Re: [Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1 users in Uy
Remember that Ceibal XOs have root access locked-down. And I recently found
out that since the key-delegation stuff was implemented, we can't request
developer keys. Not from OLPC at least, and LATU is not providing
A while ago, Daniel fixed a bug in my changes to olpc-update, and that
left me with a to-do item on the xs-activation side.
Reviewed the situation on the OAT proto concept of always sending a
stolen token, with the idea that xs-activation should do what the
protocol proposes: always send a
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:48 AM, John Gilmoreg...@toad.com wrote:
Re: [Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1 users in Uy
Remember that Ceibal XOs have root access locked-down. And I recently found
out that since the key-delegation stuff was implemented, we can't request
Hi, I'm trying to do some research on the wireless parameters reported by
the XO, mainly on the quality (Q), in order to do some tests and establish a
relationship between Q and capability of connecting to an AP and the
stability of that connection.
The thing is that I've already been looking
On Monday 24 August 2009 10:11:54 am Walter Bender wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:48 AM, John Gilmoreg...@toad.com wrote:
Re: [Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1 users in Uy
Remember that Ceibal XOs have root access locked-down. And I recently
found out that since
Pareciera ser que estamos en una situación de violación de la licencia...
Una pregunta, deduzco entonces que OLPC no está a cargo de
entregar las claves de desarrollador para las XO que están en Perú -
me pregunto:
En Perú, cómo puede un maestro o un chico, solicitar una clave de desarrollador?
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Martin
Langhoffmartin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
A while ago, Daniel fixed a bug in my changes to olpc-update, and that
left me with a to-do item on the xs-activation side.
Reviewed the situation on the OAT proto concept of always sending a
stolen token, with
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:45 PM, C. Scott Ananiancsc...@laptop.org wrote:
so you should probably return a
lease which is valid except for the fact that the signed string has an
randomly-chosen UUID
Exactly my thoughts -- as you can see in the bug. Implementing that
goes beyond merely coding
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Martin
Langhoffmartin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:45 PM, C. Scott Ananiancsc...@laptop.org wrote:
so you should probably return a
lease which is valid except for the fact that the signed string has an
randomly-chosen UUID
Exactly my
On Aug 24, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote:
Pareciera ser que estamos en una situación de violación de la
licencia...
Una pregunta, deduzco entonces que OLPC no está a cargo de
entregar las claves de desarrollador para las XO que están en Perú -
me pregunto:
Las maquinas Peruanas
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Caroline
Meekscarol...@solutiongrove.com wrote:
We are using Moodle for backup and I am looking at the UI. The Profile Tab
is asking people to put in their Surname and shows a made up email address.
ATM, I am partial to hiding some fields (email,etc). The
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Martin
Langhoffmartin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
A while ago, Daniel fixed a bug in my changes to olpc-update, and that
left me with a to-do item on the xs-activation side.
Reviewed the situation on the OAT proto concept of always sending a
stolen token, with
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:45 PM, C. Scott Ananiancsc...@laptop.org wrote:
so you should probably return a
lease which is valid except for the fact that the signed string has an
randomly-chosen UUID
Exactly my thoughts -- as you can see in the bug. Implementing that
goes beyond merely coding
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Martin
Langhoffmartin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:45 PM, C. Scott Ananiancsc...@laptop.org wrote:
so you should probably return a
lease which is valid except for the fact that the signed string has an
randomly-chosen UUID
Exactly my
Again we are working with
XS1 - responding to jabber.sugarlabs.org. Installed a few months ago and
currently with 1000 registered users, it tends to have about 20 people on
it these days.
XS2 - Installed a few weeks ago, responding to
schoolserver.xsdev.solutiongrove.com with about 100 registered
15 matches
Mail list logo
