Reinier Heeres wrote:
Thanks!
Pushed the patch.
Cheers,
Reinier
Hi Reinier,
are the Sugar changes suitable for upstream inclusion?
thanks
Jani
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Thanks!
Pushed the patch.
Cheers,
Reinier
Dan Krejsa wrote:
Hi,
I just got an error
sugar-jhbuild update: dependent module evince-olpc not found
from ./sugar-jhbuild.
The following change seems to fix it:
$ git diff
diff --git a/build-scripts/sugar-platform.modules
Jani,
Which upstream are you referring to? The newer evince version is already
in joyride, and Read is updated there to use it. When it's nicely tested
there it will probably go in the update.1 build.
The Read modifications necessary (a few lines) to work with the newer
evince are already in
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:27:54 -0500
From: John Richard Moser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Oprofile, swap
To: Ivan Krsti? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
(Note: most of this message isn't very useful
On Dec 19, 2007, at 7:12 AM, Ed Montgomery wrote:
Otherwise, you are wasting bandwidth on this list. I don't speak for
anyone other than myself, of course, but I am not
remotely interested in anything that is NOT open
source. Perhaps you could start a closed source list
of some sort to post
Reinier Heeres wrote:
Jani,
That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like
this was possible. I made only minor adjustments to the latest source.
The biggest changes are in configure.ac and Makefile.am: there are new
options --disable-binary and --enable-embed to
We need to submit patches upstream at some point after Update.1.
Marco
On Dec 19, 2007 3:44 PM, Reinier Heeres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jani,
That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like
this was possible. I made only minor adjustments to the latest source.
The
Jani,
That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like
this was possible. I made only minor adjustments to the latest source.
The biggest changes are in configure.ac and Makefile.am: there are new
options --disable-binary and --enable-embed to just build things
relevant
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 13:22 -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
If we should design a next generation of DCON chip, are there any
improvements we should make to it?
Adam, do I recall correctly that you had problems hooking it up to X for
idle detection? Anything we could do to make that better?
I
Thanks for the feedback, Adam.
--
dwmw2
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1449/
-Calculate-14.xo
+Calculate-15.xo
--- Calculate-15 ---
* Fixed parsing of fraction separators, #5319
--
This email was automatically generated
Aggregated logs at http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/joyride-pkgs.html
On Dec 19, 2007, at 1:50 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Yeah ... sudo is more secure than su. In fact, some systems, for
example, the Gentoo LiveCD, scrambles the root password. So you
have to do
$ sudo su -
and then set a password to ssh in as root.
+1
This is the same thing as in
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1450/
-Journal-81.xo
+Journal-82.xo
-Web-80.xo
+Web-81.xo
-sugar-datastore.noarch 0:0.7.1-1
+sugar-datastore.noarch 0:0.7.2-1
--- Journal-82 ---
* #2545 Correctly unmount the device from the DS when it is removed. (tomeu)
*
On a simmilar vein, would it be much of a perfomance hit to be running
denyhosts on these machines?
What would it do with the mesh network interface?
--e
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On 12/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a simmilar vein, would it be much of a perfomance hit to be running
denyhosts on these machines?
What would it do with the mesh network interface?
IIRC, each member of the mesh is assigned an IPv6 IP address in the reserved
*IPv4
On 12/19/07, ffm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a simmilar vein, would it be much of a perfomance hit to be running
denyhosts on these machines?
What would it do with the mesh network interface?
IIRC, each member of the
On Dec 20, 2007 1:05 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 4:00 PM, Build Announcer Script [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1450/
--- Journal-82 ---
* #2545 Correctly unmount the device from the DS when it is
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1452/
-Chat-31.xo
+Chat-32.xo
+libpcap.i386 14:0.9.7-1.fc7
-olpc-utils.i386 0:0.53-1.olpc2
+olpc-utils.i386 0:0.59-1.olpc2
+sudo.i386 0:1.6.8p12-14.fc7
+tcpdump.i386 14:3.9.7-1.fc7
--- Chat-32 ---
* Pippy-ize Chat, so that 'view
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Build Announcer Script wrote:
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1452/
-Chat-31.xo
+Chat-32.xo
+libpcap.i386 14:0.9.7-1.fc7
-olpc-utils.i386 0:0.53-1.olpc2
+olpc-utils.i386 0:0.59-1.olpc2
+sudo.i386 0:1.6.8p12-14.fc7
+tcpdump.i386
19 matches
Mail list logo