 20 23:55, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > I've just kicked off new builds for texlive and texlive-base for TeXLive
> 2020 in
> > rawhide. Hopefully, everything that depends on
On 14. 05. 20 23:55, Tom Callaway wrote:
I've just kicked off new builds for texlive and texlive-base for TeXLive 2020 in
rawhide. Hopefully, everything that depends on them will continue to work, but
if you notice any new issues generating docs (or any missing components or
broken
Just need that texlive build to finish and it should all clear up.
Tom
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 6:13 PM Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:56 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
> > I've just kicked off new builds for texlive and texlive-base for TeXLive
> 2020 in rawhide. Hopefully, everything
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:56 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
> I've just kicked off new builds for texlive and texlive-base for TeXLive 2020
> in rawhide. Hopefully, everything that depends on them will continue to work,
> but if you notice any new issues generating docs (or any missing components
> or
34 matches
Mail list logo
