Hello,
BuildRoot is only needed for EPEL5:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
If presents, it should be one of those:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#BuildRoot_tag
Removing BuildRoot and clean section are needed only for EPEL5 so I think
it would better to preserve conditionals.
Also, the conditionals there can be simplified:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag#Conditionals
%{?el5:BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root}
...
%if 0%{?el5}
%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}
%endif
-- as examples.
---
wbr, Denis.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:13 AM, David Roheim david.roh...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Pavol,
I can not approve your package, but I would suggest some things.
* Bump your rev version. Incl. changelog.
* Define your BuildRoot
* Use %{_bindir} instead of /usr/bin
* Source-format your spec-file
Why do you have:
%if 0%{?rhel} 0%{?rhel} = 5
rm -rf %{buildroot}
%endif
Why not just:
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Nice page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros
Anyways :)
David
*David Roheim*
david.roh...@gmail.com - http://roheim.org/
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Pavol Ipoth pavol.ip...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
can please somebody approve my package, it was already reviewed but
reviewer doesn't have permissions to approve new package. Can somebody look
at it. Thanks.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058038
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct