Re: Use AutoQA to track changes in provides and requires?
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 11:17 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote: Something like this? [1] [2] Yup! Something a lot like that! I did look over the AutoQA wiki before posting but didn't know enough about rpmguard to know that where I needed to look :) We already do that in the form of 'rpmguard' test [3]. Currently you have to sign-up manually to receive rpmguard/rpmlint results for new package builds [4]. So you have to subscribe per package per release? I don't necessarily want them emailed to me but accessible somewhere would be nice. All AutoQA results can be accessed via resultsdb: http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/frontend http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org is enough, that will redirect you there. You can do a search for a specific package and/or test case. On the search page - http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/frontend/search - 'Envr' seems to be the place to put the package name. So if you put 'kernel' in the 'Envr' box, and 'rpmguard' in the 'Testcase' box, and hit search, you get all the rpmguard tests for kernel package builds. Kamil, perhaps the search interface could be made a bit friendlier? A better name for the field than 'Envr', whatever the heck that's supposed to mean? A drop-down list for 'testcase', rather than free text? Friendly unicorn pictures? :) -- Adam Williamson ENVR is an abbreviation for epoch-name-version-release. So you can put there a package build specification in the ENVR format, or just a package name. I agree that it's not really descriptive. CCing autoqa-devel to annoy my colleagues and make them work harder :=) Petr, can you adjust the Envr label text to Package name or ENVR (or similar)? And maybe have a look at drop-down lists for Testcase and Arch? Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Use AutoQA to track changes in provides and requires?
Just an idea I had and wanted to float it out to the group... I think it would be nice to get an informational (obviously, not a blocking type check) to get changes in the requires or provides of a package. It would be a hassle to check it manually but I hope it would be fairly easy to automate. I'm thinking the output would just be a simple log showing added or removed items and perhaps version/soversion changes. One instance it might has helped in is BZ#842181, although in this case only rawhide was affected so as far as I know there's no real mechanism to cancel the update. Thoughts? Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Use AutoQA to track changes in provides and requires?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: Just an idea I had and wanted to float it out to the group... I think it would be nice to get an informational (obviously, not a blocking type check) to get changes in the requires or provides of a package. It would be a hassle to check it manually but I hope it would be fairly easy to automate. I'm thinking the output would just be a simple log showing added or removed items and perhaps version/soversion changes. One instance it might has helped in is BZ#842181, although in this case only rawhide was affected so as far as I know there's no real mechanism to cancel the update. You can untag the build if you catch it before the mash. . . -J Thoughts? Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Use AutoQA to track changes in provides and requires?
Just an idea I had and wanted to float it out to the group... I think it would be nice to get an informational (obviously, not a blocking type check) to get changes in the requires or provides of a package. It would be a hassle to check it manually but I hope it would be fairly easy to automate. I'm thinking the output would just be a simple log showing added or removed items and perhaps version/soversion changes. One instance it might has helped in is BZ#842181, although in this case only rawhide was affected so as far as I know there's no real mechanism to cancel the update. Thoughts? Richard Something like this? [1] [2] We already do that in the form of 'rpmguard' test [3]. Currently you have to sign-up manually to receive rpmguard/rpmlint results for new package builds [4]. [1] http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/409386-autotest/virt02.qa/rpmguard/results/1:blender-2.63a-5.fc.html [2] http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/409350-autotest/virt02.qa/rpmguard/results/1:libguestfs-1.19.27.html [3] http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/frontend/search?envr=testcase=rpmguardresults=PASSEDresults=INFOresults=FAILEDresults=ABORTEDresults=CRASHEDresults=WAIVEDresults=NEEDS_INSPECTIONresults=RUNNINGarch=limit=20 [4] http://jlaska.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/fedora-package-maintainers-want-test-results/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Use AutoQA to track changes in provides and requires?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote: Something like this? [1] [2] Yup! Something a lot like that! I did look over the AutoQA wiki before posting but didn't know enough about rpmguard to know that where I needed to look :) We already do that in the form of 'rpmguard' test [3]. Currently you have to sign-up manually to receive rpmguard/rpmlint results for new package builds [4]. So you have to subscribe per package per release? I don't necessarily want them emailed to me but accessible somewhere would be nice. Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Use AutoQA to track changes in provides and requires?
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 11:17 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote: Something like this? [1] [2] Yup! Something a lot like that! I did look over the AutoQA wiki before posting but didn't know enough about rpmguard to know that where I needed to look :) We already do that in the form of 'rpmguard' test [3]. Currently you have to sign-up manually to receive rpmguard/rpmlint results for new package builds [4]. So you have to subscribe per package per release? I don't necessarily want them emailed to me but accessible somewhere would be nice. All AutoQA results can be accessed via resultsdb: http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/frontend You can do a search for a specific package and/or test case. On the search page - http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/frontend/search - 'Envr' seems to be the place to put the package name. So if you put 'kernel' in the 'Envr' box, and 'rpmguard' in the 'Testcase' box, and hit search, you get all the rpmguard tests for kernel package builds. Kamil, perhaps the search interface could be made a bit friendlier? A better name for the field than 'Envr', whatever the heck that's supposed to mean? A drop-down list for 'testcase', rather than free text? Friendly unicorn pictures? :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
