Re: Is security activation critical in Peru ?

2008-04-25 Thread Ivan Krstić
On Apr 25, 2008, at 1:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is Software activation critical? If the XOs are deployed in the poorest towns then there is small possibilities for theft and robberies. In those small villages (with 100 families approximately) all of them know each other: you can

RE: A technical assessment of porting Sugar to Windows.

2008-04-25 Thread Raymond F. Hayes Jr.
These might be stupid questions since I just joined the newsgroup today so my apologies in advance but I wasn't able to find an answer on the site. When you're talking about running Sugar on Windows XP, are you talking about a running the retail version of XP or a version of Windows XP Embedded

RE: A technical assessment of porting Sugar to Windows.

2008-04-25 Thread scott
why climb aboard a sinking ship, particularly when yours is moving fast... On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Raymond F. Hayes Jr. wrote: These might be stupid questions since I just joined the newsgroup today so my apologies in advance but I wasn't able to find an answer on the site. When you're talking

Re: An olpcfs experience report

2008-04-25 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 25.04.2008, at 04:05, Michael Stone wrote: Over the last few weeks, I've spent a fair bit of time producing several essay drafts and transcriptions of IRC conversations. Something you may not have known is that I did so on top of olpcfs [1,2]. Yesterday, 1cc experienced a power

Re: Walter leaving and shift to XP.

2008-04-25 Thread Aaron Kaplan
On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:25 AM, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: By my judgment, I'm glad Richard Stallman isn't running OLPC. He would have delayed the launch until we have a GPL'd replacement for the mesh firmware. As it is now, we have a laptop which is more pure license- wise than any other

Re: Auto backlight management?

2008-04-25 Thread Martin Dengler
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:05:10AM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 25.04.2008, at 10:46, Martin Dengler wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:07:12AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote: It's clear to me that it would be quite useful to have a bright backlight AND black white mode for reading a book at

Re: Auto backlight management?

2008-04-25 Thread Martin Dengler
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 09:47:29AM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:54:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: my machines are out on loan right now. is this monochrome mode the high-res mode, or is this still using multiple screen pixels per display pixel like color

Re: Auto backlight management?

2008-04-25 Thread karl
Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 25.04.2008, at 10:46, Martin Dengler wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:07:12AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:43 PM, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bert misread the spec. When the backlight is switched off, the

boot problem

2008-04-25 Thread Daly Ikbel
I try to copy a repositery of 258Mb. I get an error of lack of space. while rebooting I get this message: OSError: [Errno 28] No space left on device and the XO freeze. Any help? best regards ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org

Re: Better anti-aliasing

2008-04-25 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bert Freudenberg wrote: | One thing that someone (Albert IIRC) proposed was doing a better | filtering job than the DCON does - it uses a simple 5-tap filter which | adds a noticeable amount of blur. It is still vital to do filtering, | otherwise a

Re: Better anti-aliasing

2008-04-25 Thread Paul Fox
bert wrote: On 25.04.2008, at 15:07, Paul Fox wrote: unlike a traditional display, every pixel has a single color. given this, it seems wrong to talk about the red channel of the first pixel. you either use some of that pixel, or you don't. in effect, the display is implementing

Re: An olpcfs experience report

2008-04-25 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:25:53AM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 25.04.2008, at 04:05, Michael Stone wrote: [1]: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Olpcfs This is not a technical assessment, but I like the olpcfs idea. I like it too. I wish I had more time to study the implementation. What is

RE: A technical assessment of porting Sugar to Windows.

2008-04-25 Thread Raymond F. Hayes Jr.
I've been reading Cross-Platform Development in C++ by Syd Logan. It's a fun read if you like coding for fun. I've got all the source; just want all the information before I start playing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A technical assessment of porting Sugar to Windows.

2008-04-25 Thread Aaron Konstam
Below is exactly my attitude about getting in Bed with Microsoft. They are not in the business of helping to distribute OPEN Software. On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 15:00 -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote: Thanks, Scott, for taking us away from the direction of flamage to many of the real issues. I have

RE: A technical assessment of porting Sugar to Windows.

2008-04-25 Thread scott
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Raymond F. Hayes Jr. wrote: I've been reading Cross-Platform Development in C++ by Syd Logan. It's a fun read if you like coding for fun. I've got all the source; just want all the information before I start playing. Seems like most everyone involved currently considers

Re: Auto backlight management?

2008-04-25 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Apr 24, 2008, at 10:39 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Opportunistic use of the on-board camera and the time-of-day clock could yield such heuristics. Just for reference, in my mind the best mechanism to do this on the current hardware would have been to use the battery-status LED in reverse to

Re: A technical assessment of porting Sugar to Windows.

2008-04-25 Thread Jeffrey Kesselman
This may be obviosu to everyone, but just a note if it isnt I have a lot of experience *trying* to tlak Win32 into doing things other then its own way from my time in the Sun Java Performance tuning team. Java has a very X inspired window system. Retting that to run reliably on Windows has

Re: A technical assessment of porting Sugar to Windows.

2008-04-25 Thread NoiseEHC
You mean everything that actually calls into GDI. The kernel is fully thread safe and preemptive on NT. Since as I know GTK is thread affine as well, probably it is not a problem. Jeffrey Kesselman wrote: This may be obviosu to everyone, but just a note if it isnt I have a lot of

Re: An olpcfs experience report

2008-04-25 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Joshua N Pritikin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wish I had more time to study the implementation. What is stored in Berkeley DB? Only the indexes? The dependency on Berkeley DB makes me nervous. I recall the Subversion Berkeley DB backend suffered from the

Re: A technical assessment of porting Sugar to Windows.

2008-04-25 Thread Jeffrey Kesselman
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Jeffrey Kesselman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:01 PM, NoiseEHC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You mean everything that actually calls into GDI. Right, my mis-speak. Given that almost all my interaction with Windows has been through GDI I

RE: A technical assessment of porting Sugar to Windows.

2008-04-25 Thread Raymond F. Hayes Jr.
Realistically this is a big project but I do have MAC/PC/Linux platforms to work with so implementing and testing some of Mr. Logan's methodologies is interesting. I'm also working with Sparx Systems's Enterprise Architect which has a roundtrip software engineering feature that supports Python.

[no subject]

2008-04-25 Thread John Watlington
The question has come up from Peruvians who bought G1G1 machines: how can we get Sugar to use Spanish, while keeping an English keymap (because G1G1 machines have english keyboards) ? Please pardon my ignorance... wad ___ Devel mailing list

Re:

2008-04-25 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:31 PM, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The question has come up from Peruvians who bought G1G1 machines: how can we get Sugar to use Spanish, while keeping an English keymap (because G1G1 machines have english keyboards) ? Bernie's got the canonical

Re: (unknown)

2008-04-25 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Chris Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The question has come up from Peruvians who bought G1G1 machines: how can we get Sugar to use Spanish, while keeping an English keymap (because G1G1 machines have english keyboards) ? I'd edit

RE: A technical assessment of porting Sugar to Windows.

2008-04-25 Thread Raymond F. Hayes Jr.
I understand your concerns. This is my work at home though which is far enough away from what I do during the day to not be in conflict so I hope I can contribute something useful. The aim of the OLPC organization is getting more important with each passing day. Ray -Original Message-

Re: (unknown)

2008-04-25 Thread Walter Bender
If you have a G1G1 machine, just use sugar-control-panel -s language Spanish/Peru to get the laptop to use the Spanish strings but keep the keyboard settings. -walter On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:43 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Chris Ball [EMAIL

Re: A technical assessment of porting Sugar to Windows.

2008-04-25 Thread NoiseEHC
Thanks for providing this summary! What is not clear to me is whether we are talking about: 1. Windows on XO with Sugar 2. Sugar on Windows on any machine 3. Both Also not clear what advantage could any variation provide to OLPC so probably NN could be a little more concrete about Sugar on

Re: Ad-hoc Networking

2008-04-25 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Thursday 24 April 2008 01:27, John Gilmore wrote: In ad-hoc mode, there is no forwarding of packets. It isn't a mesh. It's just point-to-point communication between two radios, without any intermediaries. While this is true, it's also incomplete :-) Adhoc mode is not limited to two

