On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:31:10PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora,
and if there is anything in the packaging
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:34:46AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:31:10PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
That's just utilities, not the actual binary.
Yep, since UML is basically just another special kernel build, I always
had the impression that you'd have to convince the kenrel RPM maintainers
to add another sub-RPM containing the UML build for it
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:52:15AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Does UML kernel even build on Fedora these days ? I tried to build it
a year or so back and found that it had ben broken by GCC/LD update
and no one upstream showed any interest in fixing it. So I rather
considered UML to be
Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora,
and if there is anything in the packaging guidelines that would stop
UML being packaged as a regular package?
By regular package, you mean using a separate
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:45:14PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora,
and if there is anything in the packaging guidelines that would stop
UML being packaged as
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora,
and if there is anything in the packaging guidelines that would stop
UML being packaged as a regular package?