Request for Project Hosting: wine-activities

2008-04-25 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 1. Project name : wine-activities 2. Existing website, if any : http://dev.laptop.org/~bemasc/DOSConsole-3.xo 3. One-line description : Turn your Windows application into a Sugar Activity (if it runs in Wine). 4. Longer description

Re: An olpcfs experience report

2008-04-25 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Joshua N Pritikin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My other question about OLPCFS is how the versioning interacts with activities which work with projects composed of discrete elements (such as TamTam). I'm not sure whether there is a problem here. I'm just thinking

Project name : wine-activities is set up

2008-04-25 Thread Henry Hardy
Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:22:25 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Project name : wine-activities Done. Your tree is here: git+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/projects/wine-activitieshttp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/activities/imagetosound Please follow instructions here for

Re: An olpcfs experience report

2008-04-25 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
My other question about OLPCFS is how the versioning interacts with activities which work with projects composed of discrete elements (such as TamTam). I'm not sure whether there is a problem here. I'm just thinking out loud. TamTam deals with sounds which are stored as independent self-contained

Re: An olpcfs experience report

2008-04-25 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 04:59:56PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote: If you want a solid semantic solution to the problem, you're looking at something like: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1242520.1242521coll=dl=ACM but that requires extending the filesystem API to support transactions. I

Re: Project name : wine-activities is set up

2008-04-25 Thread Henry Hardy
The correct URL is git+ssh:// [EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/projects/wine-activities --HH. On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Henry Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:22:25 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Project name : wine-activities Done. Your tree is

New joyride build 1897

2008-04-25 Thread Build Announcer v2
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1897 Changes in build 1897 from build: 1896 Size delta: 11.41M +cdparanoia-libs alpha9.8-27.2 -gstreamer-plugins-base 0.10.15-1.olpc2 +gstreamer-plugins-base 0.10.15-3.olpc2 +libvisual 0.4.0-3.fc6 +perl 4:5.8.8-28.fc7 +perl-libs

Maintaining visibility into Collabora's work for OLPC

2008-04-25 Thread Michael Stone
Rob, Daf, others, This email is just to let you know that I haven't forgotten about you and that I'm still working on collecting the actual feedback necessary to authoritatively respond to your proposed work statement [1]. [1]: http://teach.laptop.org/~mstone/collabora.txt (temporarily

Re: Maintaining visibility into Collabora's work for OLPC

2008-04-25 Thread Dafydd Harries
Ar 25/04/2008 am 22:50, ysgrifennodd Michael Stone: In the mean time, I'm quite happy with Daf working on Gadget and with Guillaume working on debugging Telepathy/presence-service issues. (Daf -- we should have a chat with Martin about how to coordinate the testing and deployment of Gadget

New faster build 1897

2008-04-25 Thread Build Announcer v2
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build1897 Changes in build 1897 from build: 1895 Size delta: 11.27M +cdparanoia-libs alpha9.8-27.2 -gstreamer-plugins-base 0.10.15-1.olpc2 +gstreamer-plugins-base 0.10.15-3.olpc2 +libvisual 0.4.0-3.fc6 +perl 4:5.8.8-28.fc7 +perl-libs

Re: [Server-devel] Network Provisioning

2008-04-25 Thread John Watlington
On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Stefan Reitz wrote: Hi Y'all, On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 14:57 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:38 PM, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Proposed change to the hardware spec: From one to four access points may use an simpler

Re: [Server-devel] Network Provisioning

2008-04-25 Thread Stefan Reitz
I would prefer to see fairness in access to QoS. We are working with oversubscribed networks. QoS simply ensures that one or two students will have a good experience while the rest get nothing. Who decides which students get the good experience ?And just wait until someones

Re: [Server-devel] Network Provisioning

2008-04-25 Thread Martin Langhoff
On 4/26/08, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do dispute any claim that 1Gb/s network interfaces are over the top at this point in time. The cost difference on the manufacturing side is around $2. How does it translate to market price? I would put a strong recommendation for 1Gb

Re: [Server-devel] Network Provisioning

2008-04-25 Thread Martin Langhoff
On 4/26/08, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This deserves its own page, not just a discussion on another page. Yes, and I think it's 2 pages. One about how to run an XS in an existing infrastructure, the otherone is how to size a high-end XS. Martin and I got started in this direction